moonbattery logo

Oct 29 2012

Government Spends $60,000 per Family on Welfare

Anyone who even now believes you can fight poverty by having the government subsidize it is invited to explain this:

[L]ast year, the United States spent over $60,000 to support welfare programs per each household that is in poverty. The calculations are based on data from the Census, the Office of Management and Budget, and the Congressional Research Services.

Due to Big Government’s inherent inefficiency, most of the money never gets to the intended beneficiaries.

This dollar figure is almost three times the amount the average household on poverty lives on per year.

Also, many coercively financed welfare benefits go to those with no financial need.

But no matter how much people are paid to be poor, poverty will not be relieved:

A congressional report from CRS recently revealed that the United States now spends more on means-tested welfare than any other item in the federal budget — including Social Security, Medicare, or national defense. Including state contributions to the roughly 80 federal poverty programs, the total amount spent in 2011 was approximately $1 trillion. Federal spending alone on these programs was up 32 percent since 2008.

Although obviously unsustainable, welfare spending does make sense from a certain point of view. The more the government subsidizes something, the more of it we get. The more poverty, the more people reliant on handouts, the more votes for Democrats. Unencumbered by morality or a sense of responsibility, Democrats will naturally spend ever more of other people’s money to increase their voter base. The taxes and/or inflationary spending required to finance the handouts cripple business, further restricting employment opportunities.

This death spiral is literally an existential threat to America.

On tips from Artfldgr and Shawn R.

Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on Twitter


  • Comrade J

    So in other words those families would have been better off if they were just plain given $60k…

    Commie-O’s picture should be an illustration to 3 words in a dictionary:

    Failure
    Marxism
    Socialism

  • http://theeveningchronicle.blogspot.com/ Davis

    When the power goes out in New York and Philly etc. the EBT cards won’t work. What do you think will happen when the run out of cigarettes, Doritos and orange soda? The perfect excuse for bad behavior to put it mildly. Next on the agenda? The storm creates so much havoc Obama uses it as excuse to try to postpone the election?

  • http://theeveningchronicle.blogspot.com/ Davis

    On the other hand the media must be grateful for the storm as it will give them a story they can bury the stench of Benghazi gate under.

  • M. Wilson
  • 762×51

    So if they just wrote each of those families 1 check for $30,000 each year the family would have 50% more money and our welfare costs could be cut in half. Of course then we would need all those useless bureaucrats. . . .

    But flat screen TV sales would skyrocket.

  • Ghost of FA Hayek

    The rest swirls down the great vortex called government
    Wait, Keynesian manure slinger Paul Krugman labels that “economic stimulus”

  • Sgt Stadenko

    The Bureaucracy devours 2/3 of the money spent on welfare programs for the poor. Nice.

    Even better: the Democrats’ plan to “fix” it is always more bureaucracy. They are NOT looking out for the “little guy”, they are looking out for the public employees’ unions. Full stop.

  • Pingback: Obama Said He Didn’t Get Beyond 7th Grade Math. « American Elephants

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy