moonbattery logo

Feb 27 2013

The Tyranny of ObamaCare Continues to Unfold

According to a lawyer for the Obama Regime, the federal government has the authority to compel you to commit the most appalling crimes against your conscience — even to murder children — regardless of how grievously this would betray your religious beliefs:

The assertion came in the case of Tyndale House Publishers v. Sebelius, a challenge to the Obama administration’s regulation requiring health-care plans to cover sterilizations, contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs.

Tyndale is a for-profit corporation that publishes Bibles, biblical commentaries and other religious works. …

As a matter of religious principle, the foundation believes that human life begins at conception and that abortion is wrong.

The corporation self-insures, providing its employees with a generous health-care plan. But, in keeping with its religious faith, it does not in any way provide abortions. For this reason, Tyndale sued the Obama administration, arguing that the Obamacare regulation that would force it to provide abortion-inducing drugs and IUDs in its health-care plan violated its right to the free-exercise of religion.

In the Regime’s corner: Benjamin Berwick, a lawyer for the Civil Division of the Justice Department.

Berwick argued here — as the administration has argued in other cases where private businesses are challenging the sterilization-contraception-abortifacient mandate — that once people form a corporation to conduct business they lose their First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion insofar as their business is concerned.

In the face of this argument, [US District Judge Reggie] Walton asked an interesting question. His wife, a graduate of Georgetown Medical School, is a physician. She has incorporated her medical practice. Does that mean, according to the Obama administration’s argument, that the federal government can force her to act against her religious faith in the conduct of her medical practice?

Berwick’s alarming answer: Yes.

Did you think those manning the ovens at Auschwitz were working on a voluntary basis?

Obama-constitution-burning

On a tip from Steve A.

Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on StumbleUponShare on Facebook


  • Comrade J

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Down with Obambian Faschists.

  • Flu-Bird

    This by far has been the most anti-constitutional presidensy in americas entire over 200 year history

  • Tim

    I guess this means all individuals who incorporate their small businesses lose all their civil liberties, then, right Mr. Berwick? That means the Feds can tell them they are not allowed to speak their mind, be religiously oriented at all (bye bye YMCA, Christian schools, etc.), search and seize their property without a warrant, convict them of a crime without trial and then burn their building to the ground?

  • StanInTexas

    George Bush designates a terrorist an “enemy combatant” and hold him without charges. Liberals say Bush is shredding the Constitution and demand he be impeached

    Obama kills American citizens without due process, deliberately violates the freedom of religion with ObamaCare, and tries to restrict the 2nd Amendment. Liberals love and adore him, while defending his every action.

    What a difference a party makes!

  • Zil Trabant

    A special thank you to comrade John Roberts.

  • Pingback: From Moonbattery: The Tyranny of ObamaCare Continues to Unfold | Deacon John's Space

  • Kevin R.

    Those damn statists have lost all of their humanity.

  • Mickey Shea
  • Jodie

    Satan had a field day with ObamaCare! So much evil in one bill! Of course, he’s got the baby killing in there; I’m sure he’s quite proud of the way he is forcing God’s people to participate in it.

    The coup de gras though, is, likely to be the implementation of the Mark of the Beast. That might be the next “surprise” in ObamaCare.

  • Tax Slave

    Mickey Shea,

    Reminds me of the time they had to cull the herds of wild sheep on one of the Channel Islands of LA, and refused to recover the mutton. The moonbats were all in a tizzy over the death of innocent sheep, but I seem to have been the only one upset that all that meat could have fed the poor in LA.

  • Clingtomyguns

    Are some Democrats at DU Beginning to Defect From Blind Allegiance to the Party and their Chairman Comrade, and actually think for themselves?

    Try finding any of this dissension on any MSM outlet:

    http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022322751

    rustydog Feb 6

    “I am not a “Loyal Member of the Democratic Party” I am a Democrat and I am conflicted on drone strikes. I am adamantly against the Administration’s justification of drone assasinations of American Citizens overseas based on an official’s belief they could, possibly, maybe be involved perhaps, in a possible maybe imminent (maybe not) attack against America. Shit this is what Bush and the GOP put forth as Unitary Executive. If the President does it, it is legal…Bullshit, it flies in the face of all that we stand for (supposedly stand for).”

    Authorization to Use Military Force. Pres Obama appears to be extending these powers further than Bush. And it appears there is nothing to stop him or the next president. Seems to me that the AUMF is unconstitutional. The Constitution establishes a balance of power between the branches and I dont believe Congress can abrogate their powers to the president.

    rhett o rick

    “It seems that those that fear the office of the president might gain too much power are in the minority. Just look here in DU. It’s full of rationalizations that whatever the president does is fine. Small war crimes are better than larger war crimes. All presidents commit war crimes so why not this one? He is only killing those that deserve it (which is a lie).

    I agree with you. Seems there is not much we can do.”

    rustydog Feb 6

    There is no excuse for siding with this or any Administration that advocates they have the legal right to execute, without evidence, bothersome trial or any review, an AMERICAN CITIZEN they think may be a threat to America.

    “Proof?, we don’t need no stinkin’ proof!”
    Kill him/her. Go into Oslo where they are hiding and murder them in the name of a very fearful America! Fuck the justice system that tried and convicted Nazis, the Unibomber, the DC sniper and how many others?

    You do not just pack your morals in the back closet and pull them out when you vote! You have to use your voice and stop the insanity. Nixon resigned in shame once the uproar got loud enough.

    We rolled over and still allow torture and extrodinary rendition (because they are grabbing terrists!) We as a nation are capable of being so much better than this.

    Just because you may be stifled by distance and maybe this sticky little thing called PROOF It is our responsibility to “second-guess” them every single day! They work for us and for the interests of this nation. WE are the nation, and they answer to us every day, not just on election day.

    Efilroft Sul (904 posts)
    78. Cheers to you, rustydog!

    President Obama could eat a baby in a nationwide televised press conference and his fan club on D-Yoo would gush how he had the courage to go before the American people and do the hard but right thing. Besides, the baby probably, likely, maybe could grow up to threaten our national security, and the danger had to be put down immediately. Time is of the essence, and due process could cost other Americans their lives, man!

    Sure, the above example is absurd. But it’s not as absurd as defending the indefensible, and so many people whom I thought stood for ideas and ideals during the Bush regime are allowing themselves to be led down the primrose path to being politically compromised. Then again, maybe they let that happen to themselves long before the Justice Department memo surfaced.

    It’s still wrong, and as you said, it all flies in the face of what we supposedly should stand for as Americans.

    liberal_at_heart
    80. I agree. The democratic party threw hissy fist when George W. Bush used executive power in this way. Now all of a sudden it is okay. It is not okay just because Obama is our President.

    Perhaps there are a few Democraps still left that realize the party they have held so closely in allegiance has become Nazified and blind to anything but blind and unbounding devotion to one evil man.

  • SNuss

    In the words of Theodore Roosevelt:

    “Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the president or any other public official, save exactly to the degree in which he himself stands by the country. It is patriotic to support him insofar as he efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to oppose him to the exact extent that by inefficiency or otherwise he fails in his duty to stand by the country. In either event, it is unpatriotic not to tell the truth, whether about the president or anyone else.”

    BE A PATRIOT! OPPOSE OBAMUNISM!

  • Adam

    At least, if Judge Walton’s query is any indication, it looks like the case could end up in Tyndale House’s favor.
    SNuss,
    Great quote from one of my favorite figures in American history! I’ll need to remember that!

  • TheLiberal

    You shall worship no god but ME! I am LIBERAL, I am your ONLY GOD!

  • http://blog.cutthemalarkey.com Vic Kelley

    Collaborator John Roberts needs to be mentioned every time we lament the disgrace of obamacare. Mark Levin regularly derides Roberts for his treason. I hope others will do the same.

  • Jeff

    Obama is an antichrist. Those who support him are either evil, fools or both. What they are demanding is pure evil: They are demanding nothing less than worship of the state as “god”.
    @Clingtomyguns, As I see it, there is very little significent difference between a Nazi and a democrat. For all practical purposes they are more or less the same in world view.
    To those who still are under the mistaken belief that the Nazis were “right wingers”; the term “Nazi” was an easy term in english to say National SOCIALIST.

  • KHarn

    “Clingtomyguns says:February 27, 2013 at 11:12 am”

    Hell hath no fury like an “intelectual” proven to be a fool.

    Really, I’ve seen it happen.

  • whotothewhat

    The more I read about the horrible direction this country has taken the more emotionally calloused I get. I use to get angry but that just plays into the Lefts meme. I use to have respect for other peoples point of view but now I see especially on the left YOU WILL BELIEVE WHAT I BELIEVE OR ELSE!!!! I even read a comment on another site from a leftist basically stating you conservatives better start respecting our laws in order to remain in this country, like we are not legal tax paying citizens as they are. But that statement was just proving to me what I have suspected for sometime, is that the left along with elites are the new landlords and we are just the tenants who better keep our nose’s clean and pay the rent on time or you are out!!! No one should ever give into them if employer does not want to provide birth control to their employees let the Feds take them to court. No surrender No quarter given NO stepping one more foot back!!!

  • Ghost of FA Hayek

    that once people form a corporation to conduct business they lose their First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion insofar as their business is concerned.
    ____
    Incorporation is nothing more than a filing status to satisfy the IRS.
    The corporation is then recognized as a “person” under the law
    _____
    So now consider the second half of the government’s claim:

    that once people form a corporation to conduct business they lose their First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion insofar as their business is concerned.

    Clearly a corporation still has first amendment rights…..ALL of them.
    The government cannot parse them out.

    So if by law, a corporation is still considered a “person”, are they not setting the stage to removal of ALL first amendment rights ?

  • Flu-Bird

    Demacrats never allowed anything like the U.S. CONSTITUTION get in their way of creating BIG GOVERMENT

  • Dupree

    This is coercion for the sake of coercion. The argument that a person has no other place to obtain health insurance other than their employer will be null and void next year once the State exchanges open under Obamacare. Next year, any individual will be able to purchase individual health insurance for themselves. So saying that this employers choice to limit coverage of abortions is limiting the persons ability is null and void.

  • Pingback: New Bill Would Stop Obama Admin’s Assault on Religious Freedom « vineoflife.net

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy