moonbattery logo

Sep 25 2012

Pigford Pigout Extended to Women, Hispanics

Remember the Pigford Pigout, by which our moonbat rulers have been passing out $50,000 apiece to any black willing to pretend to have been a farmer oppressed by discrimination? This illegal operation has been so successful at “spreading the wealth around” by the $billions from those it belongs to to those Obama expects to vote for him that it has been extended to other key groups in the balkanized electorate: women and Hispanics.

As part of “a new era of civil rights” at the Department of Agriculture, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack announced Monday that Hispanic and women farmers and ranchers who believe USDA discriminated against them can file claims to get a piece of at least $1.33 billion in cash awards and tax relief payments and up to $160 million in farm debt relief, beginning this week.

To qualify, you must lack a Y chromosome and/or have a Z on the end of your name. Already 86,000 blacks have lined up for Pigford handouts, out of a total of 39,697 black farmers in the entire country. Obviously our rulers don’t mind a little cheating; the whole point is to remind favored minorities of the financial advantages to turning up at the polls on voting day.

Indians get handouts too:

The Keepseagle settlement made $760 million available to Native American farmers and ranchers who believe they did not receive the same farm loan opportunities as whites between 1981 and 1999.

Sorry white guys. You don’t get to pretend you’re oppressed. After all, someone has to pay for all this.

Incredibly, there are male Caucasians who will vote to reelect the current administration. Explanations include ignorance, stupidity, self-hatred, and psychosis.

Criminals like Obama and Vilsack have already looted our country almost to the point of collapse. They are more of a threat to this nation than Hitler, Tojo, or the Soviets ever were.

pigs trough
Make way for more “oppressed” special interest groups.

On tips from Artfldgr and J.

30 Responses to “Pigford Pigout Extended to Women, Hispanics”

  1. Dr. 9 says:

    This is why blacks would rather burn the coutry down than see the Muslim-in-Chief lose the election.

    This is also a warning to the mindless American people of the price they must pay for their highly misguided sense of tolerance and compassion.

  2. Bo-Jangles says:

    Obummer is not only the first black president, he’s also the first president for blacks and other professional “victims” only.


  3. A. Levy says:

    “Our legislators are not sufficiently apprised of the rightful limits of their powers; that their true office is to declare and enforce only our natural rights and duties, and to take none of them from us. No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another; and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him…” -– Thomas Jefferson

  4. Spider says:

    And now, some reality…

    (Breitbart) President Barack Obama is having trouble drawing large crowds on the campaign trail. At the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, his campaign was forced to move his acceptance speech from the 74,000-seat Bank of America Stadium to the 20,000 Time Warner Cable Arena, citing weather as the excuse. But the media are always eager to help–for example, putting 18,000 people inside a 5,000-seat arena at an Obama event in Milwaukee on Saturday.

    The contradiction was first noted by Local media, including the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, reported that Obama had addressed “supporters who filled the 5,000-seat BMO Harris Pavilion, along with thousands more who sat in bleachers and stood on the pavement beyond the protection of the roof, even as wind and rain lashed down in the latter moments of the near 30-minute speech.”

    The pavilion was not “filled”–a local reporter for filmed empty seats in the bleachers at the side of the arena. Nevertheless, the Journal-Sentinal played it safe, putting attendance at roughly 5,000-plus, a small but respectable turnout.

    That’s not how national media covered it. Darren Samuelsohn of Politico reported that the president addressed “a crowd the Obama campaign estimated at 18,000 in a city park overlooking Lake Michigan” in an attempt to “lock up” Wisconsin.

    Laura Meckler of the Wall Street Journal–whose news section, according to UCLA professor Tim Groseclose, (is the most liberal of any major mainstream outlet)–repeated the campaign’s 18,000 claim without even revealing the source of the official-sounding estimate.

    Both outlets described the location of the rally as a “park,” without revealing the name of the arena itself, which would have given the game away.

    The images provided by news wires are predominantly close-up shots such as the one above, showing Obama surrounded by a small circle of supporters. Only Getty Images has a wider shot, similar to images at the left-wing message board Democratic Underground that show the inside of the arena. That’s a full-ish arena, but nowhere near 18,000 people.

    There seem to be no images at all of the 13,000 people who supposedly made up the difference outside the BMO Harris Pavilion.

    Meanwhile, the nation is being told that Obama drew a massive crowd–nearly the size of the crowd at his acceptance speech in Charlotte–in a crucial swing state six weeks before the election is over.

    If Obama were really doing so well, why would the media have to resort to such distortions?

  5. 762x51 says:

    Redistribution, nothing more.

    I can’t wait until they have a big give away for white males . . . . . . . . . . . sometimes, I really crack me up.

    If the libtard scum running the government, universities and media want to champion a group being discriminated against then straight, white, Christian men are the only group left

  6. KHarn says:

    =They are more of a threat to this nation than Hitler, Tojo, or the Soviets ever were.=

    True, except that the regressives are the “children” of Stalin, Malenkov, Krushev and Gorbachov.

  7. KHarn says:

    Oh, and also Mao and Ho Chi.

  8. Mr Evilwrench says:

    Hey, I may have a Y chromosome in my cells, but I’m a woman! Don’t dispute it, you sexists. I could’ve been a farmer but the man kept me down! I’m tellin ya, I deserve my .gov handout! Fork it over!

  9. Sinister66 says:

    Is it just blacks that get 50,000?
    Bet the fact Michelle Bachmann got 260,000 pisses them off.

  10. Mickey Shea says:

    Gibs me dat.

  11. Sam Adams says:

    A world wide bacon shortange is predicted for next year.

  12. Sam Adams says:

    Mr Evilwrench says:
    September 25, 2012 at 12:41 pm Hey, I may have a Y chromosome in my cells, but I’m a woman! Don’t dispute it, you sexists. I could’ve been a farmer but the man kept me down! I’m tellin ya, I deserve my .gov handout! Fork it over!

    You, my friend, are a woman in transition. Just as Barack Obama decided that he was black, you can decide that you are a woman. I suspect, truth be told, that you can use the LGBT angle too. After all, you are now a self declared woman who still, most likely, prefers “the company” of other women.

    For the government to declare you a man would be sexist and hateful. You should sue.

  13. Jimbo says:

    Stinking pigs stealing money and giving it to other stinking pigs.

    Such is the stinking liberal mentality.

  14. […] around” by the $ billions from those it belongs to to those Obama expects to vote […] Moonbattery Tags: Extended, Hispanics, Pigford, Pigout, Women Posted in Pundits | No Comments […]

  15. J says:

    Hispanics had better take a good hard look at what the Democratic Party has done to the African American.

    How they’ve essentially turned the African American into indentured servants by making them largely dependent on whatever government issued pittance their liberal benefactors see fit to dole out to them.

    How they’ve subjugated African Americans under the aegis of social justice.

    Hispanics better take a long cold look at how the African American condition has been worsening despite 40 years of empty liberal promises, and ask themselves if they want to be subjugated in the same manner.

  16. Sam Adams says:

    J says:
    September 25, 2012 at 2:02 pm Hispanics had better take a good hard look at what the Democratic Party has done to the African American
    Here’s an article that puts this topic into focus:

    If you are a family of three and you earn $3,625 per year, by the time you get all the free government goodies that are provided in the social safety net, your net income is $31,630. If you earn $30,000, your net income is $27,379. All those great government supplied goodies get taken away.

    Let’s say that you work hard and make $60,000 per year. Your net income is $34,366.

    Bottom line is that the government never wants anyone to graduate from poverty, since that is where their government jobs come from. Additionally the government wants to make it as hard as possible for you to save up $40,000 or $50,000 which might be all you need to start your own business.

    We can’t be having any of that!!!

  17. born in 76 says:

    Shit, might as have my wife claim farmership. Get the $50G’s and invest it in my sons future. He’s going to need it.

    Our family will be paying for all of this 10 times over anyways.

  18. AC says:

    My house sits on 18 acres of agricultural land. I buried some government cheese in the ground but none would grow. The USDA didn’t help me. Somebody sent me a check.

  19. AC says:

    My house sits on 18 acres of agricultural land. I buried some government cheese in the ground but none would grow. The USDA didn’t help me. Somebody send me a check.

  20. -Sepp says:

    Hmmmm…I’m white and a farmer…and when I contacted the USDA about a farm loan…I was pretty much told to pound sand.
    Where’s MY “victim money”???

    I don’t get any…because I’m white, pay taxes into the system and not a part of some phont protected class.

    I’ve made it WITHOUT the government’s hand anyways…and I’ll still be producing food long after those pigford pieces of shit blow their millions and are back on welfare where they started from.
    It’s a reparation scheme.
    As far as I’m concerned, the debt has already been paid 10x over and all that are left are shitbags looking for a free ride for something they’ve never earned to begin with.

  21. oldguy says:

    Don’t you get a picture in your mind of Barbarians with their burlap sacks descending on Rome? They act the same when their basketball team wins or loses.

  22. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Just so I get this straight
    If the Bachmann’s own some land through a trust and lease it out, every dime of subsidy collected by the farmer can be assigned as income to them ?

    Just so you know, if the Bachmanns are collecting crop program payments while having no interest in said crop, they are violating the law
    If so, Moveon would have been all over this like a fly on sh**
    However there are a lot of wealthy land investing liberal lawyers around here collecting conservation reserve payments on their hunting properties
    But I suppose since THEY support the welfare state, all is good

  23. White_Polluter says:

    Didn’t this happen back in 2010? Is this another 1.3 million that was approved above the amounts approved back in late 2010/early 2011?

    And where did 86,000 farmers paid come from? I thought 14,000 had been paid and an additional 70,000 filed but were denied?

  24. Ummah Gummah says:


    Where is Kittens on this one? Why to pussy footing? Afraid to rouse the non-voters, you POS RovINOs?

    Running an absolute LOSER campaign so you guys can keep crawling the aisles in desperate search for a few crumbs off the Runaway demonRAT Gravy Train?

    GOPer RINOS, I despise you. But I have no choice but vote for your guy this time around.



  25. -Sepp says:

    White polluter, all those “extra farmers” came about due to the standards of being “a farmer” were lowered down to the criteria being “If you EVER tried to farm” and down to growing a flower in a flower pot became the definition of “a farmer”…as long as you happened to be black.
    Even the actual black farmers who were screwed around by the USDA are balking at this blatant scamming of the system.
    I contacted the USDA for information on a loan for equipment…a loan, NOT a handout…and was flatly told that it wouldn’t be happening even if I did actually apply.

    While I’m ranting, I find it offensive as a farmer to have the welfare budget being called a “farm bill” since a miniscule portion of the USDA’s allotment actually goes to assist farmers while the rest of it is the welfare system’s goodie bag for the leeching class.

    IMO, the ONLY reason the govt calls it a “farm bill” is to make it sound respectable to the populace who would balk at the idea of handing out such a vast amount of money to those who produce nothing.

  26. Sinister66 says:

    Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    “Just so I get this straight”

    You didn’t.

    “But I suppose since THEY support the welfare state, all is good”

    I knew you were a lib.

  27. Ghost of FA Hayek says:


    From your link
    Paul Bachmann received nearly $260,000 in farm subsidies between 1995 and 2007, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data compiled by the Environmental Working Group. The lion’s share, about $250,000 of it, was corn and dairy program subsidies. There are no records of any crop subsidies after 2007.

    Paul Bachmann is her father in law.
    He owns the crop, so only HE can receive the subsidy
    I did not say I approve of farm subsidies, in fact I don’t.
    That is simply how it works
    The land is in a trust
    This is a common arrangement, mainly to avoid having the farm swept away by the death tax
    The farm is then leased back to the father or another family member
    Are you liable for any welfare benefits your mother in law applies for ?

  28. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Most of these loans are commodity loans
    You are required to have a crop in the bin as collateral to qualify.
    The loans in question were for beginning farmer loans, equipment, cattle, seasonal operating loans and the like.
    If the bank said no, the government was willing to risk YOUR money on them instead.
    These loans were just like those junk housing loans the government demands be made.
    The farmers first must show they were turned down by a bank, yet they still were required to show some collateral.
    Pigford settlements are being made to blacks that never even saw the inside of a USDA field office

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy