moonbattery logo

Aug 05 2011

Communist Party Endorses Obama

Even as Obamunism works its evil magic on what’s left of the economy, there is one endorsement the Manchurian Moonbat knew he could count on:

It may be early in the campaign season, but the Communist Party USA already has seen fit to endorse Barack Obama for the 2012 election.

[…CPUSA chairman Sam] Webb said that for communists there are major differences between Democrats and Republicans. He urged his supporters to continue to back the Democrats.

In the past, Stalinists weren’t so forthright about their support for Comrade Obama, lest people come to realize just what he represents.

Last November, the Communist Party USA was caught scrubbing its website of references that stated it “actively supported” President Obama’s election, as WND reported.

But in light of what he’s been doing to our country, any support from anyone is a feather in Obama’s cap to be displayed with pride.

Meanwhile, the CPUSA is delivering this message of harmony to its faithful:

It is urgent for President Obama, the Democrats, the labor movement and all progressive allies to rally the troops, expose the danger [of anti-socialist resistance] and prepare for war.

At least this time we won’t have to listen to Obamunists bleat that their tin-pot messiah will “unite” us. Not even a moonbat could get that out without choking on laughter.

Obama-CPUSA
His base is still behind him, via New Zeal.

On tips from Screwy Puppy, Wiggins, lonelypatriot, and AC. Hat tip: Weasel Zippers.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on StumbleUponEmail this to someoneShare on Facebook


  • Jimbo

    The democrat party keeps damned strange bedfellows:
    Communists, KKK, NAACP, La Raza, prison inmates, dead chicago voters…

    Those liberals are some weird ones.

  • Spider

    I’d be willing to bet that the radical Left (MSM, academia, commiewood, etc.) is very unhappy with such an open and obvious endorsement from their fellow commies. Oh sure, they want their support, as always, but didn’t want it to be this obvious, especially since the Marxist-in-Chief is losing support in most of the rational parts of the country. In fact, he’s even losing support in FloriDUH, a place not normally known for being politically rational.

    If nothing else, this endorsement should be a wake-up call to the brain-dead voters who are still waiting to see that “hope and change”. Don’t think so? No, neither do i.

  • http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com Reaganite Republican

    New Zeal does a smoking job tracking down commies… his research is outstanding

  • SPURWING PLOVER

    Joe McCarthy was right about these commie reptiles their everywhere especialy in our goverment

  • Jodie

    Most libs will have no problem with the communist party supporting Obama. Even if a lib was previously against communism, it’s a different story now. They think it’s necessary now, because Obama has convinced them that it’s the only way to defeat conservatism and capitalism.

    The liberal “millionaires and billionaires” are willingly giving Obama their money to redistribute as he sees fit via his continuous stream of fundraisers:

    *President Obama will celebrate his 50th birthday week with a pair of events that double as fundraisers for his 2012 election campaign.

    One, at Chicago’s Aragon Ballroom, at 4 p.m. Wednesday, will include 1,000 attendees who will shell out up to $35,800 a couple to see the likes of Herbie Hancock, Jennifer Hudson and OK Go perform, reports Reuters. A second, more intimate soiree will be held later in the evening, with somewhere between 80 and 100 VIPs. The beleaguer Prez will attend both.

    http://fineartandgraphics.com/straightG/obama-b%E2%80%99day-fundraising-35800-per-couple

    “A high-powered, intimate, $71,600-a-couple fund-raiser for President Obama hosted by Anna Wintour and Harvey Weinstein will be held at the movie mogul’s New York home next week.

    The expensive affair — billed on an invitation obtained by Page Six as a “small dinner and discussion” — is planned to bring together heavy-hitters from the worlds of fashion, movies and finance at the West Village home of Weinstein and his fashion designer wife, Georgina Chapman, on Thursday. It had been scheduled for July 18 but was postponed because of the debt ceiling debate.”

    http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/harvey_hosts_money_meal_VhI39ZLE7ST1wXoHLmtWQL

    “New York — President Obama is coming to Harlem for a DNC fundraiser that has many Harlemites scratching their heads.

    The fundraiser, which will be held at the new Marcus Samuelsson restaurant, Red Rooster, will cost $30,000 for entry.”

    http://newsone.com/nation/washington-watch/newsonestaff2/obama-dnc-bash-30000-harlem-red-rooster/

  • KHarn

    “Jodie says: August 5, 2011 at 9:29 am”

    Why don’t these assholes hold fundraisers to PAY OFF THE DEBT they forced on us?

  • Penny

    I did a quick search on the Communist Party website and couldn’t find an announcement. Is there a better source for this story than World Net Daily? They don’t exactly have a stellar track record for reliability, and even the Fox News website just links back to the WND article.

  • khARN
  • SPURWING PLOVER

    Mao Si Tung was a bigger mass murderer then hitler ever was the same for stalin as well

  • Jimbo

    Penny – actually the WND track record is very good.

    You’ve heard too much from the discreditors (sick liberal deny-ists). Careful where you read you reviews. Seriously – look at the WND regular columnists:

    Alan Keyes
    Ilana Mercer
    Victoria Jackson
    David Limbaugh
    Pat Buchanan
    Larry Elder
    Walter E. Williams
    Gary Bauer
    Hal Lindsey
    Chuck Norris
    Ann Coulter

    To name a few, and many others – What website would you give more credibilty to than WND?

  • Penny

    KHarn: I see a lot of positive write-ups, but not a full-on official 2012 endorsement there. Don’t get me wrong, it wouldn’t surprise me a bit, but I’m not comfortable repeating it to anybody else unless I can find explicit verification of the endorsement.

    Jimbo: I’m not denying there’s some truth there, but I’m sure I remember more than a couple(can’t come up with examples, admittedly–didn’t keep track) instances where the WND was undeniably factually wrong, or at least misleadingly hyperbolic. As an unashamed fundamentalist Christian, I’m sympathetic to a lot of the material on that site, but I also believe that I have a moral obligation to accurately understand and convey my opponents’ arguments, and not to create an indiscriminate strawman.

    For a news story like this, I’d like to see at least one source totally unrelated to WND before I repeat it.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial