moonbattery logo

Apr 20 2012

ABC News Coughs Up Picture of George Zimmerman’s Bloody Head

If a vicious punk 7″ taller than you punched you in the face and started doing this to your head by bashing it on the sidewalk, and you had a gun, would you use it?

George-Zimmerman-Head-Injury

Who wouldn’t? All the same, kudos to George Zimmerman for pulling the trigger.

Hat tips: The Daily Caller, Wyld Goose. On a tip from SR.

Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on StumbleUponShare on Facebook


  • http://www.henrypbabcock.com Henry

    But, but, but… St. Skittles was just an innocent boy!

  • http://wyldgoose.wordpress.com Wyld Goose

    Tomorrow’s rally by Pastor Terry Jones in Sanford, FL will be very interesting. I foresee a violent counter protest. I’m currently watching the bond hearing, and even now evidence is coming out. my my my

  • Winston Smith

    Im sure THEY will argue he did that to himself. Never underestimate the gullibility of the masses to the believe the liberal media establishment.

  • StanInTexas

    Winston, they will first say it isn’t Zimmerman. Then they will say it was not taken that night.

    And then all the Liberals with their fake medical degrees will tell us that the injuries were never life-threatening and that Zimmerman was not hurt THAT BAD, etc, etc, etc…..

    So long as a Liberal refused to admit something, they think that means it does not exist. We even occasionally have one pop up here talking about how Bush stole the 2000 election.

  • Bloodless Coup

    Ut Oh! Da New Black Panfers Is Gonna Git Real Pissed Off Now Whitey!

    Errybody Knows Dat It’s Racist Not To Suppress The Damning Evidence Against Saint Skittles.

    U F-ed Up Now Crackkkers!

  • Tim from TK

    Yep, Stan has it, after all, it must be fake and remember, our fake LEO expert RICH said there is no way a younger, taller, 10 or so lbs lighter guy could beat up an older, shorter, 10 or so pounds heavier guy.

    Just ask Sonny Liston…

  • http://nobarack08.wordpress.com nobarack08

    The enemedia will claim that was Trayvon’s blood.

  • Son of Taz

    If there was clear HD video of the attack along with DNA evidence that Skittles did this, many of the underclass would still believe he was an innocent victim.

    It’s the same class that found OJ Simpson not guilty of two horrific murders.

    It’s going to take a lot of changing hearts and minds before stuff like this goes away.

  • dmgore

    You guys should read some of the comments on the ABC site.
    No wonder we are in the shape we are in. People are unbelievably stupid.
    DM

  • Dr. 9

    Evidence doesn’t matter. The racist DOJ WILL find something to hang on Zimmerman.

    “Beware of those who cry racism, for they are the true racists…”

  • Bob Roberts

    The passion of St. Skittles continues. The prosecution continues to lie again and again to try to prevent bond or make it exceptionally high. The judge refuses to go along and sets bond in the still too high amount of $150,000.

  • Louisiana Steve

    “…you had a gun, would you use it?”
    No less than three rounds to ensure the threat is eliminated.

  • Bob Roberts

    Zimmerman feels true remorse for the death of Martin & apologizes despite the fact it was Martin himself who turned this into a life or death struggle and a situation where Zimmerman had NO CHOICE but to shoot Martin to stop the vicious, murderous attack Martin initiated.

    I have to give the Martin parents some credit for not creating a media friendly outburst in the court today. Even more credit goes to Zimmerman for saying what he said today.

  • Bob Roberts

    Louisiana Steve says: April 20, 2012 at 8:16 am
    —————-
    I believe that the evidence is that Zimmerman actually only fired once, correct? I did not see the whole hearing today – apparently part of what I missed was a false allegation from his wife during a time they had some trouble. Wives, unfortunately, often make such false allegations when marriages start to struggle. And, predictably, the prosecution apparently milked this false allegation for all it’s worth.

  • AC

    $150k is it? He’ll make that, easy. If the Zimmerman family doesn’t have that much equity then I’m sure a Second Amendment loving good samaritan will step forward to save George from being murdered in jail.

  • Kevin

    This was nothing more than an apartment complex tussle. Mistuh Zimmuhmuhn needs to be subject to the maximum punishment the law allows.

    Love,
    “Reverend” Jesse Jackson

  • StanInTexas

    AC, not sure that will help. The NBPP still has the Wanted Dead or Alive bounty out on him, and the Hispanic community have turned their backs on him because they are LIBERAL FIRST, and Hispanic further down the list (and American even further down).

    Zimmerman will be hunted and haunted the rest of his life, jail or not!

  • Pingback: Breaking: New Image Shows Bloodied Head Of George Zimmerman « Red Alexandria

  • Judith M.

    “Someone must have been telling lies about George Z. for without having done anything wrong he was arrested one fine morning.”

  • Ghost of FA Hayek

    Mediaite is livestreaming what appears to be NAACP lawyers inciting the race war over Zimmermans release on bond
    http://www.mediaite.com/uncategorized/watch-msnbcs-livestream-of-george-zimmermans-bond-hearing/

  • Bob Roberts

    Cast of characters: Mark O’Mara is Zimmerman’s lawyer.
    Kenneth Lester is the judge in the case (at this time, anyway, until the left threatens and causes/pressures him to step down).

    State Attorney’s investigator Dale Gilbreath said, amazingly enough, that while he was one of those who wrote and signed that joke of a probable cause affidavit for this case, that he did not expect to testify in court.

    KEY DETAILS ESTABLISHED IN COURT TODAY:

    Perhaps none is more important than this one:

    O’Mara asked Gilbreath about unattributed statements in several sections of the affidavit.

    Gilbrath had no legitimate answer to this.

    O’Mara grilled Gilbreath on his use of the word “profiling” in describing Zimmerman’s behavior that night, asking why he used the term. Gilbreath said the term indicates that Zimmerman saw the teen, then formed an opinion of him not based on any facts.

    Zimmerman based his opinion on very clear facts:

    1) A neighborhood which had a recent and significant number of burglaries, apparently coincident with the arrival of St. Skittles.

    2) A young man who was not known to Zimmerman, who lived in this relatively small, gated community who was dressed in a suspicious manner and acting suspiciously by loitering rather than moving along quickly on a cold, rainy night.

    3) Furthermore, this young man ran when he noticed Zimmerman had noticed his suspicious activities such that Zimmerman lost sight of him and this young man was moments from home and safety were he really afraid of Zimmerman, but he chose to lay in wait then ambush, confront and attack Zimmerman.

    4) Finally, as all the evidence confirms, as further confirmed today, Martin attacked Zimmerman verbally then physically, with such murderous force and intent that Zimmerman had only one choice – drawing his weapon and firing – to end the attack.

    O’Mara asked Gilbreath about unattributed statements in several sections of the affidavit.

    “‘Zimmerman confronted Martin.’ Those words, where’d you get them from,” O’Mara asked.

    “According to one of the witnesses that we talked with, there were arguing words going on before this incident occured,” Gilbreath said. He said “confronted,” the word O’Mara took issue with, was one of probably 30 he could have used.

    Zimmerman himself stated, and it was reported to us through one or more of his family members, that there were “words exchanged” before Martin attacked, something to the effect of:

    Martin, approaching suddenly and unexpectedly from behind: “Do you have a problem”

    Zimmerman: “No”

    Martin: “You do now”

    Followed by Martin sucker punching Zimmerman, leaping on top of him and attempting to murder him.

    During further questioning by O’Mara, Gilbreath admitted that the state has no evidence who started the fight.

    So clearly while there IS evidence who started the fight – Martin – the key point is that the state has now admitted they have no evidence either way, which is a lie because there IS evidence, both testimony and physical evidence, of who started the fight – Martin – but at least now they’ve slammed the door on trying to make the case Zimmerman was the aggressor.

    There is also no evidence that Zimmerman didn’t walk back to his car after chasing Martin on foot, as the defendant has claimed.

    Another KEY point – the state may not now double back and try to claim that Zimmerman was looking for a fight when in fact he was merely returning to his vehicle after Martin exhibited the suspicious activity of running to elude him and further it is now even more clear that the only reason there was a confrontation was that Martin, instead of walking the final few yards to his home, apparently concealed himself, laid in wait, then initiated both a verbal and then a physical confrontation with Zimmerman as Zimmerman merely walked back to return to his vehicle.

    Of course the state representatives (specifically Gilbreath) maliciously lied and claimed Zimmerman’s injuries were not as we all know they were. That was expected.

    At the hearing the state foreshadowed the coming big push to replace known fact with media manufactured lies and propaganda such as “Zimmerman was uninjured”.

    Robert Zimmerman said he saw his son the day after the shooting, and he had gashes on the back of his head. His face was swollen, the elder Zimmerman said.

    Gladys Zimmerman testified that her son was active in protesting in 2010, when a Sanford police lieutenant’s son was caught on camera punching a homeless man outside a bar. George handed out flyers advocating for an arrest, “so that poor man could have justice,” she said.

    She said her son is very protective of people, regardless of race. He also worked as a mentor for children in need, she said.

    I believe that case they spoke about was the one where a “person of color” was the victim and Zimmerman was a lone and tireless advocate for him.

    Zimmerman’s father, Robert Zimmerman, said, “I’ve never known him to be violent at all unless otherwise provoked, then he’d turn the other cheek.”

    <OK here is what I missed, the details of Zimmerman's alleged "violent past", based on a single unusual incident which apparently was not what I thought based on what I had been told, in error apparently:

    Zimmerman had a 2005 arrest, in which he was accused of striking a law enforcement officer near the University of Central Florida. Shellie Zimmerman stated that, “The police officer did not identify himself.” but did not apparently give more details of what exactly happened then.

    Apparently what I had been told, in error, was based on this:

    The prosecutor then brought up a domestic violence injunction filed against George Zimmerman by an ex-fiancee.

    “I am aware that he had to protect himself from her,” Shellie Zimmerman said. “Absolutely he is not a violent person,” nor a threat to the community.

    I will correct if I’m wrong about this, but apparently ZIMMERMAN got an order of protection AGAINST HER, not the other way around as some have suggested.

    It is clear from this hearing that the charge against Zimmerman is unsupported by the facts and that the state really doesn’t have a case. I’m surprised the judge did not already reduce the charge, but of course he is mindful of the immediate violent reaction that might provoke and the racists who would use it to further incite such reactions all across the country.

  • Bloodless Coup

    Let’s see…

    a hispanic guy shoots a black guy in self-defense and somehow it’s a racist white guys fault?

    Huh?

    How does that happen?

    There’s a little sumptin, sumptin, that don’t quite add up.

    The facts mean nothing to these sub-human grievance mongers.

    They just want to play the race card and “get paid”.

  • StanInTexas

    Oh, I forgot to ask…

    HEY LAO…. which number post is this? And how many time have I and Bob and AC posted on the subject?

    Not that you are OBSESSED or anything!

  • dan

    I know Zimmerman shot accidentally…anyone with intent would have emptied the clip and promptly gone into
    amnesic shock.

  • Adam

    Someone remind me, how did we come to nickname Martin “St. Skittles”?

  • Sinister66

    Were these pictures lost before and just found? People have been argueing if wether or not zimmerman had any injuries to his head and ABC decides to release a picture now? What else is being hidden?

  • Ghost of FA Hayek

    The prosecutor then brought up a domestic violence injunction filed against George Zimmerman by an ex-fiancee.
    The problem was they had nothing current to bring up as to why Zimmerman would be a danger to society
    ——

    Of course the state representatives (specifically Gilbreath) maliciously lied and claimed Zimmerman’s injuries were not as we all know they were. That was expected

    This is their case in a nutshell now, that St Skittles gave him “love taps” to the head
    This is because of what you mentioned first Bob:
    —-

    There is also no evidence that Zimmerman didn’t walk back to his car after chasing Martin on foot, as the defendant has claimed.

    Another KEY point – the state may not now double back and try to claim that Zimmerman was looking for a fight when in fact he was merely returning to his vehicle after Martin exhibited the suspicious activity of running to elude him and further it is now even more clear that the only reason there was a confrontation was that Martin, instead of walking the final few yards to his home, apparently concealed himself, laid in wait, then initiated both a verbal and then a physical confrontation with Zimmerman as Zimmerman merely walked back to return to his vehicle.

    The reason this evidence that is favorable to the defense is suddenly rolling out, is that the prosecution will find it’s case thrown out for concealing it
    Much to the left’s chagrin, there can be no courtroom “surprises” of this nature.
    Remember Ted Stevens ?
    http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/04/19/45782.htm

    Suppressing evidence favorable to the defendant

    Sometimes prosecutors, in their zeal to obtain a conviction, fail to turn over factual evidence that is favorable to the defendant when the evidence is material to guilt or punishment. One of the greatest threats to rational and fair fact-finding in criminal cases comes from a prosecutor’s hiding evidence that might prove a defendant’s innocence. Between 1963, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Brady v. Maryland that such a practice is a deprivation of due process, and 1999, at least 381 defendants nationally had a homicide conviction thrown out because prosecutors concealed evidence. Of the 381 defendants, 67 had been sentenced to death. The consequences of such misconduct when it is discovered can be serious. Convictions are reversed, cases are retried, appeals are brought that cost taxpayers millions of dollars, and public confidence in prosecutors is undermined.

    The “we held evidence close to the chest for fear of loosing” is no defense here
    http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_3_8_special_responsibilities_of_a_prosecutor.html

  • TED

    Judge sets bail at $150,000, media lynching continues.

  • Ghost of FA Hayek

    Sinister
    Those pictures would not have helped their agenda of jury tampering

  • TED
  • Unonymous

    Makes me wonder what else they are hiding from the public. Not just on Zimmerman but also dirt on the Golden Boy himself.

  • AC

    What else is being hidden?

    Innocence. It doesn’t fit the racemongering narrative.

  • blue
  • StanInTexas

    Sinister, in my NEVER humble opinion, the reason it has taken this long to see pictures like this is because these pictures favor Zimmerman and not Martin. This is no different than the release of Zimmerman’s mug shots instead of a recent picture, or the fact that HISPANIC is being portrayed as white.

  • Sam

    Then George Zimmerman’s wife has to testify via phone because of threats:

    http://tampa.cbslocal.com/2012/04/20/zimmermans-wife-my-husband-is-not-a-violent-person/

    Real set of stones there, lefties.

  • http://wyldgoose.wordpress.com Wyld Goose

    Rallies of ‘Justice for Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman’ hosted by Terry Jones and the New Black Panthers Armed Rally Scheduled for the Same Day in Sanford, FL
    http://wyldgoose.wordpress.com/2012/04/20/rallies-of-justice-for-trayvon-martin-and-george-zimmerman-hosted-by-terry-jones-and-the-new-black-panthers-armed-rally-scheduled-for-the-same-day-in-sanford-fl/

  • Sinister66

    AC says:

    Innocence. It doesn’t fit the racemongering narrative

    That is still yet to be proven. I am sure there are plenty of police photos that will be released.

    StanInTexas says:

    “Sinister, in my NEVER humble opinion, the reason it has taken this long to see pictures like this is because these pictures favor Zimmerman and not Martin.”

    So in a shooting involving the death of a minor, only one news organization shows up and takes the only picture of zimmermans head. Not buying it.

  • StanInTexas

    Sinister, then you need to read the actual article and stop making thinks up off the top of your head. A news agency didn’t take the photo.

  • Sinister66

    Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    “There is also no evidence that Zimmerman didn’t walk back to his car after chasing Martin on foot, as the defendant has claimed.”

    Except the fight and shooting happened in a courtyard between two apt. buildings quite a distance from zimmermans car.

  • Sinister66

    StanInTexas says:

    Not making “thinks” up.

    I doubt this is the only photo taken of zimmermans head.

  • Gunny G

    Somewhere a woman who would have been beaten and robbed or raped wil have a wonderful life thanks to Zimmerman.

    Florida should be happy that they saved money in court costs, jail costs, and feeding the bum for Life in prison thanks to Zimmerman.

  • StanInTexas

    Sinister, I see you have reduced your argument down to pointing out typos.

    You may go now.

  • wingmann

    So let me see if I got this….
    A tall negro with gold teeth and tats wearing a hoodie and acting suspicious is spotted by a short/squatty, registered democrat,half jewish half latino,with a buzz haircut,neighborhood watchman who shoots and kills said negro and it’s the white republican’s fault…..do I have that about right?

  • AC

    I doubt this is the only photo taken of zimmermans head.

    Additional photos can only substantiate his injuries as being the result of the aggravated assault from Saint Skittles.

  • AC

    A tall negro with gold teeth and tats wearing a hoodie and acting suspicious is spotted by a short/squatty, registered democrat,half jewish half latino,with a buzz haircut,neighborhood watchman who shoots and kills said negro and it’s the white republican’s fault…..do I have that about right?

    Correct. George Bush did it.

  • SR

    Martin family attorney – Benjamin Crump:

    “How bad could it have been if they didn’t take him to the hospital and didn’t stitch him up.”

    I know the guy is just being a lawyer.

  • wingmann

    AC says:
    April 20, 2012 at 10:25 am
    Correct. George Bush did it.
    ____________________

    Thanks for the laugh there AC.

  • lao

    From the beginning I have mocked the inclination of the parrots around here to dissect the minute details that are known about this case as Trial By Blog.

    On Tuesday I wrote: Presumably ALL the evidence the special prosecutor has, that led to those charges, will be presented. Will that evidence hold up in court? Who knows? I’m not going to try to second guess a judge and jury.

    The displayed photograph proves my point.

    Despite claims to the contrary, nobody here has all the evidence.

  • Clingtomyguns

    On the bright side, a fine case of prosecutorial misconduct against Corey is brewing in Florida reminiscent of the Duke Lacrosse case, another instance where the prosecutor, Mike Nifong, subordinated his oath of office and discretion for the expedient politics of kissing the butts of the same old black racebaiters like Sharpton and their lynch mob cohorts. Hope there is another happy ending eventually here too for Zimmerman, just as the liberal media falsely drove that case against the white players, under the slow wheels of justice it eventually collapesed, the race-based trumped-up charges were dropped, and the state Attorney General declared the players innocent. Icing on the cake was when the North Carolina State Bar disbarred Nifong for his heinous and unethical actions during this case.

  • Ghost of FA Hayek

    Sinister

    The prosecutor today admitted as much
    During further questioning by O’Mara, Gilbreath admitted that the state has no evidence who started the fight. There is also no evidence that Zimmerman didn’t walk back to his car after chasing Martin on foot, as the defendant has claimed.
    If the state HAS evidence of Zimmerman returning(or some such thing) as the aggressor, they MUST disclose this.
    What would be the point of keeping this evidence under their hats if the very act of doing so could very well spring him ?

  • Ghost of FA Hayek

    —–
    Despite claims to the contrary, nobody here has all the evidence.
    Lao
    But withholding it for some last minute “Hail Mary touchdown” late in the fourth quarter ??
    Today was as much a sales pitch for the potential jururs as it was a bond hearing.
    Too bad
    It’s not supposed to work that way.

  • Clingtomyguns

    Oh, and Ms. Corey should be aware that her fellow traveller Mr. Nifong also filed for bankruptcy, listing his assets of almost $244,000 and liabilities of over $180.3 million, the bulk of which being six $30 million “unsecured nonpriority claims,” one for each of the six members of the 2005–2006 Duke Lacrosse team civil suits against his sorry ass. The players can still pursue their claims in bankruptcy if the debt was incurred through “willful and malicious injury” to them, and that’s precisely what they are pursuing. Having fun yet, Mikey? Up for debate whether players had decent libel claims against the New York slimes.

  • wingmann

    Angela Corey(anger gorey)has GOT to be a transexual…I mean cmon!

    http://staugustine.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/story_slideshow_thumb/11027773.jpg

  • Robert Peahl

    I wonder whether in the course of the proceedings that it will come out that the furor over this entire episode didn’t explode into the national spotlight until a website called change.org posted a petition by Mrs. Martin calling for justice for her slain son?
    The site exists strictly for people to submit petitions which are then signed (or not) by other members and forwarded to the “appropriate outlets”.
    I had never heard of this incident until I received an email on 13 March forwarded by an associate containing the following (headered Walking while Black):
    On February 26, my son Trayvon Martin was shot and killed as he walked back from a convenience store where he had just bought some candy. He was only 17 years old.

    Trayvon’s killer, George Zimmerman, admitted to police that he shot Trayvon in the chest. Zimmerman, the community’s self appointed “neighborhood watch leader,” called the police to report a suspicious person when he saw Trayvon, a young black man, walking from the store. But Zimmerman, who is white, still hasn’t been charged for killing my son.

    Trayvon was my hero. At the age of 9, Trayvon pulled his father from a burning kitchen, saving his life. He loved sports and horseback riding. At only 17 he had a bright future ahead of him with dreams of attending college and becoming an aviation mechanic. Now that’s all gone.

    When Zimmerman reported Trayvon to the police, they told him not to confront him. But he did anyway. All I know about what happened next is that my 17 year-old son, who was completely unarmed, was shot and killed.

    I don’t know if my family will ever receive justice for this terrible tragedy. It’s been nearly two weeks and the Sanford Police have refused to arrest George Zimmerman. In their public statements, they even go so far as to stand up for the killer – saying he’s “a college grad” who took a class in criminal justice.

    Please join me in calling on the the Sanford Police Department and Florida State’s Attorney Norman Wolfinger to investigate my son’s death and prosecute George Zimmerman for the shooting and killing of Trayvon Martin.

    Remind me of when the media erupted. If the name change.org isn’t enough of a giveaway, the NYT and the Baltimore Sun have both lauded this organization for their work in bringing “justice” to America.

  • Robert Peahl

    Just to avoid confusion, the description of events are Mrs. Martin’s words, not mine. I could surmise her motives for filing such a petition, but I won’t bother.

  • Clingtomyguns

    wingmann says:
    April 20, 2012 at 11:19 am Angela Corey(anger gorey)has GOT to be a transexual…I mean cmon!

    Yep, a tranny with a face made from the hand-tooled saddle leather of the old Time Life Western series.

  • TrickleUpPolitics

    Adam, in answer to your question, Trayvon is called St. Skittles because he had a bag of Skittles with him when he was killed, and he has been sainted by the race hustlers.

  • LarryG

    Now show us a photo of the Skittles and tea and provide us with the findings on the wound; how far away was the weapon when it was fired? Were there powder burns on the victim? You know, facts.

  • TrickleUpPolitics

    As a former prosecutor, I am appalled at the behavior of the special prosecutor in this case. When I first heard about the affidavit, I knew there were ethical problems and I am glad Dershovitz has come out accusing the prosecutor of immoral and unethical behavior. I have learned one thing by living here in Florida the last 5 years: the Florida bar will refuse to do anything about Corey’s unethical behavior. The bar and the judiciary is corrupt here. I can’t wait to get out of this state and go to Texas.

  • TrickleUpPolitics

    Oh, one other comment. I was pleased to see that the judge allowed Zimmerman’s attorney to grill one of the leo’s who signed the affidavit and make him admit he had no facts to base his conclusions, such as “Zimmerman profiled Martin” in the affidavit. It will make for a great cross examination at trial.

  • LarryG

    “The Oxbow Incident”. You can watch it free on your computer – just Google it. Very good example of the “justice” being wrought here.

  • wingmann

    TrickleUpPolitics says:
    April 20, 2012 at 11:53 am
    “I can’t wait to get out of this state and go to Texas”
    ______________________________

    I will welcome you with open arms.

  • oldguy

    I said this in another column. Governor Rick scott: You appointed this special prosecutor, do you see that glint in your eyes? That is your career dissipation light you are seeing.

  • AC

    Leave Florida? Crazy talk.

  • Bill T

    TrickleUpPolitics
    Take your pick http://traveltex.com/multimedia/texas-videos

  • http://Whydidn'tZimmermangototheERfortheseinjuriesiftheyweresoserious?Andhopefully V

    Why wasn’t Zimmerman taken to the ER if these injuries were so serious? And can we see the X-ray photos of this broken nose Zimmerman claims he sustained?

  • Chuck T

    Why the hell do people keep bashing liberals and liberal media when there aren’t even any liberal comments.
    Why do you think liberals are all Snooty buttholes. Snooty buttholes are snooty buttholes, just as ignorant asses are ignorant asses. Liberal media and radicals aren’t liberal agenda just as Fox news and conservative radicals aren’t conservative agenda.

    Here’s a liberals point of view.

    There was obviously a fight between the two.
    Who started the fight? My bet would be on Trayvon, he’s a teenager, rather large for his age, hormone crazy, probably has pride issues like most kids his age.

    Now was there a way to prevent the encounter, yes. Zimmerman is at fault for following the kid when the cops told him not too; that was just complete stupidity on his part. He could of just stayed home an let the cops do their jobs. But I’m assuming Mr. forty four 911 calls followed him to make sure the cops found him and either got caught by trayvon, or did something stupid like walk up to him and talk to him.

    Then words were said, something that would frustrate Trayvon I’m sure; maybe a racial slur, Zim accused him of being suspicious, or Zim mentioned the cops, and then I’m sure Zimmerman asserted he stay and not leave. Then Trayvon, being a cocky teenager, punched or pushed him out of annoyance, then the fight started.

    Now the whole Trayvon yelling for help on the 911 call.
    Could of been a couple things.

    It could have happened when the fight started, Trayvon being scared of Zimmerman, but I doubt it.

    I guarantee he didn’t start screaming for help until he saw his gun. Then either he 1.) started to hit him more, which I doubt because the guy had a gun,2.) tried to get the gun away from him, which I believe happened. or 3.) ran away, which I also doubt because he was shot in the chest.

    Now here’s where key evidence and facts come into play. The distance between Martin and Zim when the gun went off. If it was close range then I’d have to go with Zimmerman; but far range would create a bunch more possible circumstances.

    I doubt Zimmerman just went up to trayvon and waved his gun around then chased and shot trayvon. That’s just crazy talk.

    It was most likely a tragic misunderstanding between a paranoid neighborhood watch and a riled up teenager. Both were probably terrified when the whole thing happened, and I’m sure Zimmerman is feeling awful about it.

    I would like to just add about this headline and it’s bias; calling trayvon a vicious punk? come on If some guy came up to me at the age and started giving me shit I would of done something; I don’t know about you, but when I was a teenager the biggest thing that would set me off was when people accused me of something I didn’t do.
    And 7″ taller than you? Ok, this would make someone think Trayvon was a giant, but actually Zimmerman is just short, Trayvon is 6 feet, Which is pretty average for a guy his age. Also, I’m 6’4 and I know plenty of people under 6 feet who could kick my ass, height has nothing to do with it.

  • Tellitlikeitis

    Man that photo has been edited in adobe Photoshop or something. If Tray was slamming his head back and forth. The blood would have been running all down his neck and pretty much running all his head. That blood looks fake. Again that image is fake………. Also that image that was added in the background is artificial.

  • Agnostic Conservative

    No visible head injury they said.

    We are all Trayvon they said.

  • TrickleUpPolitics

    I’m moving to San Angelo, a little town I was stationed in twice while I was in the Air Force. It’s a dry heat!

  • TrickleUpPolitics

    V: As a brand new prosecutor I prosecuted the guy who was slamming a guy’s head on the parking lot cement. The guy he was slamming had jumped him and refused to give up even after the “jumpee” got on top of him because he was full of cocaine and felt no pain. The jumpee slammed his head until he did give up but by that time he had sustained brain damage (like shaken baby syndrome). We had a jury trial and the jury refused to convict. In NM, we call that western justice.

    Now imagine if Trayvon had slammed Zimmerman’s head on the pavement until Zimmerman had brain damage. Would Trayvon be prosecuted once he claimed he was profiled? And if so, would the jury convict.

    Just sayin’.

  • Ghost of FA Hayek
  • Festivus

    “V”,

    A “broken nose” won’t necessarily show up on an x-ray.

    Zimmerman was treated by an EMT at the scene and he refused further treatment that was recommended by them (going to the hospital).

  • http://wyldgoose.wordpress.com Wyld Goose
  • FrankW

    I have kind given up on lao. At the moment I tend to believe he thinks GZ is guilty of murder, mainly because the greatest majority (95%+)of the things he posts tend to be supportive of the liberal position and he has not stated a position either way except for the direction of his posts.
    I have seen a small number of neutral posts and 1 or 2 that were somewhat right leaning. This is not a defense of lao, because he posts and offers no commentary that distances himself from the item he posts, one must presume he agrees with the direction his postings go. When cornered he still does not make his position clear. And no, simply stating that you will accept the verdict the jury renders is not deciding anything.
    As Mr Myagi said, Right side of road, ok. Leaft side of road, ok. Middle of road, smash. (paraphrased for brevity)
    Like I ranted before I think he roots for the refs.

  • http://wyldgoose.wordpress.com Wyld Goose

    I am getting fed up with this “Zimmerman was at fault because he followed” argument. Lets really look at what your claiming. Trayvon Martin was justified in attempted murder because Zimmerman followed him. Zimmerman made Trayvon attack Zimmerman.

    Please, next time you feel that someone may be following you or possibly “eyeing you’ from across the room, turn to them, and sucker punch them in the nose, then proceed to tackle them and slam their head into the floor. Let’s see if the courts justify your actions.

    This is the ONLY argument being put forth by those who want to see Zimmerman hang

    As for those justifying there views of Zimmerman because “where are the pictures, where are the medical records, where is the autopsy report or where is the evidence in general?”, why don’t you ask the state of Florida’s prosecutor’s office. Today’s bond trial gave the first opportunity beyond the evidence-lacking affidavit to put forth evidence damaging against Zimmerman’s account. The state provided zero, na da, zilch, absolutely no evidence. Do you really think that the state wants Zimmerman on bond? We can surmise that the state has no evidence at all (which is untrue) or that any and all evidence that the state has corroborates Zimmerman’s account.

    The state is only running with the “Zimmerman profiled” and “Zimmerman followed” arguments.

  • Festivus

    Chuck T says: April 20, 2012 at 2:06 pm

    Now the whole Trayvon yelling for help on the 911 call.

    That wasn’t Trayvon.

  • http://www.henrypbabcock.com Henry

    “Then words were said, something that would frustrate Trayvon I’m sure; maybe a racial slur, Zim accused him of being suspicious, or Zim mentioned the cops, and then I’m sure Zimmerman asserted he stay and not leave. Then Trayvon, being a cocky teenager, punched or pushed him out of annoyance, then the fight started.”

    And you’re “sure” of all of this how exactly?

    Purely fabricated conjecture. Come back after the LSD wears off.

    Can we get a better quality troll around here?

  • lao

    frankie, you need to understand, that what you “tend to believe” and what you “must presume” about me, are your own fantasyland notions and NOT reality.

    Likewise, this entire ridiculous Trial By Blog is full of people who “tend to believe” and who “must presume” because they don’t have all the facts.

  • ED357

    If you put me in fear for my life……

    I will use every means at my disposal……up to and including taking your life…….to ensure my survival…..

    then you’re welcome to take me to trial……

    BUT THE BOTTOM LINE WILL BE……

    I LIVE……..YOU’RE DEAD.

    Molon labe.

  • http://www.henrypbabcock.com Henry

    lao says: April 20, 2012 at 6:33 pm

    QED

  • Mepluribusunum

    mmmm, mmmm, mmmm…somebody’s gonna get fired Monday morning for coughing up that picture.

  • Bob

    You all seem to have forgotten the video taken about 45 minutes after the attack, which clearly shows that there was nothing wrong with Zimmerman`s head

  • Bob Roberts

    lao says: April 20, 2012 at 6:33 pm
    Likewise, this entire ridiculous Trial By Blog
    ——————-
    As I’ve said several times, and lao simply cannot comprehend it – WE DO NOT WANT A TRIAL – WE ARE NOT ENGAGING IN A TRIAL – WE SAY NO TRIAL IS NECESSARY!

    Lao, I figured out what your problem is. You need to add some variety to your sex life. Try using the other hand.
    I also figured out why lao hates me so much. It’s because I’m a reflection of what he wishes he could be, but he knows he cannot and will never be.
    You know, lao, there’s a fine line between smartass and dumbass and you seem to have mastered straddling it.
    Seriously though, I saw something that reminded me of you today. Don’t worry, I flushed – twice – and it went away.
    Lao: Living proof you’re only young once but you can stay immature forever!

    As it turns out, evidence the prosecutor SURELY HAD, unless she’s going to claim she totally botched the investigation, proves Zimmerman was fighting for his life and only shot Martin in self-defense, ruling out any murder charge of any degree.

    Seriously, there’s so much evidence that Martin was attempting to murder Zimmerman and Zimmerman was forced to defend himself the only way he could that, really, NO CHARGE AGAINST HIM IS APPROPRIATE, as was decided the night of the event based on ALL THE FACTS which were and still are available.

    It is lao and his ilk who “tend to believe” and who “must presume” because they don’t have all the facts.

    That’s enough exposing lao for the pathetic loser/liar he is for this week, since it’s almost over anyway.

  • Bob Roberts

    And, I meant to add, in fact it is lao and his ilk who “tend to believe” and who “must presume” because they deliberately ignore, distort and outright lie about the facts.

  • Ghost of FA Hayek

    Bob
    Why are we going through this exercise in futility ?
    Or better yet
    What really is on trial ?
    Daily you hear assertions from the left like the following:
    “The stand your ground laws are faulty”
    “In a just society, duty to retreat is enough”
    “This case highlights the inherent racism in this country”
    None of this convicts Zimmerman (or at least it shouldn’t)
    ——-
    Trial By Blog is full of people who “tend to believe” and who “must presume” because they don’t have all the facts
    Lao
    We have had examples of every letter of the alphabet soup networks outright fabricating evidence in this
    case.
    And an affidavit of probable cause written by a third grader
    http://johnrlott.blogspot.com/2012/04/affidavit-of-probable-cause-in-george.html#links
    Do we include those as “facts” ?
    Now Lao asserts that he is being patient as this thing unfolds.
    But he does this knowing full well his comrades in arms are doing their best to tamper with the jury pool.
    While Sharpton, Jackson, and the Black Panthers ect run around with their bullhorns, MB documents their stupidity. Yet the irony is that Lao only sees fit to tabulate the threads here calling out that stupidity.
    All is fair in love and war, right Lao ?

    But where is this victory the left is searching for ?
    Is it simply a conviction of Zimmerman ?
    Or is it an attack on stand your ground laws ?
    Castle doctrine ?
    Second amendment ?
    Or to undermine the justice system for political ends ?
    Shoring up the base ?
    Or even to ignite a race war ?
    Meanwhile Zimmerman faces a criminal trial
    And undoubtedly a civil trial
    And bet your bottom dollar Holder charges him with violating St Skittles civil rights as well
    Time is on their side
    And this all is on YOUR dime.
    So there has GOT to be some hay to be made somewhere along the way

  • Bob Roberts

    By the way, in my comment: April 20, 2012 at 8:17 am

    I was wrong.

    Martin’s parents had apparently been making a fuss over the fact Zimmerman had not said anything, yet refused to meet with him so he could and, when he did, portrayed it as insincere and inappropriate.

    They’re media whores of the worst kind and are playing this for all it’s worth.

  • lao

    lao says: April 17, 2012 at 9:31 pm
    I love how idiots who scream NO TRIAL IS APPROPRIATE, NO TRIAL IS NECESSARY, think it means anything in the real world.

    Guess what? Charges have been laid. That’s the facts. That’s the reality.

  • Bob Roberts

    Ghost of FA Hayek says: April 21, 2012 at 4:20 am
    ———————-
    Yes, as you note my point is simple:

    Our very own village idiot keeps stating that we’re engaging in a “trial by blog” when we’re the ones who clearly state there is no appropriate trial to engage in because the facts CLEARLY indicated, on the night in question and ever since, that no trial was appropriate. The harder the left tries to manufacture evidence to the contrary the more obvious this becomes.

  • Bob Roberts

    lao says: April 21, 2012 at 6:24 am
    ———-
    Three words, lao:

    Salem Witch Trials.

  • Ghost of FA Hayek

    Bob
    I agree, however I don’t know if there ever be a way to totally resolve this for Zimmerman
    He has been accused, tried, and convicted by the leftist media from coast to coast.
    Every possible jury pool has been tainted.
    And the noose has been tied
    He has been sentenced to death, and not by the Black Panthers actions alone.
    As long as Holder’s justice department lets them roam free, their unjust sentence has the implicit backing of the government itself.

    Holder has convicted Zimmerman with this death penalty
    The only thing that can save Zimmerman now is a long drawn out process where the Government and it’s media enablers throws it’s feces at him until (they hope something, ANYTHING sticks ) or somehow Zimmerman and his lawyers embarrass them with their own buffoonery, and time draws the public’s attention away or an election clears the rotten apples from power.

  • Bob Roberts

    Bob says: April 20, 2012 at 11:33 pm
    ——————–
    And you seem to forget multiple important facts regarding that video:

    1) It clearly shows one of the officers taking a moment to stop and check out the serious wounds on Zimmerman’s head which, because of the distance involved and the poor quality of the camera (resolution) admittedly were not obvious in the raw video.

    2) In an enhanced version of the video the wounds on the back of Zimmerman’s head were clearly visible.

    3) You admit that video is from 45 minutes after Zimmerman was wounded, after he was treated for those wounds, which you lie about and suggest that they never existed. With the blood cleaned up and further bleeding stopped, with the lighting, camera angle and likely cheap equipment used by the police, no wonder you can’t see the wounds clearly, but they’re there: ELSE WHY DID THE POLICEMAN STOP TO LOOK AT THEM?

    4) I could go on, but I’ll just refer you TO THE PHOTO AT THE TOP OF THIS THREAD, TAKEN A FEW MINUTES AFTER MARTIN TRIED TO KILL ZIMMERMAN, WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS THE WOUNDS IN QUESTION. You might have thought to check the photo AT THE TOP OF THIS THREAD before you posted and proved your own ignorance and disingenuous nature.

    Ghost of FA Hayek says: April 21, 2012 at 8:56 am
    ————
    You are basically correct. Once a person is falsely accused, falsely arrested, falsely imprisoned, falsely tried, their life is damaged in ways that cannot be undone, ever.

    Put aside the fact you know that Zimmerman is torturing himself even though he had no choice but to shoot Martin. You know he’s wishing he had shot him a couple inches to one side, the other, or up or down – apparently he got him something like right through the heart or through maybe the aorta or into another vital organ that caused him to bleed right out – that’s an interesting angle that I haven’t seen explained nor, frankly, is it the public’s business I suppose.

    Indeed another fact in Zimmerman’s favor is he shot a single shot even though he was in fear of his life – some people would have emptied the weapon into their attacker in similar circumstance. I am relying on news accounts that there was only a single shot and the absence of any contrary reports, of course. If that turns out to be incorrect, then obviously so am I.

    But you make great points and, as I said, as difficult as it will be for Zimmerman to draw this out, that is perhaps in his favor. Because Obama needs this to happen before the election for several reasons. First, he intends to milk it for all it’s worth and, if he can get a result of innocent before the election then he starts a race war and we are distracted as he steals the election. Second, after the election, with him hopefully defeated, he won’t be able to order Holder to heap on yet more false charges as you state and I agree will occur if the appropriate verdict is reached in this trial. There are many other reasons, but these two are the main ones and you seem to be aware of what’s going on. Our troll is really showing his complete ignorance on this one.

  • lao

    LOL!! More “ignoring” from bobby as expected.

    The concept of Trial By Blog is very simple.

    When bobby and others, feel the desperate need to examine in the tiniest details everything that supposedly happened between Martin and Zimmerman, over and over and over again, and, most importantly, pass your own personal verdict, that’s Trial By Blog.

    I understand you are dismayed that ALL the evidence, including stuff you don’t know about, will be examined in a court of law, in front of a judge as opposed to being decided by you.

    Fortunately, as I have said several times before YOU bobby, have no influence on this case whatsoever.

  • Jester

    I have mocked the inclination of the parrots around here to dissect the minute details

    Oh, I suppose you don’t know anything about dissecting minute details at all, do you lao?

  • lao

    youjest, you won’t see me doing it multiple times in five dozen plus threads on the same topic.

  • Bob Roberts

    Today, and in general Saturdays, will henceforth be “Kick the Troll” days. I still suggest we ignore him the rest of the week and see how that works, knowing he’s paid to be here and try to disrupt, distract & hassle us.

    As for:

    lao says: April 20, 2012 at 10:50 am

    and

    lao says: April 21, 2012 at 2:25 pm

    —————-
    Over and over lao lies, claiming we’re putting someone on trial when we point out what the world already knows, with the details that are all public knowlege:

    Zimmerman shot Martin because Martin was attempting to murder Zimmerman and Zimmerman’s only way to defend himself was to shoot Martin.

    Now in a trial, someone has to be on trial.

    So, lao, if we’re REALLY engaging in trial by blog, WHO IS THE DEFENDANT?

    You won’t answer, because you can’t answer, because your A PROVEN LIAR and this proves it again.

    Now note how lao’s narcissistic megalomania is showing again, as he falsely concludes that I think this is somehow about me or that my opinions and conclusions matter:

    When bobby and others, feel the desperate need to examine in the tiniest details everything that supposedly happened between Martin and Zimmerman, over and over and over again, and, most importantly, pass your own personal verdict, that’s Trial By Blog.

    I understand you are dismayed that ALL the evidence, including stuff you don’t know about, will be examined in a court of law, in front of a judge as opposed to being decided by you.

    Fortunately, as I have said several times before YOU bobby, have no influence on this case whatsoever.

    First, lao failed to point out who is on trial. That’s because no one is.

    Second, the details are pretty serious and major as SOMEONE WAS KILLED but, naturally, lao, as a liberal, thinks that a lost life is trivial.

    Third, I never claimed that I might have ANY significant influence on these events, but lao lies and claims that I might or that I do, apparently, or that I think I might or think I do, which I never said anything to support or encourage.

    What you see is lao seeing a reflection of his own narcissistic megalomania in me. It’s more of his own feeling of emptiness and uselessness, projecting his own feelings on me because, deep down, he wishes he was more like me and so he thinks I’m like him.

    Thank GOD I’m not, eh?

  • Bob Roberts

    Sinister66 says: April 20, 2012 at 10:08 am
    ————–
    If you had been paying attention, you would know that Zimmerman, thinking that Martin was running for the back gate, took the most direct route to a point where he could view it, due east, practically, of where he parked his vehicle and saw Martin running away.

    If you had been paying attention you would know the 911 call indicates Zimmerman had decided that yes, following Martin was not really necessary, particularly since Martin had given him the slip, most likely by finding a spot to ambush him from, which he did shortly after Zimmerman hung up, as he walked back past the “T” in the sidewalk towards his car.

    Class dismissed.

  • lao

    bobby, in Trial By Blog, Zimmerman is the defendant and you declared him not guilty ages ago.

    And I HAVE pointed out who will ACTUALLY be on trial. Zimmerman. Charges have been laid and ALL the FACTS will be presented in his trial. Accept it.

  • lao

    bobby @6:39 claims: Third, I never claimed that I might have ANY significant influence on these events, but lao lies and claims that I might or that I do, apparently, or that I think I might or think I do, which I never said anything to support or encourage.

    bobby, it’s a shame I have a better memory than you do.

    lao says: April 11, 2012 at 5:22 pm
    Thanks for your opinion bobby. Maybe you should contact Zimmerman’s lawyers and offer them your expertise.

    Bob Roberts says: April 11, 2012 at 5:31 pm
    And on your claim I should contact Zimmerman’s lawyers, actually that’s not a bad idea. I’ve won every case I’ve presented so far… No legal document I’ve written has been overturned and one of them was even attacked, but not defeated, by the firm which boasted as a partner Leonidas “Leon” Jaworski.

    So yeah, maybe I will!

  • Festivus

    I’m going to predict right now that this case will not go to trial. Not on murder or manslaughter charges, anyway.

    That’s not a “trial by blog” (what a useless little twat). That’s a prediction.

  • FrankW

    If you do not wish to participate in what you call trial by blog, why offer any commentary on any subject? Ever.
    You call it “trial by blog”, I call it a discussion of various aspects of the case and an examination of the publicly available evidence.
    Do you ever discuss upcoming games in whatever sport you may watch? Do you discuss with buddies the relative merits of taking Andrew Luck with the first pick? Do you chat about NCAA basketball players that should stay four years instead of jumping to the NBA early? Do you have an opinion that you have shared with others on the infield fly rule? These are also discussions, or in your terms trials.
    You do realize that public scrutiny is a tool that helps keep the legal/political systems in line? An informed electorate is the check and balance against elected judges and pols.
    You claim it is pointless as all this discussion can have no meaningful impact. And you cite that as a reason to not participate.

  • lao

    frankie, the issue has been “discussed” by the far right on this blog in well over five dozen threads devoted to the topic. That’s pretty keen “public scrutiny”.

  • Tiredoftheracismcard

    just because he had candy and a drink doesnt make him innocent, iknow plently of people that get the munchys and have cotton mouth that would try anything to get ouot of trouble… even if THEY are the ones that caused it all. trayvon was trying to be “a big man” and take out the “athourities” if they didnt get into a fight why was his head slammed up and his noes broken. why was the gun powder res on both of them. its not like he just shot the MAN. trayvon wasnt a child. they are just using that as an peg to lean on. yes george shouldnt have followed BUT he didnt just go off shooting black people… he was attacked and defended himself.

  • Bob Roberts

    FrankW, as you can see from my attempts, lao simply is unable to comprehend that WE SAY NO TRIAL IS NECESSARY. We are not engaging in a trial and no, Zimmerman is NOT a “defendant” because you can’t be a defendant if you’ve done nothing that needs defending. You have to be accused before you’re a defendant and we’ve said, all along, that Zimmerman was acting in justified self defense. Therefore no charge, no defense and no trial are necessary.

    Our poor little pet troll simply cannot stand to have been so wrong so often that he runs into a mess of concertina wire and just keeps struggling and struggling, drawing it tighter, making it cut deeper.

    Perhaps the biggest of his lies was this one:

    lao says: April 21, 2012 at 4:02 pm
    youjest, you won’t see me doing it multiple times in five dozen plus threads on the same topic.
    ———-
    He says, after falsely accusing us of trial by blog on multiple threads, although he’s lying also about the “same topic” as they are different aspects/topics of the same event. His mind can’t comprehend that a thread about Zimmerman’s injuries is not the same as a thread about how Zimmerman was crucified in the press or a thread about how one network lied about and maliciously edited a 911 call and how none of those is the same subject as a thread about the usual racists, from Obama on down, trying to incite a race war.

    In fact, he’s such a narcissistic megalomaniac that if he sees this post, in which I’m talking TO YOU, not him, as it is not KICK THE TROLL DAY so I’m ignoring him, he will still try to suggest this post is an example of NOT ignoring him.

    He is a piece of work!

  • Bob Roberts

    Oh, I was wrong, I found an even bigger lie:

    At 6:39 I said, “I never claimed that I might have ANY significant influence on these events”

    The pathetic troll then replied, at 6:54 pm:

    lao says: April 11, 2012 at 5:22 pm
    Thanks for your opinion bobby. Maybe you should contact Zimmerman’s lawyers and offer them your expertise.

    Bob Roberts says: April 11, 2012 at 5:31 pm
    And on your claim I should contact Zimmerman’s lawyers, actually that’s not a bad idea… Maybe I will!
    ————–
    Now note the troll suggests that I contact Zimmerman’s lawyer and I say it’s a good idea, maybe I will, BUT I NEVER SUGGEST THAT BY DOING SO I MIGHT ACTUALLY INFLUENCE THIS CASE because I know that I almost certainly will not. At this point I doubt if there’s anything I can offer that they haven’t already thought of so I was just playing out some line to the troll, seeing how much he would swallow, how deep he would let me set the hook – HE TOOK IT ALL AND CAME BACK BEGGING FOR MORE!

    So, once again, the troll is caught in yet another fantasy induced lie.

  • Bob Roberts

    IT’S KICK THE TROLL DAY!

    Unfortunately he’s likely to miss it here, but we’ll see, MAYBE NOT!

    Here’s his latest lie, a repeat of the same tired one he’s been telling virtually since the whole Zimmerman/Martin affair took place:

    lao says: April 21, 2012 at 6:44 pm
    bobby, in Trial By Blog, Zimmerman is the defendant and you declared him not guilty ages ago.

    And I HAVE pointed out who will ACTUALLY be on trial. Zimmerman. Charges have been laid and ALL the FACTS will be presented in his trial. Accept it.
    ——————-
    First, we’re the ones who state that, since Zimmerman was properly found to be justified in his shooting of Martin, in self defense, as Martin was attempting to murder him, I can only laugh at lao’s ridiculous logic and self-contradiction. Note how he states we’re putting ZIMMERMAN through trial by blog since we believe he is innocent? He apparently doesn’t comprehend that INNOCENT PEOPLE DON’T GET PUT ON TRIAL!

    So no, lao. We’re not “engaging in trial by blog”. As I’ve said all along, as you still cannot comprehend, Zimmerman was and is innocent and does not deserve to be on trial. We certainly aren’t trying him, as you claim, WE ARE PROCLAIMING HIS INNOCENCE AND STATING NO TRIAL IS NECESSARY. But, typical troll, even though you know you are wrong, you can’t accept & admit it.

    Now you state we’re engaging in trying him by blog, then you say, “I HAVE pointed out who will ACTUALLY be on trial. Zimmerman.”

    Utter nonsense. Read it again and see if even you are stupid enough to deny it.

    Anyway, we all know why “charges have been laid” and we also know, as even far left moonbat liberals agree, what a joke those charges are. We all know they’re clearly politically motivated and those involved in bringing them about are just grandstanding.

    Although one thing is also certain: In fact this trial promises to be even more of a mockery than was the OJ trial, in which the prosecution was so inept and bungling that a man a majority of Americans felt was certainly guilty was easily acquitted.

    Yes, the prosecution in this case promises to be even more laughable than Obama’s team’s attempts to defend obamacare or go after Arizona’s SB10.

    And, of course, I caught lao in multiple lies on this topic and our discussions of it. Like the one that I ever said I would have influence on this case.

    Saying you might contact the legal team is not claiming you will have any significant impact on the case. But lao can’t seem to understand that. He comes to his own ridiculous false conclusions all the time!

  • Bob Roberts

    NOTE: When I said “Innocent people don’t get put on trial” I was speaking of the reasonable, fair, idealized case. As noted by the fact Zimmerman has now been put on a sham of a trial, obviously in the real world, sometimes mistakes are made, for political reasons and such, and innocent people do wind up on trial.

    I’ve pointed out how this “trial” could actually work out in his favor, though, particularly if it’s a delaying tactic to keep the Obama INJUSTICE department off him until Obama is ridden out of office on a rail this November. Yeah, that’s right, Michelle. Walk out and just keep walkin’!

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy