moonbattery logo

Jan 24 2013

Lib Admits Fetuses Are Human, Advocates Killing Them Anyway

A liberal has dropped the absurd position that life begins not at conception, but at some arbitrary point in pregnancy determined by the government. Unfortunately, this is not a concession, but another step toward a dystopia so soulless that a fetus being human is no reason not to kill it. Salon offers a look into the moral abyss:

I know that throughout my own pregnancies, I never wavered for a moment in the belief that I was carrying a human life inside of me. I believe that’s what a fetus is: a human life. And that doesn’t make me one iota less solidly pro-choice.

Why not? Because “All life is not equal.”

[W]e make choices about life all the time in our country. We make them about men and women in other nations. We make them about prisoners in our penal system. We make them about patients with terminal illnesses and accident victims.

Anyone else see the difference between killing a healthy baby with its whole life ahead of it and executing a murderer? I mean, besides the fact that most liberals oppose executing murderers.

According to the grotesque convolutions of moonbat logic, killing babies actually saves lives.

[I]t saves lives not just in the most medically literal way, but in the roads that women who have choice then get to go down, in the possibilities for them and for their families. And I would put the life of a mother over the life of a fetus every single time — even if I still need to acknowledge my conviction that the fetus is indeed a life. A life worth sacrificing.

Presumably the same thinking would apply to humans of all ages deemed to be inconvenient.

Liberalism is reducing us to a society of monsters.

fetus_sucking_thumb
Human, but expendable.

On a tip from St. Gilbert.

Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on StumbleUponShare on Facebook


  • A DAngelo

    It’s ok 200 years ago dems didn’t think Blacks were human life ether this is a step in the rite direction I guess.

  • StanInTexas

    So it is OK to decide which life has more value or meaning than another and kill the less desirable one?

    Where have we heard this attitude before?

  • christopher swift (@wyatt99)

    Liberals confuse and convince themselves by their inability get beyond their glib and easy first thought. Yes, we do make decisions about human life all the time but endless amounts of thought and agonizing goes into them. Even the life of some guilty scumbag on death row gets years of court time, expense and lawyering. An innocent fetus? Not so much, apparently.

  • facebkwallflower

    Pro Lifers have always had it in their minds that IF the abortion supporters KNEW ‘it’ was a baby, was alive, we could change their minds. The reality is brave and bold enough now to come out and be honest, “We don’t care. Of course it is alive! It still is first and foremost MY body and as long as the baby is leaching off me, like a blood sucker, it is a parasite before a baby.” You want to shake up Planned Parenthood and the use of taxpayer/government funds for these abortions, prove there are NOT nearly as many abortions being performed by PP as reported. Like Acorn, PP is a money redistribution entity, a money funneling operation for the Marxist. O’Keefe Planned Parenthood on this and you will see the abortion supporters demand they be defunded. If anything it would give states a legitimate reason, outside the scope of Life vs Killing, to cut off the monies AND demand payback. Start crunching the numbers, start observing, and we may find we are fighting the war the Marxists want us to fight; the one fueled by our convictions. Then they can keep adding numbers for billed abortions — which is most likely much higher than ACTUAL abortions. Do I have anything to back this up? No, this is just in the awareness/observation stage. But it does need asking since we know how other ‘provider’ programs have been handled and run.

  • whotothewhat

    The leftist is just practicing the tried and true moral relativism. The author of the salon article is trying to have her cake and eat it too. She is having a baby that she wants to have but is torn by guilt she is having feeling she is betraying feminism.

  • ant

    Clearly, we can see again, and in the words and deeds of The Wons, that liberals don’t understand the term ‘sacrifice’. They think they are ‘sacrificing’ when someone else suffers or dies….they are truly twisted. Even Satan himself couldn’t pervert logic and though as expertly as a liberal.

  • Doug

    Maybe Diane Feinstein can hold a press conference reinforcing their beliefs in abortion and begin with…..a prayer.

  • Ghost of FA Hayek

    And I would put the life of a mother over the life of a fetus every single time — even if I still need to acknowledge my conviction that the fetus is indeed a life. A life worth sacrificing.
    Translation;
    Get them on the abortionists table, and they are ours for life.

  • MicahStone

    “Presumably the same thinking would apply to humans of all ages deemed to be inconvenient.”

    …aka, the OFFICIAL POLICY of the OBOZOCARE Death Panels.

  • Skyfall

    Yep, Micah…these are the people (and this is the thinking) that is now in charge of your health care. Doesn’t that make you feel safe and secure?

    Progressives have been, are now, and will always BE about one thing: death. They are fanatical in their desire for abortions, “recreational” drugs, suicide (assisted or otherwise), euthanasia and atheism (which, if you’re a Christian, means TRUE death…the second death).

    Welcome to Progressive Utopia.

  • Doug

    After all…..he IS the Anti-Christ.

  • JDinks

    The catholic Church has used the “fetus are not human lives” argument to escape a law suit…

    Your argument is…vanquished.

  • Jodie

    “And I would put the life of a mother over the life of a fetus every single time”

    What a farce. My guess is that there is a very, very miniscule number of abortions done to save the life of the mother. Barely any are probably done as a result of rape or incest. The overwhelming majority of abortions are done, due to the “inconvenience” of the baby.

  • 762×51

    Liberalism and mass murder go together like strawberries and whipped cream, just not as sweet.

    What a shame Stanley Ann Dunham did support abortion.

    StanInTexas says:
    January 24, 2013 at 1:46 pm

    So it is OK to decide which life has more value or meaning than another and kill the less desirable one?

    Where have we heard this attitude before?

    Stan – The answer to your question is, of course, Nazi Germany. However,the Nazi’s got those ideas of racial purity and eugenics from early twentieth century American Progressives. Margaret Sanger and her death squads just didn’t have the totalitarian power behind them to “do it right” But they originated the ideas that the final solution implemented. Now the Progressives have enough power to implement those ideas here.

    Why worry, look at how well everything worked out the last time their ideas were put into practice . . .

  • StanInTexas

    762×51, it was a trick question. I could have been talking about Nazi Germany, or American slavery, or Stalin’s Russia, Saddam’s Iraq, or any number of other historical events where a group in power decided unilaterally that this group of people were of less importance than another and should die.

    And the ironic thing is that these same cowardly Liberals crowing about their ‘right’ to kill their children spent the eight years of the Bush Administration whining that their free speech was being taken away.

  • oldguy

    As these women who have had abortions enter old age, I bet churches will become crowded with these old ladies going to church every day begging for forgiveness.

  • Bloodless Coup

    Video: Major General Paul Vallely Talks Obama Eligibility;
    Multiple Social Security Numbers…

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/01/video-major-general-vallely-talks-obama-fraud.html

  • Clingtomyguns

    With each passing day, the mask slips a little further off of the evil face of the left in this country. If anything positive can be said about the reelection of Barack Hussein Obama, it is that it has emboldened the enemies of this world and of the next in this country to slither further forth from their dark places, so that those of us with eyes still left to see, but who were unconvinced before or in a fog, can have no further excuse. The time has come to choose sides in the inevitable path of the next civil war between remaining children of the light and the increasing hordes of the devil’s spawn, and for everyone to choose between themselves and their God which one they are on.

  • rinardman

    “— even if I still need to acknowledge my conviction that the fetus is indeed a life. A life worth sacrificing.”

    Wow! She really claimed the moral high ground with that statement.

  • Sam Adams

    “[W]e make choices about life all the time in our country. We make them about men and women in other nations. We make them about prisoners in our penal system. We make them about patients with terminal illnesses and accident victims.”

    Actually “we” don’t make choices…at least not yet. I make choices that affect me and my family. “We” are the ones who decide what care we will or will not receive and how we will pay for it. Do you want me making choices about you and your health care?

    Of course, liberals believe that allowing corn to be turned into ethanol, raising the price of food and literally starving people in third world countries is an acceptable sacrifice to Mother Earth, since they don’t know those people. They can pretend that they aren’t really people, just like they can pretend that their unborn baby isn’t really a person.

  • Pingback: WHEN DOES A FETUS HAVE A SOUL? « Pukirahe's Blog

  • figment

    How long til they start building the altars to throw the aborted babies into the fire themselves.
    worshippers of baal, indeed.

    “some animals are more equal then others.”
    “great civilizations are not murdered, they commit suicide.”

  • ftauss

    “All life is not equal.”?

    Well lefties since arent’t. Such thinking was previously popularized by another snappy dressing cult some decades ago. See how well that went.

    People, we are at war. Very few people seem to be aware of it.

  • Pingback: Leftist: “All Life Is Not Equal” « The Patriot Perspective

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy