moonbattery logo

Mar 15 2012

Sandra Fluke’s Recreational Sex Partner

In case you’re wondering who is helping Sandra Fluke run up the allegedly unaffordable birth control bills she demands other people pay, there’s no need to wait for her amen corner in the “mainstream” media to look into it. The Graph has the answer:


The name is Adam Mutterperl, of the zillionaire moonbat Mutterperl clan. Some background:

The Mutterperl family, via Adam’s great grandfather Sol’s handbag fortune, established the “Mutterperl Scholarship Endowment Fund” in 1951 for Brandeis University. This school, as some people call it, is named for Louis Brandeis, a secular Jew, Zionist, and United States Supreme Court Justice appointed by Woodrow Wilson. Brandeis was a self-proclaimed socialist. Herbert Marcuse, the famous Frankfurt School Marxist, came to Brandeis in 1954, three years after the Mutterperl fund was created. Brandeis University is one of the nation’s leading petri dishes for anti-American and neo-Marxist thought.

It figures Adam would hit it off with Ms. Fluke. I wonder if she lets him call her “cutie pants”:

Just when I thought the Sandra Fluke spectacle could not possibly get any more pathetic.

On a tip from Ghost of FA Hayek.

40 Responses to “Sandra Fluke’s Recreational Sex Partner”

  1. innominatus says:

    Looks like he already has a green full-body condom. So what was she complaining about?

  2. Granny Jan says:

    Hold on now. What Adam Mutterperl became is typical of third generation Jewish immigrants who attend lefty schools and become indoctrinated.

    His grsndfasther, Sol Mutterperl, was a great businessman who was famous for cheap but stylish lesther pocketbooks. (That’s what we call them in Massachusetts.) The family gave generously to the Jewish community not to leftwing causes and giving to Brandeis would be de riguer for Jewish philanthropists.
    They were capitalists as were all the Jewish families I knew including my own.

    The most surprising thing about this story was that Sandra had a boyfriend at all.

  3. Granny Jan says:

    I was just talking about this with my husband and he reminded me that until late 1960s a lot of schools had quotas on the number of Jews they would accept including the Ivys. That’s why Brandeis was important to the Jewish community and wasn’t considered far left at the time. I always thought of it as the place for nerdy, quasi religious kids went. Not at all hip. Today it is lefty but what school isn’t?

  4. Sam says:

    I think he gets more dick than she.

  5. AC says:

    Somebody actually wants to have sex with Sandra Fluke?

    Can’t a zillionaire do better?

  6. TrickleUpPolitics says:

    He doesn’t look anatomically correct to me….how could he be servicing Ms. Fluck?

  7. NorthernX says:

    Yep. Just an average co-ed, right?

  8. Gunny G says:

    This guy can’t get any lighter in the loafers.

  9. Bob Roberts says:

    Absolutely underwhelming.

    Seriously, with all his money, all he’s lacking is any hint of talent.

  10. Bob Roberts says:

    Granny Jan says: March 15, 2012 at 4:22 pm

    The most surprising thing about this story was that Sandra had a boyfriend at all.
    Yeah for some reason I got the impression she was either gay or at best (worst?) bisexual.

    TrickleUpPolitics says: March 15, 2012 at 5:25 pm
    He doesn’t look anatomically correct to me…
    Is that a crayola in his “cutie pants” or is the fact another guy just put his arm around him turning him on?

  11. Zorro says:

    Libtards (rich and poor) want others to pay for their indulgences. QOTD: Adam, is Sandra, Bruce or Eve on your playdates?

  12. Hail The Amberlamps! says:

    Eternal childhood, a hallmark of liberalism. The goal is to infantilize enough Americans so they adopt the state as parent.

    Then it’s Lord of The Flies time.

  13. IslandLifer says:

    A rich superhero costume wearing gold digging whore thumper? Now that you silly faggot is comedy production. Mission accomplished!

  14. Dave H. says:

    I know who wears the strap-on in that relationship.

  15. AC says:

    I noticed that page on “Weimar culture” has not one mention of inflation, just as would be expected when dealing with currency-debauching Marxists.

  16. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Now where have I seen this happy couple before ?

  17. Duke says:

    When first I heard of Ms. Fluke I was opposed to paying any part of her contraception to enable her to have indiscriminate sex with people to whom she was not married. After seeing this waste of human flesh in the video he produced I’d like Ms. Fluke’s mailing address so I can send her my credit card number.

    These people should NOT reproduce.

  18. joe5348 says:

    That Graph post is anti-semitism, pure and simple. It does not take a hyper sensitive Jew to recognize it. That no conservative has denounced it tells you that conservatives don’t care who they associate with, just so long as there is an anti-Obama theme somewhere. And it is not just me that sees this If you can’t see it, I suggest a course in sensitivity.

  19. Beforethestorm says:

    It’s a shame they didn’t use a little of those millions to change their name.

  20. SNuss says:

    Justice Brandeis did have some comments appropriate to our current situation:

    “The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in the insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding”.

    “Experience teaches us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government’s purposes are beneficent.”
    Louis D. Brandeis

  21. CT says:

    Egads!!! After seeing that lime green encased “man” I am fairly certain I need eye bleach. Is that what passes for young virulent male of the species these days? Do you really think it could reproduce?

  22. Bob Roberts says:

    NOTE: Strangely silent, lao simply cannot think of anything to say about this.

    Or does he:

    joe5348 says: March 15, 2012 at 7:30 pm

    Sorry, joe5348. Anti-semitism is the forte of the occupy crowd and the left. And I suspect you’re “one of them” based on your post perhaps, unless you’re kidding.

    Yes, unless you were just being facetious, you can take your “course in sensitivity” and cram it you know where.

    The fact this loser is a Jew is irrelevant and immaterial to the broader story – in fact, if you re-read the post above, you won’t find any mention he was a Jew. There’s a mention of Louis Brandeis, a secular Jew, but no mention that he’s Jewish. Now that YOU mentioned it I can see from the names that you’re likely correct – but in fact until YOU mentioned it I hadn’t really given his religion or ethnic background, any thought. It doesn’t matter to the story.

    More important, he’s one of the mythical “1%”.

    THAT matters.

  23. Bob Roberts says:

    (continued from above)

    And the Graph post is not anti-SEMETIC, it’s anti-SOCIALIST.

    It doesn’t speak ill of JEWS, it speaks ill of SOCIALISTS who happen to be Jews.

  24. Bob Roberts says:

    er, SEMITIC… finger fumble. SHHH – it happens!

  25. Granny Jan says:

    @joe5348 I cringed when I read the story on The Graph and some of the anti-semitic comments on it which might have been deleted by now. I’m Jewish but try not to find anti-semitism under every rock. I don’t know anything about The Graph. I know they are wrong about implying motives to people who gave money to Brandeis and said so here.

  26. Nancy Pelois says:

    The most surprising thing about this story was that Sandra had a boyfriend at all.

    Are you saying she is too stupid to operate a dildo?

  27. TED says:

    S.L.U.T. Socialist Lecturing U.S. Taxpayers.

  28. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Granny Jan
    When you go down this list, what comes to mind ?
    An attack on the Jewish faith ?
    Or concern that the faith you hold close to your heart is being transformed into something like this ?
    And on the subject of Catholics, even some higher ups are starting to understand Obama’s motives
    They (in my opinion) hope this divide and conquer strategy will result in the same outcome as in the Jewish community, where some who are more faithful to the Democrat party than to the general idea of freedom of religion called off the struggle for religious liberty on a “technicality”

    I guess I fail to see the “anti Semitism” in calling out a particular group, or organization of Jewish people as leftist, or Socialist.
    Comments such as “all Jews are ______” would be entirely different

  29. TrickleUpPolitics says:

    Make sure you pronounce her name correctly: Fluke rhymes with F**K (seriously)

  30. whotothewhat says:

    And we all know who wears the strapon in that relationship.

  31. TerrorPalooza says:

    This guy will never succeed as a producer of comedy material. His own video is as unfunny as it gets. In fact, it’s annoying.

  32. dan says:

    buy her the condoms lest she reproduce…..

  33. Zilla says:

    Looks like he’s got a camel-toe on his mangina. WTF is he wearing?

  34. Westie says:

    Has this Mutterperl nuggat made its way into the M.F.Media?

  35. true democrat says:

    just wanted to make sure my comment would be posted, anyways here it goes. I’ve changed my mind , we cannot allow these two to procreate, I’ll give to have both neutered, will anyone join me ? .

  36. mega says:

    Brandeis is wronged and slandered in the article. My sister went there; it was basically Ivy League for Jews since Jews were largely kept out through strict quotas at the real Ivys. Brandeis was not a politically-leaning institution for many years. Now, it is hard-left, but only insofar as all elite universities are hard-left.

  37. WTSherman1864 says:

    You have got to be kidding! ….Is something I don’t say so often these days….

    You have got to be kidding and I wish you were!

  38. Jodie says:

    I’m still confused about his body. Does he have a hernia?

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy