moonbattery logo

Nov 19 2016

Big Government Confiscates Hotel on Behalf of Colonists in Ficarolo, Italy

This is what happens when private property rights come up against the campaign by Europe’s rulers to displace the native population with welfare colonists from the most savage parts of the Third World:

The hotel owner Luigi Sheets is to be paid €7 per day per colonist. He wouldn’t agree to that, so force was required. It’s doubtful he can make a profit at that rate, and regular customers will be driven away, but that’s his problem. When he goes bankrupt, he can go on welfare like his unwelcome guests.

Vlad Tepes asks, “Remember when police were paid by your taxes to protect you and your property?”

That is the most fundamental purpose of government. To the extent your property is confiscated rather than defended, you are not dealing with a legitimate government, but with a gang of thugs.

On a tip from Dragon’s Lair.



  • Mr. Freemarket

    He owns a hotel. He must be rich.

  • I’ll make do with the article and thread comments. I can’t watch the video. How did Italy get infected with this malarkey? Burn the hotel to the ground, Luigi.

  • DM

    Hope that is sarcasm. By the looks of the hotel he is just getting by. This will ruin him.

  • DM

    Notice how the women and children are disguised as men of military age.

  • Veritas100

    You guys here at Moonbattery did everything in your power to stop Trump, even though he’s the only one willing to take a stand against against invaders such as those illustrated here. Yet you print this article about government’s duty to defend us. Can’t have it both ways, Moonbattery.

  • I would hope that those here are aware of KELO V. NEW LONDON (04-108) 545 U.S. 469 (2005) ; 268 Conn. 1, 843 A. 2d 500

    In case they say “It Can’t Happen Here”, yes, it can.

    It did.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-108.ZO.html

    It may well again.

  • First, your claim “You guys” is wrong because there was an obvious and sometimes bitter divide over the fact that some people were so obviously and unreasonably (IMHO) against Trump.

    Now the thread’s owner did go a wee bit too far sometimes, but he went even further against Hillary Clinton, and justifiably so, because (IMHO) she was the worst choice. Trump had a lot of baggage too.

    I’m actually somewhat pleased with his statements and actions since the election, so far at least. They give me hope my own misgivings were perhaps ill founded.

    This article goes beyond the simple concept of Government having a duty to defend us. We agree to government so that we can go about our business without fear that someone will steal all our stuff, even our property, while we’re doing it. This article is about government stealing the property. Government doing the opposite of what it was created to do.

    This article is timely and important, for it sums up what happened during 8 years of Obama and what would go on during 4 years of Clinton. Reluctantly I add that it is possible it may also touch on what might happen under Trump. We shall see.

  • I’m sure it was sarcasm… the point being the liberals felt that since he was rich his property was fair game for confiscation. But once all the job and income producing property is confiscated, where do the tax revenues come from? Liberals never think this through. Once all the jobs are destroyed and everyone is on the dole, where does the money come from?

    Liberals have been saying that everyone should be paid a wage by the government. Nobody should have to work. They should be allowed to do whatever they want. They’re actually doing an experiment on this right now – about half the country is on government support and basically does drugs (illegal ones, alcohol, etc.) and they only get up to demonstrate about how unfair the world is and how Republicans are the reason. You’ve seen them. Occupy. That was them. Those camping out in Cannonball, ND protesting the DAPL. That’s them. And those protesting the election, as if their silly protests are going to make a difference. That’s them.

  • KirklesWorth

    With due respect, I have two differences in opinion (just for the record):

    #1. “the thread’s owner did go a wee bit too far sometimes” – that sounds like and understatement to me (see below).

    #2. “he went even further against Hillary Clinton” – I don’t find that to be the case. I’ll refer you to these lists of Moonbattery articles from August that refer to either Trump or Hillary. You can see that there were more and severer articles about Trump than Hillary. Many, if not most, were referred by Torcer:

    List of Moonbattery articles in August regarding Trump: 1. The Vicious Hatred Toward #NeverTrumpers Explained 2. Nine Percent Imposed Hillary/Trump (Torcer) 3. One Born Every Minute: Trump and the Supreme Court (Torcer) 4. Trump Doesn’t Say What He Says 5. Constitution’s Reception at a Trump Rally (Torcer) 6. Trump Versus Trump (Torcer) 7. Top GOP Spokesman in Florida Quits Rather Than Support Trump (Torcer) 8. Trump: “My Temperament Has Gotten Me Here” (Torcer) 9. Trump Promises Us More Money; That’s the Bad News (Torcer) 10. Trump Threatens to Stop Raising Money for Republicans (Torcer) 11. Trump Calls for Increasing National Debt (Torcer) 12. How Laura Ingraham Helped Persuade Ben Shapiro Not to Vote for Trump 13. With One Tweet I Could Rest My Case Against Trump (Torcer) 14. How Far Can Triumph the Insult Comic Dog Push Trump’s Loyal Supporters? (Torcer) 15. Trump Death Knell (Torcer) 16. Trump Trails by 30 Points in His Home State (Torcer) 17. Brad Thor Endorses Donald Trump 18. Democrats Can’t Tell Hillary From Trump Quotes (Torcer) 19. Trump Hymns (Torcer) 20. Why Trump Scares the Hell Out of Conservatives (Torcer) 21. Trump Begins to Pivot on Illegal Immigration (Torcer) 22. Trump and NBC Discussed Using Presidency for Reality Show (Torcer) 23. Trump Supporters Respond to the Great Illegal Immigration Flip-Flop (Torcer) 24. Hitler Finds Out About Trump’s Great Illegal Immigration Flip-Flop (Torcer) 25. Trump Redefines Softening as “Hardening” Regarding Illegal Immigration Sellout (Torcer) 26. Ted Cruz Predicted Trump’s Great Illegal Immigration Flip-Flop (Torcer) 27. Plea for Trump to Keep His Word and Drop Out (Torcer) 28. Caller Calls Out Rush Limbaugh for Selling Out to Trump

    List of Moonbattery articles in August regarding Hillary: 1. The Hillary Standard 2. Nine Percent Imposed Hillary/Trump (Torcer) 3. Top Seven Reasons You Should Not Vote for Hillary 4. Hillary: Too Cool for School 5. Hillary’s Top 10 Scandals 6. Investigating Hillary’s Bizarre Behavior 7. Hillary Barks About Gun Control With Father of Orlando Killer Seated Behind Her (Torcer) 8. Dan Abrams: Media Doesn’t Like Hillary Because She Isn’t Far Enough Left (Torcer) 9. Unsurprising Source of Support for Hillary 10. Clinton Foundation FBI Investigation Could Mean Actual Consequences for Hillary (Torcer) 11. Right to Be Believed Edited Out of Hillary’s Website 12. Were Hillary Clinton’s Statements False? (Torcer) 13. Hillary Supporters Want to Repeal 2nd Amendment (Torcer) 14. A Salivating Hillary Plans Her Looting Spree (Torcer) 15. Democrats Can’t Tell Hillary From Trump Quotes (Torcer) 16. Hillary’s E-Mail Lies 17. Hillary Didn’t Just Delete Her Emails… (Torcer) 18. Hillary Deleted Subpoenaed Emails Related to Benghazi Terror Attack (Torcer)

  • NotKennedy

    So,tell us, what do you do when you are not compiling and tallying statistics? You sound more and more like a DoJ thought monitor with each passing day.

    In case you missed the central thesis, Trump is not, has never been, nor will he ever be conservative. He is not a Republican and has never been a Republican.

    It is a moot point that the enemy won the popular vote but the Electoral College preserved democracy. Some have said as much about W and look how he turned out. His best recommendation was Gore and then Comrade Fonda-Kerry.

  • EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

    .

    WHO THE FRACK cares if he is a Republican or ever was a republican??!!!

    Did you watch that video ??!!!!! Did u even BOTHER TO??!!!

    Hitlery was set to import those savages here and drop them on wherever the most white people/Conservatives live – you know.. for the demographics.. It’s their big thing now.. they have figured out that they can rule forever when imposed “diversity” divides the ones they wish to rule and control.

    THAT has been narrowly avoided for the next four years.

    I don’t care WHAT party purity Trump has or doesn’t have.

    JUST KEEP THOSE BARBARIANS AWAY FROM ME.

    That is the real job of the government. Not all that fancy other stuff.
    .

  • EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

    .
    Some politician or crony is already sitting by cash in hand waiting for the bankruptcy sale..
    .

  • NotKennedy

    The real job of the government? Diminished expectations.

  • KirklesWorth

    I’m sorry…are you insulting my thoroughness? Have you witnessed the demand for proof of everything around here? No? Sounds like you are using a liberal shaming tactic they use when they lose an argument to me.

    I think it was you who missed the point, as this was about a difference in opinion with Bodhisattva about how Trump and Hillary were reported on this site, so you can save your lecture.

    And I hate to tell you this, but your claims that “he is not a Republican” is in direct conflict with the facts. If you want to say he is “not republican enough” for you, then so be it.

  • tfhr

    Luigi has a bad case of the ‘fugees and I feel bad for him. I feel bad for the refugees too – they should stay at a nicer place like George and Amal Clooney’s in Laglio on Lake Como. I’m sure he’d be a welcoming host based on his publicly stated views.
    https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/feb/12/george-clooney-meets-angela-merkel-germany-support-refugees

  • Noted.

    I don’t claim to be perfect or have all the answers, despite clams to the contrary by at least one.

    We are all entitled to our opinions, even if they are wrong.

  • Actually I applaud one who goes to such lengths to support one’s contentions. It may seem creepy and obsessive, but it’s one thing I constantly fault liberal moonbats for NOT doing, so I cannot bring myself to criticize someone for actually doing it.

  • I care about what happens going forward, period. We are where we are. It sucks, yeah, but that’s not what matters. What matters is the future. It’s ours to fix or continue to screw up.

  • http://www.theonion.com/article/area-liberal-no-longer-recognizes-fanciful-wildly–54670

    Area Liberal No Longer Recognizes Fanciful, Wildly Inaccurate Mental Picture Of Country He Lives In

    Every once in a while the Onion manages to actually present some real news when trying to parody it.

    Not all of it, mind you, but the part of how liberals are so out of touch, more so since they lost.

  • NotKennedy

    Such a delicate exposition.

    Trump is neither a Republican nor a conservative. Your advocacy for him has yet to be vindicated. His best recommendation remains Hillary Rodham-Clinton.

    “not republican enough”? I am not a Republican, I am a conservative.

    Ah well, to RINOs, every cola is a Coke.

  • NotKennedy

    Haha, well yeah, it does seem creepy and obsessive. One man’s neuroses is another man’s raison d’etre.

  • KirklesWorth

    I don’t know where you get your “definitions”. What are the requirements of being a republican? You say you are. And you remain one until you decide otherwise, questions about your party fealty notwithstanding. Ronald Reagan said “I didn’t leave the democratic party, the party left me” and PRESTO! – he becomes a republican. Was there an entry exam or a loyalty pledge?

    My advocacy is for the president-elect of the United States, so pardon me if I show a little loyalty to him and the 59 million Americans who voted him in. How did your candidate do?

    And to CINOs, it’s okay to risk a Hillary presidency “on principle”.

  • NotKennedy

    Now that is a media outlet I’ve always depended on when humor was in short supply.

    Bless the tender little urchins, real life is going to blind-side them one day and they will have no repertoire of experience to handle it.

  • KirklesWorth

    What’s so “creepy and obsessive” when you are a computer programmer? Couldn’t news and comic floods be considered just as “creepy and obsessive”? Couldn’t judging things “creepy and obsessive” be “creepy and obsessive”? People seem quick to attribute negative characteristics to things and people they may not understand. When you have the facts, it seems disingenuous to be criticized how they were obtained – as though it were witchcraft or hours of work or something.

  • NotKennedy

    Reagan was as Democrats used to be. That swapping of party names has more history than RR but you go ahead and bandy “president -elect” about as freely the socialists when they celebrated Obama’s mandate.

    Jim Jeffords was a fine Republican until, PRESTO! Arlen Specter? Ghosts of the past, just like RR. Too bad Trump will not have the authority to order the striking O’hare horde to honor their duty. Reagan’s crowning moment was firing the ATC and crushing that union.

    Bush 41! Who did he spend election eve with?

    Pardon you? Haha. Sure, what the hell, have a good one!

  • EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

    .
    So what do we do? McCUCKnell doesn’t want to even allow a vote on term limits. Hatch mclame and Grahamnesty don’t want to change the filibuster rule.. we’re stuck with some very nasty senators who are intent on blocking any attempt at reform.
    .

  • EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

    .
    Who are these hollyweird actors interfering in the affairs of independent sovereign nations? Something has one terribly wrong here..
    .

  • KirklesWorth

    There’s only so much lecturing I’m going to take from somebody badmouthing me, the republican president-elect, 59 million patriotic and heroic voters who saved the country from Hillary, or our country in general – even if he is a veteran. It’s no wonder you defend 762×51 – you make accusations and inferences as ignorant as he does. 762×51 doesn’t know what a progressive is and you don’t know what a republican is.

    So go ahead and wallow in your conservative-ideology-self-pity, I know you so-called “conservative” anti-Trumpers lost the election twice. But fortunately the collective sanity of 59 million patriotic and heroic voters saved us from tyranny known as Hillary that the so-called “conservative” anti-Trumpers were willing to throw the election for.

  • NotKennedy

    Haha! You will take as much lecturing as I generously provide, even in your contumacious moments of indignation.

    Casting a ballot does not meet any standard of patriotism or heroism, just look at the cast of millions that carried Hillary’s water. In fact, in many states you don’t even have to be alive, let alone be a citizen.

    When you have enough time to overcome yourself, reflect on who the GOP has foisted against America and then tell us what you think about thrown elections. Were it not for the malevolence of the media, along with the Clintons’ collective malfeasances, Trump could never have been palmed off as a Republican.

    Boehner, Ryan, McConnell? The GOP and the RNC do not represent America. Who has Trump brought in for his chief of staff?

    Wallow in that shallow loyalty, all you want. To my view, the best part of the outcome was the creation of a place-holder.

    LOCK HER UP! Mr. President BUILD UP THAT WALL.

    For the interim, the appointments, short of Priebus, are encouraging. It would be rewarding to see Cruz in a judicial robe.

    “…you so-called “conservative” anti-Trumpers lost the election twice (or three times)”.

    Jackass.

  • Fiberal

    Creepy and obsessive? WHoa.. Now how long have you been posting 20+ articles a day on MB? If you’re not being paid by Dave, I think you may have an obsession.

    Or at least a lot of time on your hands.

    Kirklesworth did a fine job posting a graphic illustration of Torcers’ systematic attacks on Trump. Keeping counts using key words is a simple job for a programmer. And not for anything, but even if KirklesWorth had an obsession with documentation, he shut down Torcer’s “where’s your data? where’s your data?” operation for a thread or two.

    That was worth seeing.

    BTW, you may have read some of what the poster following me around for a time, who was repeatedly demanding hard numbers on the national covert cheating activities of the Clinton machine. The guy had no clue as to the math he was criticizing.

    I think his responses to me along with the twitter-nature of discussion that MB has devolved into over the last few years, more than illustrates both the desperate need for some quantitative thinking around here and the good work done by Kirklesworth.

  • KirklesWorth

    Of course you will tell me what I will do like a good fascist. But please, lecture away! Let’s begin!

    Haha! You will take as much lecturing as I generously provide, even in your contumacious moments of indignation.

    Sure, I’ll take your lecturing, but who would take the advice of a losing so-called “conservative” anti-Trump republican party deserter willing to risk a Hillary presidency?

    Casting a ballot does not meet any standard of patriotism or heroism, just look at the cast of millions that carried Hillary’s water. In fact, in many states you don’t even have to be alive, let alone be a citizen.

    Reading comprehension, huh? I called 59 million voters that saved you from Hillary patriots and heroes. Got a problem with that? I said nothing about the 59 million voters for Hillary who you would have been fine with.

    When you have enough time to overcome yourself, reflect on who the GOP has foisted against America and then tell us what you think about thrown elections. Were it not for the malevolence of the media, along with the Clintons’ collective malfeasances, Trump could never been palmed off as a Republican.

    The arrogance of questioning my republican bona fides when you won’t “reflect” on how you would have permitted Hillary to win is laughable. And blaming the media for Trump winning is hilarious. All-or-nothing conservativism always ends up with nothing.

    Wallow in that shallow loyalty, all you want. To my view, the best part of the outcome was the creation of a place-holder.

    And once again, you arrogantly insult loyalty – since you obviously have little regards for it. You obviously didn’t display any loyalty to the republican party, so lecturing anyone on what a republican is is laughable. You are an outsider attempting to impose your beliefs on a group you don’t belong to.

    “…you so-called “conservative” anti-Trumpers lost the election twice (or three times)”.

    Jackass.

    You’ve got nothing left except insults, eh? You didn’t get Cruz like you wanted, you didn’t get Trump like you wanted, and you didn’t get Hillary like you wanted – that’s a three time loser. I could go back to Romney and McCain, but that was years ago.

  • Fiberal

    So what’s the problem with compiling stats?

    Unless they came from made-up polls, I thought liberals were the ones with allergies to stats.

    Some of us were dealing with never-trumpers who routinely ignored policy and attacked with paranoid arguments, short-sightedness, their own phony “principles”, anecdotes, personal feelings, ad hominem and an unfathomably weird desire to see Cowliary in the WH.

    After Kirklesworth posted his anti-trump data, Torcer went all castrada. So it seems to me that a little quantification might go a long way here on MB.

    It certainly beats getting down in the dirt with the never-trump irrationalistas.

    .

    No. Trump is a republican. By dint of his registration and representation of the Republican party as President-elect of the U.S.

    Besides, you make a reasonable argument for Trump. That would be the Bushes. HW gave us W and W gave us BO.

    Trump if he does just one thing right– somewhere— will be a better president than the profoundly-perplexed W, who republicans voted in twice; or almost certainly better than W’s intermittently-disoriented father.

    Hard to imagine anyone calling themselves a republican could get worse than that out of tune, father-like-son duo.

  • NotKennedy

    Entry for summary judgment, I rest my case. You have been lectured to, again, and yet remain an uninspired, platitudinizing barker with one theme, neverTrump.

    Trump is yours, own it. I voted against Hillary but had nothing in it for Trump. Given that I am in Massachusetts, I could have not bothered to vote, the outcome is always the same.

    These people, like you, thought that Romney was a Republican. By liberal standards, he may have appeared that way.

    Yes, it will behoove you to go back to Romney and McCain because it was Republicans, as yourself, who endorsed them.

    Trump was the candidate created by MSM, the GOP did nothing for him. That is what they are going to do for you. Nothing.

  • KirklesWorth

    I see, so you are vote-tosser. That’s fine – certainly better than voting for Hillary although you, as you said, arrived at the same outcome as though you hadn’t voted at all. But if your intelligence didn’t tell you that Gary Johnson, or Darryl Castle, or whomever was a throw-away vote, you get points on idealism but not on pragmatism.

    So you lost three times in this fashion: Cruz, your third party, and got Trump. At least the analysis still stands.

    Trump is yours as well – didn’t you know he will be your president? The conservatives’ inability to provide a more acceptable candidate is just as blameworthy. If Cruz hadn’t have been eliminated, we wouldn’t be having this conversation because I would have been loyal to the party (and to the country) – contrary to you.

    Don’t bother putting words in my mouth. You don’t know squat about what I think. But I suppose that you didn’t vote for Romney either? If not, are republicans supposed care about what you think?

    However you tell yourself Trump was created, he represents the will of the people. Got a problem with that? Are conservatives supposed to want the government to do things for them? You’ve insulted the republicans and then said the GOP did nothing for him – isn’t that a good sign that it’s not business-as-usual? Then again, you knew you weren’t helping to defeat Hillary by voting third party so…

  • JoeK

    Golly! It’s a real shame that all you anti-Trumpers here at M.B. weren’t able to sabotage Trump’s campaign enough to get your preferred candidate, Hellery, into office! Now I just don’t know if we’ll ever be able to see this kind of bullshat here in America!! You guys must be so fretful now!!

  • NotKennedy

    What does castrada mean?

    Other than Hillary, Trump’s other recommendation is that he has never been a beltway insider or held elected office. He doesn’t deal well with being obligated or beholden to others and, as well as I am aware, owes nobody in Congress a damned thing.

    Moreover, he is 70 years old, does not need the money and will almost certainly be a one term deal. It was a contest, a prize, a competition and he won. Winning was the reward. That IS the way he rolls, he’s not a politician, that’s a good start. Appointing outside people to the cabinet, even conservatives, will make his administration a lot better–unless it backfires and ends up like Carter!

    The federal workforce is a blue as you will find, they will almost certainly do all they can to thwart the incoming administration, maybe Trump will find a way to tell them that they are fired. Haha, outsource the government to the states? What a unique approach, I wonder if anyone ever thought of that, before. /sarc

    Whereas, Jeb would have obligated himself to anyone, except conservatives. Like Kirkleworth, he has no need for conservatives. Romney made a similar disposition. It’s all about the deal.

    Reading KW is like listening to sportscasters. I guess. I haven’t done that in a long time.

    This is Dave Blount’s website. I generally agree with everything he agrees with.

  • NotKennedy

    “You’ve insulted the republicans and then said the GOP did nothing for him”

    It was the least I could do.

    Gotta wonder why Hillary ever deferred to Obama. I did not vote for Romney, I voted against Obama. That is what happens with almost all of the Republican candidates, Americans vote against socialist liberal democrats.

    People misconstrue ballots of opposition as though they were an affirmation of the alternative. Parsing between poor choices results in a poor choice.

    The RNC went into self-preservation and salvage mode. They needed Trump more than he needed them.

    Friends close, enemies closer? There could be a reason why Priebus is currently situated. I hope Trump throws him, and the rest of the RINOs, under the bus.

    FWIW, I also voted for Scott Brown to fill Dead Ted’s defiled senate seat. Look at what he did. The first person he sought out was John Kerry. Scott Brown made Obamacare possible. Scott Brown is a Republican.

  • 762×51

    But then the REAL Vlad Tepes made his reputation solving the Muslim problem. Those vast fields and lined roads of impaled bodies were Muslim invaders. Muslims went around Romania the next time they tried to invade Europe and have not troubled Romania in over 500 years.

    See, they CAN learn.

  • 762×51

    Ass sucker.

  • Fiberal

    I type kind of Gonzo style but with interruptions to go to listen to songs I’m reminded of as I type.

    So every so often something hits me as just right: Torcer = Castrada. —Somehow fits when thinking about KW’s graph and Torcer hitting an effeminate high note of displeasure.

    Castradas were castrated male opera singers. They were men without testosterone and had uniquely female-sounding voices. They grew tall and ungainly and had short lives. I assume they were probably products of intentional maiming for money; long after the last of the Spanish Comprachios.

    Think Jon Anderson, the singer in the group Yes. That kind of voice. There are actually some extant wax cylinder recordings of castradas.

    .
    I also generally agree with Blount. But in this case, he and his fellow travelers almost put Cowliary in the WH…. for absolutely nothing but hubris.

  • 762×51

    I said that very thing about April 1861.

  • 762×51

    Ass sucker.

  • 762×51

    Everyone must obey the cult.
    everyone must worship tRump.
    Everyone must submit to SS-Rottenführer jerkleTwerp as your political compliance officer.

    LMAO. A pipsqueak like you, it cracks me every time.

  • 762×51

    Fibtard the penis rider, kissing gerbilTwerks ring as the new political officer in charge of “keeping an eye on things” on MB.

    Fascists of a feather f**ck together.

    Two chickensquats, curled up all nice together, disgusting.

  • 762×51

    Man this mutual suck fest is really nauseating. You two maggots should just get a room so everyone else doesn’t have to listen to your squeals of delight.

  • Fiberal

    An interesting observation.

    I can’t help noticing however, given that so many of your insult posts and obscenities allude to men’s butts, was it intentional to discuss this form of execution which refers to spikes being forced up anuses?

    And is this a cry for help?

  • 762×51

    Oh jerkles spent hundreds of hours deeep in thought, research, analysis and documentation over tRump and his many qualifications. You know what he came up with? tRump wasn’t Hillary.

    With insight like that, what could go wrong?

    ROTFMAO!!

  • Fiberal

    don’t make me send this language to your supervisor.

  • 762×51

    A little loyalty!?!? LMFAO!! tRump has his tongue so far down your throat there is a wet spot on your shorts, or was that from an earlier encounter?

  • 762×51

    Don’t confuse the maggot with details like the Electoral College. He just gets off denigrating anyone who will not join his cult. Where you live and how that played into the overall election was immaterial to him. Never ONCE in all the months leading up to the election did the maggot known as gerbilTwerk EVER ask if the people he was brow beating lived in a state where it would have mattered.

    That is because he is a fascist, I identified him on our first encounter and he has decided to call everyone else that as cover for his own fascistic dreams. Why do you think I treat him the way I do? He is despicable and deserving of nothing but abuse.

    See, even after you explained to the rodent that your vote was irrelevant for President, he persists in persecuting you for failing to swear fealty to his lord and master, it’s disgusting. It’s a shame he is such a coward, I could easily put a stop to all this if only he had just one testicle.

  • 762×51

    “There’s only so much lecturing I’m going to take from somebody badmouthing me, the republican president-elect, 59 million patriotic and heroic voters who saved the country from Hillary, or our country in general ”

    Ohh UrkelJerk, you are just soooo brave, the way you FORCED your ballot into that computer, is was chilling to see your manliness . . . . ROTFLMAO, I can’t, it is just too ridiculous. Going along with the other sheep sure took lots of courage, you are very brave – in a group.

    So twerples, since “There’s only so much lecturing I’m going to take from somebody badmouthing me”, just how much more bad mouthing is it going to take? I am happy to ladle out as much as is necessary to get you to back up your smarmy BS. Give me an amount, that is all you will take, enough to for you to come out fighting, LOL, I’ll go 20% past that, what ever it is, the laugh will be worth, and the silence afterward.

    Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD!

  • Fiberal

    Out of the seizure colony again.

    The level of discourse has gotten real castrada since the anti-trumpers elected this old hairdresser as post facto court jester and loser.

  • It figures you would be on top of that.

    Alpha says I don’t give out enough up arrows (thumbs up) so I’ll give you one.

  • Mr. Freemarket

    Of course. I own a couple of corporations. Therefore, I, too, must be rich.

  • Settle down now. I post WAY more than many here, possibly anyone. It’s an outlet. Particularly after I drink coffee. Since I don’t drink it often it has an enhanced effect on me.

    I don’t have any problem with what Kirklesworth did. I know that my posting has raised some hackles and I tried to make it clear that my opinion was that while AT FIRST GLANCE some might say it seems “creepy and obsessive”, actually it shows a diligence of the sort that meticulously supports a proposition or claim – in other words, I’m impressed.

    Maybe I didn’t make that clear enough.

    You guys need to find a way to bury the hatchet between the Trump supporters and the #NeverTrump crowd. I will say as an opening suggestion that at least, for the most part, the #NeverTrump crowd is not whining and demonstrating and refusing to accept the outcome of the election. They seem, at least for the most part, to be willing, now that he was elected, to give Trump a chance to show us whether it was the right choice or the wrong one.

    And to me that goes a long way towards mending the fences. There were a lot of harsh words from a lot of people that really were not necessary and should not have been said. I’m not interested in rehashing it, I’m just saying “Can’t we all just get along.” Hillary lost. And nobody but Trump had a chance to beat her. As long as the concerns that Trump is actually worse turn out to be false (and so far I haven’t seen any indication he could possibly be even near as bad) we dodged a real bullet here and I think it’s best we just do what we can to forgive, forget and move forward.

    So, in closing, I repeat – I was not criticizing Kirklesworth, but actually praising him. He did a good job of showing me ONE example that supported his contention. I don’t know that it makes it universal, but I’m not going to dwell on the matter. My point was that I saw both anti-Trump and anti-Hillary from the thread owner and I got the impression (apparently wrong, though I’ve not bothered to do the analysis Kirklesworth apparently has) to support my conclusion. And now it’s academic, moot, irrelevant.

  • Such comments really don’t help matters. Best to ignore the nonsense, I’ve found. Of course what you choose to do is your business.

  • I see you misinterpreted my post as well. My poor writing is to blame, no doubt. See my longer response above.

  • Perhaps the first moves are to choose new leaders for the House and Senate. Leaders bold enough to get some things done, to crack the whip (so the whips may need to be replaced too) and light a fire under the rest of the Congress.

  • Real life just blindsided the liberals – you saw the result.

  • NotKennedy

    Ah shucks, I wonder what Jon Anderson would say. Reminds me of eunuchs aka Pelosi’s ardent adherents in Congress.

    The bass player in that band was pretty good, so was Wakeman. Wakeman interviewed Jon Lord on a British network and the two of them enjoyed their conversation at the expense of others in the group though Wakeman was notably amusing about his preference for food and wine in contrast to the dietary practices of Anderson. McCartney has also been noted for his strong perspectives on dietary preference. But, he’s a great singer, performer, and composer.

  • Fiberal

    Yes.

    Wakeman was known for his indulgences but the bigness of Wakeman somehow also seemed to transfer to his playing. The overall enormity of that band, matched with really nice melodic hooks, has been unparalleled in that genre, in my humble opinion.

    When I was a kid, I was fascinated by the ability of guitar players to sit down and crank out Steve Howe’s music. Great compositions.

    I agree with you on McCartney. He was on a whole different level of talent. After the Beatles, Paul started all over by jumping in a van and running around playing local gigs with unknown musicians, that quickly morphed into another good band replete with some very catchy songs.

    A little bizarre moving Linda’s corpse around like he did, but I suppose you can chalk that up to grief.

  • Fiberal

    I’m on the same page, kind of.

    When I need to do something mindless, I like to grab a glass of wine, sit back and read 762 x 51’s love letters.

    (I hate typing that name; I’m going to start calling him Midge)

    My thoughts on burying the hatchet with the never-trumpers is different from yours however. This is the useless gesture that conservatives always want to do.

    Whether they win or lose; whoever their candidate, they always want to “reach across the aisle”. And every time they do that, same thing happens. They get screwed.

    When liberals in congress heard the phrase “compassionate conservative” they attacked like giant shrews. That led to electing a candidate with protective pigmentation that allowed him to operate with impunity.

    The never-trumpers aligned with liberals. For the first woman president? You can imagine how that would have worked out.

    As for the posters on MB, its such a tiny sample and the posters are just basically concerned about having the last dig in a thread. That goes nowhere.

    But I think the time is now that the enemies of conservativism are crushed, driven before us, so that we can hear the lamentations of their women.

    Conservatives need to understand two things: 1) liberals are now and always will be enemies of the country; and 2) when you are fighting for the life of the country, you fight.

    You don’t stand aside on some ethereal “principle” and take yourself out of the war. That’s what millions of republicans did with Romney and look at what we got. (Although in the case of Trump, you had never-trumpers working actively down to the last minute of the election to defeat Trump.)

    The effect of the actions of the never-trumpers on the country would have been indistinguishable from the actions of liberals. Cowliary would have been the next president.

    The country is way too far gone for such indulgence.

    Trump was a fail safe that could stop the inevitable decline into communism and Greek-style chaos. Were it not for an historic rejection of liberalism and the communistic overthrow of the government under BO, liberals, minorities, illegals, a lot of women; and most ignominiously bc they know better, the never trumpers for their mind-numbing reasons, almost sent us down the road to serfdom. (apologies to von Hayek)

    Were it not for someone as well-known, wealthy and tough as nails and capable of fighting as Trump, sanity would have been defeated by the Cowliary machine. Sanity got a reprieve; short as it may be.

    Trump fought the media, liberals and the GOP establishment like hell and won; the never-trumpers fought Trump to the assured detriment of liberty.

    Anyone standing aside announcing that their “principles” shall demand that a wanton, criminal, depraved evil woman become president, when the country is at a desperate tipping point toward destruction of the constitutional republic, have at worse no principles worth having and at best, have no ability to perceive the damage that they were so embracing.

    Now…work across the aisle? To what end?

    That’s like asking Midge to stop playing with his toy soldiers.

  • Oh, I am not saying “reach across the aisle” – note he’s still as juvenile and asanine as always in his reply below. I guess, according to him, my new name is “grebilTwerk”? Was that directed at me? How pathetic, even if it wasn’t. He has some fixation on gerbils – they must really give him some kinda thrill!

    What I’m saying is if they will let bygones be bygones, then we can move forward together. I am NOT saying that we should necessarily reach across any aisles. I am saying we need to roll up our sleeves and not let any pathetic, petty people like 762×51 distract us from what must be done – in large part things that he seems to agree need to be done, even as he continues to whine and express his own butt-hurt over the outcome of the election.

    It is clear he will not, as evidenced by his response, below, join the rest of us in moving forward, so we leave him behind. If he comes to his senses and catches up, fine, welcome him aboard the ride to a better future. Otherwise let him continue to crawl like the whining, sniveling baby he continues to demonstrate he is.

    Really I don’t know why he is tolerated here. His post is nonsense. I am just a guy who posts here. I have no right or duty to “keep an eye on things”. And everyone (but him, apparently) knows that. I’m not suggesting he be banned – that’s up to Dave Blount and apparently he hasn’t crossed whatever line he must cross to get banished – and I’m OK with that. I can always block him myself and I may yet do that. For now I’ll just laugh at him.

  • KirklesWorth

    It’s laughable to get lectured from so-called “conservative” anti-Trumpers (SCATs) who’s conservatism had to be saved by moderates and independents instead of the by the conservatives themselves. SCATs didn’t learn from the country moving left by not voting for McCain, didn’t learn from the country moving left by not voting for Romney, and were apparently fine with the country moving left by not voting for the only candidate capable of stopping Hillary. Hillary would have changed the whole voting topography by adding more left-wing voters past the tipping point of no return, and conservatism would have become a quaint notion of the past.

    And now after their foolishness hasn’t dawned on the SCATs, they want to keep bellyaching about how “lacking” Trump is in conservative bona-fides – so sad, too bad. These all-or-nothing conservatives demand all and consistently get nothing (or worse than nothing) and smugly preach about how the country wouldn’t be moving leftwards if everybody just did what the SCATs said. Apparently the concept of taking the country back in small steps doesn’t occur to them, so they demand a huge leap to the right that the country isn’t willing to accept.

    So you may be correct about the details of what’s best for the right and for the country, but it’s of little-to-no value if there are no victories. Losing this election would have meant Hillary would have declared it a mandate of the people to continue to drag our country leftward – and the riots and protests are just demonstrations of our victory. Not fighting to win the smaller battles hasn’t won us the war – to the contrary, we have lost way too much ground.

    And the ridiculous assertions some made that Trump was one of the progressives, the progressives are actually going out of their mind with hatred because of the conservative ideals he’s bringing in. It isn’t just that the SCATs were wrong, they were spectacularly wrong about a plethora of things. Trump won, conservatism won (a modest victory so far), SCATs got a black eye, and some aren’t learning a damn thing.

  • KirklesWorth

    How patriotic calling 59 million American patriots and heroes saving so-called “conservative” anti-Trumpers from the liberalism they haven’t stopped since McCain “cultists”. You sure love your progressive talking points. Your disdain and contempt for our voting heroes is palpable.

    Yes, we know that without the electoral college and relying on the popular vote, California and New York would have delivered Hillary as president as you wanted – no need to bellyache about how your civil-war won’t be happening.

    1. Whose side will you be on if there is a civil war?
    2. Since you wanted Trump to lose, who did you want to win?

    Oooh…I was “brow beating”! Was I “brow beating” like this?

    762×51: I have a bullet with your name on it, any time you think you have what it takes to impose your fascist dreams, elitist f__ktard. Go f__k yourself. This comment was deleted.

    An idiot calling me a “fascist” – classic! I personally forced 59 million conservatives, republicans, independents, and probably progressives to vote for Trump, right? Imbecile.

    “He is despicable and deserving of nothing but abuse.” Abuse? Are you kidding? All you’ve done is expose what a complete moron you are – like with statements like:

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    In case I haven’t made this perfectly clear (which I have), nobody here takes orders, demands, requests, invites, etc. from you contrary to your violent fascist fantasies. Furthermore, nobody has any intention of getting within your firing range of your lying, loser, unintelligent, dishonorable, wannabe “progressive”-killing, Hillary-helping, wannabe “civil war” fighting, republican party defecting, progressive-helping, republican candidate hating, latent-homosexual, sadomasochistic, integrity-lacking, wife-insulting, so-called “conservative” face.

  • KirklesWorth

    You certainly haven’t scared me off, have you Rambo? Your stupid “progressive”-killing civil war still hasn’t started – how long should we hold our breath? Wait, before you answer that, I’m waiting for your answers to:

    1. Whose side will you be on if there is a civil war?
    2. You wanted Trump to lose, who did you want to win?

    Then again, who’d listen to anybody so inept that they would make this claim with such confidence:

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    Just keep giving us more of your “insight” you phony blowhard. Go snuggle up to your progressive lovers who speak sweet talking points into your ears.

    In case I haven’t made this perfectly clear (which I have), nobody here takes orders, demands, requests, invites, etc. from you contrary to your violent fascist fantasies. Furthermore, nobody has any intention of getting within your firing range of your lying, loser, unintelligent, dishonorable, wannabe “progressive”-killing, Hillary-helping, wannabe “civil war” fighting, republican party defecting, progressive-helping, republican candidate hating, latent-homosexual, sadomasochistic, integrity-lacking, wife-insulting, so-called “conservative” face.

  • KirklesWorth

    Yeah, like the loyalty you show for the progressives by spewing their talking points. Your latent-homosexual (or not-so-latent) fantasies are surfacing again – time to take your medication. Hurry, before you “progressive”-killing civil war starts. You know, the one you tried to Hillary elected for and then I follow up by asking these questions you don’t answer:

    1. Whose side will you be on if there is a civil war?
    2. You wanted Trump to lose, who did you want to win?

    Hurry before I’m tempted to post my favorite comment from you…oops, too late…

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

  • KirklesWorth
  • KirklesWorth

    “gerbilTwerks” is me. It’s tame compared to when it was changing its handle in an attempt to attract my attention:

    1. GoFuckYourselfKirklesworth, 2. kikrlesworthcumguzzler, 3. kirklesDouche, 4. kirklesjerkDoucheBag, 5. kirklesjerkTheMoron, 6. kirklesToadStool, 7. kirklesworthASSHOLE, 8. kirklesworthAsslickeR, 9. kirklesworthBathHouseWhore, 10. KirklesworthBlowsDonald, 11. kirklesworthCausedCivilWar, 12. kirklesworthDarkensDoor, 13. kirklesWorthDickSuckeR, 14. kirklesworthDoomApproaches, 15. KirklesWorthDoucheBAG, 16. kirklesworthEatsIt, 17. kirklesworthEatsShit, 18. kirklesworthEnablesHillary, 19. kirklesworthEnemaBag, 20. kirklesworthEnemyProgressive, 21. Kirklesworthevilagenda, 22. KirklesworthFACSISTFUCK, 23. KirklesworthFascistAsshole, 24. kirklesworthFascistFucktarD, 25. kirklesworthFascistTrumpanze, 26. kirklesworthGetsHis, 27. kirklesworthGooseStepping, 28. kirklesworthHomeWork, 29. kirklesWorthInfowarsTroll, 30. kirklesworthintheGround, 31. KirklesWorthisaDick, 32. kirklesworthisaLIAR, 33. kirklesworthisAPussy, 34. KirklesWorthisDishonest, 35. kirklesworthisHillarysBitch,
    36. kirklesworthIsMeaningless, 37. kirklesworthJackhole, 38. kirklesworthLeaves!!, 39. kirklesworthLicksASS, 40. kirklesworthLickstRumpAss, 41. kirklesworthLonesPenis, 42. kirklesworthLovesDick, 43. kirklesworthMentalMidget, 44. kirklesWorthMoron, 45. kirklesworthPettyTyrant, 46. kirklesworthProgOperative, 47. kirklesworthProgressiveAsshole, 48. kirklesworthProgressiveParro, 49. kirklesworthProgressiveParrot, 50. KirklesworthProgressiveTroll, 51. kirklesworthProgtard, 52. KirklesworthRentFreeHead, 53. kirklesworthRino, 54. kirklesworthSandyVaginA, 55. kirklesworthShitbag, 56. KirklesworthSpreads4Donald, 57. KirklesworthSSspy, 58. kirklesworthSucksDick, 59. kirklesworthSuckstRump, 60. kirklesworthSuffering, 61. KirklesworthtakesaStrapon, 62. KirklesworththeCull, 63. kirklesworththelittleBitch, 64. kirklesworthTrumpOperative

  • KirklesWorth

    Funny how you condemn what you practice. If only you were keeping a synapse firing as often as you were keeping an latent-homosexual eye on me. And then it complains like a pathetic butt-hurt progressive deptrived from its “safe space” from “microaggressions” to Dave Blount when he gets neutered (spayed?):

    762×51: They will not stop on their own, they must be driven out by force. This new policy sets an RoE that lets them run wild while tying the hands of regular posters leaving us defenseless against them. I doubt many of us will remain long to just come here and take their abuse. I don’t mind fighting back, but have no interest in being harangued everyday by those I cannot effectively oppose.

    If only it kept its promises. Poor baby can’t take the “abuse” because it is “defenseless” (except for the bullet it has for me):

    762×51: I have a bullet with your name on it, any time you think you have what it takes to impose your fascist dreams, elitist f__ktard. Go f__k yourself. This comment was deleted.

    But it’s just more sexual frustration for your lack of your “progressive”-killing civil wars that you wanted Hillary elected for.

    1. Whose side will you be on if there is a civil war?
    2. You wanted Trump to lose, who did you want to win?

  • KirklesWorth

    Don’t bother speaking for me NotKennedy, as you don’t know squat about me. What I don’t have need for is so-called “conservative” anti-Trumpers willing to hand the country over to Hillary (and previously Obama). The kind of “conservatives” who had to be saved by the moderates, the independents, and probably some progressives from setting Hillary in motion to turn the country past the tipping point into a progressive-socialist third-world country.

  • You have put up with a lot, haven’t you.

  • KirklesWorth

    We all have. I’m just not going to be bullied by its belligerence like others have and have reached the point of anticipation to see what it is going to say next.

  • KirklesWorth

    And once again, you offer the opportunity for me to show what a hypocritical, disingenuous moron you are – and let me show my appreciation:

    “Everyone must obey the cult.Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD!
    “everyone must worship tRump.”Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD!
    “Everyone must submit to SS-Rottenführer jerkleTwerp as your political compliance officer.Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD!

  • KirklesWorth

    Challenge accepted! I’m going to post June, as July didn’t have as many stories – although I have to disclaim that it looks like there were more Hillary stories than Trump in July. But since June makes my point better, I will use it. I will post July on request.

    List of Moonbattery articles in June for Trump or Hillary: 1. Trump University Scam Targeted the Elderly, the Uneducated, and Single Mothers (Torcer) 2. Why a Bernie Sanders Supporter Would Support Donald Trump (Torcer) 3. Now Trump Never Said He Wants Japan to Have Nukes (Torcer) 4. Trump’s Greatest Service to Democrats (Torcer) 5. Trump Endorses Radical Open Borders RINO Renee Ellmers 6. Trump Doubles Down on Racial Attack Against Judge in His Fraud Case (Torcer) 7. Trump Denounces American Exceptionalism (Torcer) 8. How Pam Bondi Went From Suing Trump to Serving Him (Torcer) 9. Trump Chum Renee Ellmers Is Crushed in Primary (Torcer) 10. Momentum Builds to Stop Trump at Convention (Torcer) 11. Dems Convert Trump’s Nastiness Into Ordnance; Collateral Damage Will Hit Conservatives (Torcer) 12. Loud, Nasty, Thin-Skinned Fraud Elizabeth Warren Calls Donald Trump a Loud, Nasty, Thin-Skinned Fraud (Torcer) 13. The Far Left Case for Trump (Torcer) 14. A Manifestation of the Great Orange One Is Revealed to a Follower at an Appropriate Time (Torcer) 15. Trump Endorsed Obama’s Globalist and Authoritarian “Measures to Control Climate Change” (Torcer) 16. Already Trump Crowds Are Petering Out (Torcer) 17. Chuck Todd: We Would Cover Hillary’s Scandals if Not for Trump (Torcer) 18. Undeniable Truth From Trump (Torcer) 19. At Least Trump Has Support From Gays (Torcer) 20. Trump Apparently Flips on Gun Rights Already (Torcer) 21. Trumpmania Spreads to Japan (Torcer) 22. Wheels Are Coming Off Trump Campaign Already (Torcer) 23. How His Cufflinks Are Perfectly Emblematic of Trump (Torcer) 24. Rush Limbaugh Desperately Attempts to Spin Trump’s Collapse in Polls (Torcer) 25. Opposing Trump Does Not Mean Supporting Hillary, if Only Because Trump Has No Chance (Torcer) 26. Trump TV (Torcer) 27. Could Trump Be Prosecuted for Fraud? (Torcer) 28. Support Grows for Stopping Trump in Cleveland (Torcer) 29. Why the Trump Campaign Has No Money (Torcer) 30. Ben Carson Explains Why Trump Campaign Is Broke (Torcer) 31. Donald Trump and the Decline of the Religious Right Summed Up in One Photo (Torcer) 32. Prominent Trump Delegate Threatens to “Whack” Delegates Who Rebel and Vote Their Consciences (Torcer) 33. Why Trump’s Numbers Are Likely to Get Worse (Torcer) 34. Trump Surrogate Ben Carson: Let’s Debate Whether We Need Second Amendment (Torcer) 35. Trump Drops Muslim Ban 36. Why No One Respectable Will Work for Trump Campaign (Torcer) 37. Trump Versus Reagan (Torcer) 38. Eric Trump Has Been Illegally Begging Foreign Politicians for Campaign Cash (Torcer)

    List of Moonbattery articles in June for Trump or Hillary: 1. Man Enough for Hillary 2. Shrillary’s Cascade of Lies (Torcer) 3. Podium Collapses During Hillary Speech 4. Hillary Uses Government Healthcare Expenses as Pretext to Attack Second Amendment (Torcer) 5. Hillary Denounces Income Inequality While Wearing $12,495 Jacket (Torcer) 6. Shrillary Rotten Clinton, Glowing Goddess of Government (Torcer) 7. Under Secretary Shrillary, Unqualified Rajiv Fernando Donated His Way Onto International Security Advisory Board (Torcer) 8. Terrifying Life-Size Hillary Bobblehead 9. Chuck Todd: We Would Cover Hillary’s Scandals if Not for Trump (Torcer) 10. Hillary Laugh Riot (Torcer) 11. Hillary’s “Laugh” Explained 12. Hillary’s State Department and Omar Mateen’s Mosque 13. Opposing Trump Does Not Mean Supporting Hillary, if Only Because Trump Has No Chance (Torcer) 14. Hillary to Get a Smelly Dose of Alinskyite Medicine 15. Searching Shrillary: Bing Versus Google (Torcer) 16. State Department Disabled Security Features Due to Hillary’s Private Email Setup (Torcer) 17. Hillary Teleprompter Fail (Torcer) 18. Press Begins to Penetrate Hillary’s Transparency (Torcer) 19. Hillary Calls Denying Gun Rights a “Civil Rights Issue”; Other Dems Call for More Sit-ins (Torcer)

  • 762×51

    It is an unfortunate side affect of having to deal with A-holes like you fibtard. Anyone who reads, or listens I suppose, to your sanctimonious, elitist BS automatically thinks you are an ass, an effete snob who lords over everyone he interacts with which is why you must remain hidden and anonymous on the Internet and can’t take your sniveling BS out into the real world where the peals of laughter would shatter your delusions of grandeur.

    I can’t imagine how thrilled you were when you discovered the Internet and realized that you could finally project your half-baked imbecilic ideas onto others without having to risk being stuffed into a locker like you were in high school. Since then, you have come to believe your fantasies of greatness are real, feeding you schizophrenia until one day, someone challenged you to back it all up in the real world, placing your life on the line, and you accepted. Later, realizing what that meant, you chickened out and pretended it never happened, retreating back into your delusions, hiding behind other screen names until such time as the fantasy seemed real again, which brings us to today.

    No fibtard, it’s not a cry for help, other than your own projection. It’s just that when anyone deals with you, they automatically think sphincter.

  • JoeK

    Cry baby sore loser!!

  • Fiberal

    All anyone has to do is to scroll down and see the sorry list of your replies on this thread.
    .

    .

    Its all about men’s butts.
    .

    .

  • KirklesWorth

    It’s changed its fantasizing about “rubbing wieners”.

  • Fiberal

    spare me

  • KirklesWorth

    Another latent-homosexual (or not so latent) fantasy. Poor baby misses the “he-man Trumper Hater’s club’s” anti-Trump circle-jerking echo chamber. The wise ones are moving on – but you aren’t.

  • 762×51

    Jagoff, sissy.

  • 762×51

    Unfortunately, the missing word / character problem that exists with this site cropped up in that post. What it originally said was ” I said that very thing about today being like April 1861″.

    Referring to the fact that America is teetering on the brink of civil war and there are fools out there who say it can’t happen here when it has already happened here.

  • 762×51

    So I’m still waiting for you to back it up, pipsqueak.

  • 762×51

    ROTFLMAO!! So the great jerklesTwerp saved America by electing a Progressive to save us from Progressives. That is effing hilarious. Ohhhh Jerkles, you are sooooo brave, LMFAO!

    Does your mommy read you these bedtime stories at night?

    I love the way you spit the word “conservative” tells me exactly who and what you are, cult worshiper.

  • 762×51

    The reply was to kirklesworth, aka gerbilTwerks et al. not you Bodhisattva. Jerkles is the one who said he was “here to keep and eye on things” in a reply to Torcer.

    KirklesWorth Torcer • 17 hours ago
    Yeah…you keep asking that…the answer is: to keep an eye on things. Why are you here and do you have a problem with me being here? Kirklesworth 8/18/2016

    You might want to check the comment reply to before you shoot your mouth off like that. I

  • I don’t know that I’ve experienced the “missing word/character” problem yet, but I have had some interesting issues crop up.

    “Civil” war (a misnomer if I’ve ever seen one) did happen – I think the issue was a bit more substantive then.

    Of course, we’re dealing with liberals, so yeah, as remote as it seems to a sensible person (assuming I am one), I can see how they might actually protest every day Trump is in office and also get quite violent. I don’t think it will go to war since most of them don’t have weapons and are against owning them, SUPPOSEDLY, but if they start buying them in mass quantities yeah, that would be a red flag.

    America has become deeply divided – that was the plan of Soros, Obama and their ilk. I suggest that though I admit war is possible, it is highly unlikely. Remember, I also said Trump would not be as bad as Clinton and that remains to be seen as well.

  • 762×51

    The little A-hole has dished out a lot. Notice the records he is keeping, not just on me but on everyone here. You may want to be more selective in your friends.

  • 762×51

    Ohh you poor little thing. Have mommy make you a warm glass of milk and tell you another story about how heroic you are, LMFAO!!

  • 762×51

    War is not just possible it is inevitable because the Progressives cannot transition from the current soft tyranny to their preferred hard tyranny without it. Implementation of the police state has been advanced more in the last fifteen years than in the two hundred years before it.

    Most of the Russian peasants who overthrew Tsar Nicholas had no weapons, firearms anyway, but that didn’t stop them.

    As for tRump being not as bad as Hillary, that is how we have arrived at the hole we are in today, settling for the lesser of two evils, the candidate that was not as bad as the other candidate, holding our nose and voting for a schmuck. Einstein said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results. I doubt he ever thought it would be demonstrated on such a large scale.

  • 762×51

    Let me get you a hanky, poor baby.

  • 762×51

    I know you think your latest fabrication “castrada” is clever. Well, that makes one of you, fibtard.

    You should join your new buttboy jerkles and GFY.

  • 762×51

    Of course not princess, because you are safe hiding behind your keyboard. Out in the real world, you would last ten seconds.

    BTW douchebag, I never insulted your wife, other than to imply she is married to you which must truly shame her. I simply observed that she would probably prefer someone who is not a snivel coward like you are.

  • Yes, but as I explained, they’ve voluntarily disarmed themselves. We have the weapons. They have their rage and other nonsense that can’t take a bullet and survive.

    The road to a war that they start is they have to regain the White House along with both houses of Congress and force us to take the first shots.

    Yes, we have essentially been forced to choose the lesser of two evils, or to wind up with the worst evil possible, for the last 3 elections, 5 if you count G.W. Bush, 7 if you count him AND Bill Clinton, 8 if you include G.H W. Bush.

    So did you say you voted for a 3rd party candidate, Clinton or SMOD?

  • I don’t worry about petty nonsense. If someone goes too far, I block them and that’s the end of that. I don’t know that I have any true “friends” here. I respect all opinions, as I suggested above, until I’m given a reason not to do so.

  • You really don’t gain anything of value making posts like this.

  • From some of your posts here, it seems you’re doing your best to elicit adverse responses.

    Though perhaps from your point of view your provocative responses are just that, responses to provocations past.

    It takes 2 to continue.

    It takes 1 to stop.

    Blocking is always an option.

    And if you notice, I’m telling him the same thing, more or less.

  • Yeah I saw who the reply was to – but it didn’t make it absolutely clear who the childish names within the post were directed towards.

    You know, your best option would be to simply block him. When you respond the way you do, you only make yourself look bad.

    And I’m telling him the same thing, more or less.

  • You didn’t need to do that… I was willing to accept the suggestion that you’ve been paying more attention to it than me and it seems that was a correct conclusion. It’s also nice you admit that July the situation may have been reversed. I’ve conceded that point to you already, again just to make it clear.

    Although I realize… you may be seeing an artifact of the reality that has also received much attention here – the mainstream media pulled out the stops to hurt Trump and help Hillary. What gets attention here ultimately comes MOSTLY from the media, I believe. If the media is running 3:1, 4:1 or 5:1 with bad stories about Trump v. bad stories about Clinton then I suppose that might explain your results, too.

    Does not excuse a lack of fairness/balance here, just sayin’.

  • KirklesWorth

    You’re so stupid that you don’t even listen to your own demands – why should anyone else? You haven’t proven squat, and it is not the responsibility for others to disprove what hasn’t been proven – contrary to your lazy “intellect”. Now, as you’ve screamed at me:

    Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD! PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!

    Speaking of waiting, I’m still waiting for an answer to:

    1. Whose side will you be on if there is a civil war?
    2. You wanted Trump to lose, who did you want to win?

  • KirklesWorth

    Yeah, I wouldn’t last ten seconds because you would ambush and kill me like a good cowardly progressive.

    That’s all you’ve got to deny – insulting my wife? You’re so stupid you confirmed everything and added another lie on top of it. You did insult my wife you lying scumbag:

    762×51: Hey, speaking of vomit sacks, how’s your wife, princess? Still waiting for you to say all this crap to my face, coward.

    The sniveling coward here is you. Hiding behind your guest account, afraid to answer questions like these:

    1. Whose side will you be on if there is a civil war?
    2. You wanted Trump to lose, who did you want to win?

  • KirklesWorth

    More not-so-latent-homosexual fantasies. You are on the wrong blog – “Homo’s for Hillary” must be out there somewhere – or maybe you can start it yourself.

  • KirklesWorth

    Oh, yeah…I “dished out a lot”. Like when I said this to you:

    762×51: Culprit, LMAO! You want civility in the middle of a war you started? Fat chance, douche bag. I just wish could see how long a prissy little f__k like you lasts when the shooting starts, minutes or seconds? You can walk around taking down information so you can turn others in later. Here’s a tip for you, if you suddenly feel very warm and can’t seem to draw a breath followed by deep, intense pain, you are hit. Unless you take the round in your cranial vault. LMFAO!! This comment was deleted.

    Oops…sorry, that was you.

  • KirklesWorth
  • KirklesWorth
  • KirklesWorth

    But you Bodhisattva defended yourself when criticized, which I applaud you for. In that vein, I wish to shed light on its “brilliant insights” and irrational attacks, not stop them. Too many people suffer its ridiculousness.

  • KirklesWorth
  • KirklesWorth
  • KirklesWorth

    1. Whose side will you be on if there is a civil war?
    2. You wanted Trump to lose, who did you want to win?

  • KirklesWorth

    Thanks, I think we know each others’ positions. You practice avoidance – I don’t have that luxury, nor am I any longer inclined to do so. I was off for a month and as soon as it found out I was back on it resumed the belligerence. Besides, it is a glutton for punishment as it continues to challenge me on things it knows I’m capable of schooling it on.

  • KirklesWorth

    Sorry, the baby is you – just as you whined to Dave Blount about how “defenseless” you are against the big bad abusive Trump-supporting meanies haranguing you:

    762×51: This new policy sets an RoE that lets them run wild while tying the hands of regular posters leaving us defenseless against them. I doubt many of us will remain long to just come here and take their abuse. I don’t mind fighting back, but have no interest in being harangued everyday by those I cannot effectively oppose.

    Funny, I thought you were the one admitting to haranguing:

    762×51: It is one of the reasons I seek to drive him out of here, he is scum.

    Sounds like the admission of a haranguer to me. But still too afraid to answer my questions, eh?

    1. Whose side will you be on if there is a civil war?
    2. You wanted Trump to lose, who did you want to win?

  • Knowing better than to waste time on petty, childish distractions is not “avoidance”, it’s common sense.

  • KirklesWorth

    Like avoiding muslims, avoiding illegal aliens, avoiding black lives matter, etc.? So how are you going to respond to TED in the other thread who said (nice rhyming):

    Bodhisattva: If you want to waste your time and effort looking silly that is your business. I was making a suggestion, it’s not my place to tell you what to do.

    TED: OMG, I hadn’t realized YOU were a Brownshirt also, I guess because I didn’t pay that much attention to you. It WlLL be LESS now. TTFN.

    Are you just going to walk away after being improperly called a nazi after it invoked Godwin’s Law? No need to point out how unhinged they are and like progressives?

  • As I have explained, sometimes the best way to respond to nonsense is to ignore it.

    I respond to posts as I run down my e-mail and see the notifications. I usually go from newest to oldest.

    I get a lot of actually IMPORTANT e-mail and so sometimes I am further compelled to skip the nonsense.

    I haven’t seen the notification from that post. When I get to it I will give it what I feel it deserves.

    When an idiot calls me a Brownshirt (particularly when it simply displays how little he knows about me) it doesn’t necessarily rate an answer. My skin is apparently not quite so thin as yours.

    And note, his remark is that he will be paying less attention to me now. That is a win for me IF HE FOLLOWS THROUGH.

  • KirklesWorth

    Or your tolerance of absurdity is higher than mine. Either way, I do not suffer bullies lightly. One person’s “thick skin” is another person’s “passive”. I think evil (perhaps too strong a word in this scenario) needs to be confronted, not avoided. Not that there aren’t merits to “living to play another day”…

  • First of all, I have been known to sink to that level (childlish taunting and name calling) a few times so perhaps one can call me a hypocrite for suggesting others not do it.

    Second, I acknowledge that they are doing it – and when they do the temptation to do it back is high.

    I don’t tell you what to do, I just suggest you stick to the facts and resist the temptation to lower yourself and your effectiveness by responding in kind.

    By all means, point out where they’re lying or they’ve got things wrong or whatever. But let them be the ones who show what children they are.

    Be the adult – that’s my advice. And you are of course free to take it or leave it.

  • See my recent replies to your posts in which I point out that you do seem to be responding to their nonsense in a more adult fashion without sinking to their level.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy