Obama Campaign Illegally Rakes in Foreign Donations
Voter fraud will pad the vote totals; for fundraising, Obama has other means of cheating — his campaign’s acceptance of illegal funds from abroad has been confirmed:
Chris Walker, a British citizen who lives outside London, told The Post he was able to make two $5 donations to President Obama’s campaign this month through its Web site while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney cash was rejected. It is illegal to knowingly solicit or accept money from foreign citizens.
Walker said he used his actual street address in England but entered Arkansas as his state with the Schenectady, NY, ZIP code of 12345.
“When I did Romney’s, the payment got rejected on the grounds that the address on the card did not match the address that I entered,” he said. “Romney’s Web site wanted the code from the back of card. Barack Obama’s didn’t.”
Walker’s $10 is only the tiniest tip of an iceberg that threatens to sink the integrity of our elections.
In September, Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes, according to data posted on the Federal Election Commission Web site.
The Obama campaign said the FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.”
The lame excuse must have been good enough for the “mainstream” media, or this industrial scale cheating would be all over the news.
The Obama campaign’s apparent lack of safeguards makes it possible to violate the law, says a report released by the Government Accountability Institute, a Florida-based watchdog group.
The report found that one Obama site — Obama.com — gets almost half of its traffic from foreign computer addresses. The site directs users to an Obama donation page.
Obama.com is registered under the name of Robert Roche, an Obama bundler from Chicago who now operates from behind the Bamboo Curtain.
Obama’s re-election campaign took in $130,867 from donors who provided no ZIP codes and $2 million from those with incomplete ZIPs in September.
That same month, Romney’s campaign recorded $2,450 from donors without ZIP codes and $2,500 from those with incomplete ZIPs.
Walker said it should have been clear to the Obama campaign’s computers that his donations came from a computer with a foreign IP address.
The odious United Nations and thugs like Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, and Vladimir Putin aren’t the only foreign entities to pull for Obama, who can count on anyone with an interest in America’s decline for support.
Being the bad guy has its advantages. Representing the party of coercion, parasitism, and degeneracy, Obama knows he can count on his supporters foreign and domestic to have no moral qualms about cheating. All he needs to do is make it easy for them, as he has regarding both voting and fundraising.
On a tip from Artfldgr.
Would this be Trumps “bombshell” to be announced Wednesday?
Could O’Stare Me be accepting funds from…….al Quaeda?
UNINSTALLING OBAMA…..……. █████████████▒ 97% complete.
Waiting for your vote …..
C’mon!
Why is everyone acting shocked that a democrat from Chicago is openly engaging in election fraud?
What next? Are we all going to act surprised when we discover that hordes of dead people and Disney characters also voted…again?
Here is what will happen,
We’ll complain.
Voter laws will be passed.
THEY will have their judges strike the laws down.
And, nothing will happen because AFTER the election, the govt is too lazy to prosecute democrat fraudsters.
Rinse and repeat in four years when it happens again.
Our “leaders” don’t have the balls or, the fortitude to stop this bullshit and cut it off at the head.
The democrats are making our election process into a 3rd world joke…right along with our standard of living.
Doug – Face it, Trump’s bombshell could be that the Obamas barbeque blue-eyed, blonde haired children, and that would do nothing to move his Kool-Aid intoxicated base away from him, as long as the free cell phones keep ringing.
So THAT’S why Moose Shell has an extra wide rear end load!
“He gave us a fowne, he gonna do mo.”
Strangely appropriate that it will take foreigners to re-elect a foreign dictator.
This is not news. Democrats do this every single election cycle.
It goes completely unreported and is completely forgotten.
I don’t know why I have to remind anyone of this.
Evidently they are both doing it. Obama is just getting more at this time.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/22/Report-Obama-Campaign-Accepts-16-Times-More-Donations-Via-Erroneous-Zip-Codes-Than-Romney
The difference in volume between Romney’s fraudulent donations and Obama’s points towards an underlying difference between technical errors and blatant cheating.
The Obama campaign’s refusal to ask for the security code on the back of the card, for example. A low-cost feature that most online payment services include by default, and which according to the article you yourself linked, Sinister, Obama has paid extra to *turn off*. The reason Obama “is just getting more at this time” is because while Romney has taken measures to combat fraud (asking for the security code, using a somewhat robust Address Verification System) Obama has taken steps to *encourage* fraud (disabling security code verification, using a broken AVS).
Fraud can happen whether you want it to or not of course, after all the people actually committing the fraud don’t really care that it’s illegal. But the question is do you want a president who fights against fraud, or encourages it at every opportunity?
M. Wilson says:
“The difference in volume between Romney’s fraudulent donations and Obama’s points towards an underlying difference between technical errors and blatant cheating.”
No it doesn’t. But good try trying to come up with an excuse.
This is simply another indication that the Marxist-in-Chief, the Demoncrat party, the MSM, and the rest of the Left have absolutely zero regard and respect for the American people. And, with the election so close, and with the Left/MSM still able to con the people, again, i can’t say that i blame them.
Are you saying that Obama’s campaign just “accidentally” disabled security code verification on their donation sites? That they couldn’t afford an address verification system as strong as Romney’s with all that money they’ve got?
Of course foreign interests with deep pockets and shallow morals are more likely to donate to Obama in the first place, but the problem is that he makes it so much easier for them to do so. Your attempt to cast it as “just a matter of scale” ignores the fact that scale can carry significant implications, especially when one is 16 times the other.
If you strike out now and then, it might be luck or a good pitcher. If you go all nine innings without hitting the ball once, people start to wonder if you’re even trying.
Sinister66 says:
October 23, 2012 at 8:26 am
Evidently they are both doing it. Obama is just getting more at this time.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/22/Report-Obama-Campaign-Accepts-16-Times-More-Donations-Via-Erroneous-Zip-Codes-Than-Romney
–
Vastly diverging numbers, especially when viewed in context with total fundraising.
But then this lib Sistah Sick Sick is a liEberal sniper who likes to come in here every now and then and try to disinform.
Call her a Drive-by blogger if you will.
.
.
Now that Sick-Sick got me going: How many of the illegal Obama [aka the Benghazi Fugazi™] donations were done with stolen credit cards?
;-P
Hey, MEDIA: YOU DIDN’T BUILD THAT IDEA!
Not that I think they’d investigate if someone shoved their coke-stained noses in it.
.
M. Wilson says:
“Are you saying that Obama’s campaign just “accidentally” disabled security code verification on their donation sites?”
No.
It was deliberate
But I don’t think Romney’s was due to “technical errors” as you stated.
.
Given the tiny amount of ILLEGAL contributions, it stands to reason that they were due to technical errors, indeed.
Everything else is disinformation.
.
Ummah Gummah says:
“Vastly diverging numbers, especially when viewed in context with total fundraising.”
So its just the amount thats bad. So if Obamas illegal funds were more in line with Romneys illegal funds then everything would be fine.
“But then this lib Sistah Sick Sick is a liEberal sniper”
Not liberal just not and idealog. For you to label me as such when the same practice is being done by both parties makes you a hypocrite. And judging by your post at 11:22am. I think you either are, or are partnered with bloodless coup.
And so you completely ignore my point that the difference in scale is precisely what suggests that one is erroneous while the other is deliberate.
Let’s say there are two security firms that are hired to protect banks from robbery. One enacts robust security measures, but one in twenty robbery attempts against banks they protect succeed.
The other, despite being more well funded, barely puts any security in place. Three out of four robbery attempts against banks they protect succeed, with the failures largely being the result of armed citizens or nearby city police.
Which do you think might be a fraudulent company that is actually facilitating robberies?
Sinister,
You too much Kool-Aid drink.
You line up behind Obama regardless, carrying his water.
I laugh at you.
Nah, this sinister fella is a conservative parody troll. Nobody could be that stupid. His parody puts the whole obama campaign into perspective. I think he’s funny!
Obama did the same thing last election. The Palestinians were openingly claiming to have sent millions his way. Nothing was done then, nothing will be done now.
slogan
picture.froward
[...] donations. Also needless to say, he couldn’t care less — which is why he has made it so easy for foreigners to [...]
[...] Obama Campaign Illegally Rakes in Foreign Donations – again. And the media ignores it. [...]