moonbattery logo

Sep 15 2016

Coulter Versus Hannity

Who deserves to be crowned Most Comical Trump Shill?

In one corner, Ann Coulter:

“I worship him like the North Koreans worship the ‘Dear Leaders’ — yes, I would die for him,” the conservative commentator joked to Politico’s “Off Message” podcast.

As usual when fanatical Trump supporters say something that makes you think they couldn’t possibly be serious, the extent to which this was a joke is debatable. Coulter’s slavish devotion to Trump is legendary, surviving even after he left egg on her face with his amnesty flip-flops.

In the other corner, Sean Hannity:

Fox News host Sean Hannity boasted on Tuesday afternoon about his martial arts skills while warning the Never Trump movement against criticizing him.

“They’ve all taken shots at me first,” Hannity said on his radio show of conservative media members like radio host Glenn Beck, National Review Editor Rich Lowry, and columnist Jonah Goldberg.

He continued: “I’m a counter-puncher. I punch back. Now working toward my black belt … finally got my brown belt. If you hit me, come at me, I’m really going to hurt you.”

Hannity has not made a secret of his alleged martial arts prowess:

Brown belt or not, if you put them in a real ring, my money would be on Ann Coulter. Especially lately, she has that look in her eyes that says, Just walk away.

ann-coulter-scary
Hannity would not last a round.

On a tip from Torcer. Hat tip: Right Wing News.



  • ramrodd

    In case this confuses you: According to Trump, the problem is business, not government. No, government is as pure as the wind-driven snow. The problem with health care is big pharma and not the precious, amazing government bureaucrats.

    (Memo to Rush, Laura, Sean, Steyn, Coulter, and others – feel free to notice months of red flags that have been in your colossal blind spots. They are not hard to spot.)

    He’s full Bernie on the military, and instead of rolling back our liberal government to entice companies to stay onshore or move onshore, Trump wants to sic the IRS on
    companies who don’t hire the way he wants. These are Trump’s jobs, after all,
    not the companies’ jobs. In other words, Trump stopped just short of “you
    didn’t build that.”

    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/02/socialist_sweep_new_hampshire.html

  • not hillary shill

    better then being a clinton enabler like this site. you own what clinton will do.

  • marcus tullius cicero

  • Torcer

    No, those that forced trump on the party will be responsible.

    You must be new here…

  • Torcer

    I can’t wait until someone does a mashup of Hannity with the song Kung fo fighting

  • JeffersonSpinningInGrave

    Crap. I am not responsible for him being the GOP nominee. Nor am I responsible for Hillary being the Dem nominee. I’m only responsible for them if I vote for one of them. And I’m more and more convinced with each passing day that I don’t want that on my conscience. Yes, Hillary would very probably be a bigger disaster. But perhaps we’ve had enough slow boil. If we cannot solve this by voting, I don’t see how our position gets any better by dragging it out until they manage to disarm us and make most of us dependent on government for food, water, shelter, and healthcare.

  • KirklesWorth

    That’s the way the anti-Trump so-called “conservatives” would like to spin it, but this will be the third time many of these “conservatives” will have failed the American people by not producing a quality candidate and sitting on their duffs on election day. My-way-or-the-highway conservative “principles” must not include loyalty or defending rights and liberties from democrats when they don’t get their way.

  • KirklesWorth

    And what does Hillary think? Nevermind, I have a link that’s a bit fresher than a 7-month-old American Thinker opinion piece: http://www.ontheissues.org/Hillary_Clinton.htm

  • KirklesWorth

    More examples of conservatives eating their own – throwing other conservative icons under the bus for “failing” the selective indignations of the so-called “conservative purity test”. Ronald Reagan’s eleventh commandment is once again ignored.

  • ramrodd

    you continue to play the better of 2 evils game rather than calling Trump out for the phony constitutionalist/conservative he is….

  • KirklesWorth

    Sorry, my agenda is: #1 defeat Hillary, #2 deal with Trump. No sense in wasting time now “calling Trump out for the phony constitutionalist/conservative he is” when there is a Clinton that needs defeating first.

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=76175#comment-2896435641

    Everyone please note that Kirkles failed to actually address the point of my comment.

    Nor will it define Conservative principles.
    It merely derails the discussion with a bucket fill of red herrings.

  • Grumpy Cat

    Thanks for copying and pasting the DNC press release. Moron.

  • Grumpy Cat

    He lives in your head.

  • Torcer

    Can YOU define Conservative principles?

  • Grumpy Cat

    Your head is a mug. The DNC propaganda arm is the jug. The jug pours into the mug and the mug pours into the Moonbattery jug. You enjoy working for the DNC?

  • Grumpy Cat

    Can YOU define a winning strategy for a campaign to become POTUS? Other than what the DNC orders you to say?

  • Torcer

    Answer the question please, and dispense with the false narratives.

  • Grumpy Cat

    Torcer and all the other Soros funded trolls drool over Coulter.

  • KirklesWorth

    Didn’t Bodhisattva tell you that hijacking these threads is annoying? Obviously you don’t care, and will use this tactic that I will continue to point out. Anyway, I think I addressed the point of your comment exactly by calling it “spin:

    Torcer: No, those that forced trump on the party will be responsible. You must be new here…

    KirklesWorth: That’s the way the anti-Trump so-called “conservatives” would like to spin it, but this will be the third time many of these “conservatives” will have failed the American people by not producing a quality candidate and sitting on their duffs on election day. The my-way-or-the-highway conservative “principles” must not include loyalty or defending rights and liberties from democrats when they don’t get their way.

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth More examples of conservatives eating their own – throwing other conservative icons under the bus for “failing” the selective indignations of the so-called “conservative purity test”.

    So how does trump’s new entitlement square with the principle of limited government?

    KirklesWorth Ronald Reagan’s eleventh commandment is once again ignored.

    How did Trump fulfill that obligation?

  • ramrodd

    youre correct, genius!!

    American Thinker writes for the DNC…..buy a vowel

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth Didn’t Bodhisattva tell you that hijacking these threads is annoying?

    It’s still a free country, and those of an authoritarian bent do not get to Dictate how one posts around here.

    But I’m sure it continue to show it’s authoritarian predilections as always.

    KirklesWorth I think I addressed the point of your comment exactly by calling it “spin:

    No it did not.

    Let’s see if it can actually answer a direct question and define Conservative principles.

  • Torcer

    Do you agree with trump’s new entitlement?

  • KirklesWorth

    So how does trump’s new entitlement square with the principle of limited government?

    The same as has previous presidents, including Reagan.

    How did Trump fulfill that (Ronald Reagan’s eleventh commandment) obligation?

    I don’t believe you are as dumb as you are acting. He was trying to get nominated and now elected – and you are trying to get him defeated. You are trying to defeat Trump to what end?

  • ramrodd

    how many times do you need to hear that elections..
    no wait, here is Ann again….

    Elections are no longer free. They are staged theater, designed to maintain the illusion of representative governance and to enrich the political class. This is despotism. If after this mess that we just went through, if you do not understand this, you are beyond hope.

    My God.

  • KirklesWorth

    Conservative principles:

    #1 Not let a progressive-liberal-socialist criminal be president.

    Shall I go on?

    You are trying to defeat Trump to what end?

  • KirklesWorth

    I asked if you have a better plan, and you have nothing.

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth The same as has previous presidents, including Reagan.

    Non answer – TRY AGAIN

    KirklesWorthI don’t believe you are as dumb as you are acting.

    Ah yes, it wouldn’t be a conversation with a Trump supporter without some childish invective.

    KirklesWorth He was trying to get nominated and now elected – and you are trying to get him defeated. You are trying to defeat Trump to what end?

    And of course the same hold true for their use of false narratives and a failure to answer a direct question.

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth

    Conservative principles:

    #1 Not let a progressive-liberal-socialist criminal be president.

    And it doesn’t even know Conservative principles..

    TRY AGAIN.

    Let’s see if it can actually answer a direct question and define Conservative principles.

  • Torcer

    Exhibit Number one on that score has to be his new entitlement, but his desire for single payer also ranks up there.

  • KirklesWorth

    KirklesWorth The same as has previous presidents, including Reagan.
    Non answer – TRY AGAIN

    NO. Reagan was a moderate conservative and Trump is more concerned about getting the real votes of more people than the fair-weather-republican “conservatives”.

    KirklesWorth: You are trying to defeat Trump to what end?

    Torcer: And of course the same hold true for their use of false narratives and a failure to answer a direct question.

    So, you are claiming that you are not trying to get Trump defeated?

  • KirklesWorth

    So, letting a progressive-liberal-socialist criminal win is a conservative principle? Color me shocked! It still doesn’t explain why you are trying to defeat Trump…?

  • ramrodd

    WE HAVE BEEN DOWN THIS ROAD!

    God does not need the USA – The USA needs God..

    Willing Demons

    What is the United States? It is not a republic as it follows no semblence of its Constitution, the very foundation of its power, of its authority. It is a system of terror, with the power to destroy lives with contrived charges; offhandedly encumbering citizens with debt and criminal charges on a whim. This is the very system our forefather’s fled and risked everything to resist. In effect, they have taken our citizenship, robbed us of our birthright.

    Freedom? They watch us as if we are all suspects. Cameras are everywhere; software tracks us; our new vehicles and cell phones will tell them where we are at any given moment. Our writings are recorded and available as evidence against us though no charges have been filed. The result of these intrusions into our lives will become the evidence upon which they will seek a warrant. That cannot be more backward from the intent of the Constitution.

    Enemies of the people are encouraged to roam free among us, often at the informal invitation of the government. Our borders are not secure, there is no will to discriminate between honest immigrants seeking a better life and those intent on victimizing legal and legitimate citizens of the United States.

    Our economy, the very power that denies enemies to risk war on these shores, is no better than it was in 2009. Every figure compiled by the government is a ruse, it is fraud to mollify the people. Politicians lie and contrive to further the fraud to secure their own power with no regard for the dangerous waters they have navigated at our expense.

    The tax-paying citizens of this nation intent on doing right
    and living within the laws have been targeted by the very government they support. They have become the villains while true enemies have been coddled and encouraged. Every aspect of their lives have come under attack; their budgets, their religions, their privacy, their pastimes and their associations. Anything that will undermine the society of the typical American has become taboo, while
    all manner of deviance and decadence has been promoted; cheered on to success.

    If the ideals of life, liberty and property are not worth
    defending with our lives, we deserve none of them and have proved it with our inaction over the past ten years. There is not a single representative, senator, president or supreme court justice in office today who has not committed treason. Not one.

    Vote? Are you kidding me? There is no reason, beyond
    societal suicide, to vote for anyone willing to seek the office. It is a vote to destroy yourself; to forfeit your wealth; to eliminate your job; to incur the wrath of a jealous and vengeful government, because a government unloosed from those noble principles upon which this nation was founded can become nothing more than an evil among us and those seeking office its willing demons.

    The only thing left to do is fight. Though it is much easier
    to believe in unicorns and watch TV.

    http://christianmerc.blogspot.com/2014/09/willing-demons.html

  • Grumpy Cat

    Q: Do you agree with the DNC position on Trump’s “new entitlement”

    A: YES!

  • KirklesWorth

    Uh huh. So you have copy-and-paste, but nothing concrete. No plan, no candidate, no hope. Let the progressive-liberal-socialist criminal win and let the chips fall where they may and somehow we will become a conservative nation again?

  • KirklesWorth

    But of course, you have all the answers…which is…?

  • ramrodd

    i continue to be amazed how so many continue to be fooled as they latch on to the newest hero WHO WILL NEVER FOLLOW THRU ON WHAT HE HAS BEEN SAYING…

    he continues to backtrack as the sheep follow….

  • ramrodd

    it is over….the country was lost a long time ago…

    that is the truth you hate hearing…..
    the truth that more are coming to understand……..

  • Grumpy Cat

    Q: Do you agree with the DNC position on Trump’s “new entitlement”

    A: YES!

    Answer the question please, and dispense with the false narratives.

  • KirklesWorth

    Who is your shepherd that we should follow?

  • Grumpy Cat

    Answer the question please, and dispense with the false narratives.

    Q: Do you agree with the DNC position on Trump’s “new entitlement”

    A: YES!

  • KirklesWorth

    So, then your anti-Trump rantings are for naught and you just like hassling Trump supporters?

  • ramrodd

    blind followers of course will call the truth…rants and hassles…

  • KirklesWorth

    And what is the truth in this scenario? That you are giving up on our country and are fine with a progressive-liberal-socialist criminal president?

  • ramrodd

    i know that there are no heroes left..
    if the state controlled media wish for your hero to fail – they will destroy him, so how

  • ramrodd

    The fact that a given person is holding or seeking high-level public office is, in and of itself, proof that said person is morally and/or psychologically UNFIT to hold public office.

    The Barnhardt Axiom.

    You realize this applies every bit as strongly to Trump too, right? Tell me you are not so stupid as to believe for one second that Trump would actually do ANY of the things he is talking about. He’s just smart enough to know what y’all
    want to hear, and is saying it. You know how I know that Trump will never follow through on anything he is saying?

    BECAUSE. HE. IS. RUNNING. FOR. POLITICAL. OFFICE. IN. A. NATION. THAT NO. LONGER. EXISTS.

    Remember, the only thing that actually WANTS to be in a cesspit is a PIECE OF CRAP.

  • KirklesWorth

    Huh, makes me wonder why you haven’t renounced your citizenship…? So so-called “conservatives” really give up that easily?

  • ramrodd

    of course thats where like you frauds always go!

    after 60 plus years, born here, Nam era Vet!!
    you phony conservatives would love for people that know the truth to give up their birth place!!

  • KirklesWorth

    Who are you calling a “fraud”? You’re the one giving up on our country! I am not the one who said “it is over….the country was lost a long time ago…” so spare me your indignation and your lectures – even if you are a “Nam era Vet!”

  • TrueConservative

    Yep, Coulter is definitely winning !!!!!

  • ramrodd

    Calling all phony conservatives!!

    “Love it or leave it!”

    It’s in this context that I offer for your consideration an

    “Love it or leave it!” line, first noting a couple of telling presuppositions displayed in the way this question/challenge is usually issued.

    To love the American State is to obey and conform to the will of the American State, only using the means sanctioned by the American State (like rigged economic and political systems) to correct or influence the American State. We’re slaves of the State, and we have been conditioned to love our bondage.

    Answer to the “Love it or leave it!” line is this:

    Those who love America more than Christ will ultimately be the ones leaving American land, and those who love Christ above America will be the ones ultimately owning this land.
    Put another way: Love Him or leave it!
    Fire Breathing Christian

  • KirklesWorth

    Okay – you don’t love it and you won’t leave it, so what will you do?. Your quotes don’t really give a reason to permit a Hillary presidency, but if you are trying to facilitate the “end times” then your motivation becomes more clear.

  • Torcer

    That would be NO

  • Torcer

    That would be a big NO

    Is that YOUR answer to that question?

  • Torcer

    Again: NO

    What is YOUR answer?

  • Artfuldgr

    Some have slavish loyalty to candidates that are not even candidates…
    go figure…

  • Torcer

    Grumpy Cat

    Answer the question please, and dispense with the false narratives.

    Q: Do you agree with the DNC position on Trump’s “new entitlement”

    A: YES!
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=76175#comment-2896700852

    Please cite where I actually said that.

    Or once again you will be shown to be a liar.

  • ramrodd

    it has nothing to do with me….enough

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth

    Conservative principles:

    #1 Not let a progressive-liberal-socialist criminal be president.

    And it doesn’t even know Conservative principles..

    TRY AGAIN.

    Let’s see if it can actually answer a direct question and define Conservative principles.

    KirklesWorth

    So, letting a progressive-liberal-socialist criminal win is a conservative principle? Color me shocked! It still doesn’t explain why you are trying to get Trump defeated…?
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=76175#comment-2896653436

    Once again we see that it can’t even answer a direct question and it has to deflect with as yet another set of falsehoods.

  • KirklesWorth

    Torcer: Once again we see that it can’t even answer a direct question and it has to deflect with as yet another set of falsehoods.

    Complete lie, and your word games won’t save you.

    Torcer: Let’s see if it can actually answer a direct question and define Conservative principles.

    Not really phrased as a question, yet answered anyway:

    KirklesWorth: Conservative principles: #1 Not let a progressive-liberal-socialist criminal be president. Shall I go on? You are trying to defeat Trump to what end?

    http://moonbattery.com/?p=76175#comment-2896644992

    Was it (noun) 1. a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation? Yes, therefore answered.
    Did I (verb) 1. say or write something to deal with or as a reaction to someone or something? Yes, therefore answered.
    Did I (verb) 2. act in reaction to? Yes, therefore answered.

    By all three definitions, I answered the question. Answer: 1. a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation. (verb) 1. say or write something to deal with or as a reaction to someone or something. 2. act in reaction to.

    And once again, you claim “falsehood” without proof even when challenged:

    KirklesWorth: You are trying to defeat Trump to what end?
    Torcer: And of course the same hold true for their use of false narratives and a failure to answer a direct question.

    KirklesWorth: So, you are claiming that you are not trying to get Trump defeated? What is the “false narrative” of “You are trying to defeat Trump to what end?”

  • 762×51

    Government entitlement programs are the cornerstone of Progressive acquisition of power and redistribution of wealth.

    How funny is it that these idiots rail against us not being “true conservatives” because we won’t support a phony Republican, while simultaneously, blindly supporting an unconstitutional expansion of federal government entitlements?

    I tel ya, the irony is so thick you could cut it with a knife.

  • 762×51

    Jerklesworth the genius, LAMO!!

    Hey jerkoffsworth, here are a few more potential candidates who are “qualified” under your brilliant candidate selection system of “they ain’t Hillary”.

    David Bowie
    David Beckham
    David Letterman
    David Spade
    David Schwimmer
    David Duchovny
    David Ortiz
    David Hasselhoff
    David Gilmour
    David Niven,
    David Lee Roth
    David Hyde pierce
    David Caruso
    David Berkowitz
    David Cassidy
    David Copperfield
    David McCallum
    Dave Mason
    Dave Parker
    David Geffen
    David Alan Coe

    Lots of alphabet left to go.

    Just sing out if you see one that you can worship like tRump . . .

    ROTFLMFAO!!

  • KirklesWorth

    Wow…you really went to a lot of trouble…for nothing. How about giving me one single person capable of defeating Hillary? We can wait until November.

    On a separate issue, at least you admit that you want Trump to win for your civil war so you can kill progressives. Others are reluctant to reveal their anti-Trump agenda.

  • 762×51

    Doesn’t look like tRump can beat her either so I assume that wasn’t a consideration in your “masterful” political calculations. The only actual case you can FOR tRump is, “he ain’t Hillary”. Weak and pathetic, just like you.

    Civil war happens regardless of the outcome of the election you blithering idiot. You progtard assholes are about to pay the price for your smug arrogance and single minded lust for power. Killing hajji’s, killing Progressives, it’s all the same, fascists all die a like.

  • FrozenPatriot

    People with principles don’t violate these principles for a label or an organization. Principled socialists are doing the same at the other end of the spectrum and not voting for Hitlery because she’s indistinguishable from Donald the Philanderer from their point of view too.

  • Grumpy Cat

    Don’t worry genius (7.62 IQ) no matter who wins the election they’ll still serve you ice cream once a week in your cell. Hey look at this way: if Hillary wins you’ll get to vote again!

  • Grumpy Cat

    I own you babycakes.

  • KirklesWorth

    What do you care as long as you can have your civil war and kill your “progressives”? But of course, you don’t know nor care what a progressive is, as good fascists just pick a target group and start the slaughter. What do you care about freedoms, rights, and liberties since you’re not a conservative?

  • KirklesWorth

    And “people with principles” justify their errors with flourished prose and projected blame. “People with principles” allowed Obama to be president – twice. Therefore, their “principles” failed them both in concept and in practice.

  • FrozenPatriot

    You’re even more foolish than I thought. I’ve been away for three weeks and you’ve learned nothing. Pathetic…

  • Patriciatwagner1

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !rs416f:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !rs416f:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash666DigitalCommerceGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!rs416f:….,……..

  • KirklesWorth

    Learned what? That you want Hillary to win to “wake people up”, or that you have a candidate better than Trump that can defeat Hillary?

  • FrozenPatriot

    Away from your foolishness, of course.

    “Learned what?” LOL priceless… Keep ’em coming!

  • KirklesWorth

    I already knew that you wanted Hillary to win to “wake people up”, but I gave you the outside chance that you had a candidate better than Trump that can defeat Hillary. Obviously, you have no such candidate. Forgive me if I think the foolishness is yours for helping Hillary.

  • FrozenPatriot

    LOL thanks for another gem of insight into your twisted intellect. However, I’ve quickly lost interest. Bye bye, troll. If your IQ ever rises above room temperature, perhaps we can engage in an honest conversation.

  • 762×51

    So then by your deception, only “real” conservatives support Progressive candidates like “the Douchold”. Spin away, little proggie troll. While you are at it, tell us more about how supporting unconstitutional, government expansion / redistribution policies like tRumps maternity program makes you the “real” conservative here.

    I didn’t here any complaints from you fucktards when the enemies of the United States I was slaughtering were goat herders. See, Progressives like you aren’t anti-military or even anti-gun, that is a misconception. As long as you can control it, you are good with it. What you can’t stand is anyone having the power to oppose your despotism.

    Eat shit and die, you asshole.

  • 762×51

    Just wringing your hands in anticipation of all the Conservative you will get to lock up after your cult takes power, aren’t you? Well, my brothers and I won’t be helping you, fascist. You are going to have to do it all on your own. That means you will need to grow some balls between now and then, better start taking your T supplement, pussy.

    OH, and learn the meaning of Tap, Rack, Bang, you’re going to need it. see you on the battlefield, bitch.

  • God Emperor Trump

    That’s all those beta cuckservatives can do, oh and fap fap fap LOLZ

  • KirklesWorth

    Insult..insult…insult…no denial…

    KirklesWorth: Yeah…the immediate consequences of a Hillary presidency is liberties and rights taken away. If you thought Obamacare sailed through, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet. http://moonbattery.com/?p=75428#comment-2853432751

    FrozenPatriot: Let it come. The more people suffer under the oppression of the state, the more they’ll wake up. The more people are awake, the less the need for violence to restore liberty. http://moonbattery.com/?p=75428#comment-2853444499https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/151f3f850f3ff822b5ac81cff3bfe93b079c8c57d37df1636c8cd4da7f89f9ed.png

  • Torcer

    Awww isn’t that precious!
    Suddenly it’s interested in the truth:

    KirklesWorth
    Torcer: Once again we see that it can’t even answer a direct question and it has to deflect with as yet another set of falsehoods.

    Complete lie, and your word games won’t save you

    Torcer: Let’s see if it can actually answer a direct question and define Conservative principles.

    KirklesWorth: Conservative principles: #1 Not let a progressive-liberal-socialist criminal be president. Shall I go on? You are trying to defeat Trump to what end? http://moonbattery.com/?p=7617

    By all three definitions, I answered the question. Answer: 1. a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation. (verb) 1. say or write something to deal with or as a reaction to someone or something. 2. act in reaction to.

    Definition of principle
    noun
    1A fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behaviour or for a chain of reasoning.
    ‘the basic principles of justice’
    1.1A rule or belief governing one’s behaviour.
    ‘struggling to be true to their own principles’
    [mass noun] ‘she resigned over a matter of principle’
    1.2[mass noun]Morally correct behaviour and attitudes.
    ‘a man of principle’
    Origin
    Late Middle English: from Old French, from Latin principium source, principia (plural) foundations, from princeps, princip- first, chief.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/principle

    Of course we could all demand it actually show where that is a commonly accepted Conservative Principle but from past expericence…

    And once again, you claim “falsehood” without proof even when challenged:

    KirklesWorth: You are trying to defeat Trump to what end?

    Sadly, once again we see that it goes back to spewing falsehoods.
    My demand would it show proof in the form of Excepts that is the case, let’s see if it can provide such items..

  • Torcer

    http://moonbattery.com/?p=76175#comment-2896644992

    Sadly, once again we see that it goes back to spewing falsehoods.
    My demand would it show proof in the form of Excepts that is the case, let’s see if it can provide such items.

  • Torcer

    Have you always been and advocate of wealth redistribution?

  • KirklesWorth

    Then why aren’t you re-posting my comment “You are trying to defeat Trump to what end?” and disproving it?

  • KirklesWorth

    Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?

  • Torcer

    Trump is showing his true spots as a big government leftist.

    In some ways it kind of amusing to see the Trump supporters try to explain it away..

  • Torcer

    1. Just keep in mind this quotation:

    In certain basic respects – a totalitarian state structure, a single party, a leader, a secret police, a hatred of political, cultural and intellectual freedom – fascism and communism are clearly more like each other than they are like anything in between.
    Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr.,

    2. Is Tap, Rack, Bang the primary means to deal with most malfunctions?

  • 762×51

    Yeah, old jerklesworth dancing like a worm on a hook trying to not answer that question. But then he is the “real” conservative here, LMAO!

    You suppose these imbeciles will ever get a clue that it is the agenda the candidate wants to implement that defines whether they are a Conservative or a Progressive and not the empty rhetoric or vague promises they make?

    Maybe jerklesworth should back George Soros for President, after all, he isn’t Hillary.

  • KirklesWorth

    But it all matters naught for you, since you want Trump to lose to start your civil war so you can murder your so-called “progressives” that you demonize like previous fascist dictators you admire.

  • Pingback: Moonbattery » Trump TV Trailer()

  • Torcer

    The most infuriating part of all of this will be that we are ending up
    with two leftists on the ballot when we could of had a Conservative that
    would have changed the course of the ship of state.

    That realization alone should be enough to cause the Trump supporters disappear..

  • KirklesWorth

    Trump is a moderate conservative. The realization should be to the reactionary conservatives that if they can’t get Romney elected who is more conservative than Trump, then the moderates are the ones who will make or break the republican candidates. The moderates have embraced Trump – so will the reactionaries submit or will they permit the progressive-liberal-socialist criminal to win…?

  • Torcer

    Once again we see Kirkles have to tottle off into the realm of the red herring.

    The point being made is that we could have changed the disastrous course of the country with a Conservative at the helm.

  • KirklesWorth

    So, defeating Hillary is a “red herring”? That doesn’t sound very conservative to me. You haven’t explained what your goal for attacking Trump is other than Brad Thor (fail), Evan McMullin (fail), and the whimsical “That a candidate who champions liberty wins” (fail). So you are assisting in the “disastrous course of the country” as a so-called “conservative”. Congrats!

  • 762×51

    It cannot be solved by voting. There are only two ways things like this get “solved”, ballots or bullets and ballots will no longer solve this, so . . .

    You cannot defeat an enemy by becoming that enemy which is the plan the Trumpanzees are selling. Could America have defeated the Nazi’s by becoming Nazis?

    What jerklesworth and the other swine are doing is exactly what Progressives and purveyors of evil have always done, they try to convince others to “just try a little”, we can “handle” tRump, don’t worry, “he’s better than Hillary”. Is cocaine better than arsenic? I suppose so, in the beginning, but you and I are not the ones who will pay for this mistake. I prefer my family remember me as someone who fought for their freedom not someone who sold them into slavery.

    This election, we will literally have to vote our conscience so which will it be? The Black Mamba or the Coral Snake? One is, after all, slightly less deadly than the other.

  • 762×51

    Unlikely. It is most likely one of the usual Trumpanzee Chorus who have infested MB. There are only about a half dozen of the vermin but they use multiple screen names to appear as more. Observe their use of certain words or phrases in multiple screen names and you will see what I mean.

    Progressives learned decades ago to use force multipliers such as this to give them more clout in society. This is merely an extension of an old trick.

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth

    So, defeating Hillary is a “red herring”? That doesn’t sound very conservative to me. You haven’t explained what your goal for attacking Trump is other than Brad Thor (fail), Evan McMullin (fail), and the whimsical “That a candidate who champions liberty wins” (fail). So you are assisting in the “disastrous course of the country” as a so-called “conservative”. Congrats!
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=76175#comment-2902142444

    Another classic.

    Here it disingenuously tries to twist around one words into a falsehood…

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth

    So, defeating Hillary is a “red herring”? That doesn’t sound very conservative to me. You haven’t explained what your goal for attacking Trump is other than Brad Thor (fail), Evan McMullin (fail), and the whimsical “That a candidate who champions liberty wins” (fail). So you are assisting in the “disastrous course of the country” as a so-called “conservative”. Congrats!
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=76175#comment-2902142444

    Another classic.

    Here it disingenuously tries to twist around one words into a falsehood..

  • 762×51

    Such a shallow learning curve you have.

    Civil war is certain now, regardless of which “side” of the Progressive uni-party wins in Nov, you imbecile. You assholes have guaranteed it, not me. I don’t start wars, I finish them.

    I find it very interesting how concerned you are about the future demise of Progressives, I mean, all of your ranting about Hillary seems quite disingenuous in the face of such an unsolicited position. What is it about Progressives you find redeeming? Being one yourself?

    Which “previous fascist dictators” have demonized Progressives? Also, please list the “previous fascist dictators I have said I admire, along with a citation defining where and when I uttered such a thing. I have killed a number of fascists, little boy. What have you done to stop fascism?

    You have fallen into the trap all professional liars fall into eventually, you believe your own bullshit and now cannot separate reality from your lies, jerkoffsworth.

  • Torcer

    It is kind of interesting that those who support the man tend to act like him..

    Sadly none can ever act like adults in these discussions.

  • 762×51

    Notice how concerned it is that I should discuss the coming civil war and the elimination of Progressives. It seems very concerned that Progressives will be targets. Odd don’t you think given its vociferous proclamations against Hillary?

    Seems like old jerklesworth may finally be coming out of the closet.

  • Torcer

    Well one good indication of it’s true allegiances is it’s moral relativism.

    And it’s reticence to actually be clear about it’s belief system.

  • 762×51

    They seem quite comfortable with the outright deceit perpetrated by tRump to gain, or is it game, the nomination. Why would anyone assume they would begin to hold him accountable once he in power?

    You have to laugh at the “my fascist is a better grade of fascist than the other guys fascist”, beliefs. It presumes that a slave cares not who his master is, only that he has one and is forced to serve.

    Moral relativism indeed.

  • KirklesWorth

    Evaded / ignored per usual.

    1. (Asked 12 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 13 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

  • KirklesWorth

    Your violent, psychotic, and paranoid lectures are entertaining at least. I guess whatever it takes for you to justify in your own mind electing Hillary to start your civil war to kill “progressives” (about which you have no clue).

  • KirklesWorth

    Evaded / ignored per usual.

    1. (Asked 12 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 13 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

  • KirklesWorth

    The only thing that I am concerned about is that you would murder “progressives” when you have no idea what they are or that they have the same rights as you. And what is odd is that you haven’t made as many “vociferous proclamations against Hillary” as you have against Trump and your fellow Americans.

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth

    So, defeating Hillary is a “red herring”? That doesn’t sound very conservative to me. You haven’t explained what your goal for attacking Trump is other than Brad Thor (fail), Evan McMullin (fail), and the whimsical “That a candidate who champions liberty wins” (fail). So you are assisting in the “disastrous course of the country” as a so-called “conservative”. Congrats!
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=76175#comment-2902142444

    Another classic.

    Here it disingenuously tries to twist around one words into a falsehood…

    KirklesWorth

    Evaded / ignored per usual.

    1. (Asked 12 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 13 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

    *SIGH*
    here we go again with it’s incessant game of wasting people’s time asking questions that have been ALREADY RESPONDED to.

    Request #: Sorry, your turn to answer:
    1. How is Trump any different?
    2. Merely posting articles means nothing in that regard.

  • KirklesWorth

    Evaded / ignored per usual #3.

    1. (Asked 13 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 14 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

  • Torcer

    AGAIN

    KirklesWorth

    So, defeating Hillary is a “red herring”? That doesn’t sound very conservative to me. You haven’t explained what your goal for attacking Trump is other than Brad Thor (fail), Evan McMullin (fail), and the whimsical “That a candidate who champions liberty wins” (fail). So you are assisting in the “disastrous course of the country” as a so-called “conservative”. Congrats!
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=76175#comment-2902142444

    Another classic.

    Here it disingenuously tries to twist around one words into a falsehood…

    KirklesWorth

    Evaded / ignored per usual.

    1. (Asked 12 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 13 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

    *SIGH*
    here we go again with it’s incessant game of wasting people’s time asking questions that have been ALREADY RESPONDED to.

    Request #: Sorry, your turn to answer:
    1. How is Trump any different?
    2. Merely posting articles means nothing in that regard.

  • KirklesWorth

    Evaded / ignored per usual #4.

    1. (Asked 14 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 15 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

  • Torcer

    The main thing one has to remember is that they tend to lead with deceit. One of their main method is to attack accusing others of the tactics THEY USE to preempt responses back at them.

    Earlier we saw that Trump was a leftist, and his moves left now have only reinforced that belief.

  • KirklesWorth
  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth Evaded / ignored per usual #4.

    The problem for it is that I’ve already responded to this..

    *SIGH*
    here we go again with it’s incessant game of wasting people’s time asking questions that have been ALREADY RESPONDED to.

    Request #: Sorry, your turn to answer:
    1. How is Trump any different?
    2. Merely posting articles means nothing in that regard.

  • KirklesWorth

    Evaded / ignored per usual #6.

    1. (Asked 16 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 17 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth

    You obviously don’t know what a “leftist” is.

    The problem for it is that we’re talking about a moving target.

    Trump Tilts Further Left With His Climate Change Stance
    So he’s for touchback amnesty, single-payer healthcare, a childcare plan that is nothing more than expanded entitlements (an add-in from his daughter), a tariff on imports, is against fracking, and now wants to reconsider global warming.
    Sounds like the perfect candidate.

    For Democrats.

    “There is still much that needs to be investigated in the field of ‘climate change,'” he said in response to the questionnaire. He suggested that the nation focus on efforts to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, rather than combating climate change.

    In the past, he has called climate change a “hoax” created by the Chinese, but he also has said he supports local bans on fracking.

    For most other conservative thinkers, the climate change… aka… “weather” debate has already been settled, and they recognize it as a wedge issue, in order to create broader government regulations.
    http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2016/09/13/trump-tilts-left-climate-change-stance/

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth

    You obviously don’t know what a “leftist” is.

    The problem for it is that we’re talking about a moving target.

    Trump Tilts Further Left With His Climate Change Stance
    So he’s for touchback amnesty, single-payer healthcare, a childcare plan that is nothing more than expanded entitlements (an add-in from his daughter), a tariff on imports, is against fracking, and now wants to reconsider global warming.
    Sounds like the perfect candidate.

    For Democrats.

    “There is still much that needs to be investigated in the field of ‘climate change,'” he said in response to the questionnaire. He suggested that the nation focus on efforts to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, rather than combating climate change.

    In the past, he has called climate change a “hoax” created by the Chinese, but he also has said he supports local bans on fracking.

    For most other conservative thinkers, the climate change… aka… “weather” debate has already been settled, and they recognize it as a wedge issue, in order to create broader government regulations.
    http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2016/09/13/trump-tilts-left-climate-change-stance/

  • Torcer

    *SIGH*
    here we go again with it’s incessant game of wasting people’s time asking questions that have been ALREADY RESPONDED to.

    Request #: Sorry, your turn to answer:
    1. How is Trump any different?
    2. Merely posting articles means nothing in that regard.

  • KirklesWorth

    Already responded to in the other story:

    That was a reasonable response! But only to a point. People who are left of Reagan are not automatically “leftists”, “progressives”, or any other left-wing label you wish to use. Reagan was a moderate conservative as well.

  • KirklesWorth

    The “moral relativism” is yours where you equate Trump with leftists. You are emotionally compromised with anti-Trump hatred, and your anti-Trump attacks don’t further any conservative goals that you have stated so far.

  • KirklesWorth

    What happened to your demands of “plenty EXCERPTS and Links from authentic reference sites in your answer”? Now they don’t serve your purpose, so “posting articles means nothing”. How convenient for you.

    Please cite your “answers” to these questions that you’ve “already responded to”:

    1. (Asked 17 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 18 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

  • Torcer

    To use YOUR words: Already responded to….
    [BTW, I’m not as retentive enough to count the number times this has been done]

  • KirklesWorth

    So you can’t cite your “answers” to these questions that you’ve “already responded to”. Thank you for the concession. So I will ask again:

    1. (Asked 19 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 20 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

  • Torcer

    To use YOUR words: Already responded to….
    [BTW, I’m not as retentive enough to count the number times this has been done]

  • Torcer

    To use YOUR words: Already responded to…..
    [BTW, I’m not as retentive enough to count the number times this has been done]

  • KirklesWorth

    You are the citation demander, and yet you can’t come up with any proof to support that you “already responded to” these questions. Of course you can’t cite what doesn’t exist: And of course it is a lot easier to evade 20 times rather than answer two questions.

    1. (Asked 20 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 21 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth

    It is easy to be “retentive” (like that is an excuse) when you keep evading the same questions over and over within minutes of each other. And of course, it’s easier to evade 20 times than answer two questions, right?

    You are the citation demander, and yet you can’t come up with any proof to support that you “already responded to” these questions. Of course you can’t cite what doesn’t exist:

    1. (Asked 20 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 21 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

    *sigh*
    Once again it shows that it does not care about the truth of the matter.

    The questions were responded to and yet it keeps pushing the same thing.

    KirklesWorth

    So you can’t cite your “answers” to these questions that you’ve “already responded to”. Thank you for the concession. So I will ask again:

    1. (Asked 19 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 20 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

    Does it mean the responses I REPEATED numerous times already????

    *SIGH*
    here we go again with it’s incessant game of wasting people’s time asking questions that have been ALREADY RESPONDED to.

    Request #: Sorry, your turn to answer:
    1. How is Trump any different?
    2. Merely posting articles means nothing in that regard..

  • KirklesWorth

    * Sigh *. It keeps claiming what it has no evidence for, despite it’s demands for others to provide “plenty EXCERPTS and Links from authentic reference sites in your answer.” Everybody knows it would produce proof to prove me wrong if it could.

    1. (Asked 21 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 22 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

  • Torcer

    KirklesWorth

    It is easy to be “retentive” (like that is an excuse) when you keep evading the same questions over and over within minutes of each other. And of course, it’s easier to evade 20 times than answer two questions, right?

    You are the citation demander, and yet you can’t come up with any proof to support that you “already responded to” these questions. Of course you can’t cite what doesn’t exist:

    1. (Asked 20 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 21 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

    *sigh*
    Once again it shows that it does not care about the truth of the matter.

    The questions were responded to and yet it keeps pushing the same thing.

    KirklesWorth

    So you can’t cite your “answers” to these questions that you’ve “already responded to”. Thank you for the concession. So I will ask again:

    1. (Asked 19 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 20 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

    Does it mean the responses I REPEATED numerous times already????

    *SIGH*
    here we go again with it’s incessant game of wasting people’s time asking questions that have been ALREADY RESPONDED to.

    Request #: Sorry, your turn to answer:
    1. How is Trump any different?
    2. Merely posting articles means nothing in that regard..

  • KirklesWorth

    Answered multiple times:

    Trump is different #1
    Trump is different #2
    Trump is different #3

    1. (Asked 21 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 22 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

    Which is it:

    Provide “plenty EXCERPTS and Links from authentic reference sites in your answer.”

    or

    “Merely posting articles means nothing in that regard.”

  • Torcer
  • KirklesWorth

    Calls for help now? Unbelievable what hoops you will jump through to avoid answering two questions:

    1. (Asked 22 times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct?
    2. (Asked 23 times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end?

    Here’s the pathetic cry for help to Bodhisattva:

    Could you please respond to KirklesWorth and ask it does it INSISTS on wasting people’s time asking the same question that was already responded to Multiple times??

    1. How is Trump any different?
    Trump keeps on changing so which version is it defending?

    2. Merely posting articles means nothing in that regard..
    [That should be self-explanatory, but for some reason it cannot fathom it’s meaning]

    [BTW, I don’t really care how many times it likes to retentively count it’s time wasting and now pointless repetitions]

  • Torcer
  • KirklesWorth

    My response is right here:

    “How is Trump any different?” answers: Trump is different #1, Trump is different #2, Trump is different #3,

    Torcer will not answer these questions and calls for help from Bodhisattva.

    1. (Asked 20+ times) Hillary is the antithesis of conservatism and must be defeated. Correct? It won’t answer.
    2. (Asked 20+ times) You are trying to get Trump defeated to what end? It won’t answer.

    It demands “plenty EXCERPTS and Links from authentic reference sites in your answer” or flip-flops when it is convenient to “Merely posting articles means nothing in that regard”.

    My comments are all in response to it’s claims, but claims that I am the one guilty of “time wasting and now pointless repetitions”. If it stops posting garbage, there won’t be any need for me to respond.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy