moonbattery logo

Jul 05 2016

Comey Won’t Recommend Indictment for Hillary

We have been aware for some time that Hillary broke the law when she went to extremes to keep her State Department emails secret from the public, flagrantly mishandling classified information, defiantly destroying subpoenaed evidence, and violating the Espionage Act. But we also knew that there would likely be no legal consequences, because her fellow Democrats control the “Justice” Department. That is the kind of country we are letting this become. Sure enough:

FBI Director James B. Comey said Tuesday that his agency will not recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server as secretary of state, but called Clinton and her staff “extremely careless” in handling sensitive material.

If the scolding was meant to salvage Comey’s reputation for integrity, it is likely to fall short. Comey takes his orders from Loretta Lynch, who last week got caught evidently negotiating with Bill Clinton on a tarmac in Phoenix on behalf of her own boss, Barack Obama. Shrillary appears to have agreed to Obama’s terms. Don’t be surprised if Sasha and Malia are tapped to fill Supreme Court vacancies.

The case will now be officially spiked by the Injustice Department.

Cynicism corrodes liberty. If we accept this as the way things are done now, we can look forward to an unbroken line of lawless rulers as insolently corrupt as the Clintons stretching into the murk of an unpromising future.

Obama3rdTerm
An agreement has been reached regarding Obama’s third term.

On tips from Varla, Torcer, and Stormfax.



85 Responses to “Comey Won’t Recommend Indictment for Hillary”

  1. Gex says:

    there you go dave …..your wish came true

  2. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    We all expected this, but it still feels like a kick in the crotch. We were a nation of laws.

  3. Jester says:

    C’mon. Is anyone really surprised by this farce? Please.

    Everybody get ready for our first “What Difference Does it Make?” puppet dictator.

  4. Hans Landa says:

    Who even remotely cares? #nevertrump

  5. BostonLiberty says:

    To arms, fellow citizens, time to fight for Liberty and Freedom! Defeat Tyranny!

  6. Gex says:

    food ….water…..guns…….ammo…….make sure you have plenty on hand

  7. MAS says:

    Breaking my general rule not to respond to trolls with blocked profiles; It was Dave’s wish to have Hillary given the good old boys club pass, really!? Are you that dim? Don’t answer, we all know what a straw-man argument looks like by now…you Branch Trumpians have demonstrated it enough to be VERY clear.

  8. Troll Magnet says:

    Only Trump can save us now!

    And 762×51, he can also save us for sure 😛

  9. Gex says:

    breaking my rule to never respond to an idiot

  10. Buffalobob says:

    Just stop with the never Trump BS and start openly lobbering over Cocked Hillary.

  11. Torcer says:

    Shorter FBI Director James Comey Presser: LOLOLOL. Nothing Matters. | RedState http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2016/07/05/house-speaker-paul-ryan-trumps-twitter-shenanigans-need-clean/

    FBI Director James Comey Confirmed that Everything Republicans Have Been Saying about Hillary's Email is True (VIDEO) | RedState http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016/07/05/breaking-fbi-finds-clinton-reckless-classified-information-recommends-charges-filed-full-presser-video/

    “DAMAGE is being done to the rule of law” – Paul Ryan RESPONDS to FBI statement on Clinton http://therightscoop.com/damage-is-being-done-to-the-rule-of-law-paul-ryan-responds-to-fbi-statement-on-clinton/

  12. Torcer says:

    You should have guessed that those supposed Trump supporters issuing the same false talking points would not be able to respond with anything of intellectual value.

  13. Gex says:

    maybe if you and yer buuuuuddddddy ever posted anything of intellectual value to respond to ……never mind…..that will never happen…..btw….yer buuuuuddddddyyyyyyyyy……told me not to answer the question……go here …..you really need this http://www.k5learning.com/reading-comprehension-worksheets/first-grade-1

  14. MAS says:

    Straw-man much?

  15. MAS says:

    Thanks, I think almost as highly of you.

  16. snowsnake says:

    What rule of law is Ryan talking about? The law has become a prostitute and now it just a matter of negotiating price. Clinton bought Lynch and she was very cheap! Anybody want to send their kids out to fight and perhaps die for this putrid mess?

  17. Kevin R. says:

    America fundamentally transformed: the rule of law is dead – the rule of aristocracy restored.

  18. MAS says:

    And right on cue Gex goes on the attack. You’re right, these Branch Trumpian cultists have no other route than to ad hominem attack. Want to wager they are really a bunch of acne besotted Jr. high school kids taking a break from the PS 3 to do a 21st century version of phone pranks?

  19. MAS says:

    And yet here you are, responding on a web site you clearly think is owned by and visited by idiots that you disagree with. Irony much?

  20. Gex says:

    “And right on cue Gex goes on the attack.”

    oh my……bwahahahahaha………just a couple of hi lites from your op

    “Breaking my general rule not to respond to trolls”

    “Are you that dim?”

    “you Branch Trumpians”
    good thing you didn’t attack anyone……can you say HYPOCRITE ?…..sure….I knew you could……
    but thanks for such an intellectually valuable post……LoL…..LoL…..LoL

  21. MAS says:

    Well don’t cry in your Captain Crunch junior…makes it salty.

  22. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    How far we have fallen

  23. Chronos Z. Wonderpig says:

    typically when someone violates security procedures, if they are not criminally charged, the case is handled administratively by whoever granted the security clearance. A lot, and I mean a lot, of people have had their clearances revoked for doing a lot less than Hillary did. Generally, a revoked clearance means you lose your job since lack of a clearance is grounds for dismissal in jobs that require one.
    So – what are the odds that the FBI will administratively revoke Hillary’s clearance?

  24. Chronos Z. Wonderpig says:

    more reason to hold your nose & vote for Trump!!

  25. Gex says:

    take notice of what I said

    BREAKING MY RULE to never respond to an idiot
    thanks for making my point……LoL

  26. Chronos Z. Wonderpig says:

    this is why we need the 2nd amendment…..

  27. MicahStone says:

    –Laws are ONLY for us little people….

  28. MicahStone says:

    –Third-world banana republic dictatorships have more real justice than in OBOZOland…

  29. Gex says:

    crying?????? pointing out your hypocrisy…….bwahahahaha…….its more like laughing my ass off at you…..btw….don’t forget to turn the lites off in your moms basement…..and throw your empty mountain dew bottles and and empty cheeto bags away……or your mom will ground you if she finds out you were trying to keep up with the big boys again

  30. […] may have dodged the bullet legally, but not politically, as WaPo […]

  31. […] may have dodged the bullet legally, but not politically, as WaPo […]

  32. Jack says:

    Comey is not the first disgrace to head this bureau.

  33. Torcer says:

    Do you understand that your childish invective merely highlights that you are incapable of such feats of intellectual legerdemain?

  34. Torcer says:

    Yes, the problem for them is that they lack the ability to act like an adult and put forward an intellectual argument.

  35. SNuss says:

    Since when is intent required to commit gross negligence? Negligence is an incompetent act, performed by an unwitting person. If it was an intended act, that means it was premeditated. Think of the difference between first-degree murder, and manslaughter.

  36. SNuss says:

    Scalia was right-words no longer have any meaning.

  37. KHarn says:

    I heard the announcement on the radio; at the end it sounded like Comey was BEGGING people to believe that the FBI’s honor was intact and that there was no pressure on them or favoritism on their part.

  38. KHarn says:

    Who’s going to lead us? Without leaders and a plan, we’d just be a gang of criminals.

  39. Gex says:

    do you understand that you ignoring your buuuuuddddddys post merely highlights your hypocrisy……
    please sign in under the moniker Oswald bates…….your comments are dead on something he would say

  40. Torcer says:

    I’m not responsible for someone else actions – so that’s an epic Fail for you.

    But keep on illustrating that you cannot discuss matter like an adult.

  41. Johnny Monday says:

    The only candidate who can’t win against this criminal is Drumpf. The delegates better get some backbone and dump him.

  42. Johnny Monday says:

    #NeverTrump

    That will never change.

  43. Johnny Monday says:

    It’s like arguing with a three year old. That’s typical of the Drumpf cult. They are persistent in their willful ignorance. It would be funny if it wasn’t threatening the fabric of the nation.

  44. Gex says:

    another follower of douchebattery that sees what he wants to……here you need this…http://www.k5learning.com/reading-comprehension-worksheets/first-grade-1

  45. Gex says:

    so why care about my actions……epic fail for you as well as epic hypocrisy…….i’m just following the example that you have given……sorry bout yer luck oswald

  46. Ron Noyfb says:

    Comey should have said-“Better the rule of law dies than me.”

  47. MicahStone says:

    “Comey Won’t Recommend Indictment for Hillary”
    —surprising — *****NOT*****

  48. Torcer says:

    Gex
    so why care about my actions……epic fail for you as well as epic hypocrisy…….i’m just following the example that you have given……sorry bout yer luck oswald

    Ehat are you referring to?
    Please be specific – IF you can.

    Are you a Conservative? Yes or No?

  49. rex freeway says:

    yea

  50. rex freeway says:

    An assassin could have removed so much evil and disfunction in this world by removing to 2 in that pic.

  51. CTsOpinion says:

    Comey’s first order of business will be tendering his resignation upon Trump’s election.

  52. Gex says:

    http://www.k5learning.com/reading-comprehension-worksheets/first-grade-1
    if you can get passed the worksheets……get back to me……we’ll chat

  53. Rusty Bill says:

    Rule of law is effectively dead in the United States.

    Buy more ammo. Lots and lots of ammo.

    Texit.

  54. 762x51 says:

    Rule of law is dead but not ruled by laws. Even the biggest moron alive can see from this fiasco that there is a protected ruling class who are above the law. It runs from the White House through the Congress and SCOTUS down into your state legislature, governors office, county, municipality, school district, all the way down to dog catcher to some degree. Laws have become a set of Rules of Engagement put in place by an enemy determined to enslave us. Those rules do not apply to them, only to us, witness the CA legislature passing 6 draconian gun laws then exempting itself from them or Congress exempted from Obamacare.

    I have a news flash for these vermin, the rules that don’t apply to them, don’t apply to me, period.

    I will not obey their laws.
    I will not fund their agendas.
    I will not recognize their authority.
    I will not surrender.

  55. 762x51 says:

    This is why we need to use the Second Amendment. – Fized that for ya.

  56. 762x51 says:

    Same as the odds they will indict her. Old BJ Clinton had a very productive meeting on that private jet with Lynch.

  57. 762x51 says:

    Save YOU? No. But I can kick your ass until your nose bleeds sperm breath.

    Hey Maggot, engage any dangerous cardboard targets lately? Can’t wait to hear some good IDPA war stories about you in the trenches, Do you still have nightmares about the scary ones with the hands painted on them? LOL.

  58. 762x51 says:

    This is going to be messy as fuck, that is just reality now.

  59. 762x51 says:

    Which is why engaging them in said argument is pointless. My way takes little effort and has them foaming at the mouth. Plus it’s coming down to the fight I have long predicted, may as well get the party started and get it over with.

  60. 762x51 says:

    Wheeew, stinks like Trumpanzee in here.

  61. Tom says:

    Oh, God…here you go again with your “YES or NO!” crap,

  62. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    Comey want to retire with a nice pension, and not commit suicide by shooting himself in the back of the head. With his off hand. Twice.

  63. Troll Magnet says:

    Hook, line, and sinker…

  64. Torcer says:

    Can you answer that question?
    Are you a Conservative? Yes or No?

  65. Torcer says:

    1. Clearly you cannot back up your previous statement.

    2. Answer the question Please: Are you a Conservative? Yes or No?

  66. Torcer says:

    It is quite interesting that most trump supporters are parroting the same “Hillary is worse” line in some form or another.

    It is also quite indicative that these supposed Conservatives cannot affirm such with the a basic Yes or No answer to the question:

    Are you a Conservative?

  67. Tom says:

    Are you a shill for Hillary?
    YES – or – HELL, YES! ?

  68. Torcer says:

    Is that the best you can offer in debate – Falsehoods and loaded questions?

    Fallacies of Argument
    A fallacy is a flaw in logic that occurs when making an argument. These happen frequently and can not only destroy an argument, but harm the credibility of the person making the argument.

    Loaded Question:
    Here, the writer asks a question in such a way that an unjustified or unfound assumption is a part of the question. The questions usually imply something negative about their subjects, though they might be used to suggest a positive answer about the subject if the writer wants the reader to be favourably disposed towards the subject.
    Ex. At what point did the oil company decide it wanted to destroy our beautiful wilderness?
    https://cstudies.ubc.ca/student-information/services/self-directed-writing-resources/argument/fallacies-argument

    Now, please answer my question for everyone: Are you a Conservative? Yes or No?

  69. SNuss says:

    Like the bumper sticker says:
    “The Founders would have started shooting by now.”

  70. SNuss says:

    However, per 18 U.S. Code § 793 (f) “Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
    Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.”
    I see nothing about administrative penalties here, and nothing about intent being required.

  71. Gex says:

    1. clearly you were not able to get past the worksheets
    2. try again…..maybe you can find some help from your intellectual buddies ……after you’ve passed them……..come back we’ll chat

  72. Gex says:

    easy fix…….brush your tooth…..see?…..the smell is all gone
    hey torcer I just met one of your “adult” buddy’s with an “intellectually valuable argument”

  73. Torcer says:

    Gex
    so why care about my actions……epic fail for you as well as epic hypocrisy…….i’m just following the example that you have given……sorry bout yer luck oswald

    Ehat are you referring to?
    Please be specific – IF you can.

    Are you a Conservative? Yes or No?

  74. Torcer says:

    Can you answer the question: Are you a Conservative? Yes or No?

    Or are you trying to make it plain to everyone that you aren’t Conservative?

  75. Gex says:

    http://www.k5learning.com/read

    can you understand the worksheets?……yes or no?

  76. […] following orders from above, James Comey declined to recommend Shrillary be indicted. But at least he put it on the public […]

  77. Torcer says:

    Clearly, you cannot answer that question.

    So the discussion for the rest of the class becomes, Why?

    Well, let’s noddle that out shall we?

    Right, if you WERE a Conservative (or something else.. Libertarian by example) you should be able to answer it with Yes and a clear conscience. If you are something else, the afore mentioned Libertarian, you could simply say no and explain your answer.

    But you cannot even do that… can you…

    Therefore you must be something else that would destroy your credibility as a supposed Trump supporter..

    Thus you keep on dodging the question with the typical childish games we’ve all come to know and loath from certain sectors.

  78. 762x51 says:

    I’m not defending Torcer, he can do that all by himself. I don’t subscribe to the strategy of trying to have an intelligent discussion or debate with Progressives, regardless of which letter of the alphabet they are trying to hide behind. You scum are nothing but targets awaiting engagement as far as I’m concerned. Torcer deals in factual debate, I deal in lead. If he wants to waste his time trying to debate a dishonest Progressive who is never going to admit to facts anyway, well, it’s his time to waste.

    Civil war is coming, you tRump vermin have ensured that, and there is going to more targets than in Fallujah. So if you are looking for someone to bore to tears with your Marxist bullshit you might want to try someone else. All you will get from me is a straight up gun fight which I have proven repeatedly your kind will chicken out of and run away and hide. Save time and run away now.

    Elitist fucktard.

  79. Gex says:

    yawnnnnnnnn……still waiting for an answer about the worksheets…………

  80. Gex says:

    you “deal in lead”…….which translates to your mom caught you jacking to gay porn in her basement……ahhhhh….poor little douchebat………”all you will get from me is a straight up gun fight”……….I seriously doubt that there is anything straight about you……..all you have proven is that when one poster called your bullshit you showed what a little bitch pussyboi you are……..now run along little douchebat

  81. Torcer says:

    Gex

    so why care about my actions……epic fail for you as well as epic hypocrisy…….i’m just following the example that you have given……sorry bout yer luck oswald
    http://disq.us/p/19rhe0h

    Do you understand that YOU are the one making the accusation, so you are the one who has to Prove it.

    So let see you finally do so with excerpts and links.

  82. 762x51 says:

    Yep, I have a T-shirt that says the same thing. I get asked less and less about it every time I wear it.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy