moonbattery logo

Apr 22 2013

Boston Taxpayers Helped Finance Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s Mosque

File this one under Your Tax Dollar at Work:

Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev attended a Massachusetts mosque that made a controversial deal with a Boston city agency that allowed it to buy land at a lower-than-market price in exchange for various token services to the Boston community, despite the mosque’s links to some radical anti-American figures.

Dzhokhar worshiped darkness at the Islamic Society of Boston (ISB) in Cambridge. ISB opened a “cultural center” in Roxbury on land that the Boston Redevelopment Authority valued at $400,000 but sold to the Religion of Peaceniks for $175,000. Good thing it wasn’t a church; they would have been charged $1,000,000 by the moonbats who control every level of government in Taxachusetts.

Islamic cleric Yusuf Abdullah al-Qaradawi, who said in a 1995 speech that Islam would “conquer America” and “conquer Europe,” reportedly appeared on IRS forms as one of the ISB’s trustees.

ISB trustee Walid Fitaihi, who wrote that Jews “would be punished for their oppression, murder and rape of the worshippers of Allah,” helped broker the ISB’s deal with the Boston Redevelopment Authority.

Whether liberals have terrified themselves into dhimmitude with the word Islamophobe or have been promoting Islam out of sheer malice, it could hardly be more obvious whose side they are on in this great cultural fight to the finish that has gone on for centuries.

tsarnaev-mosque
Dzhokhar’s inspirational mosque.

On a tip from Hopium Pipe. Graphic compliments of Stormfax.



17 Responses to “Boston Taxpayers Helped Finance Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s Mosque”

  1. […] Boston Taxpayers Helped Finance Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s Mosque […]

  2. Henry says:

    Recall the prog, troll terrorism enablers and apologists and their shrieking that 51 Park was A-OK because it was a “cultural center” not a mosque; it would be perfectly safe…

    LOL Stupid progs.

  3. Rube from Flyover Country says:

    You would be surprised how many of these diverse cultural enrichment centers are scattered across flyover country, especially in the midwest.

  4. Flu-Bird says:

    American tax payers forced to pay for terrorists attacks and from the same whinny liberal pansies that object to defense spending

  5. Jimbo says:

    “But, but, but… we built them a mosque! We give them what ever they want! We hate Christians and we’re making Christianity illegal just like they want us to! We give them food, education, medical care, lots and lots of rich conservatives’ money. They’re supposed to LOVE us!”

    Said the stupid liberal dipshit.

  6. gone galt says:

    You reap what you sow.

  7. Clingtomyguns says:

    AMERICAN THINKER – FEDS ARE NOT SERIOUS ABOUT STOPPING ISLAMIC TERROR

    “Our President praises the public for not being terrorized, then lectures us not to “rush to judgment” about the bombers’ motivations and “certainly not about entire groups of people.” Translation: we’re not going to talk about the jihadi war on us. Hope for the best. Do not pay attention to the problem of Islamic imperialism.”

    Here are quotations from guest preachers invited to the Tsarnaev brothers’ Islamic Society of Boston’s Cambridge mosque over the years:

    Sheikh Yasir Qadhi: This morning, the world heard news about the crash of the space shuttle. There is no doubt that Muslims were overjoyed because of the adversity that befell their greatest enemy…This way, God Willing, America will fall and disappear…

    Sheikh Yasir Qadhi was invited in 2008, around the time the older brother was becoming more religious. The Sheikh is a Holocaust denier who has “claimed that Jews want to destroy Muslims, and called all non-Muslims (Jews and Christians) a ‘spiritually filthy substance’ whose lives and property hold no value and are forfeit to Muslims during Jihad.”

    Recently, the bomber’s mosque invited Victoria Britain, a journalist who incites rage by calling the war on terror a “war against Islam.”

    “We’re not going to hear about jihad in America from this President, from our bland Republican leadership, from the legacy media, or from the public. It’s too uncomfortable. It means acknowledging that the jihadi imperialism is on the rise, that we are at war, whether we like it or not, and that we have to make changes at home.

    We could take the national security threats posed by our immigration system more seriously. We could stop issuing visas to Moslem countries like Chechnya and Saudi Arabia unless they can demonstrate and swear they do not support jihad. We could monitor their actions to make sure it is true. We could have INS, the FBI, Homeland Security do their job. We need to make sure temporary residents are not joining jihadi mosques and Muslim Brotherhood front groups here in America. They are not citizens covered by our full constitutional protections. They are potential national security risks. If we take the threat seriously, intelligent policies, consistent with our constitutional government, would be devised and implemented. We’re not even trying.

    Refugee status is a privilege that should be offered to true refugees during their time of crisis. But only as long as they are no danger to us. This need not mean automatic citizenship, especially when the so-called refugees safely travel back and forth from America to Russia and Chechnya repeatedly. We’re not serious.

    Immigration to America has to stop being treated like a charity that we dole out equally to all regions of the world. It is only a generation ago that Senator Ted Kennedy decided to re-invent immigration and citizenship with the avowed purpose to make America less white and less Western, to prove we were not prejudiced. We don’t need to prove a thing. Our immigration system was a miracle in the history of the world, creating a melting pot that was our pride and joy. Until this liberal make-over of America, we allowed people into our country who both wanted to fit in and become American, were capable of it, who left their old countries behind, and who had something to offer. We did not offer them welfare, we offered them opportunity.

    No more. We are not serious about assimilation for immigrants. These bomber brothers went to a public high school with students from 70 nations. How is assimilation to America possible under those circumstances? It isn’t. Our educational system isn’t even trying. The kids aren’t taught American history, our Constitution, our pride, our responsibility to freedom. They are not taught understanding and respect for their new American founding fathers, heroes to every immigrant because they created the land of justice and opportunity that is welcoming them to join us. Instead, Dzokhar’s high school English teacher assigned him a project to study Chechnya grievances. Really. The professor he contacted for information on atrocities there now wonders plaintively if that may have radicalized Dzhokhar.

    If the FBI had taken the brothers’ photos to all the Boston mosques, instead of broadcasting them to the public at large, it seems possible the brothers could have been identified and apprehended before their shooting, bombing breakout which killed or seriously wounded two more Americans. Is our FBI allowed to investigate a mosque following a terror attack, or is that the kind of profiling generalization Obama is warning us against?

    We could do better, a lot better, but we won’t. The public is too passive and uninformed to demand change, not for just three deaths. There has been little outpouring of grief, rage and patriotism like after 9/11.

    We must confront this violent religion that has not moderated its murderous imperialism in 1400 years. We can stop them. But only if we are willing to look into the face of our enemy. So far, it looks like we are not going to do that.”

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/we_are_not_serious_about_stopping_islamic_terror.html

  8. Nate says:

    Every time I see one of those things, I think…observatory/targeting center and rocket-made-to-look-like-a-minaret.

  9. Fiberal says:

    We have to give Lenin partial credit here:

    “The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.”

    ….except that he really meant liberals

  10. Xavier says:

    The leftards are selling “self-radicalization” to exonerate Islam and Al Qaeda.

    If (and for right now it is definitely IF) the Boston Bomber Brothers™ didn’t have any personal contact with Al Qaeda or radical Imams, then isn’t this violent episode absolute proof of how dangerous Islam is, particularly when it is spread over the internet? Doesn’t inflammatory hate speech need to be prosecuted and eliminated with the same zeal as online child porn?

  11. Flu-Bird says:

    Anyone for having the mosque raized?

  12. […] Muslim–moonbat unholy alliance has blood on its hands. More on the Massachusetts Muslim milieu that produced the Tsarnaev Brothers — and its financially […]

  13. berlet98 says:

    Ernesto Miranda and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

    The Miranda Rule, aka “Miranda Rights,” “Mirandizing,” “Miranda
    warning,” or simply “rights,” exist as a result of a split 1966, 5-4 Earl Warren
    Supreme Court ruling that provided criminal suspects in the United States with a
    “Get Out of Jail Free” card should they be interrogated by police authorities
    who fail to read them their rights.

    If liberal-leftists get their way, prosecutors of the alleged Boston
    Marathon terrorist and murderer Dzhokhar Tsarnaev could be forced to “Mirandize”
    him at some point and he conceivably might be set free on that technicality if
    they don’t.

    SCOTUS found in the case of [Ernesto] Miranda v. Arizona that a
    “person in custody must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed that he has
    the right to remain silent, and that anything he says will be used against him
    in court; he must be clearly informed that he has the right to consult with a
    lawyer and to have the lawyer with him during interrogation, and that, if he is
    indigent, a lawyer will be appointed to represent him” and that,
    “If the individual indicates in any manner, at any time prior
    to or during questioning, that he wishes to remain silent, the interrogation
    must cease” and that ”If the individual states that he wants an attorney, the
    interrogation must cease until an attorney is present. At that time, the
    individual must have an opportunity to confer with the attorney and to have him
    present during any subsequent questioning.”

    There are no reliable estimates as to how many murderers,
    rapists, and other scum of the Earth escaped legal retribution over the course
    of the last 47 years because of that Supreme Court ruling.

    Known lowlife Ernesto Miranda succeeded in having his conviction for
    the 1963 kidnapping and rape of a 17 year old girl in Phoenix overturned. He was
    subsequently re-tried, sentenced to 20-30 years in prison in 1967, released 4
    years later, and was mercifully stabbed to death in a bar in 1976 when he was
    34.

    Ironically, Miranda had signed a statement when he was originally
    questioned attesting that his confession was made “with full
    knowledge of my legal rights, understanding any statement I make may be used
    against me,” a statement that carried no weight with the Supremes any more than
    the testimony of an eyewitness. When Miranda’s suspected killer
    was arrested, he exercised his right to remain silent after being read his
    Miranda rights, had to be released, and no one was ever charged with his murder.

    Unless videography, photography, and other evidence lie, both 19 year
    old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and his 26 year old brother Tamerlan Tsarnaev committed
    last week’s heinous attacks as surely as Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK and as
    surely as Jack Ruby killed Oswald.

    Nevertheless and as anticipated, America’s lib-left leapt
    to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s defense by declaring that, as a naturalized American
    citizen as of September 11th, 2012, he is entitled to be “Mirandized” replete
    with a lawyer before authorities interrogated him. At this point,
    liberal-leftists don’t care much about Tamerlan Tsarnaev since he’s quite dead
    after a shoot-out with cops last Friday and after Dzhokhar ran over him in an
    attempt to escape.

    As usual, leading the charge in defense of criminality and against
    the innocent, the (allegedly) American Civil Liberties Union . . .

    (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=31021.)

  14. Son of Taz says:

    These mosques / “cultural centers” are offensive. Consider that because they are “religious” properties, they are tax exempt, which essentially means regular taxpayers subsidize their existence.

    Thanks Mayor Menino and all you Cambridge jackasses.

  15. BT in SC says:

    Nothing to see, here, folks. Move along…

    Or, in the alternative, “let’s not jump to conclusions.”

    /sarc off

  16. […] Taxpayers also subsidized Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s mosque. […]

  17. […] And remember Boston Taxpayers Helped Finance Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s Mosque. […]

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy