moonbattery logo

Aug 10 2017

Prof Presents Genocide as Moral Imperative

From a certain point of view, genocide is not only acceptable; it is a moral imperative. Mohammed Abed, a Palestinian professor of philosophy at California State University, Los Angeles, points out that genocide does not need to entail gas chambers and concentration camps. There are other ways to destroy a people. He considers the Civil War to be an example of good genocide. As quoted at Taki’s Magazine:

One can certainly concoct a hypothetical scenario in which the deliberate annihilation of a group’s way of life is a “moral and political imperative.” And there may be a case for classifying as genocide campaigns of social destruction that are widely considered to be not only excusable but morally required. The institution of slavery in the American South was, arguably, a comprehensive way of life and worldview to which many whites were profoundly attached. It would not be wildly implausible to say that their investment in the culture and norms of the slave-owning community rivaled in its social meaning and significance an individual’s affiliation with a national or religious group. But because the kidnapping, enslavement, and lifelong exploitation of innocent human beings was a constitutive and thus ineliminable feature of the life led by many Southern whites, annihilating their way of life was a moral imperative. The right course of action was to strip them of an identity that gave meaning to their lives.

Abed describes what has been known in some parts as the War of Northern Aggression as “a morally required genocide.”

It is a short jump from Abed to the current campaign to eradicate all trace of Southern history, as has been so graphically displayed for example in New Orleans.

It is also a short jump to the spectacle taking place in Europe, where the ruling class has been importing vast numbers of largely unassimilable Muslims from the Third World to displace the bizarrely acquiescent native population.

You don’t have to jump much farther to get to the systematic marginalization of heterosexual white males taking place in American society.

Arguably all are examples of genocide. All are no doubt considered morally imperative by leftists. Whether concentration camps come into it depends on whether the concentration camps are needed.

Not always necessary.

On tips from Friends of Abe and The LIEberal Media.

40 Responses to “Prof Presents Genocide as Moral Imperative”

  1. geeknerd says:

    “War of Northern Aggression”? That’s what Demo(n)crats called it. The Demo(n)cratic Party was the party of the slave trade, slavery itself, secession, civil war, anti-reconstruction, Jim Crow, segregation, and thanks to LBJ, the slavery of welfare, crime, and illegitimacy.

    I support the Black Republican Party [as the Demo(n)crats originally called it].

  2. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    Slavery had to go. Now that it has been eliminated as a legal practice, at least in the United States, let’s look elsewhere to where slavery is still practiced and push to force those cultures to give it up. Now where, or where, is slavery (or the equivalent under other names) still practiced? Are there any regions, dominated by a certain religion, that still practice slavery? Eh, Abed? What say you?

  3. Occam's Stubble says:

    A person of Arab descent should probably not be lecturing Europeans on slavery, glass houses and all….

  4. J- says:

    If he wants to go with that, I hope he won’t mind me suggesting that the world would be better off if the Palestinians were exterminated and all the land given to Israel.

  5. ICEvictim says:

    in which the deliberate annihilation of a group’s way of life is a “moral and political imperative.”

    okay, how about annihilation of pisslam? It is an anti civilization conquest cult with no socially redeeming values. Let’s start with the so-called “Palestinians”.

  6. Anonymous says:

    But it’s not “hate speech” when… Google’s probably offering him a job.

  7. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:

    Slavery ‘affecting every city’ in UK

    5 hours ago

    From the section UK Share this with Facebook Share this with Twitter Share this with Messenger Share this with Email Share

    Woman with her head in her handsImage copyrightSCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY

    Modern slavery and human trafficking in the UK is “far more prevalent than previously thought,” the National Crime Agency has said.

    The agency said there were more than 300 live policing operations currently, with cases affecting “every large town and city in the country”.

    The NCA said previous estimates there were 10,000-13,000 victims in the UK were the “tip of the iceberg”.

    “The more we look, the more we find,” its vulnerabilities director said.

    Will Kerr said he had been shocked with what he had seen during this year’s intensive efforts to break up gangs, with almost every major operation triggering even more investigations.

    He warned that trafficking into modern slavery was now so widespread that ordinary people would be unwittingly coming into contact with victims every day.

    The NCA said the growth in modern slavery was being driven by international gangs increasingly recognising the amount of money they could make by controlling people within a huge range of economic sectors, rather than just dealing drugs.

    It warned that the key sectors for slavery now included food processing, fishing, agriculture, construction, domestic and care workers and car washes.

    Mr Kerr said: “We have been shocked by the scale of what we have seen…

    “As you go about your normal daily life there is a growing and a good chance that you will come across a victim who has been exploited and that’s why we are asking the public to recognise their concerns and report them.”

    “The NCA said that signs of abuse included anything that suggested someone was being controlled or coerced into work – such as the manner of their dress, visible signs of injuries, signs of stress and the manner in which they had come to work in a particular area.”

  8. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:


    Slavery ‘affecting every city’ in UK

  9. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:

    Isn’t funny how the Genocide of European Christians is always for a “greater good” and is not only tolerated but promoted by “academics”? It’s as if the 100 Million Bolsheviks butchered alive was just to whet their bloodlust and provide a marker for where to go.

    When our genocide is so flippantly treated, i do believe it is time to so flippantly treat theirs.

  10. TED says:

    THIS IS what happens when the LEFT try to claim MORAL HIGH GROUND!!!

  11. KHarn says:

    Glad you brought that up. Get ready for a history lesson.
    Before 1860, there were many abolitionists and abolition societies in the south. They were disbanded because of New England’s VIOLENT tactics against slave holders and their REVOLUTION against the United States and the Constitution. This revolution culminated in “Bleeding Kansas”, that part begining when the REPUBLICAN PARTY lost the state election. They then declared the election invalid, held new elections where ONLY Republicans were allowed to vote and declared themselves the winner. After that, they set up a new state capital and declared war on anyone who disagreed.
    This was the time of the “Beecher’s Bibles” (Sharps carbines) and the horse thief “saint”, John Brown. Know why Brown raided Harper’s Ferry arsenal when there were several other arsenals between Kansas and Virginia? Letters held by Brown from his New England/Republican backers reveal that it was because his mob was going to TAKE OVER WASHINGTON DC. He was stopped by a platoon of U.S. Marines led by U.S. Army engineer, Col. Robert E. Lee and cavalry major J.E.B. Stewart who pretty much saved the yankee-lovig government.
    You’re welcome.

  12. KHarn says:

    The slavers should be killed.

  13. TED says:

    THEY put the GOO in GOOlag

  14. TED says:

    FORWARD over the EDGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  15. TED says:

    The SAME people praised this POS!!!

  16. Bodhisattva says:

    I’ve been pointing out how the liberals have a species death wish, probably an outward projection of their own self-hatred, for some time:

    – They advocate the murder of as many unborn humans as possible

    – They claim to be concerned about overpopulation, code for a call to engage in mass genocide to reduce the size of the human race

    – Their suggestions with regards to the fraud of human-driven climate change will result in countless deaths

    – They have not only allowed but encouraged two of the most dangerous, unstable nations on Earth to develop and field nuclear weapons along with the capability to accurately target a growing percentage of the Earth’s surface at will.

  17. Bodhisattva says:

    Is that George Costanza? Or just some dim dem pol who looks a lot like him? And where’s “Chuck You” Schumer and the others who belong in there? Nice balance, great diversity. Half of them are “people of color” and also half women. They can’t be upset at you for favoring one or the other.

  18. Anonymous says:

    Mohammed Abed
    3355 Wilshire Blvd #508, Los Angeles, CA 90010

  19. Torcer says:

    Questions leftist can’t answer:

    If Socialism is so wonderful, why does it have to be imposed at the point of a gun?


    If Socialism is so wonderful, why do Socialist nations have to keep people from leaving?

  20. octa bright says:

    The Grimke sisters of South Carolina had to flee the state for their safety because of their abolitionist views. In the late 1830’s mob attacks, beatings, arson attacks on property, and murder against abolitionists were common.1 The pro-slavery advocates were not peaceful.
    In Kansas the state constitutional convention met in Lecompton and was picked by an electorate of 2,000 out of a total electorate of 24,000 (the Free-Staters boycotted). There was an election for the state legislature which the Free-Staters won which met at Topeka. The Lecompton group drafted a constitution that guaranteed slavery and could be amended to outlaw slavery. Instead of an up or down vote as promised a choice between two pro-slavery constitutions was offered.2 This led to both sides forming militias, although recent research indicates that many of not most of the killings were the settling of preexisting feuds. BOTH sides were being supported by out of state forces.
    John Brown and his band were surrounded and trapped in the engine house at Harper’s Ferry. Col. Lee and Lt. Stuart did NOT prevent a march on Washington. What their gallantry did do was rescue the hostages. Brown’s purpose was to trigger a servile insurrection which was why he choose Harper’s Ferry.3
    you need to do some more research.
    Morrison, Samuel Elliot, The Oxford History of the American People.
    2. Holt, Michael F., The Political Crisis of the 1850’s
    3. Foner, Eric, Give Me Liberty: An American History

  21. octa bright says:

    Every group that does so has its justifications for genocide. Mao, Stalin, Hitler, the Young Turks in Armenia, Isis, the Taliban to name a few. There are equally “good” reasons to commit genocide against Islam. Prof. Abed would do well to consider that fact when he writes.

  22. Jester says:

    With a name like that I wonder why he didn’t include his peoples’ obvious all-time favorite form of genocide:

  23. NotablyWhite says:

    One can certainly concoct a hypothetical scenario in which the
    deliberate annihilation of a group’s way of life is a “moral and
    political imperative.”

    It is outrageous, the way that the racially disgruntled among us keep fanning the flames of hatred (a/k/a jealousy) and recommending genocide of the WHITE FOLKS as a “solution” to their discomfort with their own God-given skin color! Simply outrageous. And nothing they can ever do will make us “ashamed” or “apologetic” for our God-given WHITENESS!

  24. NotablyWhite says:

    HAH! “Priceless.”

  25. Otis Longear says:

    Because we’re living in the behavioral sink. The experiments with rats/mice where a population was contained with unlimited resources, once the population reached a certain number, the useless members (who weren’t required to expend any effort in order to survive) started de-volving with anti-social and destructive behavior. Reproduction came to a standstill,either by homosexual behavior or infertility. Nature always finds a way.

    All your marxists ideologies; feminism, environmentalism, etc etc are the result of humans having no purpose anymore. We are in the midst of civilizational suicide.

  26. Bodhisattva says:

    To some extent, yes, true. I would suggest that even those who go the wrong way have a purpose, they’re just too lazy to figure out what it is and they wind up picking stupid paths instead. Humans always kept their population in check with war when famine and disease didn’t do it – but now to a great extent we’ve eliminated major wars (or not, check what’s happening in North Korea and with China and Russia returning to states of belligerence) and at least for now we’ve conquered major diseases and famine.

  27. Bodhisattva says:

    She and many of her fellow Democrats (and a few Republicans) have already gone over the edge – they just don’t know it.

    The first time I glanced at this comic I didn’t notice the Pence sign for some reason. Now I get it.

  28. KHarn says:

    I could have written more, but it would fill several books. In fact, it has.
    What you wrote still does not change the fact that John Brown, the New England abolitionists and the Republicans were at war with the United States. The “civil war” was perpetuated to protect Lincoln’s political career (He would have been hated if he CSA was allowed to exist), the Republican party and import taxes that protected New England from foreign competition. All of these people and organizations would have been damned eternally if the union were not “preserved”. New England was NOT a political, social and industrial powerhouse until after the war and the south was in ruins. In fact, they could o longer rob the south of tax money to pay New England industries; instead, they used to money, resources and surplus looted from the south to build their industrial base.
    To Lincoln, “the union” was simply real estate and the power of the federal government. The mess we have now with the federal government having the final say in everything and violating our rights is because of the northern victory over the United States constitution.
    The war didn’t need to happen. While Lincoln was conspiring to send warships to South Carolina and Florida, Davis sent three people to negotiate a settlement on the two forts. In fact, they had instructions to offer to BUY them if all else failed. Lincoln would not allow anyone to talk to them.
    Over 620,000 American died in the war. It’s unknown how many died afterward from riots, starvation, poverty and other causes in the 150+ ye3ars of yankee domination. Remember that 150 + years when someone says how “stupid, inbred, violent, backwards, bigoted, etc. southerners are”. Remember when someone calls us “perpetual rebels and traitors” that not a single one of our leaders have ever been brought t trial, nor has anyone proven that secession is against any U.S. law.
    Also, remember that Saddam Husain cited Lincoln’s war on the CSA as “proof” that (Kuwaiti) secession was illegal. Others that followed Lincoln’s example were Gobechov, Stalin, Mao, Hitler and the Mexican Reconquista.
    I would not have to keep bringing this up if people would stop hating us.

  29. Otis Longear says:

    well, if you consider we are almost into the fourth turning, war is pretty much imminent.

  30. Bodhisattva says:

    You refer to the Strauss–Howe generational theory… Steve Bannon is a prominent proponent of the theory.

    But according to them, we already had the fourth turning. It began with the Wall Street Crash of 1929 and climaxed with the end of World War II.

  31. Otis Longear says:

    history is cyclical. Not linear. Each turning lasts 80-90 yrs. So we’re not quite in the middle of this present fourth turning if you figure that crisis stage started at the financial crash of 2007.

  32. octa bright says:

    Lincoln did not call for the raising of state militias until after Ruffin fired the first shot. Although the Constitution was ambiguous about the legality of secession it was not at all concerning insurrection.
    It should be noted that before the fighting at Fort Sumter there was a strong movement in the North to let the South peacefully secede. This ended when the fighting started.
    The Senators and Representatives of the seceding states (excluding Andrew Johnson) left Washington. Since the Republicans then had a clear majority in both houses of Congress they were the legal and duly constituted government of the United States therefore your claim that Lincoln was at war with the United States Is not correct.
    It is also significant that the primary war aim of the Federals was the preservation of the Union. The Proclamation of Emancipation was a war measure which left slavery unaffected in the Union slave states and the occupied states.
    It should be noted that before the war started both houses of Congress passed and three states ratified a Constitutional Amendment guaranteeing that slavery would be a state matter rather than a Federal matter. Lincoln supported it and therefore if the seceding states would have been willing to rejoin the Union it almost certainly would have ratified.
    Lincoln could not officially negotiate with the seceding state’s representatives because that would have granted them official recognition and invalidated his negotiating position from the start. It should also be noted that the seceding states had been seizing Federal arsenals and other installations which was illegal.
    The reason that no Confederate leaders other than Henry Wirz, commander at Andersonville (no, I don’t think that he should have been hanged since the Federal camp commanders allowed similar conditions with much less justification) was that Andrew Johnson was giving Presidential pardons wholesale while Congress was in recess. Since they had been granted and accepted pardons they could not be tried.
    John Brown was considered a dangerous madman in the North and with the exception of the hardest core of the Abolitionists was considered to be justly hanged.
    Other examples of the desire to reclaim lost territories include the Iberian Reconquista, Italia Irredentia, and the lost provinces of Alsace and Lorraine, none of which used Lincoln as a precedent.
    As far as federal power, to a large extent, blame Marbury vs Madison, which gave the Federal courts the power to review legislation.
    Finally, with the exception of a few troll and including myself the commentators on this blog do NOT despise or hate Southerners. For that you need to go to the leftwing blogs.

  33. Bodhisattva says:

    Indeed history is cyclical and we’re watching the next Pearl Harbor develop now – it will involve Iran, North Korea, or both and will be nuclear.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy