Scientific American Tries to Wipe Egg Off Its Face
The moonbats comprising the Democrat base have reacted to Trump’s triumph with predictably childish temper tantrums. Deep in the woke fever swamps, Scientific American Editor-in-Chief Laura Helmuth went so hebephrenic that even she eventually realized she had made a fool of herself:
“Solidarity to everybody whose meanest, dumbest, most bigoted high-school classmates are celebrating early results because f–k them to the moon and back,” she wrote in one post on the social media platform Bluesky, according to Fox News.
In another post, she reportedly wrote, “I apologize to younger voters that my Gen X is full of f–king fascists.”
That’s not a very scientific appraisal of the American population.
In a pathetic attempt to salvage the publication’s lost credibility, she apologized days later, confirming her general cluelessness by attributing her own foul-mouthed screeds to “shock and confusion about the election results.”
“These posts of course do not reflect the position of Scientific American or my colleagues. I am committed to civil communication and editorial objectivity,” she added.
Yeah right. As noted when Scientific American endorsed the godawful Kamala Harris,
The leftist propaganda rag issues Newspeak Dictionary updates, gins up hysteria over the weather, informs us that we like climate radicalism, hypes drag queens, racializes NFL injuries, equates failing to subject children to sex change procedures to Nazism, and even proclaims that sex organs are merely a social construct.
Who knows? Maybe Scientific American will change course and once again prioritize science over moonbattery — though this is not likely to happen with Laura Helmuth at the helm.
TRIGGERED: Read these posts by Laura Helmuth the Editor-in-Chief of Scientific American. These are the 'experts' we're supposed to trust?
h/t @TheRabbitHole84 pic.twitter.com/dcJcry5eeh
— @amuse (@amuse) November 6, 2024
On a tip from Jack D.