moonbattery logo

Jun 30 2012

Another Shell From the Romney Campaign Lands Atop Obama’s Head

Thankfully Romney is taking a less passive approach than the sacrificial goat John McCain. Yet another ad hits home:

Via The Right Scoop, on a tip from Shawn.

20 Responses to “Another Shell From the Romney Campaign Lands Atop Obama’s Head”

  1. Spider says:

    The only question here is, will the sheeple be able to retain all this info until Nov? Or, will the MSM con them, again, into thinking the Marxist-in-Chief is the one true messiah?

    We’ll find out in Nov. if the American people really care about freedom and liberty. Or, are they happy to continue being weak, gullible, sheep.

  2. gemalo says:

    I thought up a great ad for Mitt. After the obligatory approval message, he needs to say, ‘I’m here to talk about Barack Obama’s accomplishments over the last 3 1/2 years.’ Then complete silence for thirty seconds, as Mitt checks his watch every so often. Fade to black.

  3. He IS upping his game lately… a ray of hope, at least

  4. Dr. 9 says:

    If i were in charge? I would make simplicity the law of the land. Example:

    I’d get rid of Food Stamps. No cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

    Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to reproduce or use drugs or alcohol, then get a job. Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks?

    You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your ‘home’ will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

    In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a “government” job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 50 inch rims, your low profile tires, your 10 lb. gold chains, and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good”.

    Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, you will accept our rules. Before you say that this would be “demeaning” and ruin their “self esteem”, consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem.

    If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

    AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.

    And of course, not only will chain gangs be reinstitued, but the list of Capital crimes “requiring” the death penalty will be “greatly” extended.

    Thank you.

  5. Joe Biden says:

    Dr. 9 for president!!!!

  6. LouieLouie says:

    Dr. 9, June 30, 2012, 9:06 am

    Works for me.

  7. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Dr 9
    Sounds great, except for the “government jobs” part.
    Every program means MORE government workers, and MORE expense.
    I would try leaving entitlements just as they are, but offering cash in lieu of program benefits for all who qualify.
    Something enticing, such as maybe six months, a year ?? of weekly uninterrupted cash payments……..
    Spend it on what you want.
    No strings
    Then nothing.
    You’re on your own.
    Who wouldn’t choose the cash ?

  8. TrickleUpPolitics says:

    Brilliant having Hillary blast Obama!

  9. Bob Roberts says:

    Shrillary delivering the tag line at the end?


    TUP got it in before me, darn it!

  10. Bob Roberts says:

    From the link provided above by A. Levy:

    Lamberth hinted at the controversial decision when he asked Roberts if it bothered him that he can’t respond to his critics.

    “No,” Roberts said, his brief answer hanging in the air to more laughter.
    Roberts already explained himself well in his written decision.

    I’m not sure I accept his explanation, haven’t fully thought it through. But there is no need to respond because, so far, he’s not gotten any rational responses from critics, only emotional ones.

    And all the responses they need are in his written decision.

  11. Bob Roberts says:

    Dr. 9 says: June 30, 2012 at 9:06 am
    Seriously, are you considering running for office?

    I mean, there are too many schlubs and moochers who will vote against you, given your platform, I expect. But still, you would “frame the debate” perhaps and that might help.

    Good ideas. Probably not practical, but good!

  12. Ghost of Adolf says:

    And of course, not only will chain gangs be reinstitued, but the list of Capital crimes “requiring” the death penalty will be “greatly” extended.

    Wasn’t that already tried in Germany a few decades back? I have no problem with most of Dr.9’s post but that idea has to go. Replacing one Dictator with another is not an option.

  13. SNuss says:

    @ Dr. 9: I like most of what you propose, but I would add this: ALL politicians SHALL BE DRUG-TESTED. They should be tested, and the results published, as soon as they file for candidacy,and again at least a month before the election. Test all the bureaucrats, too.

  14. SNuss says:

    As to the death penalty, I would make the requirements more stringent, such as demanding multiple items of physical evidence, including DNA. I would also limit appeals to one, with sentence to be carried out within one year, if the appeal fails.

    I’d also eliminate “hate” crime laws. The severity of criminal charges should not be determined by race, gender, or sexual orientation. If there are extenuating circumstances, those should be brought up at sentencing.

  15. TrickleUpPolitics says:

    I just saw this ad on TV.

  16. Sam Adams says:

    President Ropes and Chains likely can’t tell the truth. He may not be able to tell the truth from a lie…especially as everything he says has to appear first on his teleprompter.

    Without his teleprompter, he’s no better than Joe Biden.

  17. joeh says:

    I saw the ad on Hannity last week and burst out laughing. I had to watch this 3 times… love seeing Hillary give Odingo his dose of shame.

  18. Son of Taz says:

    SNuss: how about, in addition to drug testing, a valid birth certificate be produced? Not a Photoshopped version?

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy