moonbattery logo

Feb 17 2012

US Soldiers Forced to Wear Fake Breasts and Empathy Bellies

The ultra-progressive community organizer Barack Hussein Obama, a.k.a. “Bathhouse Barry,” has been made Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces. What did you expect if not more of this?

The Army is ordering its hardened combat veterans to wear fake breasts and empathy bellies so they can better understand how pregnant soldiers feel during physical training.

This week, 14 noncommissioned officers at Camp Zama [in Japan] took turns wearing the “pregnancy simulators” as they stretched, twisted and exercised during a three-day class that teaches them to serve as fitness instructors for pregnant soldiers and new mothers.

Army enlisted leaders all over the world are being ordered to take the Pregnancy Postpartum Physical Training Exercise Leaders Course, or PPPT, according to U.S. Army Medical Activity Japan health promotion educator Jana York. …

NCOs learn special exercises for pregnant women, who shouldn’t push themselves too hard…

Not pushing yourself too hard is very important in a military that is being forced to degenerate into a social engineering project intended not to win wars but to help liberals feel smug about what kooks they are.

This is your Army on moonbattery.

On tips from Chris and Byron.

42 Responses to “US Soldiers Forced to Wear Fake Breasts and Empathy Bellies”

  1. Steve says:

    Are you fricking kidding me? It looks like some of these guys don’t need the padding…or are too slow to keep up…Geeeesh

  2. FrankW says:

    At the risk of being called insensitive, WTF is the deal?
    If they are pregnant and cannot do PT (as required by their specialty/rank) they should be either discharged or put on disability. Treat them the same as soldiers with injuries and give them X months to either rehab (give birth) or be medically discharged.

  3. Drury says:

    This former soldier and Army veteran (5th Infantry Division, Ft. Polk) is saddened to see this feminazification of our armed services. Glad I am no longer in. Pregnant women do not belong in the armed services. Period. Don’t mind women in non-combat (support) roles, but pregnancy should be grounds for discharge (medical/honorable).

    By becoming a day care service for women who find it a necessity to bear children while wearing a military uniform, we are now catering to the lowest common denominator…

    Another rotation in the swirling mass of detritus heading down the toilet. My country is disappearing before my eyes.


  4. IslandLifer says:

    Welcome to the sad twisted Obama military. Soon all male soldiers will be required to wear makeup to better understand the life of a female soldier.

  5. Kek says:

    I was in the Air Force and they made me wear the same damn thing when my daughter was born 13 years ago. There are a ton of social experimenters lurking around the military.

  6. Joe says:

    I have no words.

  7. Are they kidding us…This sucks

  8. Spider says:

    Diversity destroys every organization it is incerted into. Our military will be no different. But here’s the realy scary part. What percentage of the American people do you think even care?

  9. Jay B. says:

    Disgusting, repulsive and ridiculous.

  10. Val says:

    FrankW says:
    February 17, 2012 at 1:26 pm

    At the risk of being called insensitive, WTF is the deal?
    If they are pregnant and cannot do PT (as required by their specialty/rank) they should be either discharged or put on disability. Treat them the same as soldiers with injuries and give them X months to either rehab (give birth) or be medically discharged.

    I agree with you! That’s ridiculous! They are not forced to serve, are they? That’s one of the reasons I don’t agree with the thought the women can do the same job men! We can’t.

  11. Jimbo says:

    I wonder if they were also made to wear a Tampax like the one Comrade Obama wears?

  12. […] From Dave Blount: ’Being forced to degenerate into a social engineering project intended not to win wars but to help liberals feel smug about what kooks they are.’ […]

  13. […] Via Moon Battery Share this:EmailFacebookPrintTwitterStumbleUponRedditDiggLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. Categories: Uncategorized Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback […]

  14. Lazlo says:

    Aside from the obvious, is this frolicking around shit what passes for PT nowadays.

  15. Sam Adams says:

    Drury is correct; pregnant women have no business trying to act as soldiers. If they can’t pull their weight (literally) then they should be doing something other than attepting to act like a soldier.

    It is clear to me that Obama is taking a multifacited approach to destroying the effectiveness of our fighting forces. I pity those who are forced to serve under these conditions.

  16. James McEnanly says:

    Mark Steyn said that post WWII history in much of the Western world seemed to be an attempt to re-enact Monty Python’s Lumberjack song I don’t think that any of the group could have foreseen this.

  17. Mary says:

    Why are good men allowing this to happen?

  18. Thomas says:

    Remember this ridiculous non-army when you vote in November! What a disgrace to the exalted history of the United States armed forces!
    What? You don’t bother voting?
    Better think twice on that, and help get rid of this bum, who is turning our beloved free republic into a Socialist State!
    The Founders must be spinning in their graves!

  19. bobdog says:

    WTF? Why don’t they make them wear pantyhose and pink pumps while they’re at it?

  20. Hedgehog says:

    This is sick. I’ll bet that there is not a one of them who could do fifty pushups and a hundred sit ups. I can. And I’m a lot older than these jackasses. Fat ass line dancing pansies are not going to defend this country. Disgraceful!

  21. NorthernX says:

    I’m not a soldier, I’m just a regular dude, so I guess I can’t ever look forward to knowing what it’s like to have a swollen womb, or to haul around a rack o’tits all day. Boo hoo…

  22. Airborne Ranger 66 says:

    Don’t kid yourselves, these warriors are looking at an angle to get more nookie. Single pregnant soldiers are looking for sex, who better than a combat vet to take care of the needs. Sign me up!

  23. EL_incr says:

    Great article! It totally relieved my constipation! I just wish I had time to pull my pants down first. Last one out of America, shut off the lights.

  24. Bob Roberts says:

    While in the military, I saw some who had medical problems which caused them to gain weight.

    Nobody showed any empathy to them. Quite the opposite. They were ridiculed, degraded (which, I’m sure, exacerbated their weight control issues) and some where thrown out of the military rather than offered treatment and assistance.

  25. Hail The Amberlamps! says:

    I’m out of disgust, it is exhausted.

  26. Chris says:

    Any soldier that would go along with this insanity probably would do worse on behalf of Comrade Obama…

  27. ummahgummah says:


    moslems serving in our Military try fragging our Troops. LIEberals have finally found a more insidious way to render them ineffective:

    It’s called FAGGING.

    The entire things is too disgusting for words! What’s next, period and PMS simulations?




  28. ummahgummah says:


    Maybe they could use these outfits to spook the Taliban..


  29. Canis lupus says:

    These policies are put in place not as a way to “educate” our male soldiers, but only to emasculate and humiliate them. They are created by female man hating policy makers who have an ax to grind with men. Anyone who resists this stupid policy is branded a sexist and insensitive. Those men should not have to endure that.
    Why not make the female soldiers wear a rubber penis and testicles under her shorts while PTing, so they can understand how it feels? No? Thats what I figured.

  30. Jodie says:

    The next step will likely be for the soldiers to experience what physical training is like when they have a penis up their rear – so they can understand the challenges faced by their fellow gay soldiers.

  31. John Lozinski says:

    Generals should be 35 to 45 years old and still have testosterone. NO women should be in the military unless they can really fight or shoot! Men and woman should not have to tolerate FAGs in uniform. Promotions to E7 and above should be in 4 years like the best in the 1950’s were promoted. Colonels should be decked on occasion by senior NCO’s this is the army not some group orgy! This should be only a 1 grade bust and the Colonel should go up in front of a board to review why he got hit! If for good cause he should also be punished!
    Phluck worrying about spit and polish brains are more important. I retired long ago//////////

  32. Randall says:

    Blessed retirement. And they STILL wonder why young Soldiers don’t reenlist. All three of my kids served/are still serving (All three are combat vets as well.) and you can’t imagine how disgusted they are.

  33. LarryG says:

    This country has turned into an insane asylum.

  34. Bloodless Coup says:

    Why don’t they have them shove a few tampons up their rectums while they are at it?

    Don’t they need to experience that first hand too?

  35. Antisocialist says:

    Well when the war comes you know these clowns will be defeated by the people.

    Secularization at it’s finest, aren’t you happy your nation is turning atheist? More of this crap will come from your atheist leaders, atheists are all insane, all of them even though some of they might seem normal at first glance but when you understand they actually believes they’re Goo that burped from an explosion out of nothing. Nothing exploding is still nothing you atheist tards, you deranged satanist pos.

  36. oldguy says:

    Generals are not promoted from the ranks: They are appointed by the presidents. This is why this is happening.

  37. Sweep the leg says:

    Any doubts that IF the people do wake up, these tards won’t go all out against them?

    Nighty night, merica…

  38. FrankW says:

    For what it is worth there are two types of Flag officers. REMF’s and warriors. REMF’s tend to be politically correct and follow some other REMF up the chain. Warriors tend to be of upper middle rank (Colonel or Captain) until a conflict arises and then are promoted to higher command and then are dumped at first convenience. I had the privilege once of being associated with a warrior Admiral (he had enlisted at the end of WWII and was commissioned during Korea). This guy had the BTDT (been there, done that) t shirt and bumper sticker. Politically correct was not even in his vocabulary. And he was dumped immediately following Desert Storm.

  39. Dwayne Chandler says:

    Yup, that’s right, the majority of NCO’s in the video(modern US Army) are overweight and out of shape; performing mangina mechanics, barely moving and out of breath.

    FYI: Upon confirmation of pregnancy
    Soldier is exempt from:
    Unit’s regular physical training program
    Physical Fitness Testing
    Wearing of load-bearing equipment (including web belt); per US Army AR 40-501.

    Once a female soldier is confirmed to be pregnant, she no longer conducts regular Army PT. Without question, this voids the supposed reason for initiating this bullshit.
    Here what really burns me up: At least 50% of new female soldiers, at any post, are regularly becoming pregnant; 18-23, straight out of AIT and barely a minute in the Army.
    I see it constantly, they come into the aid station for sick call, complaining of nausea, vomiting and “not feeling good.”
    Worse yet, they come in looking and feeling like a case study straight out of the morning sickness playbook, but pretend they have no idea they are/could be pregnant.
    However, we have to play along PC and not insinuate anything, by pretending to have no idea what could possibly make them a nauseated puking maching overnight.
    From there it’s give them a cup to piss in, conduct a pregnancy test, confirm a positive bun in the oven reading and pass it on to whichever doc covers her unit.
    After that, the Army welfare state takes over, by now giving that female soldier, with less than a year in service, E-1 thru E-3 private, single and maybe knowing for certain who the barracks daddy is a first class ticket to subsidy heaven.

    Some examples: The Single Pregnant Soldier
    This soldier merits additional attention because all the issues of pregnant soldiers are magnified. The typical profile of this soldier is a young (under 25), junior (E4 or below) barracks dweller. By default, her chain of command often becomes her support network as she progresses through her pregnancy.

    Pregnant soldiers who are barracks dwellers are authorized to remain in the barracks until the seventh month of pregnancy. At that time they are entitled to BAQ and BAS in order to establish a home. “Now that brand new female soldier has the Army subsidizing a home or apartment for them, instead of living in the barracks, where a new junior soldier belongs.”

    Women, Infants, and ChildrenProgram (WIC)

    DD Form 2558: Allotment to provide for care of the children during parents’ absence.

    It’s a beautiful thing, the defense of our Constitutional Republic is entrusted to this DeGeneres/Feminazi/mangina/PC/enlightend liberal progressive buttfuck.
    Reap it America, reap it!

  40. Erich Shum says:

    my husband was requiring DD 2558 several days ago and learned about an online service that has a searchable database . If others are requiring DD 2558 also , here’s a chaNGE allOTMENT

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy