Obama is heading into his final year. Don’t believe any lame duck talk; the recent budget fiasco proves that with his allies in control of Congress, Obama is as dangerous as ever. Wild Bill for America warns that the “fundamental transformation” will not be complete until we have been disarmed:
On a tip from Torcer.
It’s as if members of the liberal elite believe the Frankenstein monster they have created with their propaganda and their welfare policy will be so grateful to them for having giving it life, it will spare them, and only attack the hated bitter clingers. Again we see that this is not the case:
[Lori] Kaplan is the Senior Director of Audience Research at NPR in downtown Washington, D.C. That is where she regularly meets her husband at the end of his evening commute on the Metro Red Line.
That is what she was recently doing when she received a text message from him: An “idiot gang” was acting belligerently in his train car, so he was going to move.
That was the last she heard from him until he got off the train: bloody, beaten, and dazed. With a broken jaw and missing teeth.
A Washington Post report — written by a former NPR correspondent named Faiz Siddiqui — managed to describe his vicious, unprovoked public rush hour beating without describing the attackers, as if the racial motive driving so many of these attacks were irrelevant. However,
Hundreds of readers of the story thought it was important — and many mentioned their own experiences with black on white violence on the D.C. Metro.
The attackers of Kaplan’s husband were black — as are virtually all of the violent predators on the Washington Metro. A fact the Post and NPR keep trying to ignore and wish away, even as they devote more and more space to Black Lives Matter and the omnipresence of white racism.
The reporter was upholding a longstanding tradition at the Post — which at NPR is an ironclad rule — not to report on the epidemic of black on white crime and black mob violence in Washington or anywhere else.
Unless they are as doggedly ideologically deranged as Tracey Lomax, Lori Kaplan and her unnamed husband will be less liberal now. But it would take an ocean of their own blood to wash away the ruling class’s moonbattery.
On a tip from Fiberal.
Isn’t there a law against funding Islamic terrorism? If so, why isn’t the Obama Regime under investigation?
A Kansas City mosque owned by an Islamic umbrella organization with deep ties to the U.S. arm of the Muslim Brotherhood has received millions of dollars in federal grants over the past several years, according to a federal spending database.
The Islamic Center of Greater Kansas City has received $2,739,891 from the Department of Agriculture since 2010, a Daily Caller analysis has found. The money largely went to the mosque’s Crescent Clinic to provide services through the Women, Infant and Children nutrition program, known as WIC.
Any money spent by the government will go to things that the government wants. Under Obama, this prominently includes promoting radical Islam. When it comes to things that we want, we can spend the money ourselves, without government coercion.
Property records show the mosque is owned by the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), which acts as a financial holding company for Islamic organizations. It offers sharia-compliant financial products to Muslim investors, operates Islamic schools and owns more than 300 other mosques throughout the U.S.
Founded in 1973 as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood-backed Muslim Students Association, NAIT’s most controversial connection is to the 2007 and 2008 Holy Land Foundation terror financing cases. Along with other Muslim Brotherhood-linked organizations like the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), NAIT was named a co-conspirator in the federal case but was not indicted.
Giving money to anyone associated with the Muslim Brotherhood is an act of treason. To learn more about the mother of all Islamic terror organizations, read the excellent work of Erick Stakelbeck. Giving money to NAIT in particular is completely over the top:
NAIT holds the deed to the Islamic Society of Boston, which operates the mosque attended by Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the so-called Boston Marathon bombers.
It also controls the Islamic Center of San Diego, which was attended by Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, two al-Qaeda members who helped fly American Flight 77 into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001. … [M]embers of the San Diego mosque helped the two terrorists obtain housing, driver’s licenses and social security numbers. …
NAIT also owns the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque in Fairfax Co., Va. — a known hotbed of terrorist activity. Al-Qaeda recruiter Anwar al-Awlaki served as imam at that location in 2001 and 2002.
As for the Kansas City mosque that Obama’s bureaucracy is showering our money upon,
The mosque made news earlier this year when it held the funeral for Nadir Soofi, one of the two jihadis who attempted to pull off a terrorist attack in Garland, Tex.
Speaking of Garland,
Both Soofi and [Garland accomplice Elton] Simpson attended the Islamic Community Center in Phoenix, which land deeds show is owned by NAIT.
That particular mosque posted $100,000 bond for Simpson following his 2010 arrest for lying to FBI agents about his plans to travel to Somalia to join a terrorist group.
Obviously these mosques are part of the infrastructure Muslims have been constructing in America to facilitate their terror war. Equally obviously, the federal government under Obama is essentially on their side against the American people.
On tips from Wilberforce and Ben S.
This sure won’t help recent college grads struggling to pay off their massive student loans — unless of course they are foreigners:
Obama is preparing a colossal new executive action that could print-up work permits for a huge number of foreign white-collar graduates every year, above and beyond the levels set by Congress. …
The 181-page rule focuses primarily on giving work-permits to foreign college-grads who will compete against Americans for white collar jobs, despite the large number of American graduates now stuck in lower-wage positions and struggling to pay off college debts. The rule will also make each foreign graduate much cheaper for U.S. employers to hire than many U.S.-born college grads.
Meanwhile, the workforce participation rate has cratered. We don’t need workers; we need jobs.
Obama’s hostility to the American people could not be more obvious. At this point he is all but openly sneering, “What are you going to do about it?”
Relying on the Republicans who were elected in 2014 explicitly to stop Obama is useless. They could have prevented him from inflicting this, but…
In April, [countermoonbat Senator Jeff] Sessions proposed language to reduce and cap the number of work-permits — dubbed “Employment Authorization Documents” — that could be distributed to foreign workers each year. Sessions’ recommendation was rejected by GOP and Democratic leaders in Congress, and so House Speaker Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI)’s December omnibus is enabling the president’s new executive action.
Ryan and the rest of the GOP establishment are on Obama’s side against their own country.
The foreign graduates typically get entry-level jobs that would otherwise go to new U.S. business graduates, designers, doctors, programmers, engineers and scientists. Also, the foreign graduates are used to replace mid-level American professionals once they seek mid-career pay-raises to help pay for mortgages and child-rearing.
The young people who foolishly helped Obama take power aren’t just getting burnt; they have been doused in gasoline and will now be set aflame:
The new policy also creates a large economic incentive for U.S. employers to hire foreign college-grads instead of new American college-grads.
That’s because the policy will allow U.S. employers to hire foreign college graduates at very low salaries. The foreign graduates will gladly take those low-wage white-collar jobs because the new policy allows them to get deferred payments from the federal government — valuable permanent work-permits that are the first step on the golden pathway to Green Cards and citizenship.
The objective is to destroy the country by progressively reducing its core population to a minority. Afterwards, a new country can be created, inferior in every way, but more suitable to oligarchical collectivist rule.
On tips from Torcer, Stormfax, and Hans Pfall.
Asylum seekers are being recruited across the country as cheap drug dealers as well as petty thieves, says German newspaper, Bild – the biggest daily paper in the country.
The paper accused the police of covering up the extent of migrant crimes in order to stop concerns among the general population. … [T]he paper said that all of the officials dealing with the problem had been ordered not to talk about it, as it was an extremely sensitive subject that has been forbidden to be referred to in an ‘offensive manner’.
We certainly would not want to talk about crime in a way that would offend criminals.
The reason given by the paper was to avoid alarming the general public already concerned with the vast number of asylum seekers the country has allowed in, but also to avoid providing material for right-wing extremists.
If they don’t want to alarm the public, they should refrain from importing over 1 million overwhelmingly Muslim colonists in a single year. If they don’t want to provide material for right-wing extremists, they shouldn’t confirm the impression that the current government is not truthful and cannot be trusted to side with the native population against hostile foreigners.
Mutti Merkel’s moonbat regime imported five times more immigrants in 2015 than 2014. There will be no shortage in 2016 or ever — virtually all of them from the perpetually dysfunctional Middle East and Africa.
Germany is a magnet for migrants partly due to generous social benefits…
As should be obvious to a small child, the combination of generous welfare and open borders is a recipe for national suicide. The Third World will inevitably pour in like a tsunami and wash everything away — as we are witnessing.
On a tip from Torcer.
An increasing number of Americans will be killed in their own country by Muslims in the years ahead. Don’t be too hard on the FBI for not protecting us. For years, their orders have been passed down from a president who has aggressively lived up to his promise to “stand by the Muslims.” On top of that, they have the liberal courts to deal with:
With the region—and the entire nation—still reeling from the San Bernardino terrorist attacks, a federal appellate court is considering whether the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) should be punished for surveilling Muslims in a nearby southern California county.
The case centers around a federal surveillance program that focused on the Islamic Center of Irvine, situated just 55 miles from the recent massacre in San Bernardino. A leftist civil rights group and a terrorist front group, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), sued the federal government for violating Muslims’ civil rights by indiscriminately targeting them for surveillance.
Indiscriminately? In light of the 27,535 lethal Muslim terror attacks since 9/11, no surveillance involving this hostile cult is indiscriminate.
The lawsuit was filed in 2011 and alleges that during a two-year period the FBI collected extensive records about the religious practices of hundreds of Muslims who attended various southern California mosques.
At first sanity prevailed. Most of the lawsuit was dismissed back in 2012 on the grounds that letting it go forward would reveal information detrimental to national security.
Too bad the surveillance was not aggressive enough to prevent San Bernardino. Next time we may be even more vulnerable:
Now, just weeks after the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11 was executed in nearby San Bernardino, a federal appeals court is considering the case. This month the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Pasadena… One of the appellate court judges, Marsha Berzon, expressed doubts to Justice Department attorneys about the government’s state secret defense.
This story illustrates how CAIR operates to facilitate Muslim terrorism, and how liberal courts can facilitate CAIR.
On a tip from Steve A.
If you think the world presented to you by your television set is freakish and terrifying, imagine riding a New York City subway:
Via the Daily Snooze:
A flamboyant fashionista captured posing on camera while threatening to slash fellow straphangers on an A train in Brooklyn was arrested Tuesday.
Merci Chrisette, a 28-year-old transgender woman [i.e., a psychiatrically deformed man dressed as a woman], blew kisses, smiled and waved at straphangers before pulling a sharp metal object from [his] red purse and lunging at two passengers near the Jay St. station in downtown Brooklyn during the Dec. 18 confrontation, video obtained by Gothamist shows.
“Do you want to know what’s going to happen when I get off this train?” Chrisette asked the frightened passengers. “I’m going to cut you and I’m going to get away with it.”
Usually they do get away with it. But being insane, Chrisette apparently turned himself in for inflicting the minor cuts.
The suspect, who also goes by the pseudonym Chrissy Jackson, confessed to the assault in a Facebook post…
“I see a lot of hate,” wrote Chrisette, sending [his] message to members of the media. “It makes me sad because all of I ever believed in was Peace & Love. However, society has chosen to shun and discriminate against me.”
The heart bleeds. On top of all the transphobic oppression, he was charged with assault, criminal possession of a weapon, and reckless endangerment.
Social engineering has brought NYC a long way since the days John Rocker complained about subway riders with purple hair.
On a tip from Sean C.
If you enjoy Moonbattery.com, be sure to check out the other winners of Doug Ross’s coveted Fabulous 50 Awards, including these best all-around bloggers:
On a tip from Stormfax.
All is permitted to Muslims when it comes to expanding Islam; the cult imposes no restrictions whatsoever in that regard. So it will be unsurprising to see increasing numbers of Muslims stoop to the level of staging hate hoaxes. Gary Nathaniel Moore, charged with arson in a Christmas Day mosque fire, may be an example:
Moore told investigators at the scene that he has attended the mosque for five years, coming five times per day to pray seven days per week. …
Using surveillance video from multiple businesses nearby, investigators were able to identify Moore, according to records. A search warrant of his home was conducted, in which investigators recovered a backpack and clothing that seemingly matched that which was seen in surveillance footage, as well as one half of a two-pack of charcoal lighter fluid bottles that seemed to match another lighter fluid bottle found inside the mosque. …
It took about 80 firefighters to put out the two-alarm blaze at the storefront mosque in Savoy Plaza, near Wilcrest Drive and West Bellfort.
While the motive is not known, this crime has all the hallmarks of a hate hoax. Had Moore not been caught, this story would have caught fire in the media, amid intimidating shrieks of Islamophobia. Let’s add him to the Hate Hoax List.
On tips from Xavier, Maudie, Chris Black, Bodhisattva, rpp, and Gary.
Even now, you still sometimes see justice in this country:
Bill Cosby was charged Wednesday with sexually assaulting a woman at his home 12 years ago — the first criminal charges brought against the comedian out of the torrent of allegations that destroyed his good-guy image as America’s Dad.
The case sets the stage for perhaps the biggest Hollywood celebrity trial of the mobile-all-the-time era and could send the 78-year-old Cosby to prison in the twilight of his life and barrier-breaking career.
This could be a setback for The Narrative.
Prosecutors reopened the case over the summer as damaging testimony was unsealed in [rape victim Andrea] Constand’s related civil lawsuit against Cosby and as dozens of other women came forward with similar accusations that made a mockery of his image as the wise and understanding Dr. Cliff Huxtable from TV’s “The Cosby Show.” …
Cosby in 1965 became the first black actor to land a leading role in a network drama, “I Spy,” and he went on to earn three straight Emmys. Over the next three decades, the Philadelphia-born comic created TV’s animated “Fat Albert” and the top-rated “Cosby Show,” the 1980s sitcom celebrated as groundbreaking television for its depiction of a warm and loving family headed by two black professionals — one a lawyer, the other a doctor.
Why are charges being brought against someone who has played such a major role in affirming the preferred liberal view on race? This offers a clue:
He was a fatherly figure off camera as well, serving as a public moralist and public scold, urging young people to pull up their saggy pants and start acting responsibly.
“Young people” is a euphemism for blacks. By suggesting they take responsibility for their behavior, and by criticizing the degenerate liberal moral creed that he lived by, Cosby wandered off the reservation. His Get Out of Jail Free card was revoked.
If O.J. had told “young people” to pull their pants up, he might have been given a real trial instead of being set free by a kangaroo court.
Likely due to his ideological transgressions, Cosby’s old hobby of drugging and raping women has gotten him charged with aggravated indecent assault — speaking of which, Red Alert Politics has compiled “A Millennial’s Guide to Bill Clinton’s 20+ Sex Scandals.” As with Cosby, many of these scandals involve sexual assault.
Why is Bill Clinton not also facing criminal charges? Because the liberals who run everything still regard the dirtbag as a demigod, and they are trying to get him back in the White House along with his conspicuously corrupt and incompetent wife. But just because we know the answer is no reason for Donald Trump and others to refrain from asking the question loudly and repeatedly.
On tips from JusttheTipHQ, Varla, Torcer, and Bodhisattva.
Someone please get this vital information to Reince Priebus and the rest of the handwringing cuckservatives comprising the GOPe:
Hispanic voters are not as crucial to Republicans as conventional wisdom has it. Romney would still have lost the election if he had won 40 percent of Hispanics. He would have lost, for that matter, if he had won a majority of these voters, something Republicans have never done. To win, Romney would have had to do a bit better than even Obama did among Hispanics.
It would make a real difference, on the other hand, if Republicans increased their share of white voters by only a few percentage points. RealClearPolitics has an interactive tool that allows for simulating different election scenarios for 2016. It suggests Republicans would win the popular vote and Electoral College if they took 3.3 percent more than Romney from whites — even if everything else about the party’s performance stays the same.
Also, it is doubtful that collaborating with Democrats who want to change the national demographics by importing tens of millions of Hispanics from the Third World will increase the Republican share of Hispanic votes at all, much less to the majority that would be necessary to offset the newly imported Democrats. Third World immigrants overwhelmingly vote for whichever party will seize more of our money and give it to them.
The white vote may be shrinking as the nation dies, but it is the only one that is up for grabs, and it is still the one that decides elections.
On a tip from Torcer.
Muslims are still a tiny percentage of the US population, and already they are gaining enough leverage to dispense with the taqiyya:
Rana Elmir, an American Muslim and deputy director of the ACLU of Michigan, says that she “emphatically” refuses to condemn jihadist terrorists “just because I’m Muslim.”
In her provocative article in Monday’s Washington Post, Elmir claims that she is often asked to condemn Islamic terrorism, to which she replies: “I emphatically refuse.”
She defends her stance with a grab bag of standard liberal tactics, including misdirection, tu quoque, moral equivalence, relativism, and dubious assertions, shouting that “mostly white men” commit a mass killing every 2 weeks in the USA, therefore the 27,529 lethal Muslim terror attacks since 9/11 are A-okay.
Never mind the fundamental difference between isolated outbreaks of psychosis and acts consciously committed as part of a terror war. It is as if a Japanese writer in 1941 refused to condemn Pearl Harbor, and justified it with the claim that every 2 weeks people get hurt in airplane accidents involving white pilots.
Well, maybe she hasn’t completely discarded the taqiyya:
“Muslims across the globe are not threats. They are threatened,” she wrote.
Tell that to the Christians watching their children get beheaded and crucified by the Islamic State.
“Condemnation,” she says, “becomes our admission of guilt.”
That the Post would publish such a piece tells you all you need to know about WaPo. That it would employ this evil creature tells you all you need to know about the ACLU.
On tips from Torcer and Rob E.
Once again South Africa demonstrates graphically what moonbattery is doing to Western Civilization:
In July, the headline read “Meet the angels who opened their hearts and home to 143 lost strangers,” and the left was drooling over the couple who followed their socialist values to the letter. Andrew and Rae Wartnaby opened up their 50-acre farmland to over 100 Muslim refugees who were reportedly displaced during “xenophobic attacks,” according to News 24.
After escaping Islamic brutality in the Central African Republic, the Muslim migrants traveled to South Africa, where they were again set upon by South African natives in black-on-black attacks. So, the good-natured yet naive white couple welcomed the refugee families to their land…
However, after only a few months of graciously allowing the Muslim migrants to live for free on their property, the loving couple soon found that they would actually be the refugees. The Wartnabys were threatened with slaughter by the same people they were helping escape brutality.
The New Observer reports that the good Samaritans’ tolerance was used by the refugees to chase them from their own farm, which has already been destroyed by the ungrateful migrants.
Last week, the Muslims attacked the Wartnabys home in the wee hours of the morning and warned that they would kill Andrew if the pair didn’t leave the property. They claimed that the white couple was “not helping them to be relocated back home or to another country,” and that it was the pair’s responsibility to provide more money, passports, and transportation.
No matter how much you give them, it is only an invitation for them to demand more.
The Muslim migrants cut down the fence, smashed the house’s windows, and broke down the doors to drive out the Wartnabys at 2 a.m. The dangerous refugees are still in control of the farm, and the couple remains in hiding, fearing for their lives from the very people they were selflessly helping.
Imagine the long-term damage if bleeding heart idiots of this stripe were in charge of whole countries, with Muslims consciously exploiting the opportunity to expand their territory. That’s the situation in Europe. Although motivated more from malice than suicidal altruism, Obama is creating the same disaster in the USA, with funding from Paul Ryan et al.
On a tip from Wilberforce.
File this one under Not From the Onion. The above headline is taken verbatim from Politico:
Amid a vicious winter storm on Monday that forced some presidential campaigns to cancel their scheduled stops in Iowa, only Martin O’Malley decided to press on.
And one man at his last event, the only person to show up, in fact, “was glad to see me,” the former Maryland governor said. But he still would not commit to caucus for O’Malley. …
A tweet shared by a reporter who was present showed a bearded man, identified only as Kenneth, sitting at a table with O’Malley…
Give it up, O’Mealy. Your desperation does not impress anyone. Not even Kenneth will vote for you.
— Sarah Beckman (@SarahBeckman3) December 29, 2015
On a tip from Torcer.
Maybe Muslims and moonbats get along so well because they are both delusional to the point of psychosis. Moonbats believe that the likes of Obama and Shrillary are fit to run the country. Muslims will swallow stuff like this:
Saudi Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Aziz has claimed that the Islamic State (Daesh) militants are Israeli soldiers and the Saudi-led 34-nation military alliance of Islamic countries will defeat it.
Why is the mufti not on the side of ISIS terrorists, who follow Mohammad’s example in the way they practice Islam? Political reasons:
The statement came after Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, the secretive leader of the terror group, called for an uprising in Saudi Arabia and pledged to attack Israel, in an audio recording released Saturday and attributed to him, AFP reported.
Terming the extremist group’s threat to attack Israel a ‘lie’, Aziz alleged that IS is a part of the Israeli army.
It isn’t any less believable than most global warming lies.
On a tip from Steve A.
— Barack Obama (@BarackObama) December 28, 2015
If smirking self-satisfaction could be converted into competence and patriotism, Obama would deserve to be president.
On a tip from Torcer.
The Muslim atrocity in San Bernardino was a big disappointment to Tinseltown royalty Samuel Jackson. He was hoping it could be blamed on white people:
“I can’t even tell you how much that day the thing that happened in San Bernardino — I was in Hawaii — how much I really wanted that to just be another, you know, crazy white dude, and not really some Muslims, because it’s like: ‘Oh, sh**. It’s here. And it’s here in another kind of way.’ Now, okay, it happened on an Army base and it happened somewhere else. But now? It’s like they have a legitimate reason now to look at your Muslim neighbor, friend, whatever in another way.”
Why does Jackson wish the killers were white guys and not Muslims? Because the killings revealed them to be evil savages. Jackson doesn’t like to see threats to the liberal narrative that props up the moronic, mendacious, and malevolent clichés that pass for thoughts in the heads of cretins of his political persuasion.
Another way to look at it is that Jackson wants white people to look like evil savages, because he doesn’t like them. He likes Muslims, so he doesn’t want them to look like evil savages.
If you are a white guy, Samuel Jackson is your enemy. If you help keep him in his mansion by paying to see his movies, you are your own enemy.