Dec
26
2012
Heat-Seeking Bullets
Our gun-grabbing moonbat overlords aren’t only trying to protect us from shoulder things that go up. We are also menaced by heat-seeking bullets:
Hard to keep up with ballistic technology, isn’t it?
On a tip from Ghost of FA Hayek.







The clip was from 2007, as was this one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDZUSN8_o3M
with a CNN moonbat screeching over banning guns to save pregnant women, and telling them in essence to run for your lives if your boyfriend happens to collect guns
Well, those bullets would be useless down here.
Wait… an incendiary device is “heat seeking”?
“All political power flows from the barrel of a gun, and that gun must remain firmly in the hands of the Party.”
Chairman Mao
Everything’s gonna be just fine. Only Uncle Gene shoots heat seeking bullets, and he wouldn’t hurt a fly.
Heat seeking bullets? The mind of a pro is a terrible thing to wast.
Yes folks, it’s called the “slippery slope”. It’s starts with banning one type of firearm, and ends banning every firearm.
In 2010, 32,788 people were killed in auto accidents, and that doesn’t include motorcycles. And the ban on autos will start when?
In her defense, we’ve known at least since Reagan (because this is a quote from him):
“The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.”
Is she perhaps confusing incendiary bullets with heat seeking moisture missiles?
I think she got “heat seeking device” confused with her dildo.
Skipping over the idiotic “heat seeking” remark…
The continual blather about hunting! Good God!
It…
Ain’t…
About…
Hunting!
Id lovbe to own a gun that could shoot and cook at the same time unfortunately I believe Dragons breath rounds are still illegal
Right up there with this must watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNZczIgVXjg
These people are idiots, elected to office by other idiots. They are making the rules by which we all must live, and are confiscating the fruits of our production to fund their idiocy. They are incompetent and cannot be trusted.
Since the intent of the Second Amendment is to allow Americans to protect themselves from a government which has become tyrannical, it therefore follows that Americans must be (allowed to be) equally well armed. Any attempt to in any way subvert the constitutional guarantee stated in 2A is treasonous, and should be treated as such.
Congresspersons are involved in the taking of actions related to the governance of Americans, and as such their words are not merely First Amendment-protected free speech; such speech constitutes an active and intentional attempt to steal or otherwise remove our constitutionally-guaranteed rights, and should be dealt with accordingly. (Virtual) tar and feathers are insufficient.
“I don’t know anything about guns and I don’t want to know anythng about them”. Sara Brady, of the “Brady Law” fame.
When the Second Ammendment was passed, it was leagal for citizen to own MILITARY weapons like muskets, lances and cannons; the CRIMINAL MISUSE of weapons was what was regulated. This was the status for over a century and the only thing that kept everyone from owning a machinegun or a cannon was the cost and people asking themselves “do I REALLY need that?”.
Funny how the more guns are restricted, the more ARMED BODYGUARDS polititions think they need.
strictly speaking… I reckon it all depends on
WHAT you’re a huntin’
Killing AND cooking a deer with one click. If only it were true:)
Its funny when ladies try to talk about something technical. Watch as another woman makes a stab at it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ospNRk2uM3U&feature=player_embedded
I am woman, hear me roar!
Jim says:
December 26, 2012 at 10:15 pm
I think she got “heat seeking device” confused with her dildo.
–
I’d call that a funk-seeking missile..
.
She is way beyond ignorance and into serious stupid. I was thinking maybe she was just a little misinformed but when she went into the killing and cooking part that sealed it.
RKae, you are exactly correct. It ain’t about hunting.
Wasnt there heat seeking bullets in some cheesy movie with robots and Tom Sellec back in the 80s?
There is a surfeit of idiots in high places these days. Normally, you’d expect the Peter Principle to stop most of them, but now, we have a large portion of the Government without the collective intelligence to run a sandwich counter.
I can count sandwiches! As long as there aren’t more than 20.
Was that Ass-emblywoman Edington talking about “cooking deer”?
Maybe she should look into banning the assault fork….
How about this for a personal protection weapon and a sporting firearm, violin case sold separately!
http://www.auto-ordnancecorporation.com/COWBOY%20AD.jpg
http://gunlore.awardspace.info/gunknow/images/AutoOrdAdsmall.jpg
The woman that said “heating seeking device”….she’s so stupid…AND SHE OBVIOUSLY DOESN’T UNDERSTAND THAT THE BULLETS ARE NOT AS BIG AS SHE THINKS..those are the rounds, the bullet is much, much smaller. This lady is so stupid.
Those barrel-shroud thingies that come in
different flavors ?
…or so I hear
And she is in our government. What kind of idiot believes a 50 cal shoots heat seeking bullets. Stupid bitch.
You can buy them on Amazon, from the same vendor that makes those “assault magazines” Dianne Feinstein was warning us about last week.
And if you hurry, you can still order 9mm revolvers and automatic Glocks. At least until Obama signs the next Executive Order.
Can I put some those heat seekers in my clip round magazine bandolier pistol holster .50cal derringer quad tracked belt fed fully automatic pez dispenser?
[...] [High Praise! to Moonbattery] [...]