moonbattery logo

Dec 16 2012

New Push Coming to Promote Homosexuality on TV

Ever sit watching the endless parade of black faces on TV, and wonder where they all come from, considering that the population is only 12% black? It’s hard not to notice that the people who rule our society through our television sets have a racial agenda. They also have a sexual agenda:

The BBC should feature more lesbian, gay and bisexual people in children’s television, a report has found.

It should be “more creative and bolder” in how it depicts lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people across all platforms, taking care to avoid stereotypes [i.e., any characterization that could be perceived as not promoting homosexuality], the review said.

The study, commissioned by the BBC [and financed by British taxpayers], found that although there has been a gradual improvement in the level of representation of LBG people, they were “still relatively invisible” in the media.

Central to the liberal agenda is to condition children from a young age to embrace the progressive ideal of what should be regarded as normal. This includes unnatural sexual activities that spread AIDS.

An expert panel said the corporation should use children’s programming to help “familiarise audiences through incidental portrayal from an early age” as well as validating older children who may be LGB.

The warped concept that children can be sexual perverts is another staple of the modern liberal faith that you can expect to be promoted vigorously on TV — both in Britain and closer to home. The “experts” have decreed it.

Where do these experts acquire their data?

Part of the study was based on interviews with LGB organisations and representatives, who said the media played a critical role in educating wider society as well as reassuring younger gay viewers by using positive role models.

It’s not your imagination; our liberal ruling class corrupts children deliberately. No doubt there could be more sophisticated explanations of their motivations, but let’s just apply Occam’s razor and call it evil for the sake of evil.

The coming push to aggressively over-represent homosexuals as well as blacks on TV will mean many an opportunity for Jamie Foxx, who recently basked in applause after extolling the killing of Caucasians on Saturday Night Live, and who stars in an upcoming movie as a hero who proclaims, “Kill white folks and they pay you for it — What’s not to like?”

Foxx says, “‘Every single thing in my life is built around race.” No doubt he owes his fame and fortune to race, but there is more to his life; he is said to be what they call on the down low — i.e., furtively homosexual.

If so, his agent should tell him to flounce on out of the closet. His next roll could be as a gay who hunts people who aren’t perverts. “Kill breeders and they pay you for it — What’s not to like?” The Saturday Night Live crowd would love it.

That would explain the scarf.

On tips from Don M, Slurp, and Bob Roberts.

26 Responses to “New Push Coming to Promote Homosexuality on TV”

  1. Dr. 9 says:

    Not too surprising coming from a nation of effeminate pansys. But why would they do this to children?

    “To conquer a nation without the use of military force, you must first control the minds of their young…” — Karl Marx

  2. dmgore says:

    Actually most of this stuff no longer surprises me. “wide and spacious is the road leading to destruction, cramped and narrow is the road leading toward life”

  3. KHarn says:

    Regressives are obsessed with sex, religion and ethnic groups. They can’t think of people as human beings, they can only relate to everyone (and everything) in POLITICAL TERMS.

  4. justme says:

    Mainstreaming black militant-ism and homosexuality bares a direct causal relationship to what has been repeatedly elected to the White House.

    See Virginia, their are consequences…

  5. justme says:

    It is pretty funny to me how the destruction of European Civilization conditions the sheep to bare their throats in order to make the Wolves lives so much easier.

  6. Rotohammer says:

    Useful idiots.

    From the Communist Goals

    21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

    24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

    25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

    26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

  7. Maudie N Mandeville says:

    Who lets their children watch TV? Raise your hands. Liberals, blacks and lazy conservative Christians.

  8. Rusty Bill says:

    They’re still doing television? Who knew?

    (Three years cable-free, thankyouverymuch)

  9. Einsamkeit says:

    “Central to the liberal agenda is to condition children from a young age to embrace the progressive ideal of what should be regarded as normal. This includes unnatural sexual activities that spread AIDS.”

    Moonbattery, and Conservatives in general it is the blatant lying or spreading of misinformation about the Homosexual issue that makes me question again, and again if I really want to associate my political vote with hateful nonsense like this.

    First of all Homosexual sex is not “unnatural”. Homosexuality is found through out nature. Penguins, Great Apes (our closest cousins that we share a common ancestor with) and other animals engage in homosexual acts. Since it occurs in nature with a decent amount of frequency that makes it NATURAL not unnatural.

    Second, the place in the world that has the biggest spread of HIV/AIDS is Africa. Since the European colonization of Africa there has been a non stop influx of Christian missionaries, particularly the Catholic church. The teachings of the catholic church is a direct cause in the AIDS epidemic. There is vast evidence of missionaries lying about condoms, and making untrue statements about condoms so that the Africans will not use them.
    The catholic church in a cases where a husband (or wife) is infected with HIV/AIDS and the wife (or husband) is not, the church still says condom use is a sin therefore the partner gets infected.

    I cannot stand and watch the churches directly spread HIV/AIDS and support that religion. The fact is that it is not Homosexuals who are spreading HIV/AIDS like you foolishly claim. To see the Christian Right spread these lies like you have sickens me.

    If it was not for the Christian Right putting the GOP in a stranglehold for the past few decades then perhaps they could win some elections.

    I understand that as an Atheist Conservative I am neither popular in either Conservative nor Liberal circles. That is fine as long as what I say is true (which it is).

  10. NancyLee says:

    It would also explain that perfectly tailored jacket on an old west outlaw!!

  11. Ummah Gummah says:


    Figures that the soi-disant “conservative” troll would yelp about “anti-gay” statements on Moonbattery rather than the genocidal rants by the racist Jamie Foxx.

    Some Conservative!


  12. Bob Roberts says:

    It’s not new. It’s been going on for some time now. I wonder what was the first show featuring an openly gay character?


    1972–1973, The Corner Bar character Peter Panama played by Vincent Schiavelli is the first continuing portrayal of a gay person on American television.

    1975, Hot l Baltimore featured “George and Gordon”, played by Lee Bergere and Henry Calvert as the first gay couple on American network television.

    1975, Barney Miller, Marty Morrison, Darryl Driscoll, Officer Zatelli, played by Jack DeLeon, Ray Stewart, Dino Natali, Marty was a semi-regular on the long-running television series and Darryl made several appearances as Marty’s lover. Initially both were presented as stereotypical swishing queens, but as the series progressed Darryl began acting and dressing more conservatively. Officer Zatelli’s coming out, initially to Captain Miller but eventually to the entire squad, was the first gay-themed story arc on American television. These roles and stories were coordinated in cooperation with the National Gay Task Force.

    To round out the 70s, there was The Nancy Walker Show, Ball Four, All That Glitters and Soap. The last of these deserves some mention. In Soap Billy Crystal played Jodie, who maintained he was gay, yet Jodie fathered a child through a one-night stand and many of his story lines throughout the series centered around his involvement with women. At the end of the series Jodie was romantically involved with a woman. Apparently this reflection of reality – that gays often realize they’ve made a poor choice and actually wind up becoming straight, which by their logic is impossible since you’re allegedly “born that way” and “can’t help it” – wound up upsetting those who are desperate to insist that deviate lifestyles are normal and there’s nothing wrong with them.

    If I’ve left anything out, please, by all means, correct me.

  13. Bob Roberts says:

    Oh, there was this, too: 1972: An ABC made-for-TV movie “That Certain Summer” featured Hal Holbrook and Martin Sheen as a gay couple.

  14. Mary says:

    There are two big soap operas in Britain: ‘Eastenders’ and ‘Coronation Street’. Both of these are unbelievable bastions of degeneracy currently with a relentless focus on race-mixing and homosexuality. I recently pointed out to a family member how much these two themes feature in the storylines of these shows, and she was literally astounded now that she was ‘aware enough’ to notice.
    I cannot fathom how they could include ‘more’ of these topics in either show since they truly are at saturation levels already…….check them out on the net to confirm it if you doubt my analysis.
    The TV is a very dangerous delivery system of agenda driven brainwashing and it is important to be aware of what you are taking in when you watch it. Important to note who is doing the programming as well 😉

  15. joe says:

    Well, I am ecstatic that someone else besides me noticed that there are too many black faces in commercials on TV. I had a funny suspicion about their agenda. Also on radio talk shows, when they do the news, Obama has to be speaking about something every day, every hour. I’m sick of it all. I won’t listen to him any longer. Barack The Magic Negro.

  16. Doug says:

    Let’s see, one percent of the population should occupy one hundred percent of television content.

    Uh huh.

  17. Jimbo says:

    He chooses to make race the center of his life. How sad is that? There are so many constructive things to center one’s life on – race is a bad choice.

  18. Marian says:

    I guess the black half of odumbo is all that matters to these racists. Race is ALL that matters to them; they’ll clap, scream, and call whites names in support of the man who is daily taking their freedoms away. They don’t deserve freedom if they can’t handle it. Funny how all those blacks in commercials and TV shows are traditional families…fantasy world. Just ask an uncorrupted child what they want and it’s a mommy and a daddy. Duh.

  19. Naqamel says:

    relentless focus on race-mixing and homosexuality
    Race is an artificial construct. There is nothing sinful about “race-mixing” as you put it.

  20. Noelegy says:

    As I said once to my friends as we were at a Paula Poundstone show: there’s a reason that stereotypes exist.

  21. Grunt says:

    Einsamkeit says:
    “First of all Homosexual sex is not “unnatural”. Homosexuality is found through out nature. Penguins, Great Apes (our closest cousins that we share a common ancestor with) and other animals engage in homosexual acts. Since it occurs in nature with a decent amount of frequency that makes it NATURAL not unnatural.”

    This craves a rewrite. First of all, homosexuality IS unnatural when you’re dealing with animals that have a gender difference. Any time “homosexual” events occur, it’s because there is a skew in the environmental dynamic that prompts this response.

    The penguins in question were a pair of male penguins in the New York zoo who, in the absence of a viable mate, followed what instinct told them was the next best thing (to get another one of their kind and connect). Unlike your average homosexual, however, these penguins are monogamous; once they picked the mate available, they were not likely to deviate from that selection. If they were in a normal group of penguins with mates of opposite gender, they wouldn’t have “become gay”.

    There is no science that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that homosexuality is a: natural and b) genetically inherited.

    Great Apes usually use “sex” as a means of politics, domination, or stress relief and re-connecting with their groups; apes don’t choose and are not “born” into the active pursuit of a same-sex-ape to the exclusion of all others. Female bonobos “gi-gi rub” when they are agitated, rather than aroused, and if they want sex, they seek out a member of the opposite sex.

    Go to YouTube, and you can actually see a chimp using a frog as a “love glove”—killing the poor frog by impaling it through its mouth onto its phallus. Is that natural?

    Go to the Zoo, and on any given day, you can watch a gorilla vomit into its hand, eat it, and do it again. You can see chimps stuff their biscuits into their own rectums.

    Chimpanzees in the wild have been known to hunt chimpanzees from other troupes, corner them, and tear them apart, eating the meat. Is this natural?

    Any number of species have been known to stalk, hunt, and kill the young of a female of their own kind, in order to bring the female into oestrus sooner. Is that acceptable?

    Male weasels have been filmed going into the nests of a female weasel that has given birth; rather than kill the offspring to get a single mating event out of the mother-weasel, this adult male weasel will separate the babies by gender, and have sex with the baby females. These will grow and throughout life, will store his seed until they have a first heat—and they will become pregnant with the offspring of their rapist. Should humans do this?

    What about all the other things that are “natural” in the Animal Kingdom? Necrophilia, parasitic pregnancy, infanticide, filicide, cannibalism, extra species couplings (when a mate of one kind of animal isn’t available, the randy females of another breed can inspire embarrassing attempts at relief!), murder, extortive ends, feuding, cuckoldry and so on; should humans also partake?

    Are there a lines to be drawn here…and whose “moral guideline” declares it?

    As to the rest of your diatribe, I’d love to see your completely unbiased source of proof that “The Catholic Chuch told the unfaithful Africans they shouldn’t use birth control, so it’s the fault of the evil religious people, not the promiscuous poor Africans who can’t keep it in their pants”.

    You’d be amazed at the kind of good a moral sense of rightness and a monogamous lifestyle could do in curbing the rise of venereal disease; but then again, a monogamous relationship is based on loving each other more than the self, whereas a gay relationship is pretty much about the sex and that’s about it.

    What makes a gay person gay? The sex act they engage in.

    What makes a Christian man cleave to his wife and represent a real man to his Family? A good moral compass and a relationship that’s based on love and respect first, and sex on a separate level.

    Don’t get me wrong, there are lots of straights out there with wanderlust; but that’s what happens when you have a society that floods your existence each day with demoralizing propaganda, encourages narcissism and selfishness, allows any and every depraved sexual information to ooze into public discourse like an infected would seeping pus…you get a completely messed-up society.

    Just so you know…? Being Conservative doesn’t mean you just vote for the “R” side of the ballot, it means you want to conserve the Republic. The Republic was built on common sense, vision, fiduciary responsibility, and a moral code that does have its basis on Biblical Doctrine.

    Now, if you choose to believe or not, that’s your prerogative and I won’t hate on you for it—we have non-believing Conservatives here, and their opinions, insight, and advice are just as valid as mine or anyone else’s.

    But you, my friend, are completely delusional if you don’t think with a missive like you last, that you aren’t seen as a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

    Homosexuality is a depraved act, and calling it a “alternative lifestyle” is joke. Tha’s like saying “Russian Roulette is just another game”—except the queers are trying to force society to accept the depravity as a virtue, then support the expense of medical care when the consequences roll around.

    I don’t hate folks who choose to be gay any more than I hate a drug addict, but I can hate what they do, the fact that it’s being offered wholesale to my kids as something “normal” (and it ain’t), and that I’m expected to pick up the tab for it.

    Ain’t happenin’. Call me a homophobe, and I can identify you as a heterophobe and an anti-religious bigot.

    That is, If I can be pressed to give a sh*t.

    Which I can’t.

  22. TED says:

    Jamie Foxx is “doing” cowboys now?

  23. Doug says:

    Um, um, um, I just emailed Soros for more talking points, um, wait a minute and I’ll, ih, get back to you…


  24. czuch says:

    Its just a race based splatter flick. Those who get their history information from Tarantino movies are the same who get their zoology from Disney movies.
    In 1830’s a slave right off the boat was around $800.00.
    Anual income was about that for a real good job. Mostly alot less or subsistance farming and hunting.
    Thats the price of a John Deere tractor.
    Ya cant put today’s morality on the 1830’s.
    They still have slavery in 3rd world countries. Take your message there and lettem know Jamie(gay)is comin.

  25. oldguy says:

    These liberals remind me of when I used to live in the Kenwood, Hyde Park and South Shore neighborhoods of Chicago. They were predominantly Jewish enclaves then and they advocated race mixing and Communism but they were the first to abandon our neighborhoods, move to Skokie and Oak Park and leave the rest of us as speed-bumps. They haven”t changed one bit.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy