moonbattery logo

Dec 21 2015

Jeanine Pirro Lays Waste to Hillary’s Security Plan

Shrillary’s pathetic attempts to portray herself as someone who would effectively defend Americans from Muslim terrorism is not impressing anyone familiar with her record, least of all Judge Jeanine:

On a tip from Bill T.



  • Pingback: Jeanine Pirro Lays Waste to Hillary’s Security Plan « The United Voice of America()

  • Torcer

    A lie told often enough becomes the truth. Lenin

  • Torcer

    A lie told often enough becomes the truth. Lenin

  • Torcer

    “Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried.” Winston Churchill

  • Torcer

    “Leave no authority existing not responsible to the people,” -Thomas Jefferson.

  • Torcer

    “We want them registered” – Nancy Pelosi

  • Torcer

    “Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried.” Winston Churchill

  • Torcer

    “Leave no authority existing not responsible to the people,” -Thomas Jefferson.

  • Torcer

    “We want them registered” – Nancy Pelosi

  • Torcer

    The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. H.L. Menkin

  • Torcer

    I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery – Thomas Jefferson

  • Torcer

    I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of it. -Thomas Jefferson

  • Torcer

    If you want to make this into an argument, Keep in mind that in the end those of us on the pro-liberty side are going to win.

    If you want, I can post all the facts on the corruption, Lies and Crimes of Comrade Clinton.

    The facts on the side of Liberty.

    Comrade Clinton is on the side of tyranny, so keep it up I will post facts of her dislike of freedom and liberty.

    October 16 2015

    “In the Australian example, as I recall, that was a buyback program.”…..“I think it would be worth considering doing it on the national level” Hillary Clinton October 16 2015

    Transcript
    Reference:
    http://www.c-span.org/video/?328774-1/hillary-clinton-town-hall-meeting-keene-new-hampshire&start=2831

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCbx2Nf0uG4
    http://leany.com/Conspiracy/hillary_clinton_transcript.htm

    Hillary Clinton
    Oct 16, 2015
    Keene, New Hampshire
    Transcript below:

    VOTER: Back to handguns. Recently, Australia managed to get away, or take away tens of thousands, millions of handguns. In one year, they were all gone. Can we do that? If we can’t, why can’t we?

    HILLARY CLINTON: Australia is a good example, Canada is a good example, the U.K. is a good example. Why? Each of them have had mass killings. Australia had a huge mass killing about 20-25 years ago, Canada did as well, so did the U.K. In reaction, they passed much stricter gun laws.

    In the Australian example, as I recall, that was a buyback program. The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of automatic weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns. Then, they basically clamped down, going forward, in terms of having more of a background check approach, more of a permitting approach, but they believe, and I think the evidence supports them, that by offering to buyback those guns, they were able to curtail the supply and set a different standard for gun purchases in the future.

    Communities have done that in our country, several communities have done gun buyback programs. I think it would be worth considering doing it on the national level, if that could be arranged. After the terrible 2008 financial crisis, one of the programs that President Obama was able to get in place was Cash for Clunkers. You remember that? It was partially a way to get people to buy new cars because we wanted more economic activity, and to get old models that were polluting too much, off the roads. So I think that’s worth considering. I do not know enough detail to tell you how we would do it, or how would it work, but certainly your example is worth looking at. [Applause]
    http://www.c-span.org/video/?328774-1/hillary-clinton-town-hall-meeting-keene-new-hampshire

    Clinton Praises Australian Gun Buyback Program http://freebeacon.com/issues/clinton-australian-style-gun-control-worth-considering-for-u-s/

    Clinton: Australian-Style Gun Control ‘Worth Considering’ for U.S.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY

  • Torcer

    The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. H.L. Menkin

  • Torcer

    I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery – Thomas Jefferson

  • Torcer

    I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of it. -Thomas Jefferson

  • Torcer

    If you want to make this into an argument, Keep in mind that in the end those of us on the pro-liberty side are going to win.

    If you want, I can post all the facts on the corruption, Lies and Crimes of Comrade Clinton.

    The facts on the side of Liberty.

    Comrade Clinton is on the side of tyranny, so keep it up I will post facts of her dislike of freedom and liberty.

    October 16 2015

    “In the Australian example, as I recall, that was a buyback program.”…..“I think it would be worth considering doing it on the national level” Hillary Clinton October 16 2015

    Transcript
    Reference:
    http://www.c-span.org/video/?328774-1/hillary-clinton-town-hall-meeting-keene-new-hampshire&start=2831

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCbx2Nf0uG4
    http://leany.com/Conspiracy/hillary_clinton_transcript.htm

    Hillary Clinton
    Oct 16, 2015
    Keene, New Hampshire
    Transcript below:

    VOTER: Back to handguns. Recently, Australia managed to get away, or take away tens of thousands, millions of handguns. In one year, they were all gone. Can we do that? If we can’t, why can’t we?

    HILLARY CLINTON: Australia is a good example, Canada is a good example, the U.K. is a good example. Why? Each of them have had mass killings. Australia had a huge mass killing about 20-25 years ago, Canada did as well, so did the U.K. In reaction, they passed much stricter gun laws.

    In the Australian example, as I recall, that was a buyback program. The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of automatic weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns. Then, they basically clamped down, going forward, in terms of having more of a background check approach, more of a permitting approach, but they believe, and I think the evidence supports them, that by offering to buyback those guns, they were able to curtail the supply and set a different standard for gun purchases in the future.

    Communities have done that in our country, several communities have done gun buyback programs. I think it would be worth considering doing it on the national level, if that could be arranged. After the terrible 2008 financial crisis, one of the programs that President Obama was able to get in place was Cash for Clunkers. You remember that? It was partially a way to get people to buy new cars because we wanted more economic activity, and to get old models that were polluting too much, off the roads. So I think that’s worth considering. I do not know enough detail to tell you how we would do it, or how would it work, but certainly your example is worth looking at. [Applause]
    http://www.c-span.org/video/?328774-1/hillary-clinton-town-hall-meeting-keene-new-hampshire

    Clinton Praises Australian Gun Buyback Program http://freebeacon.com/issues/clinton-australian-style-gun-control-worth-considering-for-u-s/

    Clinton: Australian-Style Gun Control ‘Worth Considering’ for U.S.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY

  • Torcer

    Datos, ne quisquam seruiat, enses. (The sword was given for this, that none need live a slave.) – Marcus Annaeus Lucanus

  • Torcer

    Datos, ne quisquam seruiat, enses. (The sword was given for this, that none need live a slave.) – Marcus Annaeus Lucanus

  • Torcer

    One man with a gun can control 100 without one. Vladimir Lenin

  • Torcer

    For Hillary Clinton, “Thoughtcrime” Is Good Presidential Politics
    http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/27/for-hillary-clinton-thoughtcrime-is-good-presidential-politics/

    For Hillary Clinton, “Thoughtcrime” Is Good Presidential Politics
    08/27/2014
    For all the careful staging and coaching politicians use to maintain their public images, sometimes they still slip up and say what they really think. Who can forget President Obama’s infamous remark to wealthy donors in San Francisco that rural Americans who feel abandoned by the economy “get bitter and they cling to guns or religion”?
    […]
    Speaking at a televised “town hall” meeting in June, Clinton responded at length to a question about the effectiveness of so-called “assault weapon” and “high-capacity” magazine bans. Her response told us perhaps more than she intended about her true opinion of the Second Amendment and its supporters.

    Clinton insisted the nation needed a more “thoughtful conversation” about gun control and continued, “We cannot let a minority of people, and that’s what it is, it is a minority of people, hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people.”

    In the days following that remark, a number of commentators rightly emphasized the irony of America’s former secretary of state—one whose tenure was marked by controversies over real terrorists—using that term to describe ordinary Americans. Yet the true significance of her remarks was even more fundamental and chilling.

    Clinton didn’t just condemn the ownership and use of “assault weapons” and “high capacity” magazines. Instead, she claimed that what “terrorizes” America is a “viewpoint” that diverges from hers. This “minority” viewpoint is not just ill-advised or misinformed, in her estimation. Rather, it “cannot” be tolerated at all. This is the Orwellian realm of “thoughtcrime,” where simple beliefs or opinions are deemed as unacceptable and blameworthy as criminal behavior itself.

    Clinton’s outlook mirrors that of other gun-banning extremists. Their scorn targets not just, or even primarily, behavior. Instead, they seem more determined to stamp out pro-gun thoughts than violent crimes committed with guns.
    http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/27/for-hillary-clinton-thoughtcrime-is-good-presidential-politics/

  • Torcer

    One man with a gun can control 100 without one. Vladimir Lenin

  • Torcer

    For Hillary Clinton, “Thoughtcrime” Is Good Presidential Politics
    http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/27/for-hillary-clinton-thoughtcrime-is-good-presidential-politics/

    For Hillary Clinton, “Thoughtcrime” Is Good Presidential Politics
    08/27/2014
    For all the careful staging and coaching politicians use to maintain their public images, sometimes they still slip up and say what they really think. Who can forget President Obama’s infamous remark to wealthy donors in San Francisco that rural Americans who feel abandoned by the economy “get bitter and they cling to guns or religion”?
    […]
    Speaking at a televised “town hall” meeting in June, Clinton responded at length to a question about the effectiveness of so-called “assault weapon” and “high-capacity” magazine bans. Her response told us perhaps more than she intended about her true opinion of the Second Amendment and its supporters.

    Clinton insisted the nation needed a more “thoughtful conversation” about gun control and continued, “We cannot let a minority of people, and that’s what it is, it is a minority of people, hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people.”

    In the days following that remark, a number of commentators rightly emphasized the irony of America’s former secretary of state—one whose tenure was marked by controversies over real terrorists—using that term to describe ordinary Americans. Yet the true significance of her remarks was even more fundamental and chilling.

    Clinton didn’t just condemn the ownership and use of “assault weapons” and “high capacity” magazines. Instead, she claimed that what “terrorizes” America is a “viewpoint” that diverges from hers. This “minority” viewpoint is not just ill-advised or misinformed, in her estimation. Rather, it “cannot” be tolerated at all. This is the Orwellian realm of “thoughtcrime,” where simple beliefs or opinions are deemed as unacceptable and blameworthy as criminal behavior itself.

    Clinton’s outlook mirrors that of other gun-banning extremists. Their scorn targets not just, or even primarily, behavior. Instead, they seem more determined to stamp out pro-gun thoughts than violent crimes committed with guns.
    http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/27/for-hillary-clinton-thoughtcrime-is-good-presidential-politics/

  • Torcer

    “Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried.” Winston Churchill

  • Torcer

    Amendment 2
    A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

    Amendment 9
    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

    Amendment 10
    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

  • Torcer

    “Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried.” Winston Churchill

  • Torcer

    Hillary Clinton says gun control opponents “terrorize” Americans http://ti.me/UJubxp via @TIMEPolitics

    Hillary Clinton Says Opponents Of Gun Control Laws ‘Terrorize’ Americans
    June 17, 2014
    Possible 2016 candidate wades into politically charged issue

    Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lashed out at opponents of gun control regulations Tuesday, saying they hold a viewpoint that “terrorizes” the majority of Americans.

    “We cannot let a minority of people, and that’s what it is, it is a minority of people, hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people,” Clinton said during a live CNN town hall. The comments were Clinton’s deepest foray into an exceedingly controversial political subject since leaving the State Department last year.
    http://time.com/2891821/hillary-clinton-2016-gun-control/

  • Torcer

    “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
    gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
    Winston Churchill

  • Torcer

    “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
    gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
    Winston Churchill

  • Torcer

    “If representatives betray their constituents, there is no recourse left
    but in the exertion of that right of self-defense”…
    – Hamilton

  • Torcer

    “The Founding Fathers knew a government can’t control the economy
    without controlling people. And they knew when a government sets out to
    do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose.“
    Ronald Reagan

  • Torcer

    Senator Hubert H. Humphrey,
    Comm.: Foreign Relations Minnesota
    Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used, and that definite safety rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible.

  • Torcer

    Clinton: ‘Deep-Seated Cultural Codes, Religious Beliefs…Have to Be Changed’ http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/clinton-deep-seated-cultural-codes-religious-beliefshave-be-changed

    Clinton: ‘Deep-Seated Cultural Codes, Religious Beliefs…Have to Be Changed’
    April 27, 2015
    (CNSNews.com) – Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton says women won’t have full access to “reproductive health care” until “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases” are changed.

    She urged every woman to be a “champion for change” in the world around them.
    http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/clinton-deep-seated-cultural-codes-religious-beliefshave-be-changed

  • Torcer

    “If representatives betray their constituents, there is no recourse left
    but in the exertion of that right of self-defense”…
    – Hamilton

  • Torcer

    “The Founding Fathers knew a government can’t control the economy
    without controlling people. And they knew when a government sets out to
    do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose.“
    Ronald Reagan

  • Torcer

    Senator Hubert H. Humphrey,
    Comm.: Foreign Relations Minnesota
    Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used, and that definite safety rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible.

  • Torcer

    Clinton: ‘Deep-Seated Cultural Codes, Religious Beliefs…Have to Be Changed’ http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/clinton-deep-seated-cultural-codes-religious-beliefshave-be-changed

    Clinton: ‘Deep-Seated Cultural Codes, Religious Beliefs…Have to Be Changed’
    April 27, 2015
    (CNSNews.com) – Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton says women won’t have full access to “reproductive health care” until “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases” are changed.

    She urged every woman to be a “champion for change” in the world around them.
    http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/clinton-deep-seated-cultural-codes-religious-beliefshave-be-changed

  • Torcer

    #ComradeClinton
    MSNBC Guest Argues It’s a ‘Higher Bar’ to Prosecute Clinton Because She’s Running for President | LawNewz http://lawnewz.com/video/msnbc-guest-argues-for-higher-bar-to-prosecute-clinton-because-shes-running-for-president/

    MSNBC Guest Argues It’s a ‘Higher Bar’ to Prosecute Clinton Because She’s Running for President
    During a panel discussion Monday morning on MSNBC’s Morning Joe about a pair of new reports in the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post concerning the ongoing FBI investigation into the Clinton private e-mail server, National Journal political reporter Ron Fournier argued that there should be a higher bar to bring charges against Hillary Clinton because she is running for president.

    Wait, what?
    [..]
    Fournier then pivots to address the legal implications:

    “Legally though, there is a big bar that you have to get over to prosecute anybody for these crimes, much less somebody who is running for president. …I do understand that when somebody is running for president, there is a higher bar that you have to get over because we can’t have a system in which we are constantly charging people who are running for president of crimes.”

    This remark seemed to take Scarborough by surprise and he replied, “Actually, the bar is ‘reckless [disregard]’ of classified information….”
    [..]
    Again, Fournier argued that all of that is purely a political issue about Clinton’s judgment that is for voters to decide.

    “Politically, there are severe questions about her judgment that voters really have to look into. Legally, …there is a higher bar you have to get over before you prosecute somebody who is running for president. That is just a fact,” Fournier said.

    “In what statute is that?” Scarborough asked rhetorically.
    http://lawnewz.com/video/msnbc-guest-argues-for-higher-bar-to-prosecute-clinton-because-shes-running-for-president/

  • Torcer

    #ComradeClinton
    MSNBC Guest Argues It’s a ‘Higher Bar’ to Prosecute Clinton Because She’s Running for President | LawNewz http://lawnewz.com/video/msnbc-guest-argues-for-higher-bar-to-prosecute-clinton-because-shes-running-for-president/

    MSNBC Guest Argues It’s a ‘Higher Bar’ to Prosecute Clinton Because She’s Running for President
    During a panel discussion Monday morning on MSNBC’s Morning Joe about a pair of new reports in the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post concerning the ongoing FBI investigation into the Clinton private e-mail server, National Journal political reporter Ron Fournier argued that there should be a higher bar to bring charges against Hillary Clinton because she is running for president.

    Wait, what?
    [..]
    Fournier then pivots to address the legal implications:

    “Legally though, there is a big bar that you have to get over to prosecute anybody for these crimes, much less somebody who is running for president. …I do understand that when somebody is running for president, there is a higher bar that you have to get over because we can’t have a system in which we are constantly charging people who are running for president of crimes.”

    This remark seemed to take Scarborough by surprise and he replied, “Actually, the bar is ‘reckless [disregard]’ of classified information….”
    [..]
    Again, Fournier argued that all of that is purely a political issue about Clinton’s judgment that is for voters to decide.

    “Politically, there are severe questions about her judgment that voters really have to look into. Legally, …there is a higher bar you have to get over before you prosecute somebody who is running for president. That is just a fact,” Fournier said.

    “In what statute is that?” Scarborough asked rhetorically.
    http://lawnewz.com/video/msnbc-guest-argues-for-higher-bar-to-prosecute-clinton-because-shes-running-for-president/

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy