moonbattery logo

Dec 14 2012

Open Thread


Via The Looking Spoon, on a tip from TED.

51 Responses to “Open Thread”

  1. Joe Casepack says:

    My creation, feel free to use it.

  2. Bob Roberts says:

    Details of the shooting are changing as the media stops reporting rumors and starts reporting facts. Unfortunately that means some of us who passed on early reports, assuming the media had done their job (boy, are we dumb to think the still do that!), were mistaken.

    In any case, keep up with the story if interested.

  3. Bob Roberts says:

    Now, one Chicago alderman wants to make it a crime to feed pigeons.

    Technically it may already be. That’s the problem with laws – once passed they’re used in ways that were never intended, which are not appropriate. There’s some laws having to do with migratory birds which, though those species don’t actually migrate here in San Diego, the laws are still applied as if they do. That’s just one example. In a similar way, no doubt there’s some law, somewhere, that can be used to say it’s illegal to feed the pigeons perhaps. But this guy just wants to make it clear – wants to make a NEW LAW banning feeding pigeons.

    Good luck enforcing it.

    What you going to do – round up all the homeless drunks who feed pigeons?

    An example of what I was saying above.

    Reporters and producers around the country, frantically searching for information online about the alleged school shooter, found what seemed like a match. Ryan Lanza, 24, was believed responsible for the deaths of 27 people in Newtown, Conn., at the Sandy Hook Elementary School.

    The Facebook profile showed a Ryan Lanza from Newtown, Conn., who currently lives in Hoboken, N.J. — a male who looks like he’s in his 20s. The photo fits the description, so countless news orgs ran with it in stories and tweets.

    Problem is, it seems to be the wrong guy.

    Hours later, there were reports that Adam Lanza, 20, was the shooter, not his brother Ryan.

  4. Bob Roberts says:

    Bloomberg: Obama Must Take ‘Immediate Action’ Against Guns.

    Boston Mayor: Time For ‘National Policy’.

    MURDOCH: ‘When will politicians find courage to ban automatic weapons?’.


    Only problem is banning ONE TOOL won’t stop crazy people from attacking kids:

    22 children slashed by knife-wielding adult at elementary school in China.

    Unless we’re going to start banning guns, knives, baseball bats, golf clubs, microwave ovens (imagine being bashed over the head with one), pillows (suffocated while you sleep), wire and rope (strangled), cars, planes as well as all sticks and stones were not going to be able to stop people who are determined to kill from doing so.

  5. Bob Roberts says:

    Now I DO have an idea – require all principals (and selected other staff) at all schools to be proficient marksmen and to have and carry at all times suitable firearms as needed to at least hold off any attacker(s) until the authorities can be notified and can get there.

    THAT should be a national action we can get behind to resolve this!

  6. Bob Roberts says:

    And on Murdoch’s comment (RE: Banning auto-wpns), didn’t the guy use two handguns, NOT AUTOMATIC WEAPONS? At least that’s what the media is saying now, though there’s also word four weapons were recovered at the scene, one of them a BUSHMASTER.

  7. Bob Roberts says:

    Racist comes “out of the closet”

    Jamie, 45, admitted that ‘Every single thing in my life is built around race’.

    He should try to stop being so racist. Maybe then that would change.


    “Just know one thing, Rick Snyder: You sign that bill, you won’t get no rest,” said Rev. Charles Williams II at the Tuesday rally in Lansing, according to Michigan Capitol Confidential. “We’ll meet you on Geddes Road. We’ll be at your daughter’s soccer game. We’ll visit you at your church. We’ll be at your office.”

    Do I have to mention that “Rev.” Charles Williams II is black?

    Didn’t think so.

  8. Bob Roberts says:

    Two black males knocked on an apartment door and when a woman answered, she was sprayed with some type of liquid from a lawn and garden sprayer. The woman was then set afire.

    Obama once again admits openly that doing his job, doing what he swore at his inauguration he would do, is not a priority.

    Like it or not, there are FEDERAL LAWS against marijuana. Now I’ve always felt this needed to be addressed, but as with immigration, as with DOMA, the law is what it is and HE IS LEGALLY BOUND TO ENFORCE THE LAWS AS THEY EXIST.

    And he’s not doing that. Too worried about his agenda.

    The destruction of America, the shredding of the Constitution, the effort to make Sharia the one universal world law!

  9. Bob Roberts says:


    It’s HUGE!

    IPCC AR5 draft leaked, contains game-changing admission of enhanced solar forcing – as well as a lack of warming to match model projections, and reversal on ‘extreme weather’

    IPCC model forecasts, FAR, SAR, TAR, AR4

    And the upcoming forecast, FUBAR.

    Check out the graph then take the poll.

    World reactions to AR5 leak.

    AR5 reviewer speaks out: no trend in global water vapor, contradicting IPCC position on issue.

    Prof. Pielke Jr. Analysis of UN IPCC Draft report : IPCC ‘shows almost complete reversal from AR4 on trends in drought, hurricanes, floods’

    [IPCC Draft report echoes Climate Depot’s Extreme Weather Report]: ‘No significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency…does not support AR4 conclusions regarding global increasing trends in droughts…low confidence regarding the sign of trend in the magnitude and/or frequency of floods on a global scale…there is currently no clear and widespread evidence for observed changes in flooding’

  10. F.D.R. in Hell says:

    If the boy wants to warm up, he’d better come back home.
    Lucifer says he’s done enough EO damage. 👿

  11. Alphamail says:

    Bob Roberts @ 9:42 pm

    Excuse me?

    Elementary school principals and staff required to carry?

    Again, you need to stick to conveying the news and refrain from commenting so personally on it.

    Having said that, you AGAIN joined the MSM in misreporting!

    Alas, I momentarily but accurately digress.

    To report the news while inhaling, and opining on it while exhaling, is self-serving at best (sic) and misleading at worst.

    i.e.: Hitler gassed a thousand people today in the city of Dresden…but in my opinion given his history it really wasn’t that many, and considering the burgeoning population, some say it might actually cut unemployment numbers.

    Kinda like changing the 2nd Amendment from a right to a requirement.

    Like maybe, gays have the right to be gay, so let’s require people to be gay.

    Bob…..that sucks.

    The answer lies in enforcing existing laws and stiffening penalties for those who have proven themselves to be irresponsible. Long-term penalties for those possessing stolen firearms or firearms which have been used in a crime (police agencies routinely dispose of those weapons); for those who use firearms in the commission of a crime; for those smuggling firearms (yes, Holder); for felons; for those who carry without a permit; for those who illegally acquire firearms: and for those who hold banned weapons (my definitions).

    A shooter went into a school – you say arm the principal and staff.

    A shooter went into a theater – is the projectionist required to carry?

    Convenience store clerk – required to carry?

    Mall patrons…required?

    Nonsensical reactions requiring the carrying of firearms is as dangerous as disallowing them.

  12. Alphamail says:


    Guaranteed M.O. – the shooter was a young violent-video freak!

  13. T. R. Ollberg says:

    Ezra Klein’s moronic pro gun control cherry pickings:

    Okay Ezra, graph showing US as most violence in the OECD. Why don’t you show another graph, maybe a little more inconvenient, i.e. US violence broken down by RACE and URBANICITY.

    Fucking liberal cherry picking prick. If the people you want take power they’ll bury your dumb ass with a bulldozer in an unmarked grave with all of your autocratic propagandist comrades. You’ll fucking burn just like the Russian intelligentsia who thought their “intellectualism,” “enlightenment,” and willingness to gobble Bolshevik cock all day every day would save them from the Red Bear. Lenin will be laughing his ass off from the grave while his sycophantic cultists piss on yours.

  14. /not my real name says:

    The media is screwing up sooooooo bad!!

    The Mom of the shooter wasn’t a teacher at the school. AND she was killed in her home before the insane man/ child when on his evil rampage.

    What IS the media for!!??

  15. /not my real name says:


  16. Ummah Gummah says:



    By Terril Yue Jones
    1:48 a.m. EST, December 14, 2012

    BEIJING (Reuters) – A knife-wielding man slashed 22 children and an adult at an elementary school in central China on Friday, state media reported, the latest in a series of attacks on schoolchildren in the country.,0,5592318.story

    On second thought, we could also ban school children. Equally absurd.


  17. Fred says:

    Hey gun banning dopes. If the nutjob drove his car through the school and killed 30 people, would you be willing to give up your car? Didn’t think so.
    My legally owned, registered guns had nothing to do with this senseless act of violence, so I should not be punished for it.
    I wonder how much ridlin this troubled kid was given in his life. Does anybody think that could be a factor?

  18. Jodie says:

    Fred, I was thinking the same thing. I don’t want to hear about gun control, I want to know if this kid was taking any pills. Has he been receiving counseling? Has he ever been hypnotized? Which violent video games did he play?

  19. Ummah Gummah says:


    FOUR Americans are dead in Benghazi DIRECTLY due to Obama.



  20. KHarn says:

    I’m sick of the news calling that SOB a “shooter”, he was a MURDERER!

    The guns belonged to his MOTHER. He STOLE them.

    Why don’t the regressives demand a law against MURDER?

  21. Dr. 9 says:

    Here’s Mac-Daddy Obummer spending your money like a Harlem pimp out on the town.

  22. Ummah Gummah says:

    KHarn says:
    December 15, 2012 at 7:52 am
    I’m sick of the news calling that SOB a “shooter”, he was a MURDERER!

    The guns belonged to his MOTHER. He STOLE them.

    Why don’t the regressives demand a law against MURDER?

    How about enforcing existing laws against theft?

    Tell it to the [liberal] judge!


  23. Jim says:

    According to Chicago Sun-Times columnist Michael Sneed, President Barack Obama has chosen Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts to be the next secretary of state. Here’s an excerpt from a young John Kerry before Congress…

  24. Ghost of FA Hayek says:
    Rand Paul gets it.
    Why are Republicans willing to put their moniker on some “compromise” that will do nothing to avert the disaster headed our way.
    Tax increases will only erode growth further.
    Let the Dems own them

  25. AC says:

    Marxist Radical Eric Holder: “…brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way”

    He certainly has experience doing that. At one point, sworn ATF agents believed it was wrong to sell guns to Mexican drug cartels.

  26. Bo-Jangles says:

    “I don’t know that there are a lot of Cubans or Venezuelans, or Americans who believe [I’m a Socialist]. The truth of the matter is that my policies are so mainstream that if I had set the same policies that I had back in the 1980s, I would be considered a moderate Republican. I mean, what I believe in is a tax system that is fair. I don’t think government can solve every problem. I think that we should make sure that we’re helping young people go to school. We should make sure that our government is building good roads and bridges and hospitals and airports so that we have a good infrastructure. I do believe that it makes sense that everyone in America, as rich as this country is, shouldn’t go bankrupt because someone gets sick, so the things I believe in are essentially the same things your viewers believe in…”
    Comrade Barry denies being ‘a Socialist’

    Yeah, right!

  27. icecream says:

    …oh…is that why his hands are in his pockets?

    He probably prefers ‘other people’s’ pockets.

  28. Ummah Gummah says:

    KHarn says:
    December 15, 2012 at 7:52 am
    I’m sick of the news calling that SOB a “shooter”, he was a MURDERER!

    I’m sick of calling it “the news”, it’s out and out lies and PROPAGANDA.


  29. Bob Roberts says:

    California Replaces Reforming Philly atop ‘Judicial Hellholes®’ List, Is Joined by Jurisdictions in West Virginia, Illinois, New York and Maryland

    With a sizeable majority of Americans concerned that an unbalanced civil justice system and excessive liability hurt economic growth, job creation and U.S. competitiveness, the American Tort Reform Association today released its 11th annual Judicial Hellholes® report, documenting abuses of the civil justice system in jurisdictions it says are among the most unfair and out-of-balance in the nation.

  30. Bob Roberts says:

    T. R. Ollberg says: December 15, 2012 at 2:19 am

    Now you went a little off the deep end but I can readily understand why. But let’s just take a look at the “facts” that liberal lunatic presented:

    1) Since 1982, there have been 61 mass murders carried out with firearms across the country

    That’s about 2 per year. Now how many incidents of drunk driving that resulted in fatalities, sometimes multiples, have occurred in the same period? How many lives were lost as a result? Yet nobody suggests we ban cars! How many planes were flown into buildings since then and how many died as a result? Yet I don’t hear him saying we should ban planes!

    2) Incidents where guns were used, often in places with strict and arguably unconstitutional gun laws that are already in place, had guns involved that were LEGALLY OBTAINED in 5 out of 6 cases. So clearly gun laws don’t work. Plus even if guns didn’t exist those people who were driven to murder would still have been – they just would have used a different tool and, for all we know, maybe would have been MORE EFFECTIVE at killing as a result as guns sort of announce their presence and allow people to react.

    3) About half of the 20 worst mass shootings in the last 50 years took place in countries that have even stricter gun laws than the U.S., proving that stricter gun laws won’t solve the problem.

    4) Lots of guns don’t necessarily mean lots of shootings, as you can see in Israel and Switzerland. In fact there’s evidence that PROPER, LEGAL gun ownership actually reduces violent and other crime.

    5) Of the 11 deadliest shootings in the US, five have happened from 2007 onward, concurrent with the Democrats ramping up of their virulent emotional campaigns against morality, decency, success, women, the family and gun ownership. Coincidence? I THINK NOT!

    6) If you cherry pick the data you can falsely imply America is more violent than other places which tend to sweep reports under the rug, but even then you have to admit that violence in America is on the decline.

    NOTE they even admitted that they left out at least two countries in their cherry-picked sample group because they were MORE VIOLENT.

    7) Gun ownership in the United States is declining overall.

    So if gun ownership is the problem, the problem is solving itself and there’s no need for unconstitutional government interference.

    8) Though they claim otherwise, the fact is more guns mean LESS violent crimes as those intent on committing them need to take into account the possibility of armed response. Of course they’ll point to some liberal “study” that was tailor made to “prove” their predetermined conclusion before it was even started, but we all know that’s nonsense.

    8) And, of course, they claim that gun control laws work, but apparently they don’t bother really being honest about it as most of these shootings occur in states with some pretty strict gun laws and in fact in cities known to have some of the strictest gun regulations in the nation. Of course they cherry pick the data to come to a conclusion completely opposite from reality.

    9) They admit, amazingly enough, that gun control sentiment IS WANING. More people think gun control should be WEAKER or left alone than those who say tighten it.

    10) Not surprisingly, they revisit the point since their first look resulted in the opposite conclusion from what they had hoped. They then claim that support for SPECIFIC weapon control measures are well-supported. Yeah, I don’t want my neighbor (the crazy one) to be able to buy a tank, naturally! Or a .50 cal. Or an automatic weapon with big magazines. So yeah, obviously if you cherry pick the rules you want to push you’re going to be able to show there’s a lot of support for some rules.

    11) Shootings don’t tend to substantially affect views on gun control.

    That’s because smart people know guns are just a tool and if guns aren’t available murderers will find and use another tool instead. Plus as long as you allow police and the military to have guns some will wind up in criminal hands even if you totally ban guns for everyone else. Just look in countries like Mexico where that is essentially the case.

    12) The South is the most violent region in the United States. Note they leave out that’s true largely due to the disproportionate black on black and black on white crime rates.

  31. Sam Adams says:

    Alphamail says:
    December 15, 2012 at 12:17 am

    Elementary school principals and staff required to carry?

    We expect teachers and school administrators to keep our kids safe at school. How they they possibly keep them safe from an armed criminal with evil intent unless they have effective tools to keep them safe?

    Kinda like changing the 2nd Amendment from a right to a requirement.

    When you see evil, do you ignore it? When someone says something that is hateful or hurts others, do you ignore them and walk away, or do you engage them?

    The answer lies in enforcing existing laws and stiffening penalties for those who have proven themselves to be irresponsible. Long-term penalties for those possessing stolen firearms or firearms which have been used in a crime (police agencies routinely dispose of those weapons); for those who use firearms in the commission of a crime; for those smuggling firearms (yes, Holder); for felons; for those who carry without a permit; for those who illegally acquire firearms: and for those who hold banned weapons (my definitions).

    The murdered was 20 years old. Federal law forbids him from owning a firearm. Federal law also prohibits him from getting within 1000 feed of school property with a firearm.

    Apparently he wasn’t previously convicted of a crime, but then again, couldn’t legally own a handgun. So stiffening penalities would stop a criminal like this how?

    A shooter went into a school – you say arm the principal and staff.

    A shooter went into a theater – is the projectionist required to carry?

    Convenience store clerk – required to carry?

    Mall patrons…required?

    Nonsensical reactions requiring the carrying of firearms is as dangerous as disallowing them.

    Let’s say a movie theater doesn’t permit patrons to be armed. The owner is now taking responsibility for these people’s safety. Why shouldn’t the theater owner be legally liable for the safety of their patrons if they are not allowed to enjoy their civil right to be armed and provide for their own defense?

  32. Tatersalad says:

    The following two articles will show America how the Obama regime works and how they delay and subvert the Benghazi killings with deceit and delays. Sec. of State Clinton is suppose to testify next week which would produce either of two scenarios. One….she tells the truth of the Benghazi killings and blows the lid off of the Obama regimes lies to America or………she delays her testimony until she leaves office and then becomes a private citizen. You be the judge!




  33. Bob Roberts says:


    Apparently Clinton will not testify after all.

    Apparently she’s “too sick” to testify. Apparently she has a “concussion”. Yeah, I’ll agree she’s brain damaged, alright.

    NOW AS NOTED, much of what the media has been saying turned out to be wrong so far, so take all this with a grain of salt.

    It appears likely the guns used in the CT shooting were essentially “stolen” from the perp’s mom,

    i.e. he killed her first then used her guns, obviously without her knowledge or consent, because he JUST KILLED HER, to go kill others.

    They are also claiming Lanza was involved in an altercation at the school the day before the shooting.

    The theory they’re developing was that he came back to kill the four staff members involved and he killed the three of them that were there that day, along with a number of innocents.

    There are also questionable reports Lanza tried to buy a rifle and was prevented from doing so. The store where it allegedly happened seems to be saying it’s nonsense.

    If true, perhaps what they need to do is have stores report people who come in to buy guns then suddenly lose interest when they’re informed there is a waiting period?

    They’re going to make a big deal about the mom’s avid gun collecting and the fact she didn’t take adequate measures to keep the guns out of the hands of her obviously lunatic son.

    This kid came from a good, though broken, family. His dad (earlier reported as shot and killed, apparently in error) was a VP at GE Finance, they’re saying.

    Perhaps Obama will work this fact into his class warfare meme. Something like, “See, when executives get too much money their kids turn into mass murderers. We need confiscatory tax rates to address this tragic fact.”

    DOMINO’S PIZZA founder sues feds over Obamacare.

    Where is the left’s outrage over this?

    Holder Secretly Authorized Government Ability to Develop Dossiers on Innocent American Citizens.

    I wonder if he also loves to dress up like a pretty little girl?

    (Anyone get the reference?)

    Obama promised to close GITMO – when?

    Women should be up in arms over this – it’s UNFAIR!

    6-foot, 6-inch, 220 lb man posing as a woman poised to transform women’s basketball.

    How does a REAL woman compete against that?

    The answer is they don’t.

    They can’t!

    A pair of ESPN radio hosts had laughed at her looks, referring to her as “it.”

    The 50-year-old transsexual is competing against 18-, 19- and 20-year-old young women.

    How fair is that?

    Congressmen Confront EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson Over Use of Alias ‘Richard Windsor’ to send and receive SECRET e-mails

    “In recent weeks, questions have been raised in Congress and among public interest groups about the use of one or more secondary email accounts and aliases by you and potentially other officials at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),” they wrote in a letter addressed to Jackson. “Given your reported use of at least one alias email account in your conduct of agency business, we write to ask that you describe fully the nature and extent of this practice.”

    The letter contains a detailed list of questions, including:

    “According to press reports, you have a government issued email account under the alias ‘Richard Windsor.’ Is this accurate? Does this email account still exist, and do you use it?”

    “According to press reports, on November 20, 2012, EPA issued a statement indicating that ‘[f]or more than a decade, EPA administrators have been assigned two official, government issued email accounts: a public account and an internal account.’ How many email accounts have been assigned to you at the agency? What are the email addresses for these accounts?”

    “To your knowledge, are there any other heads of Federal agencies that are assigned an ‘internal’ email address? If yes, which Federal agencies?”

    A veteran Democratic lawmaker believes the nation will go along with stronger gun control laws if President Obama “exploits” the Newtown, Conn., tragedy and nudges Congress to action.

    Rep. Jerrold Nadler, who represents portions of New York City, said he was encouraged by Mr. Obama’s statement on Friday afternoon that the mass shooting, which claimed the lives of 20 young children, requires “meaningful action” by Congress, but hopes those words turn into concrete legislation.
    Mr. Nadler was asked whether the Newtown tragedy could be the turning point in many Democrats’ longstanding struggle to enact stronger gun laws.
    “I think we will be there if the president exploits it, and otherwise we’ll go on to the next” incident, Mr. Nadler said.

    Meanwhile, in Chicago, one of the places with extreme and some suggest unconstitutional gun laws…

    10 shot, including 4 teens.

  34. Bob Roberts says:

    Oh, this just in, the CT event IS OBAMA’S FAULT!

    Obama administration, Congress quietly let school security funds lapse:

    Government officials told the Washington Guardian on Friday night that two Justice Department programs that had provided more than $200 million to schools for training, security equipment and police resources over the last decade weren’t renewed in 2011 and 2012, and that a separate program that provided $800 million to put police officers inside the schools was ended a few years earlier.

    So perhaps back when Democrats controlled both houses in Congress and also the White House they deleted $800 million that would have put police officers inside the schools? So had the Democrats not done this there may have been an officer, possibly an armed officer, there at the school?

    And if the kid really WAS in an altercation the day before, why didn’t the school and the police follow it up?

  35. Hill says:

    Why shouldn’t Bloomberg, the Boston Mayor and MURDOCH advocate a ban automatic weapons?

    They all have legalized protection via security. Who most likely carry weapons.

    Remember all of us are equal, but some of us are more equal then others.

    It is okay that the lower orders are culled.

  36. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Hey Republicans.
    Why not end tax breaks on muni bonds ?
    Indeed, Bloomberg News recently estimated that tax exemptions on interest paid by municipal bonds for sports structures rob roughly $146 million a year from the U.S. Treasury
    But then billionaire sports team owners wanting new playpens may have to risk their own money

  37. Jimbo says:

    Y’all see this headline today:

    “Egypt’s Mubarak hurt after slipping in prison shower”

    Uhmmmmm – riiiiiiight – I believe he slipped.

  38. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Gun sales …..up
    Violent crime………down
    The numbers are in
    But in the UK, gun violence is up 89 percent
    Maybe it’s high time for a lawsuit against the Brady center
    for their actions which lead to us being less safe

  39. Alphamail says:

    Sam Adams @ 1:49 pm

    Again, requiring school personnel to carry is insane!

    Requiring anyone to carry is insane unless its cops.

    I didn’t say a thing about them not having the right to carry if they so desire – they should be able to – in school zones, hospital zones, or taxi zones.

    They should be afforded the right to protect themselves and the law should provide for that. However, they should not be mandated to do so.

    Big difference. Go back and read what I wrote in that context.

    How can I disagree with the inference in your last paragraph – we agree – we’re on the same page.

  40. AC says:

    Why is requiring school personnel to carry any different from requiring a Brink’s driver to carry? If the job description requires an employee to be responsible for the safety of persons or property then it is reasonable for said employee to be armed.

    Teachers are responsible for the safety of students. It would be great if schools could be protected by officers and design features, but the cost on that might not be feasible.

    We don’t need every single school employee carrying. Just a few would stop these shootings.

    The carrot is more effective than the stick.

    Offer the ability to carry, a reimbursement for a pistol and permitting, and $15/week for doing so and you will see enough faculty armed to shut down these active shooters.

  41. AC says:

    When you are confronted by an active shooter, you have two choices:

    1. Meet force with force.
    2. Die.

    Waiting for the police is not an option.

  42. Alphamail says:


    I’m as much 2nd Amendment as you, but you cannot require someone to carry if they don’t want to – its un-American.

    I agree with Sam Adams when he suggests a theater owner might be held liable for not allowing CC customers, when his place is shot up.

    And I agree with your, “Offer the ability to carry, a reimbursement for a pistol and permitting, and $15/week for doing so.” I would probably add more $ per week and add lessons and range time.

    But you cannot mandate that, it has to be voluntary.

    If the option was open to principals or staff and none agreed to carry and help protect the kids, then they might also be liable.

    Its truly a sad comment on the state of moral decay in America when we have to discuss these options and scenarios.

  43. Sam Adams says:

    Alphamail says:
    December 15, 2012 at 8:27 pm

    Again, requiring school personnel to carry is insane!

    Requiring anyone to carry is insane unless its cops.

    Fair enough. Most kids graduating with an education degree have been sufficiently brainwashed that they won’t come near a gun.

    By the same token, most aren’t sufficiently educated to be actually teaching your kids, either.

  44. AC says:

    But Brink’s can require its drivers to carry, otherwise they aren’t able to do their job, just as a moving company can require that members of moving crews not be midgets in wheelchairs.

    Now we don’t need every single teacher to carry to do their jobs, but we do need some. The principal, vice principal, and counselors might need to carry, too.

    We can split hairs over who, but the fact remains that many innocents are dead because nobody carried, and every expected somebody else to keep those kids safe.

    If the children aren’t safe then somebody isn’t doing their job, just as would be the case if a Brink’s driver went out on his route equipped with only a safety whistle.

  45. Alphamail says:


    Mandating individuals to carry is even worse than saying they cannot.

    Nowhere would the law of unintended consequences be more apt.

    Can you say, “can of worms?”

    “…but the fact remains that many innocents are dead because nobody carried, and every(one)[sic] expected somebody else to keep those kids safe. If the children aren’t safe then somebody isn’t doing their job.”

    How can I disagree with that?

    Schools should be a CC zone and teachers should be able and advised to carry, but never mandated to do so.

    If you want to compare to Brink’s…Brink’s drivers have an inherently dangerous job – so much so, they wear uniforms and bullet-proof vests, work in pairs for backup, carry heavy weapons, and travel in an armored vehicle, plus they are a private company where employees must adhere to a company safety policy which is probably governed by the insurance industry.

    Should teachers then be mandated to wear uniforms, travel in pairs, and drive a tank? Should Brink’s drivers be required to drive a Prius and study Alinsky?

    Again, I feel teachers should be allowed to have firearms on site and available.

    If you can come up with a policy to mandate the carrying of firearms by teachers, why then can’t you mandate anything you want? Oh that’s right, Obama is already doing it.

    Mandate the purchase of health insurance. Mandate transvestites to serve in the Marine Corps. Mandate taxes. What’s next, mandate the attendance at a mosque to understand diversity? Please don’t answer that.

    Its counterintuitive, it oppresses individual freedom, and it is the easy way out – eliminating well thought out creative solutions.

    Private schools can afford to beef up security by installing better surveillance systems, creating safety procedures, and hiring a guard(s).

    Public schools can form an alliance with their local police or security agencies whereby officers could work off-duty shifts for pay. Many police officers are also parents and would love the overtime and the chance to safeguard kids. This is an especially good ongoing way to showcase the humanity of the police, particularly in urban areas, where they are often viewed as the enemy.

    Each school budget will of necessity have to add another employee but such is life.

    And, the more teachers and staff who decide to carry and work with security the better.

  46. Alphamail says:


    I believe there is a moving company in Seattle that only hires midgets in wheelchairs. Only gay Marxist pro-choice midgets in government issued solar wheelchairs.

    They can’t be called midgets anymore that’s politically incorrect. They’re to be referred to as genetically modified, vertically challenged, socially liberated mini-citizens.

    Government grants and benefits will follow.

  47. Sam Adams says:

    Should teachers then be mandated to wear uniforms, travel in pairs, and drive a tank?

    Which raises an interesting question….
    What percentage of school teachers will ever be placed in a violent situation? Our government is all set to violate everyone’s rights without considering whether violence in the schools is a major problem we face.

    Of course those who don’t wish to let any crisis go to waste never want to put anything in perspective.

    For example…how many children are killed each year by cars?

  48. Alphamail says:

    Sam Adams


    Giving up our rights for security makes us less secure.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy