moonbattery logo

Dec 06 2012

Chuck Woolery on Assault Weapons

Chuck Woolery explains why Americans need to have what the liberal governmedia likes to call “assault weapons”:

If Ice T gets it, even Bob Costas is too smart to have an excuse.

On a tip from The Only Other Conservative in Seattle.

12 Responses to “Chuck Woolery on Assault Weapons”

  1. Antisocialist says:

    Assault Weapons are good for hunting liberals… 😀

  2. -sepp says:

    LoL…people who hate guns, won’t / don’t own guns…are allowed to define what an assault weapon is without actually knowing what one is?

    “If it’s scary looking…it’s an assault rifle!”

    When the libs get that revolution they’ve been calling for…even a slingshot will be scary for them!

  3. Mr Evilwrench says:

    And here sits me with an M4gery with a night vision scope. My fiancee thinks it secksy, mmm…

  4. KHarn says:

    “Assault weapon” is as meaningless as “saturday night special”. Neither term has ever been technicly defined .

  5. KHarn says:

    President Clinton joined in the ATTEMPT at defining “assault weapons” by saying that they were “…not easily concelable.”. Does that mean he was in favor of HANDGUNS?


  6. Highway Hospital Student says:

    Bill RIN O’Reilly (registered BO butt-kisser) loses control of his interview with Bob Costas (professional midget) and gets his posterior handed to him.

  7. IslandLifer says:

    Van Jones spewing garbage, as always:

  8. IslandLifer says:

    Soetoro Admin looking to bypass Congress for ban on semi autos:

  9. AC says:

    Molon labe.

  10. Goodness says:

    Hmmm.Flat top .gov carbine. Not bad, Chuck.

  11. Dr. 9 says:

    I’m still waiting for these liberal dolts to explain what a “non-assault” weapon is.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy