Kudos to Marine Cpl Joshua Boston for standing firm against America’s authoritarian enemies both in the government and at CNN:
On a tip from born in 76.
By Dave Blount |
It’s quite obvious the Marine Corps is still producing men Americans can be “very” proud of.
Love her “law is the law” comment but then gives an excuse for one of her own breaking the law or is alright with millions of ILLEGALS breaking the law when crossing the borders.
Amused, she was, at the thought of one of the little people defying the State. That privilege is reserved for the right-thinking elite only.
What is this thing called the “constitution” when held up against the desires of our liberal gods.
This little propagandist cheerleader just couldn’t understand how Joshua could deny Feinstein/ Obama their omnipotent desires.
Cpl Boston may even be able to stand up to Hitlery Clinton.
Smirking cunt gives meaning to the phrase “dumb blonde”.
Idiot broad. There are no ex-Marines.
“From my cold dead hand” – thanks Chuck, and that goes for me too.
What will I do if it passes? Just wait. See if any of them survive long enough to get to me. Take care of those as necessary.
I would have told her to stop her patronizing smirking and asked her why she was giving cover for her felonious co-conspirator David “SFB” Gregory. The dimbulb was clearly out of her element intellectually and she is one of those women who unintentionally reinforces the “dumb blond” stereotype as Henry points out.
On a side note, my wife tells me that she would have given the CNN scrunt a good, solid backhanded bitchslap for talking to her that way.
MOLON LABE. (Greek)
“A classical expression of defiance reportedly spoken by King Leonidas I in response to the Persian army’s demand that the Spartans surrender their weapons at the Battle of Thermopylae: ‘Come and take.'”
what a fu* bitch the media hack is. The Federal Government has no authority over rights bestowed by our creator. Boston is right an UnConstitutional Law is not law.
This hack bitch needs a rude awakening.
When condescending, smirky little interviewers ask about school shootings and what the interviewee would propose, why don’t they say, “I would not make schools gun-free zones. Where is the outrage at the stupid people who went along with the stupid ‘defenseless zones’ that a killer was not stopped after a couple dead? If the principle would have concealed carry, would there be a mass murder? The principle aided the shooter. Was the secretary concealed carry? She aided the shooter. A closet is NOT a weapon of defense. Guns are. Why did the district superintendent not exercise his authority, as allowed in the gun-free school mandates to let, with his permission be concealed carry? The superintendent aided in the mass murder. And you want to say it was citizens having no guns that caused the mass murder? Not having guns did not work. Your opinion, little Miss Newscaster, is exactly WHY a shooting became a MASS murder. Try and argue with THAT!”
Or, “Duh, FBI stats based on actual shootings show when a person intent on mass murdering show: The average when no police show up is 22 dead. When police show up soon after the average is 14. When an armed citizen is present….ready? An average of 2.5 are dead. Boombah! No mass murder! We already have the answer to reducing these shootings. Why do you insist on being a bimbo about this?”
Yes, it is harsh but we must start blaming the people who let this shooting happen. We must loudly start blaming the people who took no measures, other than a providing a closet in every classroom, to protect the children. We must loudly blame and say loudly, “Feinstein you were a part of a MASS murder.”
No matter how hard she tried she couldn’t make a man of principle look like a wild-eyed monster.
“….Would you be willing to break the law?”
“….Unconstitutional Laws aren’t Laws…”
Awesome. Delivered perfectly to that smug little b*tch.
Moonbattery is powered by WordPress
Alibi3col theme by Themocracy