To be a good moonbat is to master doublethink, because progressive ideology requires you to hold beliefs that you know are false, or that oppose each other. As an example of the latter, Nazis have been exploited by the Left for demonization purposes ever since Hitler turned on Stalin. Everything about Nazis is bad. Conversely, everything about socialism is good. Throw in the fact that Nazi is short for “National Socialist German Workers’ Party” and this does not compute.

This young socialist just got owned:

The lesson for moonbats: always react to the word “national” with sputtering hostility. Hatred of all things national must come before love of all things socialist.

On a tip from Lyle.

Moonbat culture reached its apotheosis in Midtown Loft in New York City last Wednesday. They called the event Butt-Con.

The New York Post reports that Butt-Con was…

…branded as “A Holey Experience for the Like-Behinded,” which included a belfie station made in the image of Sir Mix-A-Lot’s “Baby Got Back” music video set.

A “belfie” is a selfie taken to a tasteless new extreme of malignant narcissism, described by Urban Dictionary as a “photographic self-portrait featuring the buttocks, usually posted by female celebrities on social media networks.”

Butt-Con festivities included twerking classes by a drag queen duo. At least Butt-Con was a more appropriate venue than story hour at the local library.

“Butts are the new faces,” says Dr. Rita Linkner, a dermatologist that specializes in glute skin. “People are Facetuning their backside,” she says.

Participants were invited to visit the “A** Kissing Booth,” featuring a woman dressed as a giant behind. Participants milled around in t-shirts that read “Ask Me About My Butthole.”

Unsurprisingly, HuffPost loved it. WARNING — moonbat culture is not suitable for children or the easily disgusted:

As you can see, American culture is plunging toward a dystopia of unmitigated moonbattery.

If you regret missing out on Butt-Con, try Milwaukee next July.

On a tip from Adam.

Never ask whether the Democrat Party could possibly get any worse. Moonbats take it as a challenge — one that they are always up for. Some might argue that no one could be worse than, for example, Adam Schiff. Wrong. In the primaries, he will face a transvestite running under the name Maebe A. Girl.

From People, which is a suitable place to read about the cheesy circus American politics has become:

[He] makes campaign appearances in lace-front wigs, brightly colored pantsuits and high heels, greeting voters under a tongue-in-cheek name, but make no mistake: Maebe A. Girl’s bid for Congress isn’t a joke.

Or at least, it isn’t any more of a joke than the rest of his party.

Mr Girl explains why he will conduct his campaign in women’s clothes:

“I have a more powerful voice when I’m in drag.”

Schiff’s district includes places like West Hollywood. Even a bug-eyed moonbat may not be freakish enough to represent his constituency.

Mr Girl has already won an election, placing him on the Silver Lake Neighborhood Council in Los Angeles, where he serves in the same clothes that he wears during public drag queen performances.

Sarah Cowgill gives a few reasons to think that Maebe A. Girl could win Schiff’s congressional seat:

• Joseph Crowley (D-NY) who [no] one remembers since the media’s overselling of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (D-NY) unprecedented win.
• Remember Rep. Mike Capuano (D-MA)? Yeah, well he was the 10-term incumbent in a high-profile Democratic primary and soundly beaten by political newbie and radical left Ayanna Pressley now holding court in John F. Kennedy’s former district.
• Oh, and then there is the community activist who hopped to the US Senate and then the presidency forcing a political dynasty to sit out the 2008 presidential race. Yes, Barack Obama smashed Hillary Clinton’s hopes the first time around.

As for the other two members of the Squad,

[Maebe A. Girl] may just beat [Schiff] if the increasing popularity of other America haters – Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) — is any indication. On Girl’s Facebook page [he] writes: “America disgusts me,” while calling the for the abolishment of Immigration Customs Enforcement.

In contrast, Schiff has cast votes that could be construed as pro-American, dooming him as a Democrat if the party’s current trajectory continues.

In tune with the Democrats’ progressive base, Maebe A. Girl says there are already too many white men in Congress. He is a white man himself — but not to Democrat voters. According to their religion, if a man says he is a woman, he literally is a woman. This moonbat answer to transubstantiation offers a way forward for white men in a party increasingly devoted to demonizing and marginalizing white men. White male Democrats like Schiff may soon face a choice between switching genders and switching parties.

On a tip from R F.

The reality of today’s leftists is so close to a cartoon spoof that real audio from the recent Democratic Socialist Convention in Atlanta has been successfully grafted onto scenes from South Park:

This is the moonbat cult that produced the Future of the Democratic Party.

On a tip from Troy H.

Antiracism is fundamentally racist. No matter how obvious this is, you are never supposed to admit it. This poses a problem for the designers of artificial intelligence intended to sniff out racists. Machines only understand what you specifically tell them. They don’t speak the phony language of lies used to prop up political correctness.

From Campus Reform:

A new Cornell University study reveals that some artificial intelligence systems created by universities to identify “prejudice” and “hate speech” online might be racially biased themselves and that their implementation could backfire, leading to the over-policing of minority voices online.

The systems are racially biased against favored minorities because they are not racially biased against whites. This lack of racial bias causes them to notice that blacks are more racist than whites are — which is a racist observation.

A new study out of Cornell reveals that the machine learning practices behind AI, which are designed to flag offensive online content, may actually “discriminate against the groups who are often the targets of the abuse we are trying to detect,” according to the study abstract. …

“The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates. If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will, therefore, have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users,” the abstract continues.

Anything that has a disproportionate impact on sacred blacks is racist — including acknowledging that blacks tend to be racist, which is why they tend to side with their own even in outrageous cases like the O.J. verdict, and why they vote as a homogenous borg.

So the researchers attribute their findings to human error in the programming. They denounce the presumably liberal programmers for “internal biases”; the unthinkable alternative would be to admit that the ideology they share with these programmers is a crock of crap.

Several universities have been working on systems that will automatically identify politically incorrect thoughts, as well as “fake news” — i.e., information that has not been approved by authorities. For example, social engineers at University of California, Santa Barbara are working on a system that will determine whether information shared between users is to be designated as “genuine” (politically correct) or “misleading” (politically incorrect). The idea is to integrate their software “into browsers on the client side” so as to target “content that causes hate, aversion, and prejudice.”

They had better tweak their code to allow hate, aversion, and prejudice from persons of politically preferred pigmentation, or they will find themselves denounced for being racist.

On a tip from R F. Hat tip: Brass Pills.

Now where would Kenyan colonist Yak Dut get the idea that being black gives him a license to violate the law? Maybe he has been keeping up with events in New York City, where the latest fad among communities of color is to publicly douse police officers with buckets of water before jeering crowds.

The New York Post describes what happens when police attempt to arrest someone for pouring water on them:

Disturbing cellphone video shows an ex-con wanted in a water-bucket attack on NYPD cops boldly challenging the detectives who tracked him down in The Bronx — then bolting when they try to place him under arrest.

The arrogant hoodlum is one Keith Ford, who was on parole for attempted robbery.

When Ford — who’s 6 feet 5 and 255 pounds — shakes off one cop, a struggle ensues and the cops wind up facing off against Ford as he stands with his back to an iron fence.

The cops could have overpowered him — but they didn’t dare. Here’s why:

The brazen display of contempt for the NYPD emerged Tuesday, one day after Police Commissioner James O’Neill fired Officer Daniel Pantaleo over the fatal arrest of Eric Garner in 2014.

Pantaleo was cleared of intentionally choking Garner. Nonetheless, when a black law-breaker dies, the white cop is always in the wrong, according to the liberals in charge.

What if the cops used force against Ford and he got a bloody nose or something? It would be recorded on someone’s Obama phone, the media would run with it, and O’Neill would serve up their heads on a platter on orders from the commie cockroach that currently passes for a mayor, Bill de Blasio.

They tried to tase him when he ran away…

…but Ford appears to yank the barb from his clothing as he leads the cops on a chase down the block and around a corner, with shouting onlookers encouraging him to escape.

Those responsible for upholding law and order know what side “the community” is on; it’s the same side that de Blasio and most of the media are on.

The head of the NYPD Detectives’ Endowment Association [Michael Palladino] said the Thursday incident showed “how emboldened criminals have become, thanks to the rhetoric of our phony [i.e., left-wing] politicians.”

Civilized people are advised to leave New York before the situation deteriorates any further.

Watch the video here. Ford is apprehended in the end, but he’ll be loose soon and he knows it.

On a tip from Varla.

When people earn their money, they can spend it as they please. True, it can be irritating when the ultrarich rub their massive wealth in everyone’s face with showy extravagance. But we have no right to complain, because the wealth they created benefits us too. Carnegie gave us steel, Ford gave us cars, Rockefeller gave us oil, Gates gave us software.

Then there are those who did not create any wealth, but end up outlandishly rich anyway. Other than 8 years of bitter division and national degradation, what did Barack Obama ever give us? Yet we read this:

Barack and Michelle Obama are close to buying a massive Martha’s Vineyard estate.

Martha’s Vineyard is the premier Northeast playground of the liberal rich and powerful.

TMZ reports that the former president and first lady are in escrow — aka in contract to purchase — a 29-acre beachfront plot with a 6,892-square-foot main house.

This palace was most recently on the market for $14.85 million. It is doubtful it would serve as a primary residence, considering that he just bought an expensive mansion in the District of Corruption 2 years ago. The Martha’s Vineyard estate will probably serve as a part-time summer home.

Obama acquired his vast fortune through politics. His career was characterized by inflating the size and greed of the government while spewing Marxist rhetoric like this:

At a certain point, we have all we need and politicians like Obama are entitled to confiscate the rest. But too much is never enough for Obama himself.

Obama largely owes his political success to being part African. Meanwhile, according to the ideology he personifies, we must believe that blacks are inherently oppressed, and we are expected to hate ourselves and our country over it.

Are there really people with stomachs strong enough to digest all this?

On tips from Varla, Stormfax, KirklesWorth, and Dragon’s Lair.

At least in 1984, party apparatchiks streamlined the language. Recent revisions to the Newspeak Dictionary by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors are anything but streamlined. But then, Shakespeare did say that “brevity is the soul of wit” — and as we know, moonbattery is the soul of witlessness.

The San Francisco Comical describes the new “person first” language guidelines adopted by the board:

Going forward, what was once called a convicted felon or an offender released from jail will be a “formerly incarcerated person,” or a “justice-involved” person or simply a “returning resident.”

A parolee or someone on criminal probation will be referred to as a “person under supervision.”

A juvenile “delinquent” will become a “young person with justice system involvement,” or a “young person impacted by the juvenile justice system.”

And drug addicts or substance abusers will become “a person with a history of substance use.”

The idea is to destigmatize criminals, so that they will not be “forever labeled.”

According to the board’s language resolution, words that acknowledge the criminality of criminals “only serve to obstruct and separate people from society and make the institutionalization of racism and supremacy appear normal.”

At the current rate of deterioration into sheer lunacy, it won’t be long before “felon” goes from “returning resident” to “angelic victim of racist injustice.”

In their resolution, the Supervisors go on to lament that

“Inaccurate information, unfounded assumptions, generalizations and other negative predispositions associated with justice-involved individuals create societal stigmas, attitudinal barriers and continued negative stereotypes.”

Social engineers must be delighted that medical technology may provide a cure for people who have negative stereotypes of criminals.

What language to use for the victims of criminals? Applying the new terminology, here’s how you could refer to someone whose car was stolen by a paroled junky:

“A person who has come in contact with a returning resident who was involved with the justice system and who is currently under supervision with a history of substance use.”

On tips from Chuck A, Jack Bauer, KirklesWorth, and Pierre.

To get an idea of what countermoonbats are up against, consider the Young Turks. For a brief summary, Wikipedia will do:

The Young Turks (TYT) is a progressive left-wing American news and commentary program on YouTube. It serves as the flagship program of the TYT Network, a multi-channel network of associated web series focusing on news and current events. The program was created by Cenk Uygur, Ben Mankiewicz, and Dave Koller.

Cenk Uygur crosses the line from a barking to a rabid moonbat. Ben Mankiewicz is also a prominent host on Turner Classic Movies, which gives an idea of the kind of people who control our cinematic cultural heritage. Dave Koller is a childhood friend of Ben Monkeybusiness.

Fill-in hosts and recurring guests include Uygur’s nephew Hasan Piker. If you don’t mind a little obscenity, let’s hear what Piker has to say about the horrific Muslim terror attacks of 9/11:

“America deserved 9/11.” We can expect an increasing number of progressives to publicly admit that they feel this way and have all along.

In terms of obscenity, it gets worse. Here’s what Piker has to say about Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-TX), who lost an eye fighting Islamic terrorists. Warning — Piker is really sick:

Transcript via Twitchy:

“What the f***? What the f*** is wrong with this dude? Didn’t he go to war and like literally lose his eye because some Mujahideen — a brave f***ing soldier — f***ed his eyehole, with their d*ck? Isn’t that how he lost his f***king dumba** eye? Cause he got his fucking eyehole f***ed? By a brave soldier?”

To say that Piker sides with Islam against America would be putting it mildly.

These are not people you reason with. They are more like something you would scrape off your shoe.

The “oppressed” are obviously privileged in the extreme — but maybe not as privileged as some have come to believe. An African thinks he has free reign to assault Australian Policewomen:

Yak Dut was pursued by the female police officers when they saw him driving a Volkswagen with a missing wheel in February last year in Mill Park, near Melbourne.

The then 21-year-old stopped outside his house in South Morang and assaulted the officers so violently they were rushed to hospital.

One of the officers suffered ligament damage in her neck. Both endured trauma.

Following his arrest, he threatened to hunt the women down and kill them with their own guns, reported the Herald Sun.

This has understandably caused the officers continuing anxiety.

Dut has been in custody for a year and four months, but is confident he’ll be free to walk to streets again because he’s Kenyan-born with dark skin.

‘I will get away with anything because I’m black. I will play the race card,’ he told police.

The race card can accomplish some amazing magic, but even given Australia’s advanced stage of moonbattery, it is hard to believe that Dut will walk free after his sentencing, which is scheduled for tomorrow.

Even so, political correctness has convinced innumerable low-IQ sociopaths of color that they can get away with anything. The result of this perception is escalating violent chaos.

On a tip from ABC of the ANC.