moonbattery logo

Apr 16 2012

Occucommies Attack Starbucks, Police

Bad news for ostentatiously moonbatty corporations and their posturing liberal customers: the anarchocommunist crocodile won’t be eating them last after all — as demonstrated Saturday night when a horde of Occupy Wall Street vermin laid siege to a Manhattan Starbucks:

According to police, around 25 people tried smashing the windows of the cafe with eight-foot long steel pipes at around 8:45 p.m. after attending the Anarchist book fair earlier in the day. “Patrons fearing that they would be hit by flying glass hid under tables,” the police said in a statement. “Several” officers were assaulted with pipes and bottles, the police added. …

According to police, part of the rowdy group — some of them masked — marched near Washington Square Park, chanting “cops are murderers” and “all pigs must die.” The crowd eventually grew to around 150, with some tipping garbage cans and spray painting anarchist symbols on buildings, the police said.

Commentary from Breitbart:

The Occupy movement is a nihilist attack on Western civilization, including the warm fuzzy organic white bread NPR eco-leftism of a modern American company like Starbucks. The radicals of Occupy see right through the mix of fair trade good intentions, acoustic guitar soul patch hipster design and affluence aspiring capitalism and their answer was an eight foot long steel pipe The gave-at-the-office latte drinking liberals aren’t able to donate their way out of the path of broken glass because at their core, they romanticize these thugs the same way the J-School Occupy fetishists do.

I wonder if Obama can tell the difference between OWS and the Tea Party yet.

Time to start nailing boards over the windows.

On a tip from Sean.

34 Responses to “Occucommies Attack Starbucks, Police”

  1. Toa says:

    I need to start keeping count of the OWS photos I keep seeing which feature tough, aggressive-looking women and sissy men.

  2. mojo says:

    They attacked a Starbucks?

    Here’s a question for these geniuses: HOW MANY Starbucks’ are there in Manhattan alone?

  3. Sam Adams says:

    Business owners in NYC better start leaning on the police to step up arrests of anarchists while the crowds are still small.

    Unfortunately those FEMA camps may be needed after all, at least if mayors, etc., start enforcing their laws.

  4. Bob Roberts says:

    When I see these “occupy” morons the words that come to mind are “ugly”, “dirty”, “ignorant”, “angry” – these and other negative terms are what one cannot help but think when they see them.

  5. Laurie T says:

    >”…tough, aggressive-looking women and sissy men”<

    …which is why their pathetic little "revolution" won't last long once the conservatives get p!ssed off enough to do something about it.

  6. culebra775 says:

    Guardian Angels, where are you?

  7. Stay Calm says:

    UPDATE: Employees discovered the mob had stolen all of the Burt Bacharach CDs off the counters.

  8. dmgore101 says:

    I’m assuming you made your list based on how ingredients in food are listed….the most to the least.
    That being said, I cant decide which one is vying for first place…ugly or dirty.

  9. forest says:

    Was the anarchist book fair at the Starbucks?

    And when did anarchists start having book fairs?

  10. Hal says:

    Is it just me or does this look like a scene from “The Walking Dead”?

  11. justme says:

    No one thought much of Hitler’s Brownshirts or Lenin’s Bolsheviks at first either. They were considered fringe groups who would not come of anything too.

    But they pounced when their nations were weakest, the leadership near collapse, and the rest of the population too afraid or comfortable to do anything to oppose them. Like rotten apples left in a bushel, when left alone to fester they soon contaminate the whole bushel..

  12. ED357 says:

    Hey Starbucks………

    How’s that leftist supporting business plan working out for you….NOW?

  13. wingmann says:

    Coddled, carried, Affirmative Action token, elected by putty-pated idiots who wanted free stuff….and they are about to elect him AGAIN!

  14. […] “Occucommies Attack Starbucks, Police” […]

  15. wingmann says:

    I realize this is long but Robin of Berkeley from American Thinker can bring it:

    Robin says:
    October 27, 2011 at 10:22 am
    Dear Lucy,

    You seem very nice. You also seem duped.

    What I find fascinating is that I have more in common with the hard Left out here and elsewhere than liberals and progressives. L and Ps want so much to believe in Obama and Michelle– they’re on your side! The Democrats care so much. . all of those multi-millionaires like Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein and Michael Moore and Obama.

    The hard left sees through the BS. The ones out here with whom I have spoken did not vote for Obama; they voted for Nader. They realized that Obama was in bed with bankers and corporations.

    Shall we all remember that Obama installed more bankers into his Administration than ever before, such as his Secretary of Treasury?

    What is so pathetic is that the occupiers think that the Democrats are their friends and the Republicans their enemies. Most of them on both sides of the aisle are in bed with the globalists and the foreign bankers and the Federal Reserve. No wonder Ron Paul can’t even get a bill passed to AUDIT the Federal Reserve, much less eliminate it. Who is in the Federal Reserve? What do they do with our money? Why do they loan our money to foreign banks? Why do they lose trillions? No one knows. Even the socialist Congressman, Bernie Saunders has been furious at the Federal Reserve chief’s arrogance and secrecy.

    They are not part of the Federal Government, despite the name. The unknown Obama wouldn’t have won if he weren’t in their (and Soros) pockets.

    The hard left knows this. They are also appalled by Obama’s assaults on civil liberties, such as his ordering an assassination of an American abroad without due process. Many old time leftists, such as Daniel Ellsberg, have protested in writing this President’s assaults on civil liberties. But the liberals and the progressives are duped; they are the true cult believers.

    So let’s put this together:

    The liberals and progressives support insurrection and occupation, thinking this is going to lead to. . .actually they haven’t thought this far. Some lofty notions about “fairness.”

    However, all this insurrection is benefiting: a. Radical Islam, which would love to put Lucy and me in a burqua and do genital mutilation of girl babies. They are winning in Egypt, and now, Libya. The churches in Egypt are being decimated, with Christians at grave risk, and no one seeming to care in the administration,

    b. the Globalists, who want widespread insurrection, anarchy. . leading to the downfall of nations, and a global currency, WHICH THEY WILL RUN. A global bank. A one-world government, headed by them. Something demonic, as the Bible (Revelation) prophesies.

    As for Jesus, he wasn’t a social revolutionary. He was a revolutionary of the heart. I can’t presume to speak for Jesus. I imagine that he would not like the occupation and the insurrection and the anarchy. Remember, he didn’t start a war. He wasn’t a warrior like David, which is one of the reasons why the Pharisees rejected him and had him crucified. He obediently died on the Cross. He came to save our souls so we wouldn’t die, not to start a revolution. He came to save us from hell, not to create a heaven on this earth.

    What would Jesus do? He sure wouldn’t be screaming on the streets of Wall Street and threatening the police. He also didn’t preach utopia nor fairness in this realm. (By the way, he said that if people don’t work, they shouldn’t eat, not exactly Marxist doctrine.) Jesus wasn’t a community organizer, a la Obama/Alinsky/SEIU, despite what the liberal churches may preach.

    Lucy, you and your dad and your friends seem fed up and desperate for change. Many conservatives feel the same way. We’re all being screwed by the same people, but it doesn’t have to do with Left and Right.

    However, supporting violent revolution and worldwide chaos isn’t the solution. Fighting each other, the police, etc. simply distracts from the real oppressors. It will simply lead to violence and chaos, as history has shown us again and again (The Soviet Union, Cambodia, China, etc.) The globalists would be thrilled, however. Their goal is as few people on earth as possible so they will hold all the money.

    Demonic indeed.

  16. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Again with “food justice” ?\
    Why can’t these lib idiots learn from history ?
    Marxists will never be happy until we are all dying of starvation

  17. TexasDoc says:

    1) Water cannons
    2) Orange jumpsuits
    3) Gitmo

  18. Jodie says:

    wingmann says:
    April 16, 2012 at 9:47 am

    That letter is brilliant! Love it!

  19. Eric says:

    Wait wait wait….lets see if Jon Stewart speaks up?

  20. Henry says:

    I do believe that a metal pipe and/or bottle would be considered a dangerous instrument when used in the commission of an assault, justifying the use of deadly force to stop the threatened harm.

    Keep it up, progs – the streets may soon run red.

  21. AC says:

    Here in Florida, several motorists have been ruled justified for standing their ground against road ragers with bats and tire irons. A pipe or sharp bottle would be similar, at least in a state with sane self-defense laws, of which New York is not.

  22. AC says:

    That should read, “against road ragers armed with bats and tire irons.”

    The incidents I am referring to were justifiable shootings.

  23. StanInTexas says:

    Not necessarily, Henry.

    Remember the Rodney King riots. The person that smashed Reginald Denny in the head with a cinder block? the decision was that a conder block was NOT a deadly weapon!

  24. 70Stage1 says:

    Hal, April 16, 2012 @ 9:00, I was thinking the same thing. IQ obviously matches the walking dead as well.

  25. Tim says:

    “Cops are murderers’ “All pigs must die” along with assault with pipes, sounds like enough to warrant a threat to me. Pop a couple of these punk children and the roaches will scatter.

  26. Mattius Maximus says:

    WARNING EXTREMELY GRAPHIC!!! This is what a violent crackdown on protesters looks like:

  27. Mattius Maximus says:

    I would hate to see the occupy vermin exterminated in this sort of fashion, but if they keep pushing the boundaries they just may find themselves in the crosshairs of riot police.

  28. Jeff says:

    Toto, I don’t think we are Kansas any more! Look at all the zombies. Target rich enviorment.

  29. ent says:

    Wouldn’t it be funny if a group of anarchists found themselves being violently assaulted, and the police just stood back and watched? They have such contempt for the police and the rule of law that I’m sure they would be down with that … right?

  30. SNuss says:

    Our local “Occupy” group tried to occupy a park, where no camping is allowed. It didn’t last long:

    Police remove Occupy Rockford camp from empty downtown lot
    Read the rest at:

    They are a whiny bunch.

  31. Spider says:

    Here is the face of anarchy. And guess what? One of them is, of course, a lawyer, proving that Shakespeare was right.

  32. Adam says:

    Anarchist book fairs are held every few months or so in random cities around the country (As you can probably guess, they’re regular occurrences in San Francisco). Basically, Anarchist groups rent out flea- market- type areas where they can sell their asinine propaganda literature that respectable bookstores don’t want to carry, and other Anarchist vermin come to buy them.
    The fact that they were assaulting police officers with those materials proves that the Anarchists were posing an armed and active threat, so the police could very well be justified in using extreme measures. However, as much fun as it would have been to see those trust- fund brats get what they deserve, it would have undoubtedly led to a zillion lawsuits being filed against the police, as well as any Anarchist trust fund brats who died in the process being held up as martyrs to their demented cause.

  33. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    But as AC reminded us, Williams eventually messed up and killed someone of value(a drug dealer) and so was finally put away.

  34. […] Who attacks a Starbucks and police with steel pipes as well as vandalizing the entire […]

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy