Top White House Advisor Took $100,000 From Iran
What have we here?
Republicans pounced on a report Monday that said top White House adviser David Plouffe took a $100,000 speaking fee from an Iran-tied firm whose technology may have been used to track dissidents, claiming Plouffe’s involvement could represent a “loophole” in sanctions against the regime.
At least this could help explain Obama’s hands-off policy toward Iran, when it looked like the terrorist mullahs might finally be overthrown — which stood in stark contrast to his policy of dislodging our ally Mubarak from Egypt so that he might be replaced with the sinister Muslim Brotherhood. It should also help lay to rest the notion that sanctions are anything other than a farce, now that we know even Obama’s inner circle does business with Iran.
Don’t be too hard on Ploof I mean Pluff I mean Plouffe. At least he isn’t Iranian by birth, like Obama’s top teleprompter programmer Valerie Jarrett. At least he doesn’t have three members of his immediate family in the Muslim Brotherhood, like Secretary of State Shrillary’s right-hand girl Huma Abedin.
On tips from Dr. 9 and Shawn.
From InfoWars.com
Sikh Temple Shooting: Get Ready For “Hate Crime” Propaganda
http://www.infowars.com/sikh-temple-shooting-get-ready-for-hate-crime-propaganda/
Eyewitness: 4 Man Team Behind Sikh Temple Shooting
http://www.infowars.com/eyewitness-4-man-team-behind-sikh-temple-shooting/
Hummm….Jarret was born in Iran….helps to explain the cozy relationship that Obama hoped to have with the Iranian leadership after his election. BTW, wasn’t Obama going to meet with those leaders and get them to give up their bomb-making ambitions?
How’s that going for ya?
Pouffe and Manning: separated at birth?
http://www.bradleymanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/bradley-manning.jpg
Or just cut from the same “gay” cloth?
[...] in sanctions against the regime. At least this could help explain Obama’s [...] Moonbattery Tags: $100000, Advisor, From, House, Iran, Took, White Posted in Pundits | No Comments [...]
Plouffe took $100,000 from firm doing business in Iran
…and now we know another reason why OBOZO’s weak, meaningless “sanctions” against Iran are such a joke (except to Israel.)
America’s fate is in the hands of these people
Were truer words ever spoken?
Friday, November 07, 2008
The Jews Who Got Obama Elected
By Moshe Feiglin
For some reason, it is always the Jews who are deeply involved and sometimes responsible for the revolutions in the world. It is the Jews who are inexplicably driven to perfect the world in the name of some cause. If they are not busy perfecting the world for the Kingdom of the One G-d of Israel, then they will throw themselves into the perfection business in the name of communism, liberalism or some other ism. Whenever you peek behind a real revolution, you will discover a Jew pulling the strings.
Barack Obama’s meteoric rise to power is a revolution. It is difficult to describe this revolution because it has gone to great lengths not to describe itself. Time will tell exactly what revolution we dove into this week. But one thing is for sure it is a revolution, indeed.
Who are the Jews who got Obama elected?
On the surface, the answer is simple. Obama’s campaign manager – the brains behind the brilliant campaign of the young candidate who has never filled an executive position in his life belong, of course, to a Jew – David Plouffe. Jews were prominent at every level of the Obama campaign, as well.
http://jewishleadership.blogspot.com/2008/11/jews-who-got-obama-elected.html
and then there’s this:
Standard Chartered Bank Accused
Wow.
According to reports on CNBC and elsewhere New York State has accused Standard Chartered of hiding $250 Billion in Iranian transactions, that the acts were willful, that they involved stripping identifying information from the transfers so as to prevent identifying the source of said transactions and that this was an intentional and pervasive practice.
The allegation involves some 60,000 transactions and state regulators have threatened to suspend or revoke the bank’s operating license in New York (and, presumably, is doing so in concert with the OCC and/or Treasury.)
This isn’t the first time that a bank with operations in the United States has been accused of stripping identifying information from transactions. That act, standing alone, is a federal offense under existing laws and up until now has been met only with “handslap” fines.
Details are somewhat sketchy on the latest allegations — but note that the firm claimed in 2007 that it cut all ties with Iran. It appears that the complaint deals with conduct prior to that time.
Oh, and as for the bank’s attitude? Read this from the complaint:
Lest there be any doubt, SCB’s obvious contempt for U.S. banking regulations was succinctly and unambiguously communicated by SCB’s Group Executive Director in response. As quoted by an SCB New York branch officer, the Group Director caustically replied: “You f—ing Americans. Who are you to tell us, the rest of the world, that we’re not going to deal with Iranians.”6
But remember folks, nobody committed any crimes! (according to Gary Johnson, Barack Obama and Mitt(ens) Romney)
Yeah, right.
http://market-ticker.org/
The contrast IS striking. I would be surprised if there aren’t more unsavory connections yet to come to light.