moonbattery logo

Jan 02 2013

Dianne Feinstein Dreams Aloud of Seizing All Guns

Astonishingly, there are gun owners who vote for Democrats. They must not understand the party’s objectives. Here Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) — author of the firearms legislation quickly brought forward to exploit Sandy Hook — makes those objectives crystal clear:

Note she doesn’t mention the Constitution as an obstacle; only the vote tally. As Obama’s economic policies make ever more Americans dependent on government largesse, vote tallies will soon cease to be a problem for authoritarian statists like Feinstein.

Then it becomes a question of whether we are still American enough to put up resistance. It will be our last chance.

On tips from G. Fox and The Only Other Conservative in Seattle.

24 Responses to “Dianne Feinstein Dreams Aloud of Seizing All Guns”

  1. […] Way back in 1995, California Senator Dianne Feinstein (D) dreamed of taking all guns. […]

  2. Bill T says:

    Think she’ll give up her CCW?

  3. GunnyG says:

    Bill T,

    No, that pig is more equal than others.

  4. Bloodless Coup says:

    I think you can count on people in the Southern States to face off with whomever attempts to take take their guns.

    In the blue states perhaps not so much. The blue states are not too big on gun ownership to start with, and are more likely to willingly become slaves of the State without a fight.

  5. Mr Evilwrench says:

    Well, I don’t care to live on that planet. Read that as you will.

  6. Jester says:

    This kind of talk flat-out scares the sh*t out of me.

  7. Henry says:

    μολὼν λαβέ

  8. A. Levy says:

    The govt., the MSM, and the rest of the Left knows that generally speaking, the American people lack the backbone, the will, the brains, and the interest to take up arms and go into the streets to save this country. Of course, their reaction would be far different if someone stopped their data plans and kept them from tweeting. The Left knows this, and they are counting on it. And sadly, i think they are right.

  9. RKae says:

    Why shouldn’t they exploit the Sandy Hook shooting? They worked very hard to set it up!

  10. hiram says:

    BC, you’re not kidding. Today, on the way home, I passed through a small (pop. 11k) town in Louisiana. Stopped by a gun shop I have frequented in the past.

    They are OUT of assault rifles. Sold out. All makes, all models. The guy at the counter said he might get some in 6-8 weeks, but a couple of weeks ago when rumors of an executive order were floating around, they sold 138 ARs and AKs, and over 125,000 rounds of ammo in ten hours.

    If the Feds think they’re going to start confiscating around here, they’d better bring the Army… wait, that won’t work. Most of the Army would be on our side… lol.

  11. fading banana republik says:

    How do these statist tyrants get voted in over and over? Is the kool-aid that delicious out in the people’s republik of kalifornia? Will it be this year when mommygov asks the taxpayers in 49 (56 if you were educated in Indonesia, Chicago, Kenya, Hawaii) states to bail out the failed democRAT run states?

  12. oldguy says:

    Seven Days in May.

  13. TED says:

    When you know they are serious!

    Hollywood Gun Violence

  14. John Lewis says:

    It should not be forgotten that leftists love guns – in their own hands, and those of their agents; and this should be brought out.

    Feinstein probably has an armed bodyguard, does she not?

  15. Nicki Thomas says:

    I think the scoffers here are dead wrong. I believe that many if not MOST gun owners WILL fight if push comes to shove, because the word has gotten out that slaughter follows gun confiscation anyway, if not from the red diaper babies then from “regular” criminals. Call and write all of the Senate and all of the Congress and raise hell. Let them know you mean business. Don’t make threats or do anything stupid, but be firm and state your opinion. Someone in the other thread mention correctly that push might come to shove and things could turn violent, but nobody really wants that. So, keep your cool and let the government know how you feel. I figure we have nothing to lose. If their voicemails get jammed full of irate citizens they pretty much have to make some adjustments to their plans. I can’t imagine that those sissy Democrats really want a civil war with angry white men, most of whom are the guys who actually do the real combat in our wars.

  16. […] Dianne Feinstein Dreams Aloud of Seizing All Guns […]

  17. […] require driving nails should be attended to promptly, because after our nanny state overlords have confiscated firearms, their next target may be hammers. It would make more sense than banning “assault […]

  18. […] require driving nails should be attended to promptly, because after our nanny state overlords have confiscated firearms, their next target may be hammers. It would make more sense than banning “assault […]

  19. […] gun-toting author of opportunistic antigun legislation who has admitted to an ultimate objective of banning all firearms: Senator Dianne […]

  20. […] CA Senator Diane Feinstein has come right-out and stated her end-goal as confiscation of ALL guns in this […]

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy