moonbattery logo

Apr 27 2012

Obama Drags Federal Government’s Favorability to Lowest Level Since Clinton Era

Finally, a silver lining to the Obama Regime: it has instilled a healthy distrust and dislike of federal authority:

Today, just one in three has a favorable view of the federal government — the lowest level in 15 years, according to a Pew survey. The majority of Americans remain satisfied with their local and state governments — 61 percent and 52 percent, respectively — but only 33 percent feel likewise about the federal government.

In 2002, nearly double that figure, 64 percent viewed the federal government favorably, and Americans held their local and state governments in similar esteem, at 67 percent and 62 percent, respectively. …

The poll also reveals that more Americans trust their state governments to be honest, efficient and less partisan than the federal government.

Obama’s legacy is already secure.


On tips from Shawn, J, and Bob Roberts.

8 Responses to “Obama Drags Federal Government’s Favorability to Lowest Level Since Clinton Era”

  1. A. Levy says:

    Obummer is the product of a weak, gullible, and totally mindless population. While the sheep are busy tweeting and looking to the MSM to tell them what to think, their country is going down the drain. Perhaps letting the country implode is best. Maybe, maybe, we can get it right next time.

  2. SNuss says:

    Not just fail, but “epic fail”. The sooner we sweep all traces of the Obama regime into the dustbin of history, the better.

    The next step? Target the “RINOs”, and the entrenched bureaucrats,so we can begin to trim the bloat out of the Federal government.

    Note to senseless Leftists: “Target” is meant figuratively, not literally. “Epic fail” is literal.

  3. TaterSalad says:

    Barack Obama has “failed” the American people but it was all planned to be done this way. He needs four more years to complete his “transformation” to a fascist state. Barack was educated here in America, bought and paid for by Saudi money who paid for his education. It is pay-back time and that is why Barack is making us dependent on their oil and not ours. Hence, no drilling, no Keystone, no off-shore and pushing green BS jobs as a disguise to keep Saudi Arabia happy and beholden to them.

  4. dan says:

    Saudi money …a made man.Small wonder that he kissed the Saudi Prnnce’ring….he probably would have kissed his ass given the opportunity….of course,propping them up by starting WWIII would do.

  5. wingmann says:

    If we can get through without a black swan event shutting down the elections AND voter fraud….we just May get him out of office.

    As I sit here,50/50 chance of getting said TOOL removed.

  6. blue says:

    USS Harry S Truman
    USS Franklin D Roosevelt
    USS Gerald Ford
    USS Ronald Reagan
    USS George H W Bush

    we have a history of naming aircraft carriers after presidents……..

    guess who they want to name the next one after and it’s not B. Hussein

  7. James McEnanly says:

    Rather than naming the next aircraft carrier after a local politician who was dishonorably discharged, why not call it Enterprise, a name that was borne proudly by two previous aircraft carriers. CVN 65 will be ending its illustrious 50 year career later this year. It was named after CV-6, which was one of only 3 aircraft carriers to have survived WWII, despite having seen more major actions than any other naval vessel of the time.

  8. Sam Adams says:

    Bureaucrats always feel the need, and think they have the right, to progressively government more and more of your life. The only limits are the amount of money they have available to expand their fiefdoms.

    Unfortunately Bush helped push us down this path, and Obama has put it in hyperdrive.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy