moonbattery logo

Nov 26 2012

New Democrat Constituency: The Mentally Disabled

David Horowitz was already aware that, unencumbered by morality or any respect for our system of government, Democrats do not hesitate to cheat during elections…

But even knowing this, I was not prepared for a conversation I had at Thanksgiving dinner today with my brother-in-law, Henry, who has lived most of his life in a home for the mentally disabled, and though now in his forties has the intelligence level of a six-year-old.

“Obama saved me,” he said to me out of the blue.

“What do you mean?”

“I voted for him for president and now he’s saving me.”

I was taken aback by these words, since Henry had no idea who Obama was, or what a president might be, and would be unable to fill out a registration form let alone get to the polling place by himself. So I asked him how he knew that and how he had registered and cast his vote. In halting, impeded speech he told me that the people who take care of him at the home filled out “the papers” to register him to vote, told him how Obama cared for him, even taught him the Obama chants, and then took him to the polling place to vote. They did the same for all of the mentally disabled patients in their care, approximately sixty in all.

Multiply this incident by thousands and you get an idea how a guy who any responsible, patriotic American would die before voting for could get reelected.

For Democrats, elections are just a game. You don’t have to win fairly, you just have to win. This time Eric Holder broadcast years in advance that voter fraud would be easy and risk free. Some areas controlled by Democrats recorded not a single vote for Romney.

The party of statism and degeneracy has reduced our elections to a banana republic charade. Who is going to call them on it, John Boehner?

Democracy for the mentally disabled.

On a tip from Troy H.

14 Responses to “New Democrat Constituency: The Mentally Disabled”

  1. Doug says:

    Figures. You have to be mentally disabled to vote for the Affirmative Action Clown.

  2. bob says:

    It’s easy to cheat when the referees are on your side.

    Romney coulda pulled a Bush and litigated his way to a win by exposing even just the most blatant fraud. Why didn’t he?

    The swing state margins were so close, it was obviously a)fraud b)uncounted absentee and early votes and c)uncounted military votes

  3. Doug says:

    Romney didn’t contest because he knew that civil war would have ensued: the makers vs. the takers. He would have gone down in history as the none who caused it.

  4. StanInTexas says:

    “New Democrat Constituency: The Mentally Disabled”

    Same as the OLD Democrat Constituency!

  5. modd kenwood says:

    testing 1-2-3

  6. Spider says:

    Without the mentally disabled the Demoncrats would have no base.

  7. Frank says:

    Doug says:

    Romney didn’t contest because he knew that civil war would have ensued: the makers vs. the takers. He would have gone down in history as the none who caused it.


    So – what’s wrong with a civil war to get the country back on track? It’s just been delayed, is all.

  8. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    We wouldn’t want to disenfranchise those Democrats who have figured out how to get their vote counted sixty times, would we ?

  9. AC says:

    Does each personality get to cast its own ballot?

  10. Kevin R. says:

    If you ask most people that voted for Obama you’d get pretty much the same retarded response.

  11. Tatersalad says:

    Tell all of us something that the rest of America doesn’t already know. Democrats are politically clueless and don’t know anything about government, spending and debt. Spoken by one of their own and they can not deny this one. Liberals will continue to argue with the other party on the internet and TV shows but their cluelessness is ever present in their talking points. When they start to lose the argument, they will resort to name calling, personal attacks and slander. That is the liberal way.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy