Dec
06
2012
Chuck Woolery on Assault Weapons
Chuck Woolery explains why Americans need to have what the liberal governmedia likes to call “assault weapons”:
If Ice T gets it, even Bob Costas is too smart to have an excuse.
On a tip from The Only Other Conservative in Seattle.
Assault Weapons are good for hunting liberals…
LoL…people who hate guns, won’t / don’t own guns…are allowed to define what an assault weapon is without actually knowing what one is?
“If it’s scary looking…it’s an assault rifle!”
When the libs get that revolution they’ve been calling for…even a slingshot will be scary for them!
And here sits me with an M4gery with a night vision scope. My fiancee thinks it secksy, mmm…
“Assault weapon” is as meaningless as “saturday night special”. Neither term has ever been technicly defined .
President Clinton joined in the ATTEMPT at defining “assault weapons” by saying that they were “…not easily concelable.”. Does that mean he was in favor of HANDGUNS?
/sarc
[...] h/t: Moon Battery [...]
Bill RIN O’Reilly (registered BO butt-kisser) loses control of his interview with Bob Costas (professional midget) and gets his posterior handed to him.
http://nation.foxnews.com/welfare-state/2012/12/06/o-reilly-americans-need-wise
Van Jones spewing garbage, as always:
http://youtu.be/DkgS2o04FBM
Soetoro Admin looking to bypass Congress for ban on semi autos:
http://youtu.be/Uv15rMVN9ds
Molon labe.
Hmmm.Flat top .gov carbine. Not bad, Chuck.
I’m still waiting for these liberal dolts to explain what a “non-assault” weapon is.