Martin Luther King is best remembered for saying that people should be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. Yet he is posthumously exploited to represent an ideology that takes a diametrically opposite stance by subjecting whites to unrelenting (self-)hatred.
This noxious ideology has strayed so far from respecting character that we see a presidential candidate of conspicuously low character calling for genocide by displacement. If a Japanese politician declared that Japanese people should be made a minority in Japan, his career would be over. Yet among Democrats, Joe Biden is regarded as a moderate.
Mark Dice demonstrates how pervasive liberal racism is getting:
Brandon Tatum lays total waste to the concept of “white privilege.” Unfortunately, despite the title of the video, he does not explain how to make it go away:
True enough, the concept of white privilege is BS. It does not benefit blacks, but rather encourages them to wallow in a victim mentality that results in underachievement. However, so long as Cultural Marxists can use this bogus notion to tear the country apart, it isn’t going anywhere.
In case anyone does not understand that Elizabeth Warren would be a lousy choice for president, she drives the point home herself by asking,
“How could the American people want someone who lies to them?”
Maybe she is running out of gas and is ready to step aside so that Bernie can monopolize the Marxist-Leninist vote. Not even a wealthy Democrat elitist could be so out of touch as not to realize that we have noticed her constant lying. Does she not know that people sniggeringly call her Lie-awatha due to the preposterous falsehood that she is an Indian, which she used to advance her career?
It is by now well established that Elizabeth Warren is a serial liar. She lied about her parents having to elope because of racism against her mother, who was white. She lied about being the first nursing mother to take the bar exam in New Jersey (which doesn’t keep such records). She lied about being a “single mom” when she met her second and present husband (she was still married, and had not yet filed for divorce). She lied about the death of Michael Brown, which was not a murder. Only recently, after more than 30 years, has she stopped lying about being a Cherokee and a woman of color. …
Warren has been telling a story about how a boss supposedly fired her from a teaching gig after discerning at a glance that she was pregnant. Her own previous telling was otherwise: She walked away from that job.
She also lied about her children attending public school and about her father being a janitor.
A compulsive liar like Elizabeth Warren never stops to ask herself how easy it will be for others to debunk what she is saying. A recent example:
On Friday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) claimed to be “the only one running for president [who has] actually been on the executive side.” This is clearly false given that former Vice President Joe Biden (D-DE) was . . . well, vice president. Not to mention that Michael Bloomberg (D-NY), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), and Pete Buttigieg (D-IN) are all former mayors.
Also not to mention that Donald Trump has the ultimate executive experience of having served as President of the USA. Warren is actually the only major candidate who does not have executive experience, even counting Amy Klobuchar.
Warren’s lies are brazen and incessant. “How could the American people want someone who lies to them?” is the punchline to the tasteless joke that is her candidacy.
“How could the American people want someone who lies to them?” @ewarren says after I asked if it’s disqualifying for a presidential candidate to lie to the American people about anything pic.twitter.com/b4AxH5Bq1m
If you want to deny objective reality, government is glad to help out by providing bogus documentation — so long as the pretense advances liberal social engineering objectives.
A law that allows people to change their birth certificate to reflect their gender identity without a court order, surgery, or a doctor’s note, just took effect in Colorado on Jan. 1.
Gov. Jared Polis, Colorado’s first openly gay governor, signed the bill into law in May. The law allows transgender and nonbinary residents of Colorado to change their name on their birth certificate to reflect their new gender identity. They can also revise their gender to “M,” “F,” or, my personal favorite, “X.”
Reality is officially under siege. If it advances the agenda, they will soon allow us to change our parents and place of birth too.
Big Government propping up their grotesque delusions will not help the sexually insane to get the help they need. But this isn’t about helping lunatics; it’s about exploiting them.
The bill is named Jude’s Law, after a transgender student who started testifying at the Capitol in support of the proposal at just 9-years-old.
It is unlikely that a 9-year-old would on his own initiative launch a legal jihad to have his actual sex officially reversed. Social engineers also exploit children.
We want kids to grow up with a healthy appreciation of the right of free speech, but some notions are too offensive to allow in public schools — like the idea that virginity is good.
A St. Charles County couple said the Wentzville School District threatened to suspend their son if he wore his ‘Virginity Rocks’ sweatshirt to class again.
A social studies teacher pulled 13-year-old seventh grader Londyn Piglowski out of class and escorted him, possibly by the ear, to the principal’s office, where he was commanded to wear the sweatshirt inside out or face punishment. Later he was threatened with suspension if he dared wear it again.
The district’s dress code does not allow students to wear clothing with statements advocating immoral, illegal, sexual, or violent behavior.
In practice, this appears to mean that students are not allowed to contradict what they are told in their sex ed classes.
Let’s let the educrats explain themselves. From an official statement:
The District’s policy regarding student dress provides opportunities for our administrators to address student attire that is potentially disruptive to the educational environment.
If you have been following the descent of public schools into unmitigated moonbattery, you can see why encouraging adolescents not to have sex would be seen as “disruptive.”
Maybe the educrats were just trying to nip Londyn’s problematic attitude in the bud before it could escalate into full-blown thoughtcrime like this:
Meanwhile, a nurse was ‘cancelled’ and harassed by a hate mob who tried to get her fired after she suggested that young people could avoid STD’s by not having pre-marital promiscuous sex.
Even a drag queen is appalled by the moral turpitude of liberal social engineers who subject innocent children to drag queen story hours to advance their warped sociopolitical agenda. In the video below, drag queen Kitty Demure makes some points that should be obvious to everyone, including that drag culture is highly sexualized and for that reason alone totally inappropriate for children. Also, it does not do the LGBT community any favors to reinforce in the public’s mind an association with sexually corrupting children.
The American Library Association supports Drag Queen Story Hour, stating that they have a “commitment to combating marginalization and underrepresentation within the communities served by libraries through increased understanding of the effects of historical exclusion.” But drag queens are not a protected class, they are not marginalized, they are performers plying their trade. Drag queens are not underrepresented and in need of protection by librarians.
As always with Cultural Marxism, this is not about uplifting the oppressed; it is about tearing down our culture, with no regard for who gets hurt.
Progressive social engineers accomplished an amazing feat by mainstreaming homosexuality, which was nearly universally regarded as repugnant for centuries, in a short period of time with a blitzkrieg propaganda campaign. The same may be accomplished for pedophilia. The campaign is already gathering momentum.
This April 18, liberal Baltimore will host a workshop entitled, “Authenticity in the Face of Stigma: Challenges for Clinicians and Minor-Attracted People.”
Just as homosexuals must now be referred to as “gays,” pedophiles are to be called “minor-attracted people” or “MAPs.” What’s in a name? Plenty, or liberals would not dictate which words we can use with never-ending updates to the Newspeak Dictionary.
The goals of the workshop are for participants to:
• Become aware of the numerous ways stigma impacts the lives, relationships, and careers of MAPs, clinicians, and researchers.
• Learn about ways to effectively manage stigma and its effects.
That is, they will learn that pedophiles MAPs are sacred victims deserving of sympathy, just like homosexuals gays. Then they will learn how to reduce the stigma against this “orientation.”
Reducing stigma is a euphemistic reference to progressive objective #1: erode moral standards.
Progressives have consciously pursued this objective with welfare and single motherhood, with predictably pernicious results. Lately, they have been achieving it with drug use, mental illness, and sexual perversion, largely by sanctifying homelessness, transsexuality, and homosexuality.
That which shame once encouraged people to overcome, they are now egged on to wallow in with belligerent pride, while demanding special rights and privileges. It would be hard to imagine a moral virus more certain to destroy a civilization than liberalism.
The political radicalism and antiwhite racial hostility that prevail on college campuses have infiltrated the “mainstream” media. On Friday, NBC News published a piece promoting the views of University of Baltimore School of Law visiting professor Terry Smith, who holds that voting for Republicans is “racist” and that Big Government can and should step in to prevent it. Hold on for some authoritarian insanity:
Rather than excuse racist voters or try to figure out how to live with their choices, [Smith] argues that racist voting is not just immoral, but illegal. The government, Smith says, has the ability, and the responsibility, to address it. …
Smith argues that it’s in line with the Constitution and with years of court rulings. For example, Smith points out that racist appeals in union elections are illegal and that an election in which one side uses racist appeals can be invalidated by the National Labor Relations Board.
Therefore, the same should hold true in other elections when liberals decide that their opponents are “racists.”
According to Smith, voters who pull the levers to harm black people are violating the Constitution. If the Constitution means that overt racist appeals undermine the legality of union elections, it stands to reason that they undermine the legality of other elections, as well.
Trump made racist appeals by mentioning crime and by promising to defend the US border from foreign invasion. Therefore, his election was unconstitutional.
Furthermore,
Because the majority of white voters in the South vote Republican, and because they outnumber black voters, there isn’t a single Democratic senator from the Deep South other than Doug Jones in Alabama, who may well lose his seat in 2020.
What to do about it? Creating racially gerrymandered Senate “districts” might help. But the main thing is to acquire sufficient power. Then you can do any damn thing you want. Smith advises Democrats to get their claws on that power by packing courts — up to and including the Supreme Court — with extra judges who would do whatever it takes to nullify the votes of deplorable racists.
NBC News concludes:
It’s difficult to address injustice, however, if you’re unwilling to say injustice exists. Politicians and pundits, Republican and Democratic alike, have been unwilling to reprimand voters or hold them accountable. But voters are not well-intentioned innocents who are helplessly manipulated by malevolent leaders. They make important decisions as constitutional actors, for which they have moral responsibility. Racist voting isn’t an accident. It’s a choice that may violate the principles of our Constitution and our legal system. We should say so, and then we should find ways to reduce the harm it causes.
“A republic,” said Benjamin Franklin, “if you can keep it.” We will keep it only so long as we can defend it against the leftists who control the “mainstream” media.
Given the way Democrats haveobjected to killing terrorist mastermind Qasem Soleimani, you might think they would even have sided with the militants who initiated Iranian hostilities back in November 1979 by seizing the US embassy in Teheran and holding Americans hostage for 444 days. At least in the case of Bernie Sanders, you would probably be right.
[I]n 1980 [Sanders] aligned himself with the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), the self-proclaimed Trotskyist revolutionary party, became its presidential elector in Vermont, and campaigned for its candidates and platform that defended the Iranian hostage seizure.
Virtually all Americans agreed that the Iranians were out of line and ought to free the hostages. Not Bernie’s SWP.
When its presidential candidate, Andrew Pulley, came to speak at the University of Vermont in October 1980, Sanders chaired the meeting. …
In his standard stump speech, Pulley condemned “Carter’s war drive against the Iranian people,” and said that the U.S. “was on the brink of war with Iran” …
Sound familiar? After Soleimani was killed, the liberal media shrieked that we were on the verge of World War III.
As for the hostages, Pulley said “we can be sure that many of them are simply spies… or people assigned to protect the spies.”
Pulley’s words were a direct echo of what the Islamic Society of University Teachers and Students had declared on Nov. 4, 1979 : “We defend the capture of this imperialist embassy, which is a center for espionage.”
Today, it is Democrats and the liberal media that echo Iranian propaganda. Malevolent fanatics like Bernie Sanders are so mainstream among these people now that he could win the Democrat nomination.
The University of Sheffield is recruiting a paid student Stasi to suppress “microaggressions,” defined as “subtle but offensive comments” that transgress against political correctness.
The student thought police have to undergo indoctrination:
They will be trained to “lead healthy conversations” about preventing racism on campus and in student accommodation. …
The students will be paid £9.34 [US $12.15] per hour as “race equality champions”, working between two and nine hours per week to tackle “microaggressions” in the university.
Examples of microaggressions include:
• “Stop making everything a race issue”
• “Why are you searching for things to be offended about?”
If students learn one thing at University of Sheffield, it will be that it is racist not to be obsessed with race.
One of the student spymasters, a Malaysian girl called Santhana Gopalakrishnan, has written a piece for a left-wing freesheet explaining that there is nothing sinister or oppressive about this.
Santhana offers other examples of microaggressions, such as complementing foreigners on speaking good English.
Since you never know what might qualify as thoughtcrime in ideologically rigid totalitarian systems such as communist police states and modern universities, it is wise to limit all conversation to reciting current leftist talking points as spoon-fed by the media.
Have you received your daily dose of multicultural enrichment? If not, watch the video below, which features Muslim colonists making themselves at home in France:
I wonder how bad it will have to get before the French start wishing we had never chased the Nazis out for them.
The moonbats at Salon admit that 1917 is an excellent movie, but they warn you not to watch it anyway, because this film about a war fought for nationalistic purposes is unforgivably nationalistic and therefore “falls in line with Trumpism.”
If duty, honor, courage, love of country, et cetera are now called Trumpism, let’s have more Trumpism. But to please moonbat reviewers, the heroes would have to be squishy and useless Bowe Bergdahl types, soulfully examining their navels rather than fighting, and then deserting or defecting to the enemy.
On Thursday, Senator Martha McSally (R-AZ) declined to answer questions from CNN congressional correspondent Manu Raju, dismissing him as a “liberal hack”:
Here's the moment when Sen. Martha McSally called CNN's Manu Raju a "liberal hack": pic.twitter.com/5iJ4brXuXg
There you have it; rabid CNN moonbats literally cannot even pronounce the word “dignity.”
Too bad they didn’t respond to the criticism more constructively, by reflecting on why people might think of them as liberal hacks. This could have been a teachable moment for CNN, inspiring it to establish credibility in the public mind.
Instead, CNN narcissistically not to mention unprofessionally chose to make itself and its own snowflakery into the story, its hyperbolic overreaction overshadowing any rudeness by McSally.
It is especially funny to see Jake Tapper blame Trump for creating “this groundswell of media hatred.” The media has done that for itself; CNN has been a major contributor.
Meanwhile, as the liberal hacks at CNN whimper belligerently about their hurt feelings, Liz Wheeler tells us what happened last week:
Cultural Marxism dictates that the woke must embrace both feminism and Islam, as both ideologies can be used to undermine the foundations of our society. This difficult feat is managed through ignorance and doublethink; even liberals who know how women are treated under Islam manage not to know it when the knowledge is inconvenient.
When Jimmy Carter self-righteously proclaimed that he was severing his ties with the Southern Baptist Convention after 6 decades because its attitudes toward women did not meet his standards for political correctness, he barked the following:
The truth is that male religious leaders have had – and still have – an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions – all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God.
Including Muhammad where he clearly does not belong is reflexive with Islamophilic moonbats. Here, it would not be much less appropriate to include Ted Bundy.
David Wood offers three Koran verses that make clear where Mohammad stood on women’s rights:
…And get two witnesses out of your own men. And if there are not two men (available), then a man and two women, such as you agree for witnesses, so that if one of them (one of the two women) errs, the other can remind her…
—Koran 2:282
Your wives are a tilth for you; so go to your tilth when or how you will…
—Koran 2:223
Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom you fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them.
—Koran 4:34
Muslims literally regard these far from chivalrous proclamations to be the word of God. Small wonder women tend to be abused in places that have succumbed to Islam.
Wood gives some background in the video below and sums up with this:
“According to Allah and Mohammad, women are stupid. They’re the property of men and have to submit themselves fully to their husbands’ sexual whims. Those who don’t are to be beaten into submission.”
The Islamic “feminist” Linda Sarsour personifies the inherent phoniness of progressivism, and demonstrates how the Cultural Marxist coalition can only be used to destroy. To build anything, there would have to be cohesion beyond a shared hatred of our core culture. As soon as normal Americans have been marginalized, Muslims, feminists, LGBT militants, and the rest of the “oppressed” will be at each other’s throats.
Comments (0) 
