moonbattery logo

Jul 10 2017

WaPo Says Jihad Is Not a Dirty Word

Here’s why poetic justice would steer the next airliner hijacked by Muslims straight at WaPo’s offices:

Pictured above is liberal darling Linda Sarsour, a hate hoaxer and principal organizer of the D.C. pussy hat spectacle, who recently called for Jihad against the United States government while urging Muslims not to assimilate into American culture.

On tips from Jester and Torcer.



  • RKae

    These are the same people who are afraid of a wrestling video.

  • FromNJ

    Linda Sarsour can do no wrong as far as the progressives are concerned.
    She has them totally fooled.

  • geeknerd

    Who is the SeeMore character showing up in the lists?
    Every time I read the comments, I hear that song from “Little Shop of Horrors”, Suddenly Seemore!
    Perhaps some posters (I’m talking to you Bodhisatva!) should learn that “brevity is the soul of wit.”

  • KirklesWorth

    She wants it to mean one thing to the muslims and lie about it to the infidels. It’s a codeword that declares war to one group and claims pacifism to the other in typical taqiyya fashion.

    Let them cry it to liberal Google: ji·had (jəˈhäd) noun: 1. a struggle or fight against the enemies of Islam. “he declared a jihad against the infidels”. 2. the spiritual struggle within oneself against sin (this definition hardly applies)

    Here are the first five paragraphs from TheReligionOfPeace’s What Does Islam Teach About…Violence that mention the term “jihad”:

    ● Quran (4:95) – “Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home).Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward.” This passage criticizes “peaceful” Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah’s eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that “Jihad” doesn’t mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man’s protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle).

    ● Quran (9:20) – “Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah’s way are of much greater worth in Allah’s sight. These are they who are triumphant.” The Arabic word interpreted as “striving” in this verse is the same root as “Jihad”. The context is obviously holy war.

    ● Quran (25:52) – “Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness with it.” – The root for Jihad is used twice in this verse – although it may not have been referring to Holy War when narrated, since it was prior to the hijra at Mecca. The “it” at the end is thought to mean the Quran. Thus the verse may have originally meant a non-violent resistance to the ‘unbelievers.’ Obviously, this changed with the hijra. ‘Jihad’ after this is almost exclusively within a violent context.

    ● Quran (47:3-4) – “Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord… So, when you meet (fighting Jihad in Allah’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)… If it had been Allah’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost.” Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn’t do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test.

    ● Quran (48:17) – “There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom.” Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means ‘spiritual struggle.’ If so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.

  • StephaneDumas

    I guess they forgot how Khomenei thanked his communist allies during the 1979 Iranian revolution? By throwing them under the bus.

  • Stosh

    Wonder how they feel about Crusades…

  • Agrippa

    No confusion here, bitch. “Jihad” means convert, pay the dhimmi tax, or die. Tell me where I’m wrong, you lying twat. [Crickets chirp continuously]. Yeah, thought so . . .

  • ICEvictim

    I came to the conclusion some years ago that a bunch of space aliens with a really nasty sense of humor are orbiting in the L4 and L5 points beaming a stupid ray on the planet and watching the results.

  • ICEvictim

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy