moonbattery logo

Jan 04 2012

Planned Parenthood: A Holocaust on Our Dime Every Three Years

These bleak times of Hopey Change are a golden era for Planned Parenthood. According to its latest annual report, the outfit received almost half a $billion of other people’s money coercively acquired by Big Government. In return, it killed a third of a million children.

According to its latest annual report, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) received $487.4 million in tax dollars over a twelve-month period and performed 329,455 abortions.

Thanks to generous subsidies from our federal overlords, the abortion industry is big business:

The Fiscal Year 2009-2010 annual report also shows that PPFA’s net assets as of June 30, 2010 topped $1 billion, specifically $1,009,600,000.00.

As Sad Hill News points out, it only takes Planned Parenthood about three years to kill as many children as died in the Holocaust.

But since we’ve already been born, we don’t have to worry about liberals’ sneering contempt for the value of innocent life. At least, not for now.

Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards, the Adolf Eichmann of “choice.”

64 Responses to “Planned Parenthood: A Holocaust on Our Dime Every Three Years”

  1. StanInTexas says:

    Planned Parenthood is a FOR PROFIT business whose leaders receive 6-figure salaries.

    Why are they receiving one-thin dime of MY money????

  2. Sgt Stadenko says:

    The irony, of course, is that Margaret Sanger was an unabashed racist who wanted to use birth control methods, including abortion, to control the black population. Her program of eugenics continues to this day as a wildly disproportionate number of abortions are of black babies.

  3. Sam Adams says:

    Sgt Stadenko makes an excellent point. All those abortion mills in the inner cities eliminate a disproportionate number of potential black citizens. I saw a figure a few months ago that projected that, if these abortion rates continue, by 2038, the blacks will comprise an insignificant minority in the US society.

    It is sad, and a blot on American, that we have allowed almost 50 million potential US citizens to be killed by their mothers.

  4. IslandLifer says:

    I wouldn’t call them mothers. More like selfish murderous sluts. Enjoy your nice things you’ve acquired while profiting from the murder of children because it’s only temporary. Your mental hell will be eternal.

  5. Sinister66 says:

    Wow Stain, looks like I have to agree with you on that one. They shouldnt recieve any tax payer money.

    Does anyone know how much of the tax payer money was used for abortion. Abortions only account for 3%-5% of thier services per year. Just curious.

  6. TrojanMan says:

    Too bad she wasnt aborted

  7. StanInTexas says:

    Doesn’t matter in the least SinSister.

    They are a for-profit organization that provides many services INCLUDING child killing. They should get NO finding from the government.

  8. Sam Adams says:

    Actually, Sinister, the 3-5% statistics are misleading. They count handing out a condom as a “service.” By far and away, abortion is the most profitable of the services that they provide.

  9. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Planned parenthood and the systematic elimination of the black race

  10. Dave says:

    May God forgive us for the corporate sin of sacrificing children on the alter of Planned Parenthood. This rivals sacrificing children to the false god baal.

  11. Sinister66 says:

    That would be contraception-35% of their services.

  12. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    In an interview published March 17 in the Texas Tribune, Ms. Richards spoke at length about all the healthcare PPFA provides: “We see 3 million patients each year across the country. For 97 percent of them, we provide preventive care. Three percent are abortions.”

    Yet according to PPFA’s own March 2011 Planned Parenthood Services fact sheet, 332,278 abortions were performed on some of PPFA’s three million clients in the year ending June 30, 2009. This suggests that eleven percent of their clients had abortions in that year, not three percent. But the best measure of how important abortions are to PPFA’s bottom line is the fact that abortions produce at least 37 percent of PPFA revenues “by very conservative estimates.”[1]

  13. StanInTexas says:

    So SinSister, are you OK with the government paying for abortions through Planned parenthood?

  14. ant says:

    @sinister. Penn State is only one school among many. So what if there was a little child rape? It’s a small percentage overall. Same with the Catholic church, there are millions of Catholics, so what’s a little molestation here and there gonna hurt?

  15. Sam Adams says:

    “Dave says:
    January 4, 2012 at 1:20 pm

    May God forgive us for the corporate sin of sacrificing children on the alter of Planned Parenthood. This rivals sacrificing children to the false god baal.”

    Actually I was thinking much the same thing. It takes a pretty cold heart to be willing to sacrifice the life of an innocent, unborn child. It also begs the question of who or what is next. Grandma can’t be far behind, followed by “undesirables” who don’t share your political or religious views.

  16. ant says:

    The spirit of Jezebel is alive and well.

  17. Sinister66 says:

    Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Your getting confused between services and clients.
    They had 3,000,000 clients and performed 11,000,000+ services in 2009.

    “But the best measure of how important abortions are to PPFA’s bottom line is the fact that abortions produce at least 37 percent of PPFA revenues “by very conservative estimates.”

    So then what are the numbers. Anyone can Assume.

    ant says:

    Last I checked child rape was illegal. You would have a valid point if abortion was also illegal.

    Stain says:

    Listen and try to keep up,especially since you are obviously to slow to see that I was agreeing with you in my first post.
    I was asking if anyone knew the amount of tax payer money used (if any) for abortions.

  18. BigJoe says:

    How long will it be till the Murdering Liberals declare abortions can now be retroactive? What the hell does it matter what side of the vulva you’re on? What’s the difference? Then, they can justify the murder of whom ever they want, anyone they deem ‘inconvenient’.

  19. Sinister66 says:

    BigJoe says:

    “How long will it be till the Murdering Liberals declare abortions can now be retroactive?”

    Its called capitol punishment.

  20. StanInTexas says:

    SinSister, you only agreed that PP should not, as a for-profit business, be receiving taxpayer money.

    I asked tyou a simple question, are you OK with PP using taxpayer money to pay for abortions. A simple YES or NO is all that is needed, not your whining!

    And to help out my friend Ghost, it was YOU that made the BULLSHIT claim that abortion was only 3-5% of Planned Parenthoods revenues. Ghost showed you that it is closer to 37%. It is now YOUR TURN to prove your 3-5% is true.

    We’ll wait!

  21. BigJoe says:

    The difference is, Shit-sitter, Capitol Punishment is for the guilty.

  22. StanInTexas says:

    Big Joe, that are already on their way. Partial Birth Abortion brings it within seconds and inches. And Kermit Gosnell is being accused of performing abortion well after birth.

  23. StanInTexas says:

    SinSister, the death penalty is PUNISHNMENT for the GUILTY.

    Tell me what has the child of an abortion done to deserve the death penalty?

  24. BigJoe says:

    It’s easy Stan, they’ve commited the sin of being ‘inconvenient’. Retroactive abortion is already going on in China if you’re unlucky enough to have been born without a penis.

  25. Jester says:

    AMEN Stan.

  26. BigJoe says:

    Or, maybe the Murderer Liberals should just go ahead and call them what Hitler did, instead of ‘inconvenient’ just say ‘undesirable’. What’s the difference?

  27. StanInTexas says:

    BigJoe, that’s what Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood) called blacks. She also called them ‘weeds’. Her eugenics dream is alive and well… in todays Democrat party!

  28. Sinister66 says:


    You cant be for real. I said PP should not recieve any tax payer money. Do you know what that means??? That means “NO TAXPAYER MONEY FOR ANYTHING”

    And to help out my friend Ghost, it was YOU that made the BULLSHIT claim that abortion was only 3-5% of Planned Parenthoods revenues. Ghost showed you that it is closer to 37%. It is now YOUR TURN to prove your 3-5% is true.”

    Try to keep the lies to a minimum. I said, and its plainy written above, abortion only accounts for 3%-5% of the services performed. There was no talk of revenue.
    Ghost said it was 37% of their revenue but didnt show anything to back this claim up. Post a link to the numbers.

  29. In the USSR, the shortage of birth control devices -even condoms- due to systematic (and chronic) supply problems led to abortion as after-the-fact birth control… because it was pretty much all they had

    Today in our country, irresponsible trash are simply too stupid to keep from getting pregnant all the time… and vote socialist to keep Soviet birth control available to all on The State’s tab

    You can’t spell ‘progressive’ without ‘progress’ lol

  30. StanInTexas says:

    SinSister, you made the original claim, so we’ll wait for YOU to post the proof of your bullshit!

    And I know what you said, but I asked a different question. Let me ask again, using smaller words.

    “Since PP is getting tax money to do abortions RIGHT NOW, are you ok with that?”

    And remember, all that is needed to answer that question is a YES or a NO.

  31. Sinister66 says:


    “Since PP is getting tax money to do abortions RIGHT NOW, are you ok with that?”

    Of course not.

    Now you have to prove that the money they recieve is being used for abortions.

    Now an interesting part of the link Ghost provided says:

    “Since 1970, PPFA has aborted an estimated 5,300,000 children”

    Since some claim the amount of abortions in this country exceeds 50,000,000 that would mean the rest are being done by doctors in their private offices.

  32. Sinister66 says:

    Here is where alot of the info in the article ghost linked to came from.

  33. son of a preacher man says:

    “Last I checked child rape was illegal. You would have a valid point if abortion was also illegal.”

    You can’t tell the difference between the concepts of right/wrong vs legal/illegal? You are morally retarded.

  34. Sinister66 says:

    son of a preacher man says:

    For one thing, morals are personal. Some find hunting immoral, euthanizing animals at a shelter to some is immoral. Letting a homeless person starve on the streets is immoral to some as well as the death penalty and the queer lifestyle. Whats wrong to one person isnt to another. Thats why we have laws. If you dont like the way a law is then work to get it changed otherwise STFU.

  35. StanInTexas says:

    Try this hypothetical little thought experiment, SinSister…

    Planned Parenthood’s budget works like this…
    •Administration – 25%
    •Women’s Health Services – 25%
    •Abortions – 25%
    •Maintenance and Upkeep – 25%

    Now the government says “We like your Women’s Health Services and want to fund that.”

    So Planned Parenthood’s budget changes to:
    •Administration – 34%
    •Women’s Health Services – 0%
    •Abortions – 33%
    •Maintenance and Upkeep – 33%

    And THAT is how the government pays for abortions with MY money!

  36. RKae says:

    So, Sinister, if a restaurant chain killed 329,455 people in a year through food poisoning, that would be OK as long it only represented 3% of their customers?

  37. Sinister66 says:

    We arent playing hypotheticals here. Looking for hard numbers and facts. Keep trying. If google doesnt help try yahoo.

  38. Sinister66 says:

    RKae says:

    Not even the same thing. But 32,708 were killed in car accidents in 2010 and we dont ban cars or driving.over 100,000 people die every year from prescription drugs yet they are still available.

    By the way my opinion on the matter is all abortion should be illegal after 8 weeks.

  39. Sinister66 says:

    You want to know were the money goes.

    This doesnt include the 800 location heads across the country making over 150k per year.

  40. RKae says:

    Sinister, it is the same thing because it’s about a huge number being presented in percentage form when that will make it fly better with the public.

  41. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    A Report from the Chiaroscuro Foundation
    The information is extrapolated from numbers provided by PP itself
    They also use it to expand
    In the span of the last four years, Planned Parenthood more than
    doubled its number of facilities committing medical abortions from 60 in 2006 to
    131 currently.

  42. NathanielM says:

    Can’t wait for 8th Annual Walk for Life will be held on
    January 21, 2012 at Civic Center Plaza in San Francisco!You wanna see howling, frothing moonbats?? Just participate and see for yourself. Heck they’ve already decked the place out with “US out of my uterus!” signs in anticipation of the march.

  43. Agnostic Conservative says:

    Romney Care Seal of Approval.

  44. son of a preaher man says:

    So when NAMBLA can get enough people to agree with their lifestyle choices you would not see any issue with that?

    And I expressed no desire to change any laws. Justed asked a retorical question.

  45. lvb-rocks says:

    Connecting some dots: The lovely Ms. Sanger, in advancing her eugenics dream, aggressively pushed for the use of reliable contraceptives (google Birth Control Review, her publication) even above the utilization of abortion. She knew that the fulfillment of eugenics and the ultimate legalization of abortion first required the wide societal acceptance of “birth control” (every Christian denomination officially taught against contraception until the 1930s when the Anglicans first allowed it, followed soon by nearly all Protestant churches). This seemingly small falling away from traditional sexual morality has had grave consequences. Ms. Sanger likely smiled an evil smile when so many Christians fell for her plan. She didn’t win the battle for the soul of the culture without the help of a good number of confused Christians.

    To gain any ground on the life issues in this post-Christian era, pro-life and pro-family advocates should argue their case not from a religious basis, but rather from a natural law basis. Briefly, abortion is triply condemned by the natural law: it deliberately turns the reproductive process away from its natural end; it manifests an extraordinary degree of perversity and moral corruption; and it violates the right to life that every innocent human being has by nature. Rightly understood, natural law theory does not allow for artificial contraception.

    For a well-reasoned argument on the life issues that does not presuppose agreements on religious grounds, read Robert Spitzer’s, Ten Universal Principles.

  46. Sinister66 says:

    The number that report throws around is the approx. percentage compared to the amount of government contributions not the total amount amount of contributions. the real number is around 13%. It also says PP performs 1 of every 4 abortion in this country. whose doing the other 3 of 4. And that still doesnt show PP using government fund for abortions. This would be illegal and any pro life organization worth its weight would have moved to prosecute.

  47. AC says:

    Money is fungible.

  48. TonyD95B says:

    RE: Sinister66 at January 4, 2012 at 2:32 pm:

    “BigJoe says: How long will it be till the Murdering Liberals declare abortions can now be retroactive?

    Its called capitol punishment.”

    No, Capitol Punishment is what we’re subjected to every time Congress is in session…..Capital Punishment is what I’d like to subject most of those no-good b#stards to……

  49. StanInTexas says:

    It is NOT hypothetical, SinSister. My illustration shows that PP spends money on abortions and other things. When the Government steps in and pays for those other things, PP simply diverts that money they no longer have to spend on those other things to the ONE THING that makes them the most money, that being abortions.

    Is it a very simple concept, which explains why it is so far out of your grasp!

  50. StanInTexas says:

    BTW, SinSister, car wrecks are ACCIDENTS, while abortion is the DELIBERATE killing of a child.

    First you equate abortion to capital punishment (WRONG) and now you are comparing it to a car accident (STUPID & WRONG).

    I am surprised you can still remember to breathe!

  51. lao says:

    stanWE YOU called your fantasyland “hypothetical”.

    StanInTexas says:
    January 4, 2012 at 3:50 pm
    Try this hypothetical little thought experiment, SinSister…

  52. StanInTexas says:

    LoaZee, stop trying so hard to be a prick. You have already convinced us all!

  53. lao says:

    You resent having your own words quoted to demonstrate your hackery?

    Pardon me for laughing.

  54. StanInTexas says:

    You are an asshole, LaoZee. I said hypothetical because if I had not, you and SinSister would have NEVER stopped screeching “PROVE to us that 25% of PP’s budget is abortion. PROVE IT PROVE IT PROVE IT!!!!! AAAAAAAArrrrrgh!”

    The NUMBERS were hypothetical, not the point I was making, you insufferable jackass!

  55. lvb-rocks says:

    It doesn’t matter where the $$ is directed at PP. Money is fungible, as AC stated. Even if it were all proved to be completely spent on providing contraceptives, it still is being used for abortions. Why? Because of the organic link between birth control and abortion: Birth control causes abortion. No one knew it better than Margaret Sanger. And that’s why PP pushes contraceptives out the doors like candy. It’s an investment for their real goal and blood lust. Former PP employees who have been blessed with the loss of self-delusion have said that very thing. No one goes to PP for real medical care. They go for contraceptives and abortion. PP is getting tax-payer money. The monetary percentages are irrelevant.

  56. Apostle53 says:

    Aborting babies is a National sin. Defund this genocide now!!

  57. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    I seriously doubt PP would even want federal dollars to DIRECTLY fund abortions at this time. Public backlash would be enormous.
    At the same time, primary the purpose of PP is NOT ever going to be to hand out condoms.
    The proof is in it’s expansion of medical abortion clinics into more urban arias.
    But subsidy cash is still cash.
    Here is Planned Parenthood in it’s full glory

  58. lao says:

    lvb-rocksinthehead says: Birth control causes abortion.

    This leads me to wonder if you are sexually active at all and, if so, if you have 12 kids.

    The pie chart on page 5 of this report provides the actual breakdown in Planned Parenthood’s medical services.

    Planned Parenthood Annual Report

  59. oldguy says:

    Judging from the way this country is headed, I would say the wrong people are being aborted.

  60. […] you for linking to this series!: Moonbattery, StanDeyo, Free North Carolina, SHN Facebook […]

  61. ant says:

    Lao, Planned Parenthood’s annual report? Yeah, I’m sure they’re being completely above board with the public.

  62. Leigha says:

    “Birth control causes abortion.”

    Considering that one has to be pregnant to have an abortion, and birth control prevents pregnancy, I would say that birth control PREVENTS, rather than causes, abortion.

    And no, birth control is not itself a form of abortion, like some people seem to think. Hormonal contraceptives prevent a woman from ovulating. No ovulation means no fertilization. No fertilization means no pregnancy. No pregnancy means no abortion.

  63. Christopher says:

    Just a few correctives.
    1) Posters keep on referring to unborn babies. Is that anything like the undead? Fact is fetus’ aren’t babies. Get your terms right.

    2) Since we declare that a human being is dead when their brain no longer functions wouldn’t it make logical sense to declare that life begins when the brain begins to function?

    4) Some posters may reply that life begins when a body is ensouled. Fine! Then you would need to:
    A) Prove that a soul exists.
    B) Prove that a body is ensouled at conception.

    See the problem with this idea of ensoulment at conception is that pregnancies exist in which a cell becomes two [becomes twins in other words] and then one cell absorbs the other. Does that mean that:
    a) The remaining cell now has two souls?
    b) The first cell is the only one that has a soul [then ensoulment doesn’t begin at conception – at least for the cell which existed for a short period and remained unensouled].
    c) We have no real idea when ensoulment takes place.

    Conclusion: The subject of abortion raises deep ethical and theological problems. Please don’t treat it like your opinion is the obviously correct one and all others are obviously wrong.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy