moonbattery logo

Sep 21 2015

Climate Change Ideology Destroyed by Two Graphs

Weather expert Joe Bastardi has two graphs he would like to show the Pope, who has been concerning himself not with our souls but with reducing harmless CO2 emissions in accordance with leftist ideology.

This one shows the relationship between rising CO2 and the radically improved well-being of the human race, mainly due to capitalism:

CO2_human-progress

This one proves that even if warm weather were a bad thing, it isn’t caused by CO2 anyway:

CO2_temperature-fluctuation

But even if he could get Pope Francis to look at the graphs, it wouldn’t do any good. Climate change is not about improving the human condition, or even improving the climate. It is about imposing collectivism on behalf of an authoritarian oligarchy.

On tips from Torcer and Bodhisattva.



  • MrRightWingDave

    “It is about imposing collectivism on behalf of an authoritarian oligarchy.”- True. Sad, but true.

  • David

    “It is about imposing collectivism on behalf of an authoritarian oligarchy.”- True. Sad, but true.

  • marcus tullius cicero

    …no one can convince Socialists with facts and practice, they are ruled by emotions and theories!

  • marcus tullius cicero

    …no one can convince Socialists with facts and practice, they are ruled by emotions and theories!

  • Pingback: Climate Change Ideology Destroyed by Two Graphs -()

  • Beef

    This pope’s problem is that he doesn’t believe in God.

  • Beef

    This pope’s problem is that he doesn’t believe in God.

  • seaoh

    Catholic Congressman to boycott popes speech to congress and It’s a good thing,
    http://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/catholic-congressman-boycotts-pope

  • seaoh

    Catholic Congressman to boycott popes speech to congress and It’s a good thing,
    “If the Pope plans to spend the ma­jor­ity of his time ad­voc­at­ing for flawed cli­mate-change policies,” Gosar writes, “then I will not at­tend.”

    http://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/catholic-congressman-boycotts-pope

  • TED

    The ANTI-Christ’s MINION wouldn’t!

  • TED

    The ANTI-Christ’s MINION wouldn’t!

  • TED

    FACTS and TRUTH just confuse them, it conflicts with emotions.

  • TED

    FACTS and TRUTH just confuse them, it conflicts with emotions.

  • Anyone who wants to go post this on an open thread, please feel free to do so!

    While this one may not get the notice it deserves here (better on an open thread or maybe, hint, hint, a page of it’s own!) it clearly belongs in this topic/thread, so here it is:

    Professor Emiritus Hal Lewis Resigns from American Physical Society over a variety of things, chief among them the CLIMATE CHANGE SCAM

    EXCERPT:

    When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood.

    (snip)

    How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.

    It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

    So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it.

    (snip)

    Please take a moment to visit the link provided and read the whole thing if you are so inclined.

  • Anyone who wants to go post this on an open thread, please feel free to do so!

    While this one may not get the notice it deserves here (better on an open thread or maybe, hint, hint, a page of it’s own!) it clearly belongs in this topic/thread, so here it is:

    Professor Emiritus Hal Lewis Resigns from American Physical Society over a variety of things, chief among them the CLIMATE CHANGE SCAM

    EXCERPT:

    When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood.

    (snip)

    How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.

    It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

    So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it.

    (snip)

    Please take a moment to visit the link provided and read the whole thing if you are so inclined.

  • Also note that this idea that the current level of atmospheric CO2 is bad or should be REDUCED is insanity.

    FIRST, from an alarmist site, this quote:

    “There is no doubt that the carbon dioxide increase is anthropogenic. The circumstantial evidence is strong. “

    Circumstantial evidence is rarely accepted as valid without some more substantial evidence to back it up and even then it is most often disregarded. They go on to try to claim coincidence proves causation.

    Anyway, on to my point:

    Most of what you see emitted from power plant smokestacks is water vapor and CO2, both essential for rapid growth of food crops.

    The CO2 found in modern-day atmosphere was 340ppm and has risen to around 400 ppm. But food crops would grow far faster if the concentration of CO2 were closer to 1000ppm, or roughly 250% higher than current levels. In fact, most greenhouse plant production causes a “CO2 depletion” to happen, shutting down photosynthesis and limiting food production. As the “Carbon Dioxide in Greenhouses” fact sheet explains:

    Ambient CO2 level in outside air is about 400 ppm by volume. All plants grow well at this level but as CO2 levels are raised by 1,000 ppm photosynthesis increases proportionately resulting in more sugars and carbohydrates available for plant growth. Any actively growing crop in a tightly clad greenhouse with little or no ventilation can readily reduce the CO2 level during the day to as low as 200 ppm.

    Thus, greenhouse plants are “running out” of CO2. They are starving for it. And when you add it to food crops, you get higher yields, improved taste, shorter flowering times, enhanced pest resistance and other benefits.

    THIS PAGE SHOWS CO2 LEVELS WERE NEAR 600 PPM IN THE RELATIVELY RECENT GEOLOGIC PAST AND THE EARTH DID FINE!

    ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/antarctica/epica_domec/domec_co2.txt

    This disproves a number of claims of climate alarmists, including but not limited to their claims nature can’t possibly cause a change in the atmosphere of this magnitude.

  • Also note that this idea that the current level of atmospheric CO2 is bad or should be REDUCED is insanity.

    FIRST, from an alarmist site, this quote:

    “There is no doubt that the carbon dioxide increase is anthropogenic. The circumstantial evidence is strong. “

    Circumstantial evidence is rarely accepted as valid without some more substantial evidence to back it up and even then it is most often disregarded. They go on to try to claim coincidence proves causation.

    Anyway, on to my point:

    Most of what you see emitted from power plant smokestacks is water vapor and CO2, both essential for rapid growth of food crops.

    The CO2 found in modern-day atmosphere was 340ppm and has risen to around 400 ppm. But food crops would grow far faster if the concentration of CO2 were closer to 1000ppm, or roughly 250% higher than current levels. In fact, most greenhouse plant production causes a “CO2 depletion” to happen, shutting down photosynthesis and limiting food production. As the “Carbon Dioxide in Greenhouses” fact sheet explains:

    Ambient CO2 level in outside air is about 400 ppm by volume. All plants grow well at this level but as CO2 levels are raised by 1,000 ppm photosynthesis increases proportionately resulting in more sugars and carbohydrates available for plant growth. Any actively growing crop in a tightly clad greenhouse with little or no ventilation can readily reduce the CO2 level during the day to as low as 200 ppm.

    Thus, greenhouse plants are “running out” of CO2. They are starving for it. And when you add it to food crops, you get higher yields, improved taste, shorter flowering times, enhanced pest resistance and other benefits.

    THIS PAGE SHOWS CO2 LEVELS WERE NEAR 600 PPM IN THE RELATIVELY RECENT GEOLOGIC PAST AND THE EARTH DID FINE!

    ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/antarctica/epica_domec/domec_co2.txt

    This disproves a number of claims of climate alarmists, including but not limited to their claims nature can’t possibly cause a change in the atmosphere of this magnitude.

  • Kaye Oleary

    my associate’s stride close aunty makes $98 an hour on the portable workstation……….Afterg an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I’m finally getting 97 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online.….. Weekly paycheck… Bonus opportunities…earn upto $16k to $19k /a month… Just few hours of your free time, any kind of computer, elementary understanding of web and stable connection is what is required…….HERE I STARTED…look over here
    qt………………..
    ➤➤➤➤ http://GoogleBestEasyOnlineProfitableJobsNetworkCenters/$98hourlywork…. ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy