A liberal has dropped the absurd position that life begins not at conception, but at some arbitrary point in pregnancy determined by the government. Unfortunately, this is not a concession, but another step toward a dystopia so soulless that a fetus being human is no reason not to kill it. Salon offers a look into the moral abyss:
I know that throughout my own pregnancies, I never wavered for a moment in the belief that I was carrying a human life inside of me. I believe that’s what a fetus is: a human life. And that doesn’t make me one iota less solidly pro-choice.
Why not? Because “All life is not equal.”
[W]e make choices about life all the time in our country. We make them about men and women in other nations. We make them about prisoners in our penal system. We make them about patients with terminal illnesses and accident victims.
Anyone else see the difference between killing a healthy baby with its whole life ahead of it and executing a murderer? I mean, besides the fact that most liberals oppose executing murderers.
According to the grotesque convolutions of moonbat logic, killing babies actually saves lives.
[I]t saves lives not just in the most medically literal way, but in the roads that women who have choice then get to go down, in the possibilities for them and for their families. And I would put the life of a mother over the life of a fetus every single time — even if I still need to acknowledge my conviction that the fetus is indeed a life. A life worth sacrificing.
Presumably the same thinking would apply to humans of all ages deemed to be inconvenient.
Liberalism is reducing us to a society of monsters.
On a tip from St. Gilbert.