moonbattery logo

Feb 21 2012

Keith Olbermann Defends Occucommie Rapists

Good news for Richard Armstrong, the Occucommie who raped a 14-year-old at an OWS infestation in Dallas last fall: he’s got the righteous liberal warrior Keith Olbermann on his side. In the course of attempting to debunk a list of 17 Occupy sex crimes, Queef screeched this:

“The alleged assault victim told police the sex in question was consensual. She would not press charges nor cooperate with authorities, and the claim that there was an assault in the first place originated with one local TV station’s anonymous source in the Dallas police department.”

Not quite, Überdouche. Per the arrest warrant, via PJ Media (original PDF):

The victim stated that she told him to stop and said “NO” several times, but he continued to have intercourse with her. The victim stated that she told Richard she was 14 prior to them having sexual intercourse. …

Armstrong waived his rights and admitted to having sexual intercourse with the victim. He further stated that the victim told him she was 14 YOA, and that she told him to stop but he could not stop himself because he “had no power over my body.” Armstrong admitted to not wearing a condom.

Armstrong has raped children before. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. After all, we can’t be expected to restrain perverse sexual urges; to suggest otherwise would be homophobic.

Righteous champion of Occucommie Rapists.

On a tip from IslandLifer.



25 Responses to “Keith Olbermann Defends Occucommie Rapists”

  1. geeknerd says:

    O’lbermann’s lies about the crime show the Left’s belief that there should not be an age of consent. The Left seeks to sexualize children, so they don’t believe in statuatory (as opposed to forcible) rape.

  2. StanInTexas says:

    Lao and others to jump in to defend Olbermann abd the child rapist in 5… 4… 3…

  3. Wilberforce says:

    Forever moving the goalposts, aren’t they?

  4. dapenguin says:

    NAMBLA has hundreds on lawyers on their staff. Need I say more.

  5. soulpile says:

    Well, then. Let’s just look the other way, since Olbermann says it’s alright. Where the heck did he get his “facts?” His backside?

  6. AZRon says:

    Wait now…was it RAPE rape, or just rape?

    Vile fu(king animals, the lot of them.

  7. SpringTexas says:

    There’s no such thing as consensual intercourse when the victim is underage.

  8. StanInTexas says:

    Sure there is, Spring. First we have Olbermann saying it was consensual. Then as added proof, we have our own Lao who thinks that children are “sexual beings” and should be able to enjoy sex at any time.

    Hey, all we have to do is change the age of consent to 7 or 8 and this entiore problem goes away. Right?

  9. SpringTexas says:

    Sad but true, Stan. In what alternate reality does an educated adult justify a grown man forcible having sex with a 14 year old girl? I guess the same alternate reality where sucking a baby from its mother’s womb is OK.

  10. Aussie-John says:

    ..”In what alternate reality does an educated adult justify a grown man forcible having sex with a 14 year old girl?..”

    Any muslim nation…

  11. StanInTexas says:

    Spring, I wish both of those were truly an alternate reality. Unfortunately, they are OUR reality!

    When you devalue life to the point that killing a child is a viable alternative to being pregnant, then using a child for your deviant sexual urges becomes just as acceptable.

  12. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Stan
    Lao takes it one step further

    http://moonbattery.com/?p=7855#comments

    “Whatever age someone is when they become sexually active, they have the human right to enjoy it.”

    Lao

  13. wingmann says:

    All I ask for is one…just one good one…please let me hit him just once and I will never ask for a birthday present again!

  14. wingmann says:

    What a T O O L .

    Once you come to grips that most of the left,liberal,putrid progressives are SOCIOPATHS…..then their actions will ALWAYS be understood!!!

  15. StanInTexas says:

    Ghost, try this one from the same thread…

    It figures we would have some brain-dead pathetic CONSERVATIVE on here defending keeping contraception away from kids who want it, in a futile attempt to prevent kids from enjoying sex without the risk of pregnancy.

  16. TrickleUpPolitics says:

    Stan, how do you enjoy sex with no “skin in the game”? /s

  17. BuffaloChips says:

    Aussie-John,

    ..”In what alternate reality does an educated adult justify a grown man forcible having sex with a 14 year old girl?..”

    Any muslim nation…

    Aiming a little high there aren’t you? Seeing as how “Mohamhead” banged Aisha at 9 years of age.

  18. Aussie-John says:

    BuffaloChips,

    I was allowing for inflation….

  19. Bob Roberts says:

    The particular case highlighted is rape (statutory) even if the “victim” consented, which the police report from the victim reveals she did not and the perp actually admitted the same when interviewed.

    Texas age of consent is 17 (If both involved were under 17, there is a defense against statutory rape if they were within 3 years of age, but that is not the case in this case as the perp was 21).

  20. Bob Roberts says:

    In a somewhat related vein:

    Jail-order brides.

    Sex, drugs and Mao Zedong

  21. Antisocialist says:

    Olbermann is probably a rapist himself.

  22. Matt says:

    Child rape, child murder, and child mutilation. Since these abhorrent acts have not enraged liberals, the only action left to take is to remove the champions of these deplorable acts from the planet. I am absolutely convinced that people do not care enough to take action into their own hands. Our decent, and moral society has died and what has replaced it is absolute evil. Armageddon can not get here fast enough.

  23. bobdog says:

    Sounds a bit like the classic “bitch was just asking for it” defense. She lured him in, I betcha. It’s just about sex, after all…

    I wonder how Olbermann would react if it was his kid?

    Never mind. That would require a wife that could stand him for more than 10 minutes, which is statistically impossible.

  24. Adam says:

    Disgusting, yet typical for liberals. I didn’t know Lao had made those repulsive comments. And here I thought he was our only recurring troll who DIDN’T display pedophilic tendencies!

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy