Jan
11
2013
In a Gun-Free Country
This is why we put up resistance now, before the collectivists have incrementally disarmed us:
Via 2012 Patriot, on a tip from Highway Hospital Student.
This is why we put up resistance now, before the collectivists have incrementally disarmed us:
Via 2012 Patriot, on a tip from Highway Hospital Student.
Alibi3col theme by 
Themocracy
They were told they would be safer without guns too!
The left is correct.
We don’t need those guns for hunting.
THIS is an assault gun :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=W8YuPPWuGW8#!
I am sure there are some scumbags working in Government currently that are chomping on the bit to be like those Nazi’s in the pic above.
whotothewhat, it is very clear to me that most of the things Liberals propose and try to foist on the American people comes under the category of “I’ll be the one in charge of this and it will either have no effect on me, or I will be exempt from it”.
Much of the agenda Liberal propose would never see the light of day if it were to be applied to them, or if a Conservative were the one in charge.
The above photo is every liberal’s/gun control advocate’s wet dream: They are the one holding the pistol and the kneeling guy about to take a bullet in the head is everyone they want to do it. And they will do it, if given the chance. Liberals always have some one they want to murder. Just ask antichrist Obama’s friend Bill Ayers.
And this is why our opponents call us insane.
By all means fight gun control laws. I own quite a few firearms, myself. And it’s not too much to point out that despots and tyrants are ALWAYS for gun control. Got it.
But to show a picture like this is insane. Bad Taste doesn’t even come close to it. It cheapens your argument by making you look shrill and hysterical. There’s no gravitas, never mind credibility.
If you seriously think that we are close enough to that kind of thing to warrant a warning, then there is something seriously wrong with you.
Fight – yes, absolutely. Fight for Chick Fil’A, and large magazines. Remind people that the hammer in Chuck Shumer’s hand is used to kill far more often than a long gun. Yes, yes, and yes.
But this? Absolute panic. You have now reverted to PETA, Greenpeace, and Al Gore tactics – and you should be treated just as seriously as those moonbats.
Jeff says:
January 11, 2013 at 11:39 am
______________________________
Jeff, given the fact that every time a conservative disagrees with a lib, the tweets, etc, start to fly out of the lib/prog/commie asses–”__________ should be killed!” And don’t think for a moment they don’t mean it. We can agree to disagree with them or say they are mistaken–but they want us DEAD.
“_______ should DIE!”
Again, a sample of the lib/prog/commie fascination with death. Death (of others) is what they live for–from abortion, to euthanasia of the sick and old, to death for anyone who disagrees with their agenda.
And re: my statement above–I don’t even HAVE to make the Nazi/Libprogcommie connection. It is self-evident.
Found in my inbox this morning (Thanks to Len)
Levin: Second Amendment not for hunters
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3pipZMUyDE
RobM1981
What would be “insane” would be to close our eyes to the cold hard facts of history.
The motivation behind that picture you see was not one of blood lust.
Rather this wholesale killing of people by government was done in the name of a “greater good”.
To usher in a “perfect race” or to purge society of the greedy Capitalists and build up one that serves the will of the collective.
These killers only had good intentions in their hearts.
Just as those who wish to disarm us do.
http://www.livingscoop.com/watch.php?v=MjQwMQ==
StanInTexas says:
January 11, 2013 at 9:43 am
whotothewhat, it is very clear to me that most of the things Liberals propose and try to foist on the American people comes under the category of “I’ll be the one in charge of this and it will either have no effect on me, or I will be exempt from it”.
Much of the agenda Liberal propose would never see the light of day if it were to be applied to them, or if a Conservative were the one in charge.
****************
A fairly decent description of Kip’s Law.
Kip’s Law: “Advocates of central planning always…ALWAYS… envision themselves as the central planner.”
Unfortunately for them, when they finally get their ‘worker’s paradise’, they discover that “workers” is what they become… slaves to the state.
Whenever I explain Kip’s Law to a lib, I continue to explain, “but honey, you ain’t gonna be the one making that plan or calling those shots. It’ll be someone else who gets all this power you crave, and I guarantee you that the plans and decisions that finally get implemented won’t be to your liking. If you dare to speak up or oppose them in any way… well, go online and find out what happened to Leon Trotsky or Ernst Roehm.”
Ghost,
There is no legislation before Congress. There is no Executive Order in play. There is talk all over the place, but there is nothing actually in play.
Should we fight? Yes. Should we let them know “we’re ready for you?” Absolutely. Should we remind them that NRA enrollment is through the roof, and you can’t even BUY many types of firearm these days because of the demand.
Yes, yes, yes. Come and get them, by all means.
What we have here isn’t that. What we have here is a huge leap that says the government is going to completely disarm the populace, followed by what you see here.
99% of the population view that as shrill. Actually, a lot more than shrill.
Consider: Al Gore has referred to “CO2 Deniers” as being equivalent to Holocaust Deniers.
And we have mocked him for it.
And rightly so.
Today Obama met with Karzai surprisingly he did not call for gun control and disarming of the Afghan citizens.
RobM1981, you might have a point on this picture being pure hysteria… IF we did not have a recent example in history of EXACTLY this type of thing happening. There may be no legislation or executive order in play (as far as we know), but that does not mean it is not being considered or will be.
I appreciate your passion, but the truth is that this is a real possible outcome.
Consider: Al Gore has referred to “CO2 Deniers” as being equivalent to Holocaust Deniers.
RobM1981
Yet the governments of disarmed subjects have committed genocide.
Over and over
How do we square this ?
Buffalobob
The asking price for an AK-47 pattern assault weapon in Afghanistan is reported to be US$150
http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/afghanistan
What is Communism but a monopoly of Socialism
Most everyone understands that Socialism thrives by creating parasites to feed off the producers of society.
But what happens when those producers are finally gone ?
George Bernard Shaw told us…….
These (unarmed) parasites are then “sorted” according to their value to the state
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WBRjU9P5eo
http://offthefbwall.wordpress.com/2013/01/11/pro-choice-gun-toting-mama/
facebkwallflower, Liberals are only pro-choice when the ‘choice’ is something they approve of.
Ghost of FA Hayek says:
January 11, 2013 at 9:25 am
The left is correct.
We don’t need those guns for hunting.
Actually, I have several that are specifically for hunting . . . . . . . . LIBERALS.
Momster says:
January 11, 2013 at 11:57 am
Again, a sample of the lib/prog/commie fascination with death. Death (of others) is what they live for–from abortion, to euthanasia of the sick and old, to death for anyone who disagrees with their agenda.
Mom – I agree, the world ignored Mein Kampf and it was a blueprint for what followed. Can America afford to learn that lesson again?
Libtards have called for the death penalty, which they are against for murderers and rapists, to be applied to those of us who know that “global warming” is a hoax.
They won’t use it on mass murderers but disagree with their greenie religion and they want you dead. Believe them when they say it because they mean it.
RobM,
Name me one time when the right took any position on anything the left didn’t like, and were not summarily characterized as “shrill” or “insane”.
That’s what the left does and whenever the right puts legitimate concerns aside or tempers their rhetoric, they lose.
The 2nd amendment was meant to address the issue of government tyranny. Under the present circumstances (some idiot in congress wants to put BO in office for a third Reich–I mean term) we could be looking at a liberal demolition of the constitution.
We are certainly seeing no uncertain deterioration of the rule of law under BO.
The IRS, EPA and other branches of government are arming up.
You also have the world’s most powerful police force and military set to take action in a volatile and unstable civil context in the U.S.
Which is to say, hyper-taxation, hyper-unemployment, the assured onset of hyperinflation, deterioration of the dollar and eventual breaking down of the free market fomented by the ever-increasing ranks of liberal parasites.
You have more and more illegal aliens and muslims coming into the country, armed up, dumb as a bowling ball and ready to fight.
All this in the context of a hyper-armed government. What do you think might happen if gasoline dries up for even a single day? What if food isn’t being distributed?
You think the government would have no interest in the ensuing panic? And government has only one rule of engagement: coercion.
How far off would you consider martial law to be when state after state legislature considers new gun control laws and BO is babbling about executive orders?
.
Right. At the very least BO is a forger and at worse, an illegal alien who, under the constitution should be barred from holding the office of the presidency.
The second election of BO was within the margin of the fraud error—- that we know was rampant.
Yet the country has no mechanism, no motivation and no interest in doing anything about these crimes or about a host of other WH criminal activities.
Similarly, the Jews in that photo may also have been men who ignored the criminality of their government. And for the same reasons that they couldn’t imagine that the last thing they would see was the bottom of a ditch filled with corpses.
.
Tell me again then, how reference to this photo is “shrill or insane”?
This picture was insane and shrill,in 1915,1938,1939,1972,1973. Russia,Germany,Poland,Uganda,Cambodia. Who did I miss?
Thats Einsatzgruppen officers holding class!
THE ONLOOKERS ARE IN SCHOOL!!!!!!
/2013,,,,,,,,,
RobM1981 says:
“But to show a picture like this is insane. Bad Taste doesn’t even come close to it. It cheapens your argument by making you look shrill and hysterical. There’s no gravitas, never mind credibility.”
– – -
One of the problems with today’s younger generation is they don’t know history. This picture is history.
This picture was taken when I was a kid, it was shown then, and it’s in the history books. History, as you well know, is reality.
But maybe we should only show a smiling Ike driving through Berlin, or French girls kissing liberating yanks, and forget the real reason why so many white American crosses cover Arlington and cemeteries across Europe – because an ambitious central government slowly began to deprive citizens of their individual liberties, and in the end, when the citizens resisted, what we see in the photo was the result.
As far as history is concerned, maybe you aren’t aware of the late 50’s and early 60’s anti-establishment movement, where small groups of actual Communist sympathizers and Marxist ideologues marched the streets of America and burned and bombed recruiting centers, police stations, various private institutions and government buildings.
While most people were focused on the new TV dinners, LSD, and landing on the moon, these dissidents were busy writing lengthy communist manifestos and planning on how to infiltrate our schools, media, and government.
If you haven’t noticed after about 45 or 50 years, they have done a very effective job, as nearly all of the elder liberal statesmen have some footprint in those planning sessions, and some of them actually planted the bombs. And in the course of their devotion to a more dictatorial central government, they have picked up an overwhelming number of converts who either don’t know, or don’t care, about history.
Desperate times call for desperate measures, and since 9-1-1 didn’t wake up the sleeping giant, maybe a photo refresher course in history is needed.
Maybe you don’t feel these are desperate times so you don’t like seeing this history. If we are insane, you are righteously naïve.
The left has said they want to spread the wealth, now entitlements are through the roof. They wanted Obamacare and they got it. They wanted open homosexuality in the military – they got it. Gay marriage – they got it. Greater immigration – with special emphasis on Muslims, got it. An eviscerated military – got it. No oil drilling – got it. Bankrupt coal – got it. Government denigration of Christians – got it.
Now the same people are openly calling for the forfeiture of guns, and you need to see legislation or an executive order for verification?
Your comment reinforces the saying, “a picture is worth a thousand words.”
A picture is worth a thousand words.
But maybe we should only show a smiling Ike driving through Berlin, or French girls kissing liberating yanks, and forget the real reason why so many white American crosses cover Arlington and cemeteries across Europe
Alphamale
This is one of the main reasons we are loosing the “culture war” Rob M seems so concerned about.
This generation has NO CLUE why those soldiers gave their lives in those far away lands.
Thanks to leftist indoctrination, they believe it was so Bush could get oil, or because of “imperialism, colonialism”, ect ect.
Witness how they are so willing to trade in OUR freedoms for even the smallest of shiny trinkets.
Their sensibilities need a slap upside their faces.
While they toil in the collective cast iron pots of Marxist mysery, they need to come to that aha moment when they realize why those old coots were so stubborn to reject leftist utopia..
“These killers only had good intentions in their hearts.
Just as those who wish to disarm us do”.
No,they didn’t; and they don’t.
Hey, I can see Eric Holder in the background eating a taco..
[...] In a Gun-Free Country [...]
So get this. On another site, I posted something similar to this and got a response from a libtard that conservatives always claim that Hitler banned guns and that it was untrue. He claimed that the 1938 German law we always cite only banned Jews from owing guns, not everyone.
I asked him how that worked out for the Jews and he has not responded. Libtards love to split hairs, lie, cloud and obfuscate until no sense can be made of anything.
Mike_W says:
January 11, 2013 at 9:36 pm
“These killers only had good intentions in their hearts.
Just as those who wish to disarm us do”.
No,they didn’t; and they don’t.
Mike – There is a striking similarity between the “good” in the hearts of the Nazi’s and the “good” in the hearts of the liberals. They both have deluded themselves into thinking they are doing the right thing by controlling an inferior population. That is why brain washing is a liberal standard while thinking for your self is discouraged. Liberalism is the bastion of group think, witness political correctness. They are evil and must be stopped.