Occucommies Call for Killing Cops
An “informational” letter — copies of which were left on a table when Occupy Phoenix infested Cesar Chavez Park — calls for murdering law enforcement officers. A few lowlights:
When Should You Shoot A Cop? …
Even when people can recognize tyranny and oppression, they still usually talk about “working within the system”-the same system that is responsible for the tyranny and oppression. People want to believe that “the system” will, sooner or later, provide justice. The last thing they want to consider is that they should “illegally” resist-that if they want to achieve justice, they must become “criminals” and “terrorists,” which is what anyone who resists “legal” justice is automatically labeled. But history shows all too well that those who fight for freedom and justice almost always do so “illegally” – i.e., without the permission of the ruling class. …
If a cop decides to treat you like livestock, whether he does it “legally” or not, you will usually have only two options: submit, or kill the cop. …
Basic logic dictates that you either have an obligation to LET “law enforcers” have their way with you, or you have the right to STOP them from doing so, which will almost always require killing them.
The Arizona Counter-Terrorism Information Center has put out a memo (PDF) alerting law enforcement officers to this threat to their safety.
This will be another memo DHS Top Bureauweenie Janet Napolitano doesn’t get; she has already determined that the terror threat in this country comes not from moonbats or even Muslims, but from veterans, conservatives, and others far more likely to identify with the Tea Party than its polar opposite, Occupy Wall Street.
On tips from Ghost of FA Hayak and Wilberforce.
Is this the America you live in?
Liberty Principles:
1. Sound Government
2. Republican Form of
Government
3. Morally Stable people
4. Virtuous Leaders
5. All men equal
6. Right to Govern vested
in the people
7. A system of checks and
balances must be preserved
to prevent abuse of power
8. Government must be
limited to the protection
of equal rights
9. Government must minimize
it’s regulation of the
free market for prosperity
to occur
10. Government shall
have limited powers, with
all others retained by the
people
11. Local self-government
is the keystone to preserving
freedom
12. Law must govern the
people, not the whims of
men
13. Peace, commerce, and
honest friendship with
ALL nations; Entangling
alliances with none!
14. Maintaining the core
of society—The Family
(one man and one woman)
15. Not allowing the
burden of debt to become
subjugation
Bring it on, Moonbats. We’ve been patiently waiting for you to draw first blood.
Well this is going to get interesting…
“You’re giving the Occupy Wall Street folks a bad rap about this violence. I remember seeing guns at the Tea Party rallies.”
Of course everyone remembers all the stump speeches at the Tea Party rallies calling for shooting the cops… right?
OWS is a glorious, leaderless movement!
Here’s an irrelevant link, irrelevant, just like Sarah Palin.
It’s not a fist symbol. It’s a handjob symbol, and an appropriate one at that. To be a fist, their symbol needs to be rotated about 150 degrees to the right. But that won’t happen, because no moonbat would have any idea what “rotate 150 degrees” means. They don’t teach that in the Women’s Studies program at Columbia.
I’ll be waiting with my fellow officers for the low life cowards to back up the strong words. As Inspector Harry Callahan once said: “being this is a 44 magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world and could blow your head clean off … you’ve got to ask yourself a question … do you feel lucky punk?”
Barack Obama and the left wing liberal loons try and draw a parallel with The Tea Party and the Occupy Wall Street movements. As usual with this President, there seems to be a mis-calculation in his assessment. Mr. President, it kind of looks like the same mis-understanding on how you have run the economy into the ground.
http://floydreports.com/video-occupy-wall-street-vs-the-tea-party-you-be-the-judge-2/
Cops shoot back, idiots
HYPERBOLE! SARAH PALIN! CROSSHAIRS! CROSSHAIRS! NO TRUE SCOTSMAN! HYPERBOLE! BILL AYERS WAS NEVER A TERRORIST! YOU FLAKEY PARROTS ARE HUMILIATED BY MY SUPERIOR INTELLECT! FIBBY! STANWEE! SCREEECH! NEVERMORE, NEVERMORE! SQUAWK!
Here’s a little more background for you all.
An “informational letter” was left on a table.
Ponder that firstly.
Next, here’s the text of the entire document:
Document: When Should You Shoot A Cop?
From the second paragraph: To get a little perspective, try watching a documentary or two about some of the atrocities committed by the regimes of Stalin, or Lenin, or Chaiman Mao, or Hitler, or Pol Pot, or any number of other tyrants in history.
Sound familiar?
Next, check this link to discover the article was posted at Copblock.org last June.
Cop Block
The author is Larken Rose, a self-described anarchist whose big thing seems to be the utterly discredited section 861 argument that tries to claim you don’t have to pay any taxes.
Rose was convicted of failing to file tax returns for his efforts.
If the authorities have a problem with this document, I recommend they have a chat with Mr. Rose.
I’ve been working for hours on all these links, fellas, so please, PLEEEEASE read them all.
Oh, and their not MY opinion by the way, they’re just links.
RE: Lao in Space at October 28, 2011 at 12:40 pm:
You forgot the inevitable “Hutaree Militia!!!Richie Poplawski!!! Shawna Forde!! Minutemen!!! Timmy McVeigh!!! Terry Nichols!!”
And, of course, “RNC Chairman David Duke!!!”
Actually, I’m kinda concerned about our pet troll Loud Angry Obfuscator (lao).
Normally he would have hit all his predictable standard talking points pasted up in the first ten posts. We’re up to Post No. 15 and he’s lagging…….
I don’t think he’s feeling well. Since health care is free up in the Great White North, maybe we should get him checked out.
Symbolic fists yes, but I remember a fist pumped rapidly up and down may be a more symbolic (and truthful) image.
Ponder this lao.
http://www.bigmamacass.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/flip-the-bird-thumb8408179.jpg
“An “informational letter” was left on a table.
Ponder that firstly.”
Informational letters were left on a table in a public place near its target audience? You wish us to ponder the fact that they were left in the single most obvious and commonly used location you’d expect such a leaflet to be located? Uh, ok…
“To get a little perspective, try watching a documentary or two about some of the atrocities committed by the regimes of Stalin, or Lenin, or Chaiman Mao, or Hitler, or Pol Pot, or any number of other tyrants in history.
Sound familiar?”
From experience, it sounds like the sort of thing anarchists say on a regular basis.
‘Kay, so we’ve got a bunch of fliers have been left in exactly the sort of place you’d expect a flier to be left and an anarchist is sounding just like a typical anarchist. This isn’t the most devastating counter argument I’ve ever come across so far, but let’s see if things pick up later on:
“The author is Larken Rose, a self-described anarchist whose big thing seems to be the utterly discredited section 861 argument”
The author is a clueless leftist kook. In other words, exactly the sort of person whose ramblings you’d expect the #Occupy losers to listen to. This pointing out the cocking obvious debating tactic is as bizarre as it is ineffective.
“If the authorities have a problem with this document, I recommend they have a chat with Mr. Rose.”
With groups such as “Chalk the Police” throwing their weight behind these dumbass protests, the authorities have, in stead, decided to look a little closer to the scene:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/70663794/Untitled-1
The Utopia report:
Communist countries
http://geography.about.com/od/lists/tp/communistcountries.htm
I’m not surprised I have to walk you through it little smore.
The point about a letter being left on the table is, we have no idea who put it there or why. Larkin Rose, the author, appears to live in Pennsylvania.
I quoted the document: “To get a little perspective, try watching a documentary or two about some of the atrocities committed by the regimes of Stalin, or Lenin, or Chaiman Mao, or Hitler, or Pol Pot, or any number of other tyrants in history.
Then I asked: Sound familiar?”
little smore replied: From experience, it sounds like the sort of thing anarchists say on a regular basis.
Oh Really?
AC says: October 27, 2011 at 1:45 pm
What I brought up was an example of the poisonous thinking which arises from extremist political movements which dream up extreme methods for dealing with enemies….
Maybe the Weather Underground was not the best example. Should I have played the Stalin card instead? He put into practice what the WU only dreamed about.
What’s this thread about again? Oh right. “Occucommies”. Blount concludes: Commies love fist symbols because they imply violence.
Are you really going to try to pretend that “commie” is not moonbattery’s catch-all epithet to denegrate everybody on the left?
Hmm, but wait a sec. Blount says the Occupy Phoenix people are commies. But Stalin, Lenin and Chairman Mao are commies.
So you want to claim the Occupy Phoenix commies supposedly support a document that cites atrocities committed by really bad commies. O-K.
Browsing through the document some more you’ll find this: “You have the right to have guns, but if we try to forcibly and illegally disarm you, and you resist, we have the right to kill you.” (Ask Randy Weaver and the Branch Dividians (sic) about that one.)
How often do we hear the left standing up for Randy Weaver and the Branch Davidians?
How often do we see moonbattery’s parrots exclaim “buy ammo!”?
And your point IS??
lao says: October 28, 2011 at 4:29 pm
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
———-
The “Occupy” movement is full of the usual “useful idiots” who glorify Marx, Lenin, Che and who don’t understand that it’s not Capitalism that is to blame for ANY of our problems – rather it’s government interference in Capitalism. The only remotely Capitalism related issue where they have a point is the CRONY CAPITALISM of the Democrats. It’s been going on since Dodd and others had their deals with COUNTRYWIDE which led up to the mortgage meltdown. It’s most recent famous examples are the government strong-arming of GM so that those who invested in the company lost everything and the unions got a huge payday, along with the BILLIONS Obama is funneling to those who helped him get elected in 2008 by way of questionable loans to companies that even an idiot can see will be bankrupt soon.
Well, let’s review what we DO know, shall we ?
We know that one of the main strategies of the protesters is to get arrested, and get arrested they “much”, by the thousands so far.
They have upped the ante in Oakland and Atlanta by physically challenging police.
Illicit drugs, and the dealing thereof runs rampant in these camps (which police know always brings other problems)
They are tresspassing in New York (Zuccotti Park) in which the owners we all know in the end will be sued out of existance by the Lawyers Guild for good measure.
Are these lawyers advising the protesters on the law itself ? Or only the loopholes for AFTER they have been arrested ?
Are these grounds for disbarment ?
So now your average OWS protester, who has been guided thus far by these rougue lawyers, not to mention the organizers, leaders, and attendees who are Marxists, Anarchists, drug dealers, local vagrants, recent releasees from prison (NY) finds this pamplet advising them to strike at the police. And to protesters who are either emotionally charged, mentally imbalanced, high as a kite, or all three.
And Lao demands we dismiss it on the grounds that the supposed author refuses to pay his personal tax bill, and therefor is not one of them.
Will this be included in your condolences to some officers family as well ?
Keep this all in mind, (plus the potential for looting) as these OWS groups have extended an open invitation to all manner of mayham and it’s actors. But when it shows up, you Lao, embrace the mayham(as it advances your cause) yet disown the actors involved in it.
No, lao.
We know who the CPUSA is.
Workers of the world unite.
We know who “Che” was.
What the clenched fist means.
The encircled “A” symbol
And they are VERY WELL represented there.
We know who is paying the Lawyers Guild ‘s bill.
And we know the Democrat party is walking a high wire out to them to retrieve their votes.
We know you are doing everything in your power to steady that wire.
I feel so sorry for Law Enforcement, they are literally damned if they do and damned if they don’t.
The ACLU has a pack of lawyers ready to pile on any Officer who even looks at one of these scum bag OWS protestors crossways.
It’s a no win situation.
The smart Officer soon learns that less is more.
The best thing the Cops can do is try to contain the virus and wait it out.
Winters coming…
Ghost, when I read your first line I suspected the information “what we DO know” might be…questionable. I was not disappointed. Your claims that I “embrace the mayhem” are absurd.
Back to the “informational letter”.
As I’ve already pointed out, we have no idea who left it at the demonstration or why.
How easy would it be for someone to attend a Tea Party rally and drop the same article on a table where someone in the police or media could “find” it? Would you regard that discovery as proof the Tea Party is calling for the killing of cops?
Larkin Rose wrote the article and it was posted to the net in June, three months prior to the start of the O.W.S. protests.
Obviously, the article was not written with O.W.S. in mind.
Lao
As usual you respond by pole vaulting over the main point.
Do you deny that getting arrested is an OWS strategy ?
Do you deny there is rampant drug use in these “camps” ?
Do you deny that Anarchists, Socialist, Communist, Che admiring individuals with revolution on their minds are the chief actors here ?
Do you deny that there is an atmosphere of high friction between protesters and the police ?
And this friction is generated exclusively on the protesters side ?
Would you deny there is a rather sizeable number of “protesters” who are there specifically waiting for the looting to commence ?
In fact, those who are there ONLY to support the Dodd Frank regulatory act, and nothing else are an extreme minority.
And now thrown into the mix, this incendiary pamphlet is somehow NOT like pouring gasoline onto an open flame ?
The difference is that at a Tea Party rally, BECAUSE lawlessness was NOT tolerated, a MR Rose showing up with his trash would be an extreme outlier. In fact, he likely would have been CHASED OFF.
Mr Rose (or his supporters) likely felt they “fit in” there. Why was that ?
But I will concede that the media WOULD still portray him as a Tea Party leader.
My point is not about Rose himself, the country is FULL of these nuts.
My point is about an atmosphere created by the left in which the “Mr Roses” of the world fit in and thrive, even farmed you might say, for their precious vote.
(plays violin)
Yes, I would deny those claims. Are there SOME people there who fit your breathless stereotypes? Of course.
FYI – Mr Rose lives in Pennsylvania and there’s no indication on his web site he actually visited Occupy Phoenix.
Somebody else, motivation unknown, decided to drop his four month old article on a table there.
Are you even slightly embarrassed to note that the “incendiary pamphlet” was actually NOT gasoline poured onto an open flame and it FAILED to produce any fire?
It’s a weekend. Relax. You may think vigorously beating your breast is good for you, but it isn’t, unless your heart has stopped.
[...] 358.) Who releases guidelines for killing cops? [...]