moonbattery logo

Aug 08 2017

Using Intersectionality Theory to Attack Mathematics

As George Orwell observed, “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four.” But in academia, 2 + 2 = whatever makes people who are not heterosexual white men feel empowered:

A Vanderbilt University professor recently complained in an academic journal article that the field of mathematics is a “white and heteronormatively masculinized space.”

In a recent article titled Unpacking the Male Superiority Myth and Masculinization of Mathematics at the Intersection, Professor Luis A. Leyva argues that factors such as teacher expectations and cultural norms “serve as gendering mechanisms that give rise to sex-based achievement differences.”

Citing the “masculinization of mathematics,” Leyva then suggests that the apparent “gender gap” in mathematical ability is socially constructed (as opposed to arising from inherently different cognitive abilities) and therefore a “myth of male superiority.”

Mathematics is no longer a matter of solving equations. Now it is about solving achievement inequities.

He concludes by expressing a hope that future analyses of gender in mathematics take a more “intersectional” approach, lamenting the fact that “intersectional considerations of mathematics achievement and participation shaped by whiteness and sexuality” were left out of many of the studies he reviewed.

Intersectionality theory from black feminist thought, he adds, can allow for “more nuanced analyses of gender” and its relation to mathematical performance.

So much for evaluating mathematical performance on the basis of coming up with the right answer.

They can destroy engineering with this lunacy, so of course they can destroy math. There is nothing that the corrosion of political correctness won’t ruin, because it targets sanity itself by forbidding the acknowledgment of objective reality.

225_from_pierre
If a historically underachieving lesbian of color says so.

On tips from Sterling B, J, and ABC of the ANC.



  • Anonymous

    Because Feelings! (It’s the Leftist way– their way only, that’s all that matters… )

  • ICEvictim

    it’s intersectional alright, at the intersection of stupidity and insanity

    can’t wait for the bridges and buildings to perform when designed and constructed based on confused gender and race bases.

    “Be careful what you wish for. You may get it.”

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4edce28f6fa3614907f4d3c572e19f2808bb1c41ceba4da1f25176754e6256f3.jpg

  • SLCain

    This guy is a professor of mathematics education:

    http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/bio/luis-leyva

    Not a single person will learn math better, or even at all, as a result of anything he does. His position is a sinecure. His lifes’ work is worthless crap. He is nothing but a parasite.

  • MAS

    Used to work for a judge who had a saying for stupid youngsters that came before him; “Son the world’s going to have a picnic beating the dumb out of you”. Reality isn’t concerned about how you feel about yourself…

  • Frank

    Any theory, no matter how preposterous looks good If one lacks brains.

  • Torcer

    Leftists like to pretend that words have a fluid meaning and no set definition. Try doing that with terminology such as gravity and see if you can fly.

    Definition of gravity
    noun
    [mass noun]
    1Physics
    The force that attracts a body towards the centre of the earth, or towards any other physical body having mass.
    1.1 The degree of intensity of gravity, measured by acceleration.
    Origin
    Late 15th century (in gravity (sense 2)): from Old French, or from Latin gravitas ‘weight, seriousness’, from gravis ‘heavy’. gravity (sense 1) dates from the 17th century.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gravity

  • Torcer
  • Torcer

    Feelings! Whoa.Whoa..Feelings……

    …Great, Now I’ve got that song rattling around in my head

  • Torcer

    Speaking of ‘Academicians’

    Crying Wolff
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmA-_hsx3XE

  • Racist and sexist. I always knew math was evil, it just took a really, really smart professor to prove it.

  • Anonymous
  • Frank

    I changed stupid to liberal and stupidity to liberalism in the first paragraph of Bonhoeffer’s letter. The result is quite startling.

    Liberalism is a more dangerous enemy of the good than
    malice. One may protest against evil; it can be exposed and, if need be, prevented by use of force. Evil always carries within itself the germ of its own subversion in that it leaves behind in human beings at least a sense of unease. Against liberalism we are defenseless. Neither protests nor the use of force accomplish anything here; reasons fall on deaf ears; facts that contradict one’s prejudgment simply need not be believed- in such moments the liberal even becomes critical – and when facts are irrefutable they are just pushed aside as inconsequential, as incidental. In all this the liberal, in contrast to the malicious, is utterly self-satisfied and, being easily irritated, becomes dangerous by going on the attack. For that reason, greater caution is called for than with the malicious.

  • grayjohn

    Dumb + Fuck = Feminism.

  • MAS

    Gravity, it’s the law.

  • Richard Daniels

    Sounds like a case of math envy.

  • Anonymous
  • Torcer

    Interesting, although I would have that as Socialism or Leftism instead of Liberalism.

  • JeffersonSpinningInGrave

    Bet: The prof isn’t a mathematician.

    Bet: Department of education. That was the original stronghold of Marxism in American education.

  • JeffersonSpinningInGrave

    Didn’t see this before I posted. Yep, there we go.

  • Anonymous
  • geeknerd

    THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS!!!

  • FromNJ

    Nice.

  • FromNJ

    I love how Math is all of a sudden racist because it is used to calculate things the SJWs don’t like to hear about – like crime statistics and poor grades among minorities…

  • Jester

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy