When reflexive leftism won’t suffice because intelligence is required, Obama calls upon power behind the throne Valerie Jarrett, who recently tweeted this inspiring message:
If there’s one thing we should all agree on, it’s protecting women from violence. Congress needs to pass the Violence Against Women Act.
— Valerie Jarrett (@vj44) January 23, 2013
This came out the same hour that the moonbat apparatchik serving as Obama’s Defense Secretary announced women will be serving in combat.
The arguments against putting women in combat are so numerous that I’ll just leave it at a single word: rape.
Like the push to promote homosexuality, this confirms that the liberals in charge see the military as a social engineering laboratory, in which they can exploit the command structure to inflict their will without having to wait years for media brainwashing to take effect. At best, they don’t care whether we win wars. At worst, they are actively seeking to destroy morale and fighting effectiveness — which would not be surprising, considering that it is a cornerstone of leftist ideology that the USA is the source of most that is wrong with the world.
As for protecting women from violence, a sane start would be allowing them to protect themselves (and their children), like Melinda Herman. Yet the Regime is pushing with all its might to disarm women, rendering them defenseless.
Jarrett’s rhetoric is as hollow as Barry Soetoro’s monstrous ego.
On tips from Bob Roberts, Artfldgr, Spider, and Alphamail. Hat tip: Tunnel Wall.