moonbattery logo

Jul 03 2012

California to Establish Multiparent “Families”

The front lines in our moonbat rulers’ War on the Family are often found in California:

California children could have more than two legal parents if a bill speeding through the Legislature becomes law.

The bill by Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco [an exceedingly militant homosexual], would allow judges to recognize multiple parents in cases where children would be best served by several parental relationships. …

Leno has characterized the bill as a response to America’s evolving [i.e., disintegrating] families.

How would it be appropriate for a child to have more than two legal parents?

Supporters cited several examples where the law could be applied, including a lesbian couple that conceived a child with the help of a sperm donor who has been involved as a parent, or a man who married a woman while she was pregnant with another man’s child, who also maintained his role a father.

The actual purpose:

“He’s trying to change the whole attitudes and understanding of what family is,” California Right to Life Committee Director Camille Giglio said. “Family is a father and a mother and children.”

That is, moonbats want to destroy the concepts of marriage and family by twisting them into such grotesque shapes that they are no longer meaningful. Once the most fundamental pillars have been destroyed, the pointy-headed masterminds who rule us can fundamentally transform society into the utopia of their dreams and any sane person’s nightmares.

On tips from Muddypaw, RKae, and Ianto.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+StumbleUpon

8 Responses to “California to Establish Multiparent “Families””

  1. Python says:

    The other side of this is that these Moonbats as you call them will then be able to justify having sex with anyone, any age, any gender and ultimately, probably any THING. They can then indulge in all their wildest and weirdest fantasies because it will be legally recognised and their conscience will never be disturbed from its slumber.

  2. john s says:

    Predicton: at this rate of cultural decline in 10 years time moonbats will call you an intolerant bigot if you object to affirmative action for pedophiles.

  3. FrankW says:

    This might not be so bad a thing if:
    Those named parents can be sued jointly and severally for transgressions by the chilluns (this spreads the recovery pool).
    It removes the phrase baby daddy (or baby momma) from the lexicon.

  4. [...] Via Moon Battery Share this:EmailFacebookPrintTwitterStumbleUponRedditDiggLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. Categories: Uncategorized Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback [...]

  5. MicahStone says:

    Many studies have already established that children in LGBT households suffer numerous psychological and mental development problems not found in NORMAL households. The Peoples Republic of California has now come up with a way to make that situation even worse – by helping to produce even more future adults so screwed up that they have no choice but to depend fully on the socialist nanny state for help with their existence.

  6. Paul Revere says:

    Let’s face the fact that being a homosexual is a disease of the mind. Not unlike a rapist, murderer, child molester, or necrophilia. These are all illnesses of the mind.
    So no, I will never accept laws nor people of this kind. To me they are all grouped together. Homos are sic, so if they feel accepted they now want the laws to allow more of their sick behavior. No Sir! No no no. As a father with a son I am………done, fags, sick fu..s!

  7. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    This is part of the Hillary Clinton “it takes a village” plan
    When “mom and dad” become watered down, obscure, meaningless terms to a child they are wide open targets for the deviants of society hiding behind the left’s so called “victim group” curtain (sexual perverts including pedophiles and sex traffickers, abortion industry, Marxists)
    They literally have nowhere to hide from evil anymore

  8. Bob Smith says:

    I think you’ve all missed the real purpose of this: pandering to women. How, you ask? It is inconvenient, to say the least, to only be able to demand child support from the sperm donor but not the beta provider who is actually helping mommy rear the kids. By allowing judges to “recognize multiple parents in cases where children would be best served by several parental relationships”, child support can be ordered from every man in mommy’s orbit, since surely the children will be best served by that.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy