moonbattery logo

Feb 12 2016

Democrat Pol Says It Is Not Sporting to Use a Semiautomatic Weapon for Self-Defense

In case you didn’t get the memo that Democrat politicians have for some time now been on the side of the bad guys, Pennsylvania congressional candidate Dan Muroff can bring you up to date with a recent diatribe against law-abiding citizens’ fundamental right of self-defense, which includes this gem:

It’s not sporting to use a semi-automatic weapon to go hunting, or frankly, self-defense.

Muroff also raved,

Guns in the street are easier to find than healthy produce. … They unravel the fabric of not just an individual’s future, but with it their family’s future.

Imagine that a mother and her children happen to be alone in the house when a gang of underprivileged persons breaks in to rape and pillage, and thanks to Democrats she has no modern weapon. That might unravel the fabric of a family’s future. But at least it wouldn’t be unsporting.

Downtrend gasps,

WTF!?! It’s not sporting to defend yourself using a semi-automatic weapon against a dangerous criminal? Does he honestly feel like we need to give the scumbags a sporting chance when they are trying to rape and murder? I guess so. Maybe he thinks we should all have muzzle-loading black powder muskets just to give the bad guys a reasonable chance of succeeding in their evil deeds. …

Muroff’s misunderstanding of the 2nd Amendment shines through. There is nothing in the Constitution that ties gun ownership to hunting or even self-defense. We simply have the right to own guns and liberal douchebags like him don’t have a right to mess with that.

That is because when push comes to shove, the right to own guns is not prominently featured in the Constitution to defend us from rapists and murderers, but from people like Dan Muroff.

Dan Muroff
Muroff wants to give home invaders a sporting chance.

On a tip from Steve A.

  • This man is quite insane.

  • Pingback: Democrat Pol Says It Is Not Sporting to Use a Semiautomatic Weapon for Self-Defense()

  • MAS

    No, Muroff wants to give himself and those like him (who want to enslave you and I) a sporting chance. Until they confiscate most of the firearms then all sporting chances are off…for you and I.

    Some years ago the NYPD was looking to update from revolvers to semi autos. The then Commissar said no because semi autos were the choice of criminals and he didn’t want his officers to copy them. For most liberalism is a mental illness but for the fortunate few it is a mighty tool for oppression of the masses they pretend to want to care for.

  • Douglas Byrne Sr

    I’d love to punch him in the throat.

  • JeffersonSpinningInGrave

    Understandable emotional response. But no need. As many others have said before, when a person like this demands that you give up your arms, the correct answer is simple:

    “No. Your move.”

  • Rock ThisTown

    Or the following is also acceptable as a correct answer:

    “My right to self-defense does not come from your twisted definition of it.”

  • JeffersonSpinningInGrave

    True. But I’m sick of arguing with them. I haven’t heard a substantially new argument out of them in decades, and I don’t think they have had a new argument for longer than that. Their arguments don’t hold up under scrutiny, but I don’t think the leftists smart enough to understand facts believe their own arguments anyway. Debate is unproductive. I give a bit to the NRA, GOA, and 2nd amendment foundation. Let them argue with the a-holes.

  • TED

    SUPRISED??!!! The LEFT are the CRIMINALS! AND they are whiners THAT don’t WANT TO GET HURT…

  • JAO

    Violent criminals don’t deserve a sporting chance.

  • TED


  • Appalled By The World

    If the genetic defect that causes Progressivism is ever found and cured the human race would improve at least tenfold.

  • Appalled By The World

    Amen to that!

  • Appalled By The World

    I hope 5 thugs confront him one day and beat the hell out of him. That usually (but not always) straightens out diseased minds like his.

  • Xavier

    It’s entertaining when people use words they don’t comprehend.

  • Xavier

    It sounds like I’m going to have to go full auto, then.

  • Xavier

    Drop him in downtown Detroit at midnight. By dawn, he’ll be pro-2A or dead.

  • NotKennedy

    Looks like a little J’Obiden wannabe with his little cuff links and pastel tie. Send down to South Philly with a single shot bb gun and see how he makes out in the ‘hood. Mmm, mmm, mmm, sportsmanship!

  • TED


  • TED

    AND we will be on the RIGHT track again…NOT THIS!

  • Michael Onoo

    Bolt actions are for deer, semi auto are for politicians and thugs

  • Rotohammer

    Muroff is not a talented politician. He won’t get past the primary. A skilled dem still needs to cloak his or her gun confiscation agenda better than that. For now, at least.

  • guest

    Would it be sporting to ventilate the likes of him with a musket?…asking for a friend.

  • MAS

    To quote Mark Twain “…but I repeat myself”.

  • Ed. G. Mann

    His concern is that you conservative knuckle draggers will kill his constituents. With no one to vote for him, he’ll have to get a real job.

  • Pingback: Democrat Pol Says It Is Not Sporting to Use a Semiautomatic Weapon for Self-Defense | Tea Party News()

  • ok, so I’ll give the bastard a three second head start before I empty my semi-automatic self-defense weapon into his worthless ass…

  • bobwhite

    It’s none of that Democrat Shitbags business what I’m using my semi-automatic rifle for.

  • Jack Bauer

    Is this just another case of some lefty authoritarian wannabe douchebag not understanding the terminology? Does this yardbird, like so many in the big media, not understand the difference between full-auto and semi-auto, whereby he uses the terms interchangeably?

    This reminds me of that pinhead legislator out in California who suggested outlawing the sale of magazines, “so when we got to a point that all the magazines were finally empty, all the guns out there would be useless”…

  • Appalled By The World

    Hell- “evolution” under the Progs is taking us rapidly to the level of the worm.

  • Appalled By The World

    I like option 2.

  • Hungjumper

    OK…..I’ll use a claymore instead. I’ve got LOTS of practice.

  • whotothewhat

    I will keep my semi-autos handy just in case someone like Muroff comes a collecting.

  • Mr. Freemarket

    A cannon with grape shot would be better.

  • Mr. Freemarket

    Maybe he will run into Muslims with knives.


    Hee-haw, mighty tough concept for any lawmaker to understand: “.. the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

  • magic1114

    That’d be Kevin DeLeon who thinks about the evil “30 magazine clips that fire, like, 100 rounds in half a second”… Lol!

  • magic1114

    Okay, so how about I give him/them a one step handicap before I light their jungle boogy asses up? Will that make you STFU with your idiotic nonsense?

  • Ol’ Uncle Lar

    Or an M-40 loaded with canister, that’s a single shot.

  • Harold

    Democrats suck dicks

  • Katya Kakhov

    Well they wont “let me” carry a tomahawk will they ? So , a .357 it is .

  • Elk Tracks

    If they want it to be sporting . . . . then they should issue hunting licenses.

  • Elk Tracks

    If they want it to be sporting . . . . then they should issue hunting permits.

  • Metro

    Wait – so his security detail uses…what?

  • TED

    I HAD another step on there but figured it was too GROSS, so I removed it.

  • Pingback: Idiot politicians, gun control, sporting event, democrat()

  • jarhead

    Shit-bags like him need to drop dead!

  • grayjohn

    I’d rather use a full automatic, but it’s too much paperwork. Putting me in a position where I have to defend myself isn’t sporting either. I bet this guy wears pampers under his slacks and keeps a binky in his briefcase.

  • Right next to his Gerber mashed bananas and his blankie!

  • In Florida, you can carry edged weapons on a CCW. I myself like sword-canes, but a big duster coat can hide a lot of other toys!

  • The ap mine or the big sword?

  • I prefer a Colt Walker!

  • So is a Steyr M95 pull-bolt carbine good for either? The Imperial Germans preferred it to their 98s because it was faster!

  • I used to own both a Mossberg pump and a lever .30-30. Either could move a lot of lead downrange almost as fast as a semiautomatic. Of course, Muroff is an idiot on so many levels: political, historical, and technological!

  • 762×51

    I assume his personal security detail(they all have them) carries flintlock muskets so as to lead by example. After all, don’t want to appear to be unsporting.

  • 762×51

    Full auto weapons are of very little practical use. They are a lot of fun, but only have two legitimate uses in combat. 1. To provide suppressing fire on an enemy assaulting your defilade or during your assault of an enemy position. 2. To break contact with a numerically superior enemy force outside of a defensive position, where each team member in turn empties their weapon on full auto to keep the bad guys heads down while the team disappears.

    I’ll stick with my Sig .45 for defensive carry.

  • 762×51

    The M18A1 is so effective, all you can say about the enemy is, they will be mist.

    I’d use them as well but I’m all out of det cord.

  • 762×51

    To cure the disease, we must cauterize the infection.

  • bobdog19006

    You can tell that clown has never been hunting. Or been in a gunfight. Or in uniform. Or urinated standing up.

  • Natch: he’s a Progressive, ain’t he?

  • Or wheel-lock cavalry pistols!

  • Pingback: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup » Pirate's Cove()

  • 762×51

    They could get a special permit from the fire marshal and carry match locks, concealed carry might be a problem though.

  • Appalled By The World

    I’m for that.

  • BostonLiberty

    Simple, fire his security team, and let him carry on unarmed and alone.

  • grayjohn

    That’s God gave us select fire.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy