moonbattery logo

Jul 26 2013

Feds: Refraining From Killing Babies Costs Money

At last a cost-cutting measure has been discovered that is likely to appeal to our spendthrift federal overlords — abortion:

CBO recently reported that, if passed by Congress, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act would cost the government $225 million over the next 10 years by allowing children to be born instead of aborted.

The CBO says killing children will save the government money in healthcare costs and expenditures in welfare and other social programs. …

It first assumes each and every child born as a result of the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act will be a failure and thus a burden on society. One can hear a potential Planned Parenthood rallying cry – “an abortion in time saves the government a dime.” What’s next? Abortion tax credits? Not much of a stretch in light of the Obama administration’s insistence that people of faith provide abortion-inducing drugs as part of their health insurance plans.

Abortion could solve all of our budget woes; we just need to think big. If we abort every single baby, Obama could push the national debt the rest of the way to infinity, and no one would have to pay it off because by the time the ChiComs show up in tanks to get their money, we will all be gone.

20_week_fetus
Our wise rulers would spare this child from a lifetime of debt.

On tips from G. Fox and Artfldgr.

EmailFacebookGoogle+PinterestStumbleUponTwitter



  • Bo Jangles

    There’s an easier way. Sterilize (all) blacks at birth. That would end many different problems.

  • Shooter1001

    Abort the welfare babies! Save money. Makes Liberal sense. Until they figure out they’re aborting future Democratic Party voters. Then they’ll become pro-life so fast it will make your head spin.

  • SNuss

    If it was possible to assure that only potential MoonBats would be aborted, that WOULD assure a cost savings in the future.

  • Flu-Bird

    Obama is your typical liberal demacrat supports the legalized murder of the unborn supports banned all guns Obama and Clinton have a lot in common CHOILD KILLING WAR MONGERS and liberals as well

  • StanInTexas

    How do these people know that the child they are planning to abort will be a burden on society? The arrogance… THE GALL!!!!!!

  • Doug

    All we need are much more of the legal fourth-trimester abortions. Hey, our best and brightest of the young generation agree!

  • http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/wilberforce_william.shtml Wilberforce

    More contorted thinking from the world’s largest Death Cult.

  • Carrie

    I’m sure allowing people to take their born children to a doctor to be euthanized would save a lot of money too. Doesn’t mean it is a good or moral idea.

  • captain*arizona

    so cons think we need more punks like trayvon running around terrorizing good people like zimmerman and we need to tax more for more jails and welfare and more voting machines for blacks and the browns and more illegal alien brats flooding are schools funny I don’t read on this blog how much cons yes want there taxes raised to pay for obama care for these brats to hatch them and care for them after there hatched wonder why? oh yes I know the catholic church does as their priests are running out young children to molest and they can’t all move to rio de janeiro.

  • Elizabeth

    Captain! It’s 8:30. Time for your meds. Be a good boy and take these. Don’t make us restrain you.

  • Mr. Rational

    It first assumes each and every child born as a result of the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act will be a failure and thus a burden on society.

    Nobody aborts a normal pregnancy after 20 weeks.  Those ARE failures and are almost guaranteed to be burdens on society.  And who are you to decide what others must add to their family?  This was SUPPOSED to be a free country!  Butt out.

    Until they figure out they’re aborting future Democratic Party voters. Then they’ll become pro-life so fast it will make your head spin.

    No, they know that.  That’s why they want to import another 40 million Mexicans; it’s quicker than growing them, and safer with mestizos than Africans.

    How do these people know that the child they are planning to abort will be a burden on society?

    Because the amnio, ultrasound or report from the rape victim has told them that the baby has Down’s, spina bifida, or is Black.

    I’m sure allowing people to take their born children to a doctor to be euthanized would save a lot of money too.

    In republican Rome, the paterfamilias had the power of life and death over his children as long as he lived.  Think about it.

    How much safer and more productive (thus BETTER) would life in America be, if the Trayvons were aborted before they drew breath?  You know in your heart that Margaret Sanger was right.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy