moonbattery logo

Nov 30 2011

Occupy Wall Street: A Herd of Useful Idiots

Occupied Sheep useful idiots

In the end, participants in the floundering Occupy Wall Street movement will go down as tools exploited by malevolent authoritarians who want to increase the power of the very establishment the Occulosers claim to oppose, as noted by D. Christian Moore:

Lenin used to refer to well intentioned and misguided middle class students who carried water for the Bolsheviks and later the Soviets in Russia and the west as “useful idiots”. The point being that these youths were so blinded by idealistic passion that they remained willfully ignorant to the danger posed by the wolves they were attempting to bring to power and support. The useful idiots were the sheep blissfully allowing the wolves to travel among them and blithely ignorant to the fact that they would be devoured once the wolves had killed the shepherds. …

A cursory glance at the powers behind the movement reveal a who’s who of radicals with ties to ACORN, SEIU, Communist Party USA and former terrorist Bill Ayers; there are even members who seem to be using OWS to honor Greek communist terror group N17. N17 is responsible for attacks on American service members and the murder of a CIA station chief during the Cold War. Similarly, a list of the lawyers representing OWS reveals many of the same lawyers who happily rushed to represent confessed Al Qaeda terrorists and have ties to some extremely radical socialist movements.

Someone who shares affiliations with many of these same nefarious entities is the very personification of the establishment, our Community Organizer in Chief, who despite showering more money upon crony capitalists than any other corrupt ruler in history managed to escape the wrath of the self-styled 99% — unless there was an Occupy 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue infestation that didn’t make the news.

These kids would do well to read reformed communist George Orwell’s classic tale Animal Farm and Ayn Rand’s semi-autobiographical We the Living. Or they could read the histories of the Soviet Union, Cuba, Jacobin France, Nazi Germany and a hundred other places and times. Often, those who attempt to rally anger in order to “redistribute wealth” and “eat the rich” are simply attempting to take that wealth and power for themselves and will discard the huddled masses as soon as they have served their purpose and are no longer useful, just idiots.

In the case of the Occupy Wall Street — which was hyped by the Democrat establishment and whitewashed by its “mainstream” media wing — the supposed revolution is by our rulers against the last constraints on them. Most of the ill-smelling idiot sheep of OWS have only the vaguest idea what they’ve been agitating for.

Graphic and tip compliments of Zappatrust.

EmailFacebookGoogle+PinterestStumbleUponTwitter



  • chuck in st paul

    This morning on several other blogs I found the usual suspects whinging on about the top 1% owning everything and somehow that’s why they can’t get a job paying six figures like it says in the voices in their heads.

    The ONE BIG THING that keeps getting swept under the LSM carpet again and again is that the 1% (or 10%, etc.) are not the same people over time. The top dogs in America for the most part climb up, then retire or screw up and slide back down. I grant you, some of the top 1% get there early and stay there their whole lives (Bill Gates), but most of them fall back because they no longer get those million dollar paychecks.

    That makes room for the next crop of successful folks to rise to the top. Rinse. Repeat. duh. Except of course, if you have a degree in Journalism or dead languages.

  • Mickey Shea

    I just read that the cleanup crew in LA needs hazmat suits, these monkeys essentially destroyed the park, the whole place reeks of urine and feces, there are concerns about bacterial contamination.
    The whole thing reminds me of a bunch of infants jammed into a playpen, pissing and shitting and bawling.

  • GoY

    If I understand OWS properly, “Democracy looks like” people living in tents, crapping in the streets, spreading disease, and mindlessly repeating everything their leaders say.

  • StanInTexas

    GoY, it also means…

    “Give me FREE FOOD, FREE INTERNET, FREE COLLEGE, a FREE PLACE TO STAY, all the money from WALL STREET, and…

    Hey, get out of my tent and put down that laptop, IT’S MINE!!!!!!!!!

  • Ghost of FA Hayak

    The top dogs in America for the most part climb up, then retire or screw up and slide back down.

    chuck
    The same can be said for the poor.
    Being poor in America is generally not a static condition.
    The only exception to this is in the cronic poor, those who enter the system, and farm it.
    Revolving door criminals. Alcoholics, drug addicts, OWS protesters,baby momma’s ect, those who fail due to their own nonfeasance.
    The left is constantly on the march to expand these numbers, by using a canvas of class envy to paint a picture of hopelessness and despair, with the only ray of hope coming from government through the crumbs it drops in it’s aircraft carrier- sized wake.
    Update
    I would like to amend the statement about OWS protesters being among the cronic poor.
    Many of them are likely heading back to their parents Mc Mansions or applying for that burger flipping job that was sooooo beneath their liberal arts degree in womyn’s studies.
    From there the ladder to prosperity leads up.

  • Spider

    To conquer a nation without the use of military force, you must first control the minds of their young…” — Karl Marx

  • 762×51

    Funny, they just look like targets to me. Dial in the range and wind, run your breathing drill and squeeze. All you feel as the target collapses . . . recoil.

    Targets, nothing more. Commies, jihadists, liberals, illegals, child molesters, criminals, politicians – a sub class of criminals, all are just members of species called enemy, and are to be hunted to extinction.

  • lao

    Once again 38,862 offers his “final solution”.

  • StanInTexas

    LaoZee, it is you and your ilk that want “Revolution”, that says you will start the “Civil War”, and that glorifies murderers like Che.

    762×51 may be extreme in his views, but he and I agree on one thing: The Right won’t be the ones starting the violence, but we will DEFINITELY be the ones left standing when it is finished.

  • lao

    Oh shed me some more pious tears along with your usual lies.

    “Waaaaaaa!! WE were not seeking violence! THEY made us start shooting!”

    Do tell me, what sort of event will your side regard as “starting the violence”?

    Yes, so nice of you to concede that 38,862′s proposal that liberals, among others, are “to be hunted to extinction”, “may be extreme”.

    I prefer to use the term “is insane”.

  • StanInTexas

    Poor widdle LoaZee, so wrapped up in your stupidity that you are unable to read my clearly stated words…
    762×51 may be extreme in his views, but he and I agree on one thing

    When you and your ilk attack citizens, start the shooting or mayhem that we have already seen from you, or attempt to occupy MY property; the deliniation of ENEMY will be quite clear.

    I guess you are in need of another drubbing, LoaZee. Let’s talk about the violence of the OWS movement compared to the NON-Violence of the Tea Party, shall we?

  • Jeff

    I find it very amusing that the OWS gaggle believe all those rich people they want to kill, eat and take from are going to do nothing and just let it happen. From what I have seen in my life time and from reading history, that one of the surest ways to get yourself dead prematurely is to steal the other guys money (e.g. note the drug violence in Mexico) or have sex with some elses mate. Meanwhile behind closed doors and at $3,500 a plate fund raisers; quid pro quos deals are done between the politican and those rich people.

  • StanInTexas

    Jeff, one need only to look at their dealings with the police… The OWS Scum call them pigs, spit at them, throw things at them, refuse to follow directions, and then rush the police. And what do they do next?

    “Why are you being so MEAM to us? We were just peacefully protesting! Don’t arrest us. Don’t TASE me, bro!”

    Pathtic little babies!

  • lao

    Events like 38,862′s proposal have historically been described by words, like “genocide”, “holocaust”, “final solution”, “killing fields” and “crimes against humanity”.

    It’s someone on YOUR side making that proposal stanwee and you backed him up by saying your clearly stated words: but we will DEFINITELY be the ones left standing when it is finished.

    Behold, a demonstration of how good citizens become monsters.

    Meanwhile, I’m afraid you will spend a long, long time behind your little door, fruitlessly waiting for the ENEMY.

    Try looking in the mirror.

  • Bob Roberts

    lao says: November 30, 2011 at 10:43 am
    ——————
    The occu-zombies repeatedly do all they can to provoke authorities. They’ve damaged property, threatened people, openly call for murder and cannibalism and each time lao can only make excuses and say they don’t mean it. Of course, this is the same as his famous “crosshairs” rants over benchmark symbols. He ignored it when Democrats used bullseyes, which can only be seen as a deliberate attempt to use something that was clearly a target, nothing else, let someone on the other side say something and all of a sudden that is all he can see or talk about. Now we see the same thing with “762×51″, which, for all we know, is another one of HIS sock puppets.

    Certainly enough of us are on record as being against ANY such rhetoric from ANYONE, and have never shirked from condemning it any time it has come up, that lao has NO leg to stand on (having chowed down on both of his repeatedly) even with his token “I abhor violence” statements on the one hand even as he goes out of his way to justify it and goes further to try to blame it on the right. Take his ranting on and on, admitting, supposedly, that it wasn’t the right’s fault that Loughner did what he did, then of course he turns right around and tries to suggest it actually was. He ignores the constant use of emotional arguments and blatant attempts by the left to stir their base up to angry action. But the biggest lie from his ilk is that this “occupy” nonsense is a peaceful movement. The leftist media already let the cat out of the bag, going on about how all this movement needs now is a “Kent State Moment”. All along the idea here was for this movement to get out of hand, in hopes that the weapons would come out and people participating would die. Cannon fodder. Tools. Useful idiots. Then, finally, martyrs.

    And lao pretends not to see it.

    He’s not fooling anyone. And neither are the obamunists who are behind this nonsense.

    Pity, though, that the incompetence of those who voted for t hem is so complete, because they can’t even manage to die for the cause right.

  • StanInTexas

    LaoZee, you can stop being a simpering fool any time.

    There is nothing monsterous about defending one self against an invasion of vermin. You and your pathetic ilk think you can threaten people, destroy their property, steal their belongs, and attack them; while you run and hide behind the law. News flash for you, you pissy little bitch. You come to MY house with that attitude and I will drop your ass in the street.

    I am not waiting or hiding from any enemy, as I know where they are. But if that enemy comes to me looking for a fight, I promise they will get it. You want to step up, pussy?

    And you can practice your smug attidite in the mirror all you want, Vega. If you can stand to look at your sickening reflection.

  • StanInTexas

    BTW, LaoZee, those words you used…
    “genocide”, “holocaust”, “final solution”, “killing fields” and “crimes against humanity”.

    Those words exist thanks to LIBERALS like you and your love & support for the mass murderers that orchestrated them.

  • Bob Roberts

    Philadelphia and Los Angeles grow a pair, finally.

    You know, the authorities are still colluding with this bowel movement.

    As winter wore on and these encampments became more of a joke, those who arranged and who have been manipulating these gatherings all along- “leaderless”, yeahRITE! – realized they’d gone of half-cocked. No way it would have lasted through the winter. Likely anyone stupid enough, at least in Philadelphia, to stay involved would wind up in the hospital or, worse, would save “762×51″ the trouble of “hunting them down” or whatever foolish thing he allegedly said.

    By the way, unlike lao, we don’t approve, even secretly, of such talk from EITHER side. While my faith has been shaken by the overwhelming stupidity of the left as illustrated daily here by lao, I still hope that I am correct in my basic belief that common sense, fact, truth and logic will triumph in the end.

    —————

    Police in Los Angeles and Philadelphia stormed Occupy Wall Street encampments under darkness Wednesday to arrest or drive out some of the longest-lasting protesters since crackdowns ended similar occupations across the country.
    Dozens of officers in riot gear flooded down the steps of Los Angeles City Hall just after midnight and started dismantling the two-month-old camp two days after a deadline passed for campers to leave the park. Officers in helmets and wielding batons and guns with rubber bullets converged on the park from all directions with military precision and began making arrests after several orders were given to leave.
    The raid in Los Angeles came after demonstrators with the movement in Philadelphia marched through the streets after being evicted from their site. About 40 protesters were arrested after refusing to clear a street several blocks northeast of City Hall, Philadelphia Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey. They were lined up in cuffs and loaded on to buses by officers. Six others were arrested earlier after remaining on a street police that police tried to clear.

    At least two dozen people had been arrested in the first two hours and police said they planned to arrest the 75 people remaining in the park. Police Cmdr. Andrew Smith said one person was arrested for violence against a police officer, but Smith couldn’t provide details.
    Police used a cherry picker to pluck five men from trees. Two others were in a tree house — one wore a crown and another taunted police with an American flag.
    In Philadelphia, police began pulling down tents at about 1:20 a.m. EST after giving demonstrators three warnings that they would have to leave, which nearly all of the protestors followed. Dozens of demonstrators then began marching through the streets and continued through the night.
    Ramsey said breaking up the camp in the early-morning hours helped minimize any disruption to businesses and traffic.
    “We acknowledge the fact that we are going to have to leave this space …. but in another sense this has been our home for almost two months and no one wants to see their home taken away from them,” Philadelphia protestor Bri Barton, 22, said before police began clearing out the camp.
    “Whether or not we have this space our work in the city is nowhere near done,” she said.

    —————–

    Not done, indeed, for they have yet to successfully provoke the “Kent State Moment” that is the true sole goal of this movement.

  • Jeff

    The only thing lao can contribute is his usual condiscending snarky comments, and the delusions of grandur, being so superior to rest rabble. I dont recall any practical solutions he has made. There is no shortage of lefties; Lenin, Stalin, Che, Mao, Pol Pot, Bill Ayers and Hitler (an admited socialist) who believe killing their enemies and have done so. Again if believe there is a better way, then name it. I have yet to see a riot at a TEA party event, not one death of a person being there, or raped. I have yet to see a picture of a TEA partier, deficating in public.

  • lao

    Uh-oh, bobby’s off on cannibalism again. Once a flake, ALWAYS a flake.

    And now it’s “benchmark symbols”?? TOO funny.

    Call up Sarah Palin and tell her she made a mistake in that Hannity interview when she called them crosshairs.

  • Bob Roberts

    IF IT WERE REALLY THE 99% (based on quick estimates from data from various web sources – not intended to be represented as “exact”, just a reasonable estimate):

    The population of New York City is estimated to be 8,391,881. Now you tell me. Were 99% of that figure at the “Occupy Wall Street” demonstrations, or was it closer to a tiny fraction of 1%?

    The population of Los Angeles is estimated to be 3,792,621. Were 99% of that figure at “Occupy L.A.”? Or was it closer to a tiny fraction of 1%?

    The population of San Diego is estimated to be 3,095,313. Were 99% of that figure at “Occupy San Diego”? Or was it closer to a tiny fraction of 1%?

    The truth about this movement was that it was not even a number approaching 1% and certainly wasn’t “the 99%” as repeatedly claimed in false attempts to make these idiots believe they had traction.

    But, for the sake of honesty and accuracy,I did find ONE place where, I suppose, one might say that over 1% did join this joke of a movement.

    Now if we could only convince all the others to gather there as well. Perhaps they’d either quickly learn their methods are ridiculous and doomed to fail, or nature would take them and solve the problem for us.

    And no, I don’t want them dead – but it would be an appropriate “Kent State Moment” for this movement if they would just go “Occupy the Tundra” for the next three months or so, wouldn’t you think?

  • lao

    bobby sez: …would save “762×51″ the trouble of “hunting them down” or whatever foolish thing he allegedly said.

    Comedy gold. You can look at his post @9:57 am to see what he ACTUALLY wrote.

  • Bob Roberts

    By the way, even in Bethel, Alaska, the best “the 99%” can do is .016%. Some movement, huh?

  • KHarn

    LAO
    These SHNOOKS you defend love to wear Guy Faulks masks.

    Tell us: WHO WAS GUY FAULKS?

  • Bob Roberts

    And, right on cue, lao chows down on both legs, AGAIN:

    lao says: November 30, 2011 at 11:24 am
    ————-
    Of course, he left out a lot, particularly my growing belief that he may in fact have posted the remark he attributes to “762×51″ in the first place, instigator that we all know he is.

    He also left out that my point was that nature will soon take care of any of the occu-zombies who are too stupid to realize the police aren’t shutting them down, they’re saving them from themselves. I’ve been through winter in Philadelphia. The police there just saved their lives by clearing them out.

    And yes, I stand by the fact that any who are stupid enough to try to stick around will foolishly face nature and, indeed, will save sock puppets like “762×51″ from “hunting them down”.

    Too bad lao, in his haste to try and attack me, only underlined how different I am than him, because, unlike him, I AM CONSISTENT. I suppose he is suggesting I am secretly in favor of what, more than likely, HE posted under the name “762×51″ in his further efforts to try to prove how we all secretly yearn for blood. He conveniently ignores that it is his own leftist media that calls for a “Kent State Moment”, not us. So lao underlines the fact that I said “…OR WHATEVER FOOLISH THING HE ALLEGEDLY SAID”.

    Thank you for underlining the fact that I, unlike YOU, lao, am consistently AGAINST even hinting that violence is appropriate, unlike you, of course.

  • Hail The Amberlamps!

    Analysis of a “lao” Response

    7.62mm x 51 is the metric (almost exact) equivalent of .308 Winchester (please, 7th dan Riflemasters of the Universe Pedants spare us the chamber dimension and pressure discussions). The poster’s nic indicates his entire commentary here will revolve around shooting a caliber of rifle cartridge common in military sniping. He’s made references to being a Vietnam vet, it was the cartridge used in M14 before being supplanted by the M16′s 5.56mm.

    We get it. He doesn’t like commies and would react to threats of imminent serious bodily injury or death by said commies with a round of .308 to said threat. It’s effective, it’s proven.

    When he gets tired of his one-answer response to every thread not getting the pile-on of “yeah, shoot ‘em all now,” he will find some other place to post. I’ve seen it many, many times. Or he’s just a Moby, will cross the line at some point and get the stick from the moderator.

    REAL rifle enthusiasts both in person and on dedicated blogs, reliably avoid any discussion of shooting people as part of the dialogue. If you know your weapon, your load, it’s dope and you SHOOT the gun because you LIKE shooting the gun and are professional about it, you know the responsibility that comes with its ownership and protect the right by keeping that shit to a minimum. That’s why I lean more towards Moby.

    When you wallow in your own self-rightous, partisan obsession with non-violence (by definition a “lao”) it’s inevitable you will not see this dynamic and post your boilerplate bedwetting idiocy. Just like 7.62′s predictability in the opposite direction.

    You see 7.62 is a one-trick pony, just like lao.

    You two should hook up and have many children.

  • lao

    bobby, you have so many “growing beliefs” I can’t be bothered to keep up with them.

    I don’t use sock puppets and Blount could vouch for it if he wanted to.

    bobby, you are so dense you don’t comprehend I was laughing at your use of the word “allegedly”.

    I don’t have to allege anything as 38,862′s post is right there @9:57 am for you and everyone else to see.

    Of course, contrary to your claims, I have been consistently against violence in every post I have ever made on Moonbattery.

    Of course, your “response” to that is that I’m lying which is a remarkably pathetic ploy to avoid dealing with anything I say.

  • Bob Roberts

    Is it a coincidence that these posts came one right after the other?

    762×51 says: November 30, 2011 at 9:57 am
    Funny, they just look like targets to me. Dial in the range and wind, run your breathing drill and squeeze. All you feel as the target collapses . . . recoil.

    Targets, nothing more. Commies, jihadists, liberals, illegals, child molesters, criminals, politicians – a sub class of criminals, all are just members of species called enemy, and are to be hunted to extinction.

    lao says: November 30, 2011 at 10:08 am
    Once again 38,862 offers his “final solution”.

    ————–
    Remember, oh master of sock puppets, every forum has a few idiots – all you have to do to find ours is look in any mirror. We have not yet determined to our satisfaction that “762×31″ IS NOT just you posting hateful things as you pose as one of us, to further your obvious nonsense here. And, if he’s not, we all are firmly on record at being against such violence – unlike YOUR side of this movement, which openly hopes and prays for it! POP QUIZ LAO: At how many “occupy” rallies have their been open calls for violence and violent revolution? At how many Tea Parties, coming from actual Tea Party members and not the known leftist infiltrators, were there such calls? How many in the right wing media had on-air orgasms wet dreaming about Tea Party “Kent State Moments”?

    Who are the ones hoping for, praying for, doing all they can to incite or provoke violence and death, lao?

    OK even if we claim this idiot “762×31″ as one of ours, as it is clear he is NOT, do you think that evens the scales?

  • StanInTexas

    LaoZee3 Says:
    Of course, your “response” to that is that I’m lying which is a remarkably pathetic ploy to avoid dealing with anything I say.

    No, it is playing the odds, as you lie so often, we consider it your natural state.

  • Bob Roberts

    lao says: November 30, 2011 at 11:41 am

    I don’t use sock puppets and Blount could vouch for it if he wanted to.
    ————–
    If you use different IP addresses to make your sock puppet posts he would never know. It is clear from your past posts you are following this blog professionally. You have clearly logged, categorized and have at your disposal a comprehensive index of posts made here. You lurk here for hours on end, almost as if you were being paid to do so, as, hey, we know the left does – THEY ACTUALLY PAY PEOPLE TO HANG OUT AND DISRUPT SITES LIKE THIS. Obama went to the trouble, as was reported, of hiring someone to do just that.

    I used the word “alleged” because, obviously, I don’t have the time to chase down YOUR silly nonsense about something some idiot who, as you seem to admit, IS NOT ONE OF US, for we, unlike your ilk, really DO NOT support ANY calls for violence FROM ANYONE and we, unlike you, are not secretly hoping for a “Kent State Moment” to prove how superior our methods are to yours, since it’s YOUR methods that require that, not ours.

    “Of course, contrary to your claims, I have been consistently against violence in every post I have ever made on Moonbattery.”

    And, of course, you’re careful to present a facade of being against violence as you justify those who would ensure it is widespread across our land and excuse those who openly call for it as you try to push failed claims that those who do engage in it were, no doubt, motivated to do so “by the right”.

    You can SAY you’re against something all day long and it remains meaningless until you also openly renounce and disavow those on the left who continually do all they can to make it happen.

    You go beyond lying. Because, who knows, you may actually believe that you’ve consistently been against violence. But you support the occu-zombies, who’s only purpose, clearly, is to do their best to provoke a “Kent State Moment”, so clearly your actions do not match your words.

    So tell us, lao, are you lying?

  • lao

    bobby, send Blount an e-mail making your sock puppet charge against me.

    If he bothers to pay any attention to you at all, (which would be a surprise) he’ll tell you I don’t use sock puppets.

    You and hail should have a debate. It looks like he has 38,862′s number a lot better than you do.

  • Bob Roberts

    lao says: November 30, 2011 at 11:41 am
    bobby, you have so many “growing beliefs” I can’t be bothered to keep up with them.
    ————-
    We will remember you said that next time you pull up something I said days, weeks or months ago from your vast index of MOONBATTERY posts in a pathetic attempt to twist my words into something I never said, but you did.

  • lao

    bobby, I love ignoring your long winded, redundant posts so I can respond with two or three sentences. I do this for fun and I never lie. If I become aware of an error, I acknowledge it.

  • Jay B.

    lao says:
    Because the left never openly calls for the killing of its ennemies…

  • lao

    By the way bobby, I think the “Kent State Moment” has already happened.

    It’s the pictures and video of that cop pepper spraying seated and unresisting protestors.

    Much to my amusement, even moonbattery has kept that meme alive by posting silly photoshops.

  • StanInTexas

    LaoZee, pepper-spraying a bunch of retards who were TOLD they were going to be sprayed and said “Yeah, go ahead” is NOT a Kent State moment.

    You were one that got sprayed, weren’t you?

  • lao

    stanwee, feel free to tell me what you think a “Kent State Moment” might be.

  • StanInTexas

    Well, Vega, since you are too damn STUPID to understand your own referneces, I would say a “Kent State moment would involve some authority using lethal force against a protestor and that protestor dying.

    And what would your definition be?

  • lao

    The term “Kent State Moment” was used to describe comments by MSNBC analyst Donny Deutsch who brought up the point that images of Kent State became iconic in portraying the entire anti-war struggle of the 60′s.

    He made the same point re O.W.S. and specifically said he wasn’t talking about someone getting killed. He talked about “a climax moment” that creates “some imagery” and that something like that is needed because we are a visual culture.

    The pepper spraying cop pictures have done that and, as I already pointed out, the iconography has even been used here on moonbattery.

    Ask someone to choose one picture to illustrate the O.W.S. demonstrations and that’s the one you will see.

  • lao

    I should have phrased that – When the history of the O.W.S. movement is written, that’s the key picture that will be used.

  • StanInTexas

    LaoZee, a Kent State moment describes what happened AT KENT STATE! Remember “Four Dead in Ohio”.

    There were HUNDREDS of struggles in the 60′s but the one people remember, Kent State, they remember because people DIED!

    Pepper sprayed retard as the symbol of the OWS movement? What a bunch of PUSSIES. No wonder you identify with them, Vega!

  • Sinister66

    tanInTexas says:

    “LaoZee, you can stop being a simpering fool any time.

    There is nothing monsterous about defending one self against an invasion of vermin. You and your pathetic ilk think you can threaten people, destroy their property, steal their belongs, and attack them; while you run and hide behind the law. News flash for you, you pissy little bitch. You come to MY house with that attitude and I will drop your ass in the street.

    I am not waiting or hiding from any enemy, as I know where they are. But if that enemy comes to me looking for a fight, I promise they will get it. You want to step up, pussy?

    And you can practice your smug attidite in the mirror all you want, Vega. If you can stand to look at your sickening reflection.”

    Someone is sounding like an internet tough guy. Must have your big boy pants on.

  • lao

    So much for presuming stanwee might be informed about where far right talking points come from.

    Look up videos of “Kent State Moment” and see what you find.

  • StanInTexas

    So Vega, a “Kent State Moment” involves getting pepper sprayed? Yeah, that is what EVERYONE remembers from Kent State.

    What an idiot you are.

  • Sinister66

    Has anyone gone to the OWS website and seen what these wingnuts are saying. Its pretty funny.

  • StanInTexas

    You know something SISTER, there is a difference in the bullshit boasting you do about fighting people bare handed and someone willing to defend their property and loved ones.

    Not that anyone here thinks you have the intelligence to see the difference.

  • Bob Roberts

    lao says: November 30, 2011 at 12:11 pm
    By the way bobby, I think the “Kent State Moment” has already happened.

    It’s the pictures and video of that cop pepper spraying seated and unresisting protestors.

    ——————
    Yeah, in your twisted mind I suppose a few people getting pepper sprayed IS the equivalent of people being shot and killed.

    The only thing the two events have in common is that those who got what they got deliberately provoked those who gave it to them.

    I’m not surprised lao would compare being pepper sprayed to being shot and killed – no doubt he would whine and holler as if he were dying were he to be pepper sprayed.

    You should get out more, lao.

  • lao

    You can point an idiot towards information but you certainly can’t make him think.

    Thanks for playing stanwee.

  • lao

    Same applies to you bobby.

  • Bob Roberts

    lao says: November 30, 2011 at 12:55 pm
    I should have phrased that – When the history of the O.W.S. movement is written, that’s the key picture that will be used.
    ——————-
    In other words, that image will be the long-remembered definitive proof of what a joke this “movement” was. Trying so hard to get themselves killed, the best the occu-zombies can do is get themselves pepper sprayed and arrested.

    The irony is this – as they act as willing tools of those who would make government all powerful, they attempt to force the government into an intentional abuse of government power to spark others to support their nonsense.

    Don’t they see that, in the end, they are their own worst enemies and the best example of why we should NOT support them?

  • StanInTexas

    Vega, you are amazing.

    All you pointed to was someone that lies as much as you do. Kent State was not know for protestors being abused or arrested or beaten. That happened hunderds of times at locations all over the country. Kent State is know for protestors being shot and killed PERIOD!

    You trying to equivocate those killings to being pepper-sprayed only shows how impotent both you and this movement are.

    Run away now little bitch. Run back to RWN where you can be protected from your own stupidity!

  • Bob Roberts

    lao says: November 30, 2011 at 1:19 pm
    You can point an idiot towards information but you certainly can’t make him think.

    Thanks for playing stanwee.

    ————-
    Thanks for the homage – as you just took my “You can lead a fool [lao] to knowledge but you can’t make him think” and changed the words around a bit.

    As for your “Same applies to you” comment, if I were you I’d probably go run off to some dark corner and sulk for a while after that stinging remark.

    Fortunately, I’m not you, because if I was I’d do the right thing and stop wasting perfectly good oxygen.

  • Jay B.

    So… their Kent state moment, where people actually died (are you old enough to remember that, Lao? I am) is half a dozen idiots calmly getting pepper sprayed? If the left’s standards are that low, who cares? Have you seen the interviews where these idiots giggle about what happened? They don’t even know what a Kent state moment is.

  • Bob Roberts

    So anyone want to take odds on whether lao is off sulking in a dark corner somewhere or actually, finally, did the right thing?

  • Jeff

    Loa and Vega, for the sake of clarity, would you give us your definition of “right winger” and why that is a bad thing? It is too bad that you nothing useful to offer.

  • lao

    I suggested you look up the video to see where the “Kent State Moment” right wing talking point originated. Apparently you can’t manage that.

    Here’s the transcript of what the commentator actually said.

    You know what this movement needs…one is…obviously everybody is saying, they need some…they need to kind of clarify, they need policy issues. This is what we want as opposed to….

    And I don’t want this to come out the wrong way. If we think…not needs but will happen…If you think back to the late 60′s what is the most stirring image of all of the rebellion that happened? What do we remember? Kent State.

    Now I’m not saying somebody has to get killed…there needs… what will happen will…there will be a climax moment of class warfare somehow played out on screen that I think will…the same way 9-9-9 if you will, kind of simplifies a message, that articulates this clash. So both the real clarification in terms of policy and unfortunately some imagry (Scarborough: Well we hope not.) that says to America…and I think those are the two things. I’m not saying a death, I’m just saying…we are a visual society….

    Now for those of us who pay attention to such things, we see that twice he stated he was NOT talking about someone getting killed, he was talking about some compelling visuals that would become iconic the same way Kent State was.

    Naturally, the right has transformed this, despite the guy’s words, into a claim that the left hopes they can provoke cops into killing people.

    He started off by saying “I don’t want this to come out the wrong way”.

    Small hope there. Firstly, bear in mind that “Kent State Moment” is a construct of the right.

    Check out bobby @11:01 The leftist media already let the cat out of the bag, going on about how all this movement needs now is a “Kent State Moment”.

    No bobby. The leftist media did not go on, it was the rightist media going on, fabricating what one guy said, and he didn’t use those words.

    What imagery got played out on the screen? Sitting, non violent protestors being hosed down with pepper spray.

    Look up images of “pepper spray cop” to see the truth of what I have said. That picture has become iconic.

  • Smorfia48

    “Ask someone to choose one picture to illustrate the O.W.S. demonstrations and that’s the one you will see.”

    Depends who the ‘someone’ is. If they’re the sort of pampered, Occupy supporting drama queen who wouldn’t recognise genuine state tyranny if it sodomised them with an electric baton, perhaps.

    If they’re a normal person, there’s an alternative, far more accurate image that defines the whole sorry episode. Notably members of the LAPD forced to wear HAZMAT suits while they clear up the mountains of filth that Occupy LA left behind:

    http://news.yahoo.com/photos/los-angeles-police-officers-begin-clean-occupy-los-photo-144844966.html

    http://weaselzippers.us/2011/11/30/lapd-forced-to-wear-hazmat-suits-to-clean-up-occupier-camp-protesters-storing-human-waste-for-unknown-reasons/

    Best line: “some protesters had been reported to be storing human waste at the site for unknown reasons.” What is it with the Occupy movement and their fixation with their own piss and shit?

  • Hail The Amberlamps!

    lao says:
    November 30, 2011 at 12:11 pm

    By the way bobby, I think the “Kent State Moment” has already happened.

    It’s the pictures and video of that cop pepper spraying seated and unresisting protestors.

    Bottom line is the kids were given a lawful order to disperse by a sworn law officer and refused the order; they resisted. Seated, standing, lying down, standing on their heads or squatting to pee made no difference.

    Physical force to disentangle them increased the probability of injury to both the arrestee and officer, hence the gas. OC spray and the reflex response of hands-to-face disentangled the mob and allowed cops to execute the lawful order without resorting to more dangerous joint articulation or impact weapons. It was the appropriate use of force at the appropriate time. Period.

    The Left is agitating useful idiots these kids to bait cops into cheeseball Kodak “Kent State” moments. Bolshevik propagandists like Deutsch(bag) have as their marching orders to make it so, even when it’s just a spicy picnic on the lawn and not the National Guard armed with M1 rifles backed up into a fence by a said useful idiot mob. Less lethal control-and-restraint methods like OC spray and Tasers are a result of institutional learning from the real Kent State. I’m actually waiting for an Occupier Zampolit to stage a shooting at one of these infestations since this one was such a pathetic failure.

    Give it up man, you just look more and more like a pathetic Canadian bedwetter. You know, like with Sarah Palin and the “CROSSHAIRS!” Tourette Syndrome.

  • StanInTexas

    LaoZee Says…
    he was talking about some compelling visuals that would become iconic the same way Kent State was.

    The ONLY reason Kent State was iconic was because PEOPLE WERE KILLED! Why is this such a tough concept for you, Vega?

    You cannot talk about a “Kent State Moment” without death of protestors being a part of it. It would be like you saying that what we need in this country is a “Nazi Final Solution”… but NOT meaning concentration camps.

    If the pepper spray cop is the iconic moment of the OWS protests, then your movement is dead!

  • lao

    Sorry stanwee, there are iconic and non-violent photos from the anti-war demonstrations in the 60′s.

    The blond guy in the white sweater putting flowers in national guardsmen’s guns for example. That picture captured the essence of the era, the peace movement, “flower power” and peaceful resistance in the face of military force.

    The point is iconic imagery and pepper spray cop is an iconic image.

  • StanInTexas

    Yes, Vega, there are those photographs. And NONE OF THEM OCCURED AT KENT STATE.

    Do you want a “Flower Power” moment? That is completely different from a “Kent State” moment, which is only iconic because PROTESTORS DIED.

    The more you try to defend your lies, the more pathetic you look.

  • Smorfia48

    “Bottom line is the kids were given a lawful order to disperse by a sworn law officer and refused the order; they resisted. Seated, standing, lying down, standing on their heads or squatting to pee made no difference.”

    Not to mention they freely admit they encircled the police and refused to let them leave when asked:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbmiZD2-j08

  • lao

    I see you still have not grasped that “Kent State Moment” are not words that he used.

  • Bob Roberts

    lao says: November 30, 2011 at 2:49 pm
    I see you still have not grasped that “Kent State Moment” are not words that he used
    ——————–
    Too rich! Yes, he did not say “Kent State” and “moment” strung together, just as you often abbreviate what we say, leaving out several of the words “in between”.

    The difference is that he CLEARLY WAS SAYING HE WANTED A KENT STATE MOMENT to occur, was practically begging for it.

    It’s not that we hate you, lao, but we’re smart enough to know that if we’re thirsty, have water, and come across you on fire, the right thing to do is go ahead and quench our thirst.

  • lao

    I see bobby too is unable to understand what he reads.

    Or perhaps a better way to put it is, bobby understands what he wants to understand.

    Tell me what you want to understand about these words bobby.

    Now I’m not saying somebody has to get killed…

  • StanInTexas

    HE? Oh, you mean Donny Deutshe? Here’s what he said, Vega…
    The other thing it needs, and I don’t want this to come out the wrong way. If we think — not needs but will happen — if you think back to the late ’60s, what is the most stirring image of all of the rebellion that happened. What do we remember? Kent State. Now, I’m not saying somebody has to get killed. What will happen, there will be a climax moment of class warfare somehow played out on screen that I think will — the same way ’9-9-9′, if you will, kind of simplifies a message — that articulates this clash.

    So he wants Kent State to happen all over again, with no one getting killed (but them it wouldn’t be Kent State), and it should be the climax of the class WARFARE.

    So tell us all AGAIN, Vega. How can you have a repeat of Kent State is no one gets killed?

  • StanInTexas

    lao says: November 30, 2011 at 3:02 pm
    Tell me what you want to understand about these words bobby.
    Now I’m not saying somebody has to get killed…

    Very simple, Vega.

    1) Deutshe is a lying POS.
    2) You cannot have Kent State if no one is killed.

    He WAS talking about a protestor getting killed, Vega. Why are you unabl;e to grasp that simple concept?

  • lao

    HIlarious as usual stanwee. I really enjoy your inept attempts to make sense.

    What is the most stirring image

    Not stirring EVENT, stirring IMAGE.

    Get that stanwee? No, I’m afraid you won’t.

  • StanInTexas

    Still running in circles trying to justify having your head up your ass as usual, Vega.

    And what happened at the EVENT known as Kent State? Anti-war protest? That was happening on college campuses all over the nation. Nothing special about Kent State… except for one little thing, some protestors WERE KILLED. When Deutshe or you talk about wanting Kent State in the OWS protest, you are talking about demonstrators getting killed.

    There is no other way to look at it, Vega. You can continue to lie all you want, but you can’t even convice yourself.

  • lao

    It keeps getting better.

    Now, I’m not saying somebody has to get killed.

    Poor stanwee doesn’t LIKE that part. It conflicts with his little fantasyland.

    The solution is simple Deutsch is LYING!

    Just eliminate the parts you don’t like and “interpret” the rest. Love it.

    You just can’t post without creating your own (UN)reality can you stanwee?

  • StanInTexas

    Vega, listen carefully.

    People got killed at Kent State. That is the ONLY reason to use Kent State in this context. Why didn;t he say Berekley, where there was a massive buring of draft cards. That is a whole lot closer to the pussies that inhabit the OWS movement.

    No, Deutshe and you both advocate a Kent State in the present OWS movement. You both want demonstrators killed (Like at Kent State) so that you can screech and whine about law enforcement (Like at Kent State) and try to get your way (Like at Kent State).

    Deutshe was lying and so are you. Just like if you were to say “What we need in America is a Nazi-Like final solution. Now, I’m not talking about concentration camps for undesirables…”.

    Vega, you were a lying bastard on RWN and you are lying bastard here.

  • lao

    Gee stanwee, how did I get pulled into your fantasy vortex?

    Can you point out a place where I advocate a Kent State in the present OWS movement, a place where I indicate I want demonstrators killed?

    Oh never mind. Whenever I ask you to back up your claims you wander off into la-la land.

    You are playing the same old same old. Create a lie about what I supposedly want or have said and then attack me for it. AKA attacking a very flimsy straw man.

    The lamest possible way to weasel your way out is by falsely claiming both Deutsch and I are lying.

    Naturally, the lamest possible way, is the path you regularly follow.

    Amusing, as always stanwee.

    About now, it’s time for you to declare unilateral victory, or boredom and run away.

  • StanInTexas

    I don’t run away, Vega. That is YOUR little trick.

    When you try to justify a Kent State moment at the OWS, you are asking for demonstrators to be killed to that you can make a federal case out of it. You know it, I know, and so does EVERYONE ELSE!

    Kent State is ONLY iconic because protestors were killed. By wanting that for OWS, you prove yourself to be another pathetic coward.

    Time for you to run away to RWN and complain about me to the pussy owner, you child-molesting SOB. Think you can get him to ban me AGAIN?

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

  • lao

    More stanwee lies.

    As usual.

    Ho hum.

    Of course you can’t actually cite a comment time where I said the things you claim.

    But @10:38 am YOU supported 38,862′s remark about hunting liberals among others “to extinction” with this remark: The Right won’t be the ones starting the violence, but we will DEFINITELY be the ones left standing when it is finished.

    See how easy it is to provide ACTUAL quotes stanwee?

    What is RWN by the way?

  • Jeff

    StaninTexas is correct regarding Kent State. The only reason why it is iconic, is due to the photo of teenage girl kneeling at the dead student’s body. Liberals want dead bodies cause dead people make good martyrs and PR for the cause. Que up CSN’s Ohio…”four dead in Ohio”.

  • lao

    Go ahead Jeff, you provide your explanation for this line.

    Now, I’m not saying somebody has to get killed.

  • StanInTexas

    We’ve already explained the line, Vega, Deutshe was lying, just like you.

    Now run away, you child-molesting POS!

  • Hail The Amberlamps!

    Wait, lao is a pedophile? Whoa.

  • lao

    Do you EVER tell the truth stanwee?

    Apparently not.

  • TonyD95B

    RE: Bob Roberts at November 30, 2011 at 11:51 am:

    Yep, pretty much sums it up.

  • Festivus

    Stan, it’s more of lao’s psy-ops subliminal strategy to attempt to link something while at the same time trying to deny the same thing.

    lao, this is addressed to you personally. You do realize that those folks pepper-sprayed by the police – the police were given orders by your team (i.e. OWS supporters), right?

    This whole circus has been an example of left wing interest groups turning on each other – you do realize that, don’t you?

  • Festivus

    And this one is a special post just for you, loa.

    Gingrich Leads Obama 45%-43% in National Poll

    Your infatuation with US presidential politics will resolve in one year’s time.

  • StanInTexas

    LoaZee,

    It scares you that I know so much about you.

    Doesn’t it, Vega?

  • lao

    Oh my, Festivus thinks the cops are taking orders from O.W.S. protestors. Who could have possibly guessed?

    Festivus, when I first suggested that images of pepper spray cop was the “Kent State Moment” poor stanwee was freaking out because it was not murderous enough for his tastes. (see @12:20 and after)

    Then @3:30 his whining morphed into accusing me of wanting to see protestors killed to fulfill the “Kent State Moment”.

    Can YOU find any quote of mine indicating I wanted to see protestors killed?

    Watch out for eye strain.

    It’s very convenient for stanwee to dismiss Deutsch’s Now I’m not saying somebody has to get killed… comment as a lie, but of course, Deutsch isn’t lying. He was talking about an iconic IMAGE arising out the O.W.S. protests in the same way an iconic IMAGE arose out of Kent State. There have been lots of interesting pictures but none carry the impact of pepper spray cop. I have no idea if Deutsch would agree that’s the kind of image he was talking about.

    I do enjoy your psy-ops subliminal nonsense, but of course that relies on claiming the same lies that stanwee promotes.

    It’s really a shame so many of you lot are apparently incapable of dealing with reality but I’ve learned that once the parrots latch on to a talking point, they’ll never let it go.

  • Hail The Amberlamps!

    What Vega The Pedophile is saying is that the PICTURE of the orchestrated, nonviolent, lawful arrest of misdemeanor perpetrators is more important as agitation propaganda than the truth and reality of said incident.

    Nice admission there Vega.

  • Festivus

    lao, liberal city mayors gave the orders to spray those folks. Conservatives republicans had nothing to do with it.

    lao’s Psy-Ops on this “Kent State” moment is just like the Palin crosshairs Psy-Ops nonsense. Dance around it with refereces and then deny that you’re trying to make any connection. Subliminal connections and trying to maintain some sort of plausible deniability.

    Classic.

    lol

  • Festivus

    What can we expect from the fucking weasel you are, lao.

  • StanInTexas

    Hey LoaZee, too scard to even respond to me.

    Poor baby, why don’t you go cry to someone that cares!

  • lao

    stanwee, I’ve had every imaginable profanity, slur and accusation made against me ever since I started posting here.

    I laugh at all of them and at you.

    I understand that telling the truth is immensely threatening to people like you, particularly since your own lies are so blatantly obvious.

  • Festivus

    lao, the Martyr.

    Cry me a river, douche bag.

    lol

  • Hail The Amberlamps!

    Are you a child molester or was that just a poke at you lao? I have to ask since we’ve had actual self-professed pedophiles posting here.

  • StanInTexas

    LoaZee has a thing for Sarah Palin’s children. But he only talks about it when he is posting on a board with a pussy of an owner that will protect him.

  • Hail The Amberlamps!

    Wow. I missed that story. Care to recap if for us Stan?

  • lao

    hail, stanwee is a LIAR. You’ve seen his posts enough to know that.

  • StanInTexas

    Happened on another board, Hail. Lao posts over there. He follows me around to other boards.

    He came here to slam Dave back when he was Van Helsing. Now he stays just to lie and cause problems!

  • StanInTexas

    Vega, do you think Dave is going to protect you like pussy Hawkins does?

  • Festivus

    Can’t say I’m surprised. More Psy-Ops. lol

  • lao

    stanwee, I have no idea who “Hawkins” even is or where he may post. You are off in the ozone…as usual.

    For anyone who might think stanwee is credible, look at how much he whined about pepper spray cop NOT being a “Kent State Moment” as I suggested.

    Then, suddenly, @3:30 he’s claiming I want demonstrators killed.

    Where did THAT come from? Out of his own very tiny head, NOT out of anything I said here.

  • Hail The Amberlamps!

    Hmmm, whom to believe, lao or somebody who isn’t lao….hmmmm….that’s a hard one.

  • Festivus

    All I hear is a squeal!

  • StanInTexas

    Vega, you can deny it all you want but I know who you are.

    Keep trying to distract from the subject at hand. I have the posts you made during that time. How happy do you think Blount is with all the things you said about hi? Does “VanDouchbag” ring a bell.

    I’ve had fun playing you but that is over. You are D-Vega and I am DONE playing with you. Take your lies and your child molesting ASS back to RWN!

  • lao

    RWN = right wing news?? Never, ever posted there.

    I do enjoy your delusional paranoia though.

  • Jester

    Laaooo iiinnn Spaaaacccee!!!!!!!!

    SSSSSQQQQQUUUUUAAAAACCCCCKKKKK!!!!!!!!!!!

  • StanInTexas

    Funny how you knew RWN so quickly, Vega.

    Pisses you off that I found you, doesn’t it, Vega.

    BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

  • Pingback: Das Volk gegen ein Prozent | Jihad Watch Deutschland

  • lao

    Oh my.

    Between stanwee and bobby, this thread has been a showcase for the delusional.

    Let’s see. What’s a good way to figure out what RWN means?

    Oh I know, just click on Moonbattery’s blog roll and look under R.

    Now, is “Vega” a star, a movie hit man played by John Travolta or a folk singer?

  • StanInTexas

    You can spin it all you want LaoZee. The point, whether you will admit it or not is that you know and I KNOW!

    Why don’t you write a letter to Blount whining about the way you are being treated and DEMAND that I be banned. Do you think it will work the same way it did with Pussy Hawkins?

  • lao

    Bwahahahaha!! stanwee, you repeatedly demonstrate that what you “know” is very little indeed.

    I’m almost tempted to go over to RWN and track down “Vega” so we can share some laughs. Did you use the same handle over there?

    It’s particularly funny that your whining, and, no doubt, your chronic lies, got you banned.

    I’m quite happy to see you spew your nonsense on Moonbattery for as long as you like.

    Now, if you don’t mind, I’ll shift my operations further up the page to a newer thread.

    Don’t be a stranger. LOL!!

  • StanInTexas

    Sure, Vega, run back to RWN and to the pussy owner. You know the way.

    Did you write a whiney little letter to Blount about me yet? I’ll bet you have.

  • Sinister66

    I never would have thought.

    http://twitter.com/stanintexas

    http://www.myspace.com/456567780
    You only had one friend.

    The way you act I though you were just a jackass kid. I guess your just a lonely old guy. Explains why your so bitter.

  • StanInTexas

    How pathetic you are Sister!

    I have neither a Twitter Account, nor a MySpace account UNDER ANY NAME!

    I am on Facebook, but under a DIFFERENT name.

    I had a feeling one of your would jump back on here after this post rolled off the front page. I figured it would be Vega, but your are just as pathetic.

  • Sinister66

    If you say so old timer.

  • StanInTexas

    If you say so, pissy little BITCH!

  • Sinister66

    And it is still on the first page.
    Hope your dementia isnt kicking in.

  • StanInTexas

    You may want to do a refresh, Little Bitch.

  • Sinister66

    Calm down dude.
    Dont need you blowing the back out of your depends.

  • StanInTexas

    Oh, is THAT the way you say you screwed up and lied?

    Nap-Nap time for you Little Bitch.

  • Sinister66

    If it was still on the first page on my screen, how is that a lie??

  • StanInTexas

    It was a mistake when you though it was on the first page.

    It became a lie when you realized your mistake and, instead of admitting your mistake like an adult would, you made a pissy little bitch post about me calming down.

  • Geoada

    We all hear that this stupid O.W.S. wants its memorable moment captured in time. Several people refer to it as an O.W.S. “Kent State” moment. Well the only Occupod Wall Street moment forever captured in time that will come to personify the whole O.W.S.movement is that picture of the occupier with his pants around his ankles taking a crap on the cop car. Bunch of losers and total wastes of skin.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy