moonbattery logo

Jun 07 2017

Islamophile Media Outraged by Billboard Exposing Mohammad’s Behavior

I don’t get it. Why is listing accomplishments of the guy Muslims regard as the perfect human being supposed to be an insult to Islam?

antimuslim-billboard

Cluck the dhimmified Islamophiles at IndyStar:

An anti-Muslim billboard disparaging the Prophet Muhammad that can be seen from the southbound lanes of I-465 on the east side is drawing concern from local Muslims.

Now, Islamic leaders in Indianapolis are challenging those responsible for what they say are offensive and untrue statements to stand by their words, shed their anonymity and explain their motivations.

Shed their anonymity so they can wake up at night to find some imported savage slitting their throat for Allah? Not wise.

The piece quickly degenerates into squealing about alleged Muslim oppression, even citing a case in Columbus that was not a hate crime but a hoax. It also features a video in defense of hijabs, and denounces an upcoming March Against Sharia rally.

However, the piece does not get around to explaining how the billboard was inaccurate.

BTW, 600 is toward the lower end of estimates of how many Jews were beheaded under Mohammad’s direct supervision when he liquidated the Banu Qurayza. The 6-year-old he married was named Aisha. No worries, feminists; he waited like a gentleman until she was 9 to consummate.

On tips from Stormfax, Lyle, and The Money Pit.



  • Torcer

    Could someone please explain to ‘Zachriel’ over on the Watch CNN Stage Phony Muslims Against ISIS Rally thread that she is supposed to act like an adult and answer a basic question instead of repeatedly dodging it wit regards to the national socialist media – Namely CNN – as to why they had to chose one particular location in the middle of a vast city street and why they were stage managing the event?

    Zachriel Borough Market is not a street. It’s a food market. It’s where the terrorist knife attacks occurred.
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=84854#comment-3347065181

    The previous comment referred to a STREET, meaning the one shown in the video.
    Your answers will specify why they needed to occupy that particular spot of ground past a police cordon in the relatively vast expanse of a city street.

    So far you have FAILED to do so – simply claiming that you have is not an answer.

    Your answer will also include specifics as to why national socialist media was stage managing the event. Doing so crosses the line from covering the news to manufacturing the news.

  • Torcer

    Now, Islamic leaders in Indianapolis are challenging those responsible for what they say are offensive and untrue statements to stand by their words, shed their anonymity and explain their motivations.

    Perhaps those leaders should specify what statements are ‘untrue’ instead of issuing a blanket condemnation that proves nothing.

    And if those statements are true, why is the truth considered to be ‘offensive’?

  • Ron Noyfb

    He only had a 1 inch di*k, like most inbred muslims, so it really wasn’t rape.

  • geirsmith

    Islam is the worst thing existing in the world.
    The Quran must be banned.
    It’s more Antisemitic than another banned book: Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” and the Quran has 108 passages saying to kill all Jews and Christians which is incitement to murder which is forbidden by law in 49 of 50 states in the USA.
    Actually “not”!
    Indeed, it’s forbidden in all 50 (for your infomation) you doltheads.
    Books like the Quran are totally off limits for Western culture.
    Islam cannot exist within Democratic countries. It’s incompatible with freedom.

  • SNuss

    “Why was the national socialist media stage managing the event”?
    Because that is what Leftists do, and they thought no one would notice..

  • SNuss

    The truth IS hate speech, to those who hate the truth.

  • ICEvictim
  • ICEvictim
  • Pyrran

    Remember, lying to the infidels is ok, so I don’t believe them, whatever they say.

  • Wilberforce

    On a very related note, Dave: a Deputy Sheriff friend of mine here in Des Moines is being investigated for “Islamophobia”. This’ll get your blood boiling…

    http://iowainformer.com/politics/2017/06/dan-charleston-franklin-graham-islamophobia-terrorism/

  • Jester

    Why is the Left upset? Because you and I see the billboard for what it is, while progressives want us to see it the way they do:

    “THE PERFECT MAN”

    – Voted Democrat – Voted Democrat
    – Voted Democrat – Voted Democrat
    – Voted Democrat – Voted Democrat

    In other words, to a leftist, The Ends Justify the Means.

    That’s all.

  • geirsmith

    In France, Islam’s been pawing at the doors for 1400 years.
    Muslims established emirates in Southern France for several hundred years such as in Corsica for example.
    They got pushed back to the sea eventually but they’re pawing back at the door again and taking down people left and right day by day now.
    It’s looking more and more like the Wild West with shootouts daily on Main Street.
    Citizens are running for cover or else settle down at the storefronts to watch the loonies out there do their pistol-duels in the hot mid-day sun.
    We’ve got to drive the spike into the hearts of the Islamic faith once again and best this time will be to not miss the mark.
    Destroy Islam lock, stock and barrel by banning the Quran worldwide.
    We can do it.
    It’s easy.
    Make a petition online. Gather a few million sigs and get it legal. Make petitions in each and every land on the surface of the globe.
    Game? Ready anyone? Let’s make that petition to ban the Quran. Gather millions behind it. Check out the legal status to make the signatures valid and stick.

  • geirsmith

    I’ll sign for sure. I’ll sign YESTERDAY. It’s high time now. Take out the garbage. Islam’s gone it’s full time enough already.

  • Mike_W20

    No petition will rid us of islam.
    After God is finished using islam as a scourge on a corrupt world, God will destroy islam once and for all; but it will not involve a petition.

  • Jodie

    Amen!

  • geirsmith

    We’ll make the petition if you like it or not.
    If it reaches a few million sigs the gov has to consider it.
    Then we make petitions everywhere worldwide even in China.

  • Mike_W20

    I like the idea of a petition against islam.
    islam is a curse and the more people who understand the evil nature of islam, the better.
    God allows islam because a lot of wicked people want it.

  • geirsmith

    People tolerate Islam a lot because people have rejected Christianity and they sympathize with Anti-Christian messages like Islam. But Russia’s had to live with Islam thru centuries and has paid a heavy price to Islam.
    The Mongols were Buddhists and Christians when they came to Russia and then converted to Islam for parts of them. Bringing Russia back to the Christian fold took centuries.
    But Islam was rejected as barbaric in Europe when Spain organized to reject Islam. But did they actually read the quran itself? I doubt it. In today’s world we read the books and study them. By the sword of learning we’re stronger than their swords of iron.
    Actually the Christians couldn’t kick Islam out of Spain, but the Muslims ’emirs’ fought among themselves and had diverging Muslims faiths, whether they were Sunni, Shiite or Fatimid Islam (Egypt and North Africa).
    It’s when the Muslims split up and some joined the Christians the dice were thrown and Christianity won.
    But we’re in different times and now the war is fought online in the alternative media.
    We have to use the media just as the Jihadists use Internet themselves both to recruit fighters and converts and to blitz us with it.
    They can’t stand we criticize Islam so we have to do it. They can’t resist that.
    A pertition to ban Islam and the Quran on legal grounds is great.
    We don’t need to talk to them just overwhelm them with our numbers and sheer force.

  • geirsmith

    I say we draft the petition here:
    Sign up to have Islam banned because the Quran is forbidden to be published and circulated. Indeed it says in 108 passages to kill all Jews and Christians. So it must be banned worldwide even to China in the East. It’s forbidden by law to incite to murder.
    ——-
    Is that good or what? Tell me what you think people.

  • StephaneDumas

    Vlogger Styxhexenhammer666 posted a vlog that’ll trigger some snowflakes and trigglypuffs about Islamophobia.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAWScMmYwCg&t=8s

  • JackisBack

    So you believe the this is God’s plan? That’s pretty f’ed up/

  • cieran58

    It’s not “mocking” mohamhead, merely stating facts about their pedophile prophet– after all, it’s in the koran–

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtePF8p-eIo

  • Misanthrope

    I’d rather deal with a Christian who’s nothing like Christ than a r4ghe4d who’s exactly like mohammed.

  • Mike_W20

    God is terrifying.

  • Heltau

    For me, there is no moderate islam.
    Islam is moderate until they blow you up with an IED.
    So, all islams will blow you up if they are given a chance.
    Any way, I learned all I needed to know about islam when islam did 9/11.

  • Annsragsdale

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj195d:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !mj195d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash195MarketWorldPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj195d..,.

  • JackisBack

    The books and scrolls supposedly written with his divine assistance are terrifying and are just the ramblings of misogynistic nomadic desert mental cases. So much killing in his name. Demanding blood sacrifices, slaughter, genocide, slavery. It would be better if they were all burned for they are the blueprint for inhumanity.
    He probably laughs at our interpretation of him.

  • Zachriel

    Torcer: Your answers will specify why they needed to occupy that particular spot of ground past a police cordon in the relatively vast expanse of a city street.

    They asked for permission to cross the police line to meet with the press.

  • Zachriel

    In fact, the vigil was organized by a local group.

  • Torcer

    Again: Your answers will specify why they needed to occupy that particular spot of ground past a police cordon in the relatively vast expanse of a city street.

    So far you have FAILED to do so – simply claiming that you have is not an answer.

    Your answer will also include specifics as to why national socialist media was stage managing the event. Doing so crosses the line from covering the news to manufacturing the news.

  • Torcer

    Note that our comrade cannot actually address the substance of the video and instead tries to use a red herring response to dodge the issue.

  • Zachriel

    The answer is vigil attendees went to where the press was located. Not sure why you don’t think that answers the question as to why they were in that location.

  • Torcer

    Again:Your answer will also include specifics as to why national socialist media was stage managing the event. Doing so crosses the line from covering the news to manufacturing the news.

  • Stosh

    I keep looking at the picture but cannot see where islam or mohammad is written. Is it that the description fits them so closely that they assume it’s about them?!?

  • Zachriel

    Torcer: Your answer will also include specifics as to why … media was stage managing the event.

    BBC: “The London Fatwa Council organised a small march at Borough Market on Sunday in solidarity with the victims of the attack.”

  • Torcer

    Zachriel BBC: “The London Fatwa Council organised a small march at Borough Market on Sunday in solidarity with the victims of the attack.”
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=84911#comment-3348622775

    Once again folks we see the disingenuous technique of the national socialist left of pretending to respond by providing an answer to a different question.

    Note that the supposed ‘answer’ to the question in regards to the actions of the national socialist media DID NOT make reference to the media.

    Again:Your answer will also include specifics as to why national socialist media was stage managing the event. Doing so crosses the line from covering the news to manufacturing the news.

    And please note repeating the same answer to another question will not fulfill the requirements of the inquiry.
    [Please note that I will REPEAT this posting UNTIL you properly answer the question that was asked.
    Perhaps you should just cut to the chase and refuse to answer the question that was asked and cease wasting everyone’s in these childish games.]

  • Zachriel

    Your question was “why they needed to occupy that particular spot of ground past a police cordon in the relatively vast expanse of a city street.” We answered that question. Then you attempted to fallaciously load the question with a reference to something called the “national socialist media”.

    We answered your original question, then asked the relevance, something you have refused to engage.

  • Torcer

    Again

    Zachriel BBC: “The London Fatwa Council organised a small march at Borough Market on Sunday in solidarity with the victims of the attack.”
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=84911#comment-3348622775

    Once again folks we see the disingenuous technique of the national socialist left of pretending to respond by providing an answer to a different question.

    Note that the supposed ‘answer’ to the question in regards to the actions of the national socialist media DID NOT make reference to the media.

    Again:Your answer will also include specifics as to why national socialist media was stage managing the event. Doing so crosses the line from covering the news to manufacturing the news.

    And please note repeating the same answer to another question will not fulfill the requirements of the inquiry.
    [Please note that I will REPEAT this posting UNTIL you properly answer the question that was asked.
    Perhaps you should just cut to the chase and refuse to answer the question that was asked and cease wasting everyone’s in these childish games.]

  • Momster

    Not mocking. Quoting.

  • Momster

    Hi, Jodie! Long time no see.

  • Zachriel

    As already stated, we reject the premise of your <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question&quot; loaded question.

  • Torcer

    Zachriel Your question was “why they needed to occupy that particular spot of ground past a police cordon in the relatively vast expanse of a city street.” We answered that question.

    Then PROVE you did with a re-posting of that alleged answer.
    IF you cannot, you will no longer have any credability

    Zachriel Then you attempted to fallaciously load the question with a reference to something called the “national socialist media”.

    Nice try but, that dodge has been used before.
    Merely labeling the nation’s media as socialist doesn’t fit the bill.
    Too bad you don’t have the ability to debate the issue and have to fall back on an excuse to avoid our repeated inquires which you have been repeating dodged

    Zachriel We answered your original question, then asked the relevance, something you have refused to engage.
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=84911#comment-3348854437

    Ah yes, projection at it best.
    Do we need to review the number of times you have used strawman arguments and dodged our questions?

    And of course, there is this:
    Again

    Zachriel BBC: “The London Fatwa Council organised a small march at Borough Market on Sunday in solidarity with the victims of the attack.”
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=84911#comment-3348622775

    Once again folks we see the disingenuous technique of the national socialist left of pretending to respond by providing an answer to a different question.

    Note that the supposed ‘answer’ to the question in regards to the actions of the national socialist media DID NOT make reference to the media.

    Again:Your answer will also include specifics as to why national socialist media was stage managing the event. Doing so crosses the line from covering the news to manufacturing the news.

    And please note repeating the same answer to another question will not fulfill the requirements of the inquiry.
    [Please note that I will REPEAT this posting UNTIL you properly answer the question that was asked.
    Perhaps you should just cut to the chase and refuse to answer the question that was asked and cease wasting everyone’s in these childish games.]

  • Torcer

    Zachriel Your question was “why they needed to occupy that particular spot of ground past a police cordon in the relatively vast expanse of a city street.” We answered that question.

    Then PROVE you did with a re-posting of that alleged answer.
    IF you cannot, you will no longer have any credability

    Zachriel Then you attempted to fallaciously load the question with a reference to something called the “national socialist media”.

    Nice try but, that dodge has been used before.
    Merely labeling the nation’s media as socialist doesn’t fit the bill.
    Too bad you don’t have the ability to debate the issue and have to fall back on an excuse to avoid our repeated inquires which you have been repeating dodged

    Zachriel We answered your original question, then asked the relevance, something you have refused to engage.
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=84911#comment-3348854437

    Ah yes, projection at it best.
    Do we need to review the number of times you have used strawman arguments and dodged our questions?

    And of course, there is this:
    Again

    Zachriel BBC: “The London Fatwa Council organised a small march at Borough Market on Sunday in solidarity with the victims of the attack.”
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=84911#comment-3348622775

    Once again folks we see the disingenuous technique of the national socialist left of pretending to respond by providing an answer to a different question.

    Note that the supposed ‘answer’ to the question in regards to the actions of the national socialist media DID NOT make reference to the media.

    Again:Your answer will also include specifics as to why national socialist media was stage managing the event. Doing so crosses the line from covering the news to manufacturing the news.

    And please note repeating the same answer to another question will not fulfill the requirements of the inquiry.
    [Please note that I will REPEAT this posting UNTIL you properly answer the question that was asked.
    Perhaps you should just cut to the chase and refuse to answer the question that was asked and cease wasting everyone’s in these childish games.]

  • Torcer

    Note that our comrade cannot actually address the substance of the video
    and instead tries to use a red herring response to dodge the issue.

  • Zachriel

    Torcer: Your question was “why they needed to occupy that particular spot of
    ground past a police cordon in the relatively vast expanse of a city
    street.”

    And the answer is that they asked permission and were allowed to cross the police line to meet with the press. They were in that particular spot because that is the spot where the press was.

    Torcer: Again:Your answer will also include specifics as to why … media was stage managing the event.

    The media did not stage the event as in “to produce or cause to happen for public view”. The event was staged by a local group. If by staged, you mean they told the people where to stand to be in camera view, then that is standard procedure when interviewing people on the street, in which case, so what?

  • Torcer

    My response is here:

    Perhaps you can try to further explain away the actions of the national socialist media.

    Video: More Footage Leaks Of CNN’s ‘Staged’ Muslim Anti-Terror Protest
    https://youtu.be/cTdqZnu6Gao
    We previously reported that the Muslim anti-terror protest appeared to at least have been staged to put people into place by CNN to get video on them. CNN claimed that they had just had helped protesters past barrier to be filmed that they didn’t set up or direct anything. Now this makes it very appear it was much more involved, contrary to what CNN claimed, including handing out flowers and signs.

    Via Daily Caller:

    Early this week, CNN was accused of staging a Muslim-led anti-terror protest after the London terror attacks. Now, more footage has dropped that shows what happened on the scene before the CNN shot was taken.

    A Youtube video taken by Claire Jordan shows her milling around the scene and “protest” prior to CNN lining up the protesters for their on-air shot. (VIDEO: CNN Responds To Claims They Staged A Muslim Anti-Terror Protest)

    There is a group of people in the area, both Muslim and non-Muslim, and some of them can be seen handing out bouquets of flowers and posters.

    http://www.weaselzippers.us/343235-video-more-footage-leaks-of-cnns-staged-muslim-anti-terror-protest/#comment-3353036127

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy