moonbattery logo

Nov 04 2012

Obama: Vote for Revenge

After four years of policies that have not done this country a lick of good, B. Hussein has nothing positive to say. So he urges his collectivist minions to vote for “revenge” against the hard-working, normal Americans who according to liberal ideology have been oppressing them by not giving them enough free stuff. In stark contrast, Romney urges us to vote for love of country:

You can see why Valerie Jarrett keeps Obama tightly leashed to his teleprompter:

The ‘voting is the best revenge’ slip was virtually the only time during the speech that Obama ventured away from the script he saw before him on the teleprompter.

No decent person who gets a glimpse of Obama’s real mindset would even consider voting for him.

On tips from Bill T, Jim, and Bob Roberts.

Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on StumbleUponShare on Facebook


  • chronos the wonder pig

    without looking it up, who can answer this question?

    “Since Election day was standardized in 1835, six presidential elections have been held on November 6th. How many were won by Republicans?”

  • Louie

    Six

  • Issac

    “Senior Romney adviser Ed Gillespie on Sunday had nothing but good things to say about the way President Barack Obama’s administration handled the response to Hurricane Sandy.”

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/04/top-romney-adviser-praises-obama-administrations-hurricane-response/

    All y’alls better get busy a hatin’ this guy too… how about a new Caption Contest…I know it’s sunday and Jesus wouldn’t be too happy with you, ahem, “Christians” …but it doesn’t seem thats ever slowed any one on this site before.

    Or are y’alls hanging flacid and limp from yesterdays hate-ster-bation contest?

  • BABY GLOCK

    TO HER STAFF, VALERIE JARRETT [defacto "Presidenta"] MADE THE FOLLOWING CHILLING THREAT:

    Jarrett told them, “After we win this election, it’s our turn. Payback time. Everyone not with us is against us and they better be ready because we don’t forget. The ones who helped us will be rewarded, the ones who opposed us will get what they deserve. There is going to be hell to pay. Congress won’t be a problem for us this time. No election to worry about after this is over and we have two judges ready to go.”

    http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=115892

    IT SHALL NOT STAND. Our hearts have turned to the God of Our Fathers. He hears our humble petitions to save LIBERTY, and He responds.

    ROMNEY & RYAN WIN BIG…next Tuesday!

  • Jodie

    Issac says:
    November 4, 2012 at 12:45 pm

    I’m not sure what your point is, but are you aware that Jesus was crucified for healing people on the Sabbath day? That was his only “crime”. He was killed by those who believed just as you do.

  • Jimbo

    A fool being a fool: Hatefully incoherent. Unfortunately, this world is full if incoherent fools. They’re known as ‘liberals’.

  • Issac

    Remember what JC demands.

    1. Love your neighbor as you love yourself
    2. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you
    3. JC says, As you treat the least among you so you treat me also

    His message to the RICH is clear.

    1. Sell WHATEVER (all) you have and give it to the POOR
    2. Avoid ALL forms of GREED
    3. Help the less fortunate

    Of course, few people would actually take these literally but to do the exact opposite as the Koch Bros Tea Party Ayn Rand “Christians” do.

    I agree with Gandi… “I like your Christ but I don’t like your christians”. At least the modern blood thirsty evangelical, prosperity gospel, dominionist ones. So unlike Christ. Read the sermon on the mount again.

  • Anon-Y-Mouse

    Issac, you need to read the whole book…but I’m quite sure you never will, since cherry-picking selective quotes to bash Christians with works so well for you.

    You and all like you are evil, which is why you give unfettered obeisance to your deity Obama.

    He will fall, and all those who serve him will fall with him, utterly. I pray that it’s now, and all indications seem to say that it is.

    Should the Evil One win, then God will take him down in his good time.

    November 6th…the bell is ready to toll.

  • Goldenfoxx

    Every vote for Romney is a vote of REVENGE against Obummer.

  • Catblaster

    Jarrett herself recently said that after they win it’s payback time. You think Ocommie may have had that conversation inhis peabrain when he uttered that revenge statement? These peiple are pure evil.

  • M. Wilson

    Commies that quote the verses about charity always conveniently ignore the part where it’s supposed to be voluntary.

    Notice that Jesus tells the rich man to give *his* wealth to the poor, not his neighbors. Nowhere in the Bible does it say “Thou shalt confiscate thy neighbor’s wealth and give it to the poor”.

    Thus, we are instructed to give as much as our faith and finances allow us to. Some of us have more faith, some of us have more finances, a lucky few have both. But to say that it would be more moral to rob the man next to us to pay our tithe is ridiculous.

  • Ghost of FA Hayek

    Troll
    Christians have always done more than their share
    http://www.hoover.org/publications/policy-review/article/6577
    The problem is that government does not get it’s greasy hands on it first.
    Now repeat after me;
    Redistribution at the point of a gun is not charity………

  • Jester

    I can cherry-pick selective quotes, too, Issac. How about ones from you?

    Issac says:

    …Romney!… good things Barack Obama!…hatin!… Jesus!…“Christians”!…hate-ster-bation!…the RICH!…Koch Bros!…Tea Party!…Ayn Rand!…“Christians”!… blood thirsty evangelical!…prosperity gospel!…dominionist!…

    You make it way too easy for me to point out the pathetic truth about you.

    You autorantic virtual moonbat types are such predictable, tedious, washed up has-beens. Time for you to leave now.

  • Carver

    Still waiting to see all of the multi-millionaires in thr movie or music industry give all their money to the poor.

  • Rwolf

    Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest American Militias?

    Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest Militias on the Premise members are Militants and Belligerents that pose a threat to National Security?

    Recently the Obama administration stated to Federal Judge Katherine Forest that under (NDAA) The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 the President had authorization to lock up belligerents indefinitely. That they (were justified) to lock belligerents up indefinitely—because cases involving belligerents directly-aligned with militants against the good of America—warrants such punishment.) Pres. Obama could use NDAA provisions to order U.S. Military Forces to round up without evidence, millions of Americans including militias by alleging they are belligerents or a threat to National Security. Many observers believe Obama intends to extend NDAA to imprison U.S. Citizens in Indefinite Detention not involved with or associated with enemy forces.

    Hitler included similar provisions in his fascist (Discriminatory Decrees signed February 28, 1933). Almost immediately after the German Parliament passed Hitler’s laws, the Reich Government ordered the arrest of German Citizens and confiscated their guns without probable cause or evidence; delegated powers to German Police and other authorities to arrest anyone Nazi authorities claimed attempted or incited public unrest: arrested among others were outspoken Germans, writers, journalists, peaceful protestors and artists. After World War II the East German Secret Police (Stasi) used the threat of Indefinite Detention to forcibly recruit thousands of informants.

    The U.S. 2012 NDAA legislation Obama signed 12-31-11 is similar to Hitler’s 1933 fascist laws the SS and Gestapo used to target persons in Germany for arrest, imprisonment and execution without probable cause; and confiscate millions of dollars of property. Hitler used his laws to suspend Parliament and the Supreme Court insuring his laws could not be rescinded.

    During the Obama Administration’s recent request for a (stay) to stop U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest blocking enforcement of vague NDAA provisions, the Obama Administration—never clarified what constitutes a (belligerent); or militant; or what belligerent activities (directly aligned with a militant) to order a belligerent’s arrest or indefinite detention; or what is against the good of America. Under vague provisions of NDAA, the President could accuse anyone of being (directly aligned with militants by way of any political or other association; activity, statement, writing or communication with an individual or group government deemed (militant) to arrest and indefinitely detain Americans. Writers, journalists, Americans that disagree with or question U.S. Government or its allies—may under NDAA be subject to arrest and indefinite detention.

    NDAA 2012, like Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Decrees enforces censorship; refers to the Patriot Act e.g. warrant-less searches of private property and forfeiture of property from persons not charged with crime. Provisions in NDAA 2012 keep the door open for corrupt U.S. police; government agents and provocateurs which there are many, to falsify reports and statements to target any American, group or organization for arrest, indefinite detention, complete disappearance; civil asset forfeiture of their property.

    You may have noted NDAA referred to the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act lends itself to Government / police corruption; the Federal Government may use secret witnesses and informants to cause arrests and civil asset forfeiture of Americans’ property. Witness(s) and informants may be paid up to 50% of assets forfeited. Federal Government under 18USC may use a mere preponderance of civil evidence, little more than hearsay to Civilly Forfeit Private Property. Under the Patriot Act innocent property owners may be barred by government knowing the evidence federal government uses to forfeit their property.

    Sections of NDAA 2012 are so broad, it appears U.S. Government or the President could (retroactively) deem an American’s past 1st Amendment activities prior to passage of 2012 NDAA—supported hostilities, terrorism or (Belligerents) to order the arrest and Indefinite Detention of any U.S. Citizen, writer, group or organization.

    Under NDAA 2012 it should be expected that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings when interrogated, not allowed legal counsel or habeas corpus may be prosecuted for non-terrorist (ordinary crimes) because of their (alleged admissions) while held in Indefinite Detention.

  • TED
  • Momster

    M. Wilson says:
    November 4, 2012 at 6:34 pm Commies that quote the verses about charity always conveniently ignore the part where it’s supposed to be voluntary.

    ______________________

    Libs/progs/commies NEVER quote Jesus when he says “He who WILL not work, neither shall he eat.” (Emphasis on the word will is mine.) Notice that He did not say “who cannot work” but “who will not work”. There is a difference. He wants us to take care of those who cannot work, not those who choose to live off the charity and in most cases forced confiscation of earned income of those who can and DO work.

    By the way, plenty of people who some call handicapped can and DO work. I know not all are able–those are the ones who need our loving care.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy