Oct
29
2011
Vehicle-Mounted Active Denial System
If they won’t lay down napalm over the lawless Occupy Wall Street scum, would they at least use one of these?
On a tip from Son of Taz
If they won’t lay down napalm over the lawless Occupy Wall Street scum, would they at least use one of these?
On a tip from Son of Taz
Alibi3col theme by 
Themocracy
If they used it on the Occuzombies, suddenly and swiftly, Obama would dismantle our military!
………shit I almost thought this thing was a SMART-T.
Cheaper to just dangle some pot on a stick and lead the occupy wallstreet folks to liberal neighborhoods.
If Anonymous keeps provoking Los Zetas then the napalm won’t be required. They might do themselves in with their own stupidity.
Unless it has an “incinerate” setting, what’s the point. Better yet would be a de-brainwashing neural neutralizer to clean out the manchurian conditioning.
I don’t agree. Spending millions of dollars for the active denial system seems silly when you can just use good old fashioned night sticks to disperse and subdue the filthy vermin.
Seriously though, could you use one of these on the OWS and get away with it legally? Let’s say you hide it inside a fiberglass-sided rental truck and just drive around the square causing delicious mayhem.
Is it technically considered an ‘attack’ and a criminal act? What law(s) would be broken?
Occuweenie Roast! Nightsticks work…But then someone would raise flak about violence. We could suggest firehoses someone would harken back to times of racial tensions. Couldn’t we just have a water main burst near the Occuweenies. And watch the campout float away…
Except for the problem that the “Commander in Chief” of the military actually paid for the protests.
I’m not impressed either. Whatever this thing costs – and you know it’s a lot – Tear gas, night sticks, fire hoses, rubber hoses and plastic bullets are cheaper.
Could the effect be reduced with a plastic shield? Could it be REVERSED with a large mirror or other reflective surface? Just wondering.
Getting people to flinch from heat isn’t enough; protestors can still be trained to resist the immediate effects. The OWS crowd will just regroup an hour later. Serious Communist radicals only understand severe pain and incapacitation, like a club to the head or the kneecap.
I prefer Napalm.
Imagine this thread was on HuffPo. Imagine all comments directed at O.
W.S. referenced the Tea Party instead.
Imagine the editorial portion said If they won’t lay down napalm over the Tea Party scum, would they at least use one of these?
Pretty predictable what Blount’s reaction would be then isn’t it?
From Verum Serum:
Video: Oakland Occupier Admits Protesters Were Throwing Rocks, Bottles at Police
http://www.verumserum.com/?p=31747
CROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSHAIRS!
Violent rhetoric! Someone’s gonna die because of the careless violent speech, except, of course, if the OWS puts out pamphlets in determining when it’s alright to shoot a cop!
So the suggestion of “careless violent speech” is bad when the left does it but ok when the right does it?
Nobody knows who put out the article. The article was not created by O.W.S. it was written and posted on the web last June.
If a left wing agent provocateur drops the same article on a Tea Party table, will you conclude that proves how dangerous the Tea Party is?
HERE IS THE QUESTION YOU SHOULD BE ASKING YOUR CONGRESSMEN AND SENATORS…
WHY HAS OUR GOVERNMENT ALLOWED AND ENCOURAGED ILLEGAL ALIENS TO PLUNDER OUR NATION AND STEAL JOBS AND LIMITED RESOURCES FROM IT’S CITIZENS?
LEARN MORE HERE
http://www.thepostemail.com/category/business/
Well, Bloodless, the question I think should be asked of congresscritters is, “WHY HAS OUR GOVERNMENT PLUNDERED OUR NATION AND STOLEN JOBS AND LIMITED RESOURCES FROM ITS CITIZENS?”
It is not a given that a government has to be corrupt. It is not a given that a government has to undertake the destruction of the people it governs.
BTW that microwave unit will disperse hippies but use it and it will prove to be the biggest magnet for tort lawyers ever invented.
“Could the effect be reduced with a plastic shield? Could it be REVERSED with a large mirror or other reflective surface? Just wondering. ”
no. You’s need a microwave mirror designed specifically to reflect the specific wavelength put out by the device (and if the army is smart, they made it tunable to prevent just that, like they made frequency hopping radios to prevent people listening in).
It could be a valuable addition to the arsenal of crowd control troops/police because of its massive range.
Mounted on a helicopter or rooftop, you could reach deep into a crowd and take out the instigators (who’re as we all know usually safely at the back, away from the water cannon and batons).
If it doesn’t work, cook the crowd before moving in with the riot police to pick up the pieces. Water cannon can still be used as needed, but this will be less messy (and you never run out of water and CS again).
Better yet one of these…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgpQBZF2sZQ