moonbattery logo

Feb 27 2012

Pro-Abortion Politician Calls for Criminalizing Vasectomies

As if ignorant of the fundamentals of human reproduction, a Georgia House Rep is responding to limitations on late-term abortions with the proposed criminalization of vasectomies:

Rep. Yasmin Neal, a Democrat from the Atlanta suburb of Jonesboro, planned on Wednesday to introduce HB 1116, which would prevent men from vasectomies unless needed to avert serious injury or death. …

“If we legislate women’s bodies, it’s only fair that we legislate men’s,” said Neal, who said she wanted to write bill that would generate emotion and conversation the way anti-abortion bills do.

In other words, the bill is a cross between a bad joke and a publicity stunt promoting abortion, put forward as political theater of the absurd.

The anti-vasectomy bill was a response to a bill that would punish abortions performed after the 20th week of pregnancy with prison sentences between one and 10 years.

Even Ms. Neal is bright enough to grasp the difference between contraceptive measures and killing a child 20 weeks after conception. Her tasteless ploy sheds light on a key Democrat strategy: obscure this difference in the minds of voters. This allows them both to paint Republicans as lifestyle-cramping extremists, and to further normalize the practice of killing inconvenient children.

yasmin_neal
Yasmin Neal wants to ban vasectomies.

On a tip from The Only Other Conservative in Seattle.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+StumbleUpon

16 Responses to “Pro-Abortion Politician Calls for Criminalizing Vasectomies”

  1. StanInTexas says:

    Ms. Neal might have a point… IF this was about legislating womens bodies. In fact, the debate is about saving the life of a child, not about controlling a woman’s body.

    And I wonder if Ms. Neal is aware that in many states, a woman can get an abortion without letting her husband know, but a man cannot get a vasectomy without his wife’s WRITTEN permission.

  2. AC says:

    How about free vasectomies for perpetual welfare cases?

  3. A. Levy says:

    If she was serious, she’d write a bill mandating the sterilization of all black females. That would save American taxpayers Trillions while also lowering the violent crime rate by about 90%.

  4. whotothewhat says:

    Yasmin Neal can have my balls when she can pry them from my cold dead hand.

  5. RKae says:

    In all their publicity stunts and rhetoric, the one thing they count on is “out of sight, out of mind.” Show the people pictures of abortions. Bring this murderous rampage into the light of day.

  6. Sam Adams says:

    Apparently Ms. Neal has never had high school biology….you know that class where they talk about the soon to be born child having a different genetic structure than its mother.

    Here’s a compromise idea, Ms. Neal. If the soon to be born baby has no heartbeat or brain activity, then you can continue to call it part of a woman’s body.

  7. Chris in N.Va. says:

    Typically intellectually-flaccid Liberal position.

    Cogitus interruptus.

  8. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    who said she wanted to write bill that would generate emotion and conversation the way anti-abortion bills do.
    ——-
    Ok, so this is some sick “publicity stunt”
    Actually, we are closer to MANDATING vasectomies.
    (as abortion coverage now is)
    Rhode Island taxpayers even foot the bill for them\
    http://www.health.ri.gov/projects/nocostvasectomy/

  9. Yasmin Neal’s face IS birth control. I couldn’t get her pregnant. Seriously, I’m a real trooper but I couldn’t do my business with that hag.

  10. Jimbo says:

    Another liberal living up to their reputation of being STUPID.

  11. Jay B. says:

    This is obviously the new talking points. Prepare to hear about fairness, we’ll see “feminists” demanding extraneous treatments to males just to prove a non-existant points. That’s liberals, if racism and name calling doesn’t work, try kindergarden maturity. Anything but facts, please.

  12. SNuss says:

    Spay & Neuter Liberals, before they do the same to the rest of us.

  13. Canis lupus says:

    Ive been following the topic of abortion for a while now. To me, it is like another poster stated, it is not about rights of women, but about rights of the unborn child. When women say “I support a womans right to choose” what they are really doing is regurgitating feminist propoganda. Women do have a choice. Dont get pregnant. Use birth control. Or dont have sex. We are constantly reminded about how special women are. If they are really that special then they should have the foresight to see that if they have sex with a man they could get pregnant. Also, if they are concerned that the man will not stay with them to support the baby, then dont have sex with him.
    This woman is asking to make vasectomies illegal is a what is wrong with politics today. She sounds like a man hater who is using her political position to spew her for the male gender. When I hear women like her ask women to be responsible then I will have some respect for women like her.

  14. LaInfidel says:

    This is what you get when you elect the ‘educated’ affirmative action candidate.

  15. Kevin says:

    The reasoning behind this crap is the same reasoning that would say we need to regulate unicycles the same way we regulate cars and trucks because they are both modes of transportation and they both require energy to operate. What’s depressing is that some people are dumb enough to fall for this intellectual abortion’s suggestion.

  16. LarryG says:

    Your eyes should tell you all you need to know about this urchin.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy