moonbattery logo

Sep 06 2011

British Social Workers Confiscate Children

I wonder how motivated Britons would have been to bravely defend their homeland from the Nazis if they knew that only two generations later it would degenerate into a country so far from free that the government seizes children from their parents for not meeting bureaucrat-mandated body mass index requirements:

Four obese children are on the brink of being permanently removed from their family by social workers after their parents failed to bring their weight under control.

In the first case of its kind, their mother and father now face what they call the ‘unbearable’ likelihood of never seeing them again.

Their three daughters, aged 11, seven and one, and five-year-old son, will either be ‘fostered without contact’ or adopted.

Either way, the family’s only hope of being reunited will be if the children attempt to track down their parents when they become adults.

The couple, who have been married for nearly 20 years and are not being named to protect their children’s identities, were given a ‘draconian’ ultimatum three years ago…

Warned that the children must slim or be placed in care, the family spent two years living in a council-funded ‘Big Brother’ house in which they were constantly supervised and the food they ate monitored.

But despite subjecting them to intense scrutiny … there was apparently little or no improvement.

So the children will be confiscated, and the parents will probably never see them again, despite not having committed any crime.

This intolerable tyranny is justified by official statistics claiming that people who are overweight are a burden on the socialized healthcare system.

While it’s still conceivable that we might repeal ObamaCare, we need to ask ourselves: are we willing to live in a country like Britain has become, or are we still Americans?

On a tip from Kevin S. Hat tip: It’s About Liberty.



80 Responses to “British Social Workers Confiscate Children”

  1. StanInTexas says:

    This intolerable tyranny is justified by official statistics claiming that people who are overweight are a burden on the socialized healthcare system.

    So the solution to that problem is to take the children from their parents and make them a burden on all of British society?

    So, who will be the first idiot moonbat to defend this governmental action. I say it will be Eric!

  2. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    I don’t care one way or another.

  3. Screwy Puppy says:

    Some of the stoies that have come from this site are so outrageous I thought it might be a hoax. A simple search shows this story across many different news sources so it looks to be real : https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=1697&bih=939&q=uk+obese+children+taken+away+from+parents&oq=uk+obese+children+taken+away+from+parents&aq=f&aqi=&aql=1&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=5984l22036l0l22253l41l41l0l21l0l0l190l2341l9.11l20l0

    The whole story should be read. It reads like persecution of political enemies in China.

    If the UK wants something to riot about, this is it. But you don’t destroy stores and businesses; you go after government buildings.

  4. Jeremiah Legacy says:

    I just figured this out: the reason the Left focuses on the novel “1984” is because they are keeping us distracted from the other major dystopian novel, “Brave New World”. That is a world where the government controls everything, perversion is celebrated, and – this is the key – not only do the people know they are oppressed, they praise the government for its oppression.

  5. StanInTexas says:

    Eric…
    You don’t care that children are being taken away from their parentsbecasue of some weight guidlines that some back-office bureaucrat came up with? And this is a PERMENANT removal?

    You really are sick!

  6. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Not. In. The. Slightest. I wish I could italicize this to show just how much I really don’t care.

  7. Isn’t this the same plot as the last season of “Torchwood”? Evidently, the fat kids are particularly tastey. You will never see these kids again.

  8. Grunt says:

    Those poor folks…but really (and I’m not defending it), if they had three years–and Big Brother was watching the whole time…I dunnoh….this seems so odd.

    More questions than answers.

    They lived in a subsidized home paid for by BB, and they were “monitored”; they could afford all that, rather than assign a nanny (a little less invasive, but still just as Draconian) as a consultant or something to help this Family make better choices?

    I mean, the taxpayers of the UK are footing the bill–a nanny/consultant would be cheaper.

    Even less expensive; make a “Jenny-Craig” type program available, schedule weekly visits…it’s not a medical facility necessarily, it’s a service paid for personally and privately in the US and all over. WAY cheaper than floating a Family for three years at the expense of the population!

    Why didn’t they suggest changes after ONE year, when they saw no improvement? Why not after TWO?

    This is nuts!

    When I was a kid, there weren’t a large amount of truly overweight children. Most of the ones who were pudgy as kids, though, always seemed to level out at some point and thin down as they became adults.

    Of course, that was before the age of video games and computers, when kids went outside to play instead of planting their butts in a seat to spend the day entertaining themselves electronically.

    Add to that the fact that food now a days doesn’t have the same nutritional content that it had, say, twenty year ago, and even less than thirty year ago…

    Kids are given “diet” and “sugar free” and they’re getting bigger than ever. The problem seems to be a one-two punch sort of thing–kids are less active, their diet is very poor, and they eventually wind up eating more and gaining less nutrition, yet the same calories.

    Used to be common knowledge that “all calories aren’t created equal”…we were instructed that healthy living is more than just eating wheat bread and taking our vitamins, it’s a Life STYLE…it needs a balance of smart choices coupled with smart activity.

    Watching telly with the family has become the primary form of “social integration”…used to be the telly was off when the table was set, and we all ate and conversed at the table during the week, and went out as a unit on the week end (that’s how it’s been in my house).

    My kids had video-game systems like any other kid…and I was proud of the fact that it would gather dust from time to time. 🙂 My Boys (now my Daughter!) could whup any game you set before them–who needs cable?–it was a Family event, we shared and took turns with the console.

  9. Mats says:

    Cleaner who stole £90,000 of jewellery from Tory minister’s wife walks free from court because she is a single mother

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2032152/Cleaner-Barbara-Kuligowska-stole-90-000-jewellery-minister-Charles-Hendrys-wife-walks-free-court.html

  10. dr. theo says:

    When government controls healthcare virtually every aspect of human life can become a “healthcare issue.” Food, clothing, housing, employment, entertainment, transportation, parenting, hobbies, associations, etc., etc.

    Of course it will all be done for our own good, and as in “Brave New World” we will come to appreciate all that the government does for us.

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
    C. S. Lewis

  11. Carmen says:

    As the mask slips further and further, the statists won’t have to hide behind “good intentions” any longer. They’ll eventually just bring out the firing squads and do what they want to do quickly instead of slowly.

    Why cloak your wishes behind good intentions that clearly won’t work? Just do the deed and call it enlightenment or societal cleansing for the sake of saving, or making, some cash off the system & its peasants apathy.

    I. AM. NOT. KIDDING. Power over others & others’ lives is the opiate of the statist. The lust for power and control under the guise of collective yumminess gave us genocide thru abortion of our own fellow citizens here in the States..

    The Britons are just more advanced in murdering their own society than we are. But we are catching up so darned quickly!!

  12. Spartan24 says:

    Part of the obesity epidemic may lie in cutting out recess as well as drugging our kids (mostly boys) with ADHD drugs. It seems with all the “free” healthcare in the UK they would have been able to help the kids lose weight or find out if they had a medical problem that caused them to gain weight in the first place.

  13. SPURWING PLOVER says:

    Didnt Hitler and Stalin do the same?

  14. Dr. 9 says:

    Nothing coming out of Britain, a nation of PC’ized pansy’s, surprises me any more. Not their open-arms welcome of millions of radical Muslims. Not their “official” acceptance of Sharia Law. Not their insane and petty PC-driven regulations that have all but done away with any freedom and liberty.

    Hitler must really be laughing, saying, “see you idiotic and meddling Americans, i would’ve done a much better job…”!

  15. chuck in st paul says:

    Now you know why they disarmed them.

    Oh BTW… have any of these kids ever been checked for a hormone problem…?? I wager, not. I’ve had family and friends that started porking up badly. When tested they were found to have a serious hormone imbalance. Once that was brought under control the weight dropped and stayed off. But then again, that’s real science and realy doctoring. Not as much fun as being a fascist.

  16. chuck in st paul says:

    StanInTexas says: – September 6, 2011 at 10:33 am

    Give it up Stan. The Dork Eric Diaperstain is only interested in the cute ones age 7 and under. He dreams of them giving him a lap dance all the time. You have distracted him from his kiddie porn with the ‘old’ kids.

  17. Ghost of FA Hayak says:

    I have only one question.
    Who will confiscate these kids from the state when THEY fail in the same endevour ?

  18. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Girls twelve and under, actually, but lolicon still isn’t child porn. Why am I being attacked? I said I don’t care.

  19. StanInTexas says:

    Ghost, the state has ALREADY failed them.

    From the article…
    Warned that the children must slim or be placed in care, the family spent two years living in a council-funded ‘Big Brother’ house in which they were constantly supervised and the food they ate monitored.

    So the state tried for TWO YEARS, failed to slim the children down, and are now punishing the parents for that failure.

    Those people need to get out of the country with their children as fast as they can.

  20. StanInTexas says:

    Eric, you are being attacked because your are a pervert, a danger to children, and a complete waste of DNA.

  21. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    But I said I don’t care.

  22. StanInTexas says:

    And your apathy does not absolve you of being a pathetic pervert.

    Now, run crying to your NAMBLA meeting!

  23. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    But I’ve done nothing to piss you off on this thread.

    And I especialy am not into shotacon.

  24. StanInTexas says:

    Eric, your very existance is enough to annoy any sane human being. Get help for your sick perversion. And if your pathetic lifestyle cannot stand to be criticized, then STOP POSTING!

  25. whotothewhat says:

    The country of not so Great Britan should send the kids to the lefty utopian country of North Korea. That should help them with their weight problem

  26. Grunt says:

    He says he “doesn’t want to have sex with a grade schooler, Dick!” to me, personally…

    And says this, just today.

    “TheDarkEricDraven says:
    September 6, 2011 at 1:26 pm
    Girls twelve and under, actually, but lolicon still isn’t child porn. Why am I being attacked? I said I don’t care.”

    How is “TWELVE AND UNDER” not grade school?

    TWELVE is sixth grade…”and under” denotes grades BELOW six.
    In many states, sixth grade is the last grade in primary (GRADE!) School.

    (Forgive me, moonbattery regs…) YOU FUCKING SICK PERVERT.

  27. Grunt says:

    And “BTW” Lolicon is Porn, it’s just animated so perverts can still have their fantasies but feel guiltless about their sickness.

    Sick pig.

  28. Grunt says:

    I wonder, would DorkLogan sit and watch the stuff he REALLY likes with his family?

    If not, even HE knows it’s sick, but refuses to admit it.

  29. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Attracted to =/= Have actual sex with.

    Its not “my lifestyle” or whatever being critizised that bugs me, its having done nothing to deserve being yelled at. That bugs me.

  30. StanInTexas says:

    Eric, go cry in your room or play in the street, but STOP WHINING!

  31. Grunt says:

    Sorta like the adults here having a discussion that doesn’t involve you, when you come onto this site and start your shit.

    But I know how it is, it’s like having diarrhea.

    Having you here is equally pleasant. Just so’s ya know.

    “Being attracted to…”

    You have said that you are SEXUALLY attracted to small children. And it still doesn’t address the fact that you caught yourself out. Under 12 DOES equal “Grade School Child”.

    You can rail all you like, but I really think you need to see a therapist–or, at the very least, get castrated. ANY pervert who is attracted to children sexually, should have his “tool” pulled.

    You don’t love children for their innocence, you “love” them because they are gullible enough to look up to you because you are older and you pay attention to them.
    (That’s called “grooming”, and predatory pedos have used it effectively since time began.)

    You are a SICK FUCK. You watch child pornography, and likely, masturbate to it, and you have admitted sexual attraction to children.

    These are facts.

    You’d have to be a special brand of stupid or mentally ill to not see that, Logan. I hope you wind up in prison before you hurt any child.

  32. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    No, I am attracted to little girls, but I’m NOT, nor ever will, have sex with a child. These are facts.

  33. Grunt says:

    Still wanna know…would you watch the shit you fap to with mommy and family present, Logan?

    If you wouldn’t, why not?

    Does your mommy know that the Internet she spends her money on is so her aspie (Which I call bullshit on! Every angsty kid nowadays is either autistic or has aspergers! So your hands shake and you claim you can’t write. WHY ARE YOU POSTING THEN? Man up and take some cal-mag to control the shaking…you’re deficient in vitamins…and mentality!) can watch porn on the Internet!

    Really, what qualifies as porn? To me, anything that depicts a sexual act–the physical process).

    That includes Loli…and by the way…if you are less than eighteen Logan, how are you getting this porn? Whose money provides it? Are you getting it for free? Where? Do they (the site or sore where you get it) know you’re just some 15 year old out in the weeds fapping to images of adults abusing kids because he’s too terrified of reality to take an honest look at the pervert in the mirror?

    These and other questions, to be avoided and ignored immediately.

  34. Grunt says:

    You say that because it hasn’t happened yet, possibly…I know that sickos like you have different versions of what you claim qualifies as “sex”

    You keep sowing those seeds, and the roots may never sprout until they are so deep the weed cannot be ripped out.

  35. Grunt says:

    And also, you have said you are SEXUALLY attracted. That’s you.

    Should you elect to act upon that attraction (and watching Loli, it is only a matter of time), I sincerely hope you get caught…and I hope you are caught by one of the meanest, most violent parents who treat you like all pedophiles should be treated.

  36. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    “These and other questions, to be avoided and ignored immediately.”

    Quite.
    You say that because it hasn’t happened yet, possibly…I know that sickos like you have different versions of what you claim qualifies as “sex”

    You keep sowing those seeds, and the roots may never sprout until they are so deep the weed cannot be ripped out.”

    Look, dude, it is a very simple matter. A very basic moral. Don’t murder, don’t steal, don’t fuck kids. It seems so complicated to you.

    “Should you elect to act upon that attraction”

    I’m not having sex with a kid. Period. Ever. That will not happen. Goddamn. Stop bringing this up already. You seem to love to talk about it. You, sir, are the pervert.

  37. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    And not all lolicon is really porn at all. Mitsudomoe, for example. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0wjwRZLGR8

  38. Grunt says:

    TheDarkEricDraven says:
    August 15, 2011 at 11:05 am

    Attracted MEANS sexually attracted. Is that not implied?

    Where am I missing your intent? This little gem (and others) comes from the thread “Pedophiles Follow Close in the footsteps of militant homosexuals”

    Again, I’mma gonna bet that the Loli you fap to isn’t what you’d want Momma knowing about.

    And that still doesn’t address the issues presented with regard to your AGE. If you really are 15, where are you getting access to porn?

  39. Grunt says:

    TWO Ears and ONE mouth, Jackass.

    You can call me a pervert all you like, but you won’t find porn or links to it on a single computer in my home.
    Especially not kiddie porn (Loli).

  40. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Again, Mitsudomoe. Not porn any shape or form. Its not even hentai. Just watch the video. Its like Threes Company with young girls.

  41. Grunt says:

    From the same thread:

    “TheDarkEricDraven says:
    August 15, 2011 at 3:48 pm

    Its still porn, Grunt. Have I ever, at any time, denied that?”

    Ball’s back in your court, Junior.

  42. Grunt says:

    Funny part is, that’s his response to the exact same questions he’s dodging here.

  43. Grunt says:

    And he says “Arguing with stupid people never gets old because they never learn.”

    You got that right, Sunshine.

  44. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    To say its all porn though…did you even watch it? Of course not. Because you don’t want to be proved wrong.

  45. Grunt says:

    I don’t NEED to watch it; I have no desire to set anything like that before my eyes.

    That’s not even a sensible response, Logan. Try it on:

    What…? It’s harmless! You’ve never tried to french kiss a wild baboon? Didn’t think so…you’re afraid you might be wrong. You would probably like it.

    I’m sure there are all manner of “harmless” forms, but we know the kid it takes to get your ilk off, and it’s not harmless if it depicts children being sexually molested.

    YOU can sit and use that as a way to justify yourself, but we KNOW that’s not the Loli you like. Again, I ask you: would you sit and show the kind of Loli you fap to, to a house full of your family?

    I’m certain that I don’t speak for myself alone, but in light of that, I’d bet my left foot that you would NOT.

    You are a pervert, or at the very least, a pervert-to-be.

    You’re worse than a furry, and contribute nothing to the world you inhabit and even less to the lives that enabled your existence.

  46. Grunt says:

    Ya ass got called out and you blinked, dumbass. Now go home and let the grown ups talk.

  47. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Yes, it is, actually. If I had a wife and kids, sure, I would watch Mitsudomoe with them. Its no more risque then an average show. Well, a bit more, but its all harmless. There isn’t even any nudity or anything. I’m not asking that you LIKE it, just watch the short OP and see it isn’t porn. Please?

  48. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Why are we even talking about this?

  49. Grunt says:

    I reiterate, that I will not be watching it. So, NO.

    I see you dodged yet again. Am I surprised? No.

    Why does this get bought up every time you appear? Would be a better question. Noticing a trend YET? You like to bulshit and circle talk all over this site, and I’ll make it a point to use your own talk against you. This shows anyone who comes here the absolute self-contradictory lunacy that that is the LEFT, which your ilk represents.

    You are a product of failed social engineering, Logan…of programs and processes that not only never work, but send society as a whole into the shit-bin of history. I delight in showing you what an abject failure and hypocrite you are by pointing out your double-think soundbyte-speak.

    So it’s not OUR problem for not “paying attention” to your rhetoric; it is YOUR problem that we DO.

    We will continue, count on it.

  50. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    I have no idea what you are talking about. Point is, you refuse to look at evidence. You, sir, are dodging.

  51. Alan says:

    ENOUGH with the flaming guys. Back to the central issue:

    “… 12-year-old son weighed 16 stone [224 pounds]; his 11-year-old sister weighed 12 stone [168 pounds]; and his three-year-old sister weighed four stone [56 pounds].”

    Tough one. I suppose letting your kids get that fat could be considered child abuse in some quarters, with the attendant diabetes and heart conditions. Maybe this is a stalking horse story to scare parents into cutting back on the sugar and junk?

    Still, I don’t like it. Perhaps the school teachers could speak to the parents and let it go at that. Taking the kids out of the home is overkill.

  52. Grunt says:

    Uhm, no. Logan; refusing to experience your mildest version of perversion isn’t me dodging. You refusing to answer the questions presented to you then whining “Why are we talking about this?” is dodging.

    Do I care about your opinion? No, but I have enjoyed pounding sand into your colon…it’s been fun! 😀

    You are your own worst enemy, DorkLoganLimpDick; that has been proven ad nauseum.

  53. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Keep thinking that.

  54. Grunt says:

    Someone posted earlier about taking away recess and loading kids with drugs to make ’em manageable.

    That, coupled with poor diet choices and just as limited activity at home, and it’s a recipe for disaster. Like I said, food is only part of a healthy lifestyle, as is exercise, but there’s also other factors. Both parents working is the norm, single parenthood is a factor, and a lot of the available food isn’t as nutritious (manufactured food has a friend in preservatives, high fructose corn syrup, and other additives that give food longer shelf life and a cheaper price).

    Add to that the fact that kids are kept under damn near maximum security conditions thanks to the nurturing of loli-loving minds like Logan, and it isn’t really surprising that kids get the impression as young adults that the world revolves around them. When they see it doesn’t, many seek comfort in food.

    This is only a few of the reasons…there are SO many more….

  55. Grunt says:

    Nothing to “think” Logan…I’ve proven it right here.

    Your disagreement doesn’t equal fact.

    Scrolling up actually DOES equal fact.

  56. AC says:

    Attracted to =/= Have actual sex with.

    Let me clear this up for you: Bubba from the Aryan Brotherhood won’t be attracted to you, but he will be having actual sex with your ass for however many years the judge gives you for your future sex crimes charge.

  57. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    I’m not going to rape anyone, AC. Please leave it at that.

  58. AC says:

    I didn’t say you would. For all I know, you might get busted will illegal porn, or a camera hookup in the boy scout’s locker room.

    Maybe you’ll just grow up to be a furry.

    I don’t have a crystal ball. What you do have, however, is a buffet mentality towards the various perversions out there, already cultivated at the age of 15. You’re fantasizing about Japanese child animation when you should be out fooling around with age-appropriate cheerleaders or something.

    The road you’re going down is not a good one. I can’t say I know anybody in any position of business success with a taste for the twisted and perverse. I’ve seen a few successful people with ruined marriages because of hookers and blow, but nothing close to the sick shit you’ve already taken a liking to at your young age.

  59. AC says:

    By the way, before you get any wrong ideas and add hookers and blow to your repertoire, I’m not saying it’s not a big deal – it is a big deal, but pales in comparison to what you’re into. I’ve never seen a doctor with an underage animation or a furry fetish.

  60. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    What about the Japanese artists who make millions making hentai? And wasn’t Lewis Carrol a pedophile?

  61. AC says:

    And what about El Lazca, who makes billions filling mass graves and shipping trucks full of drugs to the US?

    Don’t play that game. Stacking up piles of cash from trafficking in degeneracy is not a hallmark of success.

    For that matter I don’t know any pedophile winners of a science Nobel, either.

  62. Marci says:

    And we don’t care one way or the other about you Dark.

    Given that they were placed under restrictions and supervised, it appears that the state failed to do THEIR job. (likely ignoring genetic factors, etc)

    If we don’t repeal Obamacare, you bet this is what we will get.

  63. Grunt says:

    Give the left time, AC….seems like they’re keen on handing out Nobels simply for the sake of denying credible others and thumbing their noses at the right.

    Additionally, when I think of Loli, I think of hentai; hentai IS animated porn. Little cutesy cartoons with minor innuendo isn’t porn (Spongebob did it all the time).

    I wouldn’t let my kids watch either of the Heavy Metal “cartoons”…and that’s mild compared to the blips of hentai I have seen (will NEVER rent another movie recommended by one of my kids’ older friends…I don’t know if you’d call it “trolled IRL” or what…gah! Didn’t knwo there was a tentacle-fetish until I saw that…gheeeeshhh!)

    Incidentally, the little bastard that “got” me…

    Of course, he later grew up and had a 15 year old knocked up at age 20…he was a physically abusive and violent ass, and by the time he had his first victim knocked up the SECOND TIME–victim’s Mom was very progressive, btw–this guy was already planting seed in her younger sister’s fallow. At the time, younger sis was 14 or 15…see where this is going, Dork Logan?

    Just another anime fan.

  64. Grunt says:

    *Furrow, not “fallow”

  65. AC says:

    I hope the younger sister isn’t knocked up, too.

    What a degenerate. He’s likely already on food stamps, or he will be when his Jerry Springer royalties run out.

    Kids these days…what ever happened to getting your hands on a copy of Playboy at 16, getting caught with it, swearing you read it only for the articles, then laughing it off with your folks many years later?

    People these days get trolled into their first 2girls1cup (do NOT Google this if you don’t already know) within minutes of logging on. Kids consume all manner of really, really twisted perversity. WTF has happened to us?

    Get off my lawn, Eric.

  66. Grunt says:

    Yes, she got knocked up, too, AC…

    She was actually living with the guy when she was seventeen, too.

    Later found out that the dud was abusing his poor old mother as well (not sexually; Dad was military and died, Mom was raising the kid and running a restaurant and they lived in my neighbourhood.), shoving and hitting her, taking her money and all that.

    He was a real piece of work.

    Oh, yeah 2G1C…I’ve only heard, never seen…same with Mr. Hands and there’s a couple others, too. I learned quick never to choose “random page” on Encyclopedia Dramatica—got Goatse’d.

    (Folks, really…don’t look this crap up. ED is a trainwreck…but some of it’s pretty funny–they are balanced in that they make fun of everyone! ED broke my ‘Net Naivete…but Thanks to ED, I know where NOT to go, too!)

    Otherwise, AC, all I can speculate at, is that we lost our sense of direction…but admittedly, we had help. Personally, I think the Internet would be a better place without the worst of what’s on it, but censoring what’s out there won’t work unless the censor it within the home. That means that parents need to raise their kids and set boundaries, check out what they watch and so on. Lord know, just knowing there are repercussions can often be enough to steer kids from looking that up.

    Something like “Train your child in the way he should go; when he is old, he will not depart from it.”

    Sure, kids’ll stray from the best raisings, but when they are older and wiser, perhaps they will return to what they have been taugt.

  67. Grunt says:

    Whoops! left something out…

    When I speak of “censure”, I mean to reduce or eliminate the hits and clicks websites get by not letting those sites get visits from the computers in your home. Sort of like “voting with the checkbook”, driving pageviews from undesirable content and to desirable content.

  68. AC says:

    Shockingly enough, 2G1C isn’t the worst out there.

    Welcome to the Internet.

    Eric is the byproduct.

    Once desensitized, things which were formerly disgusting are now “cool” and “edgy” with the youth. Tentacles become just another plot device to these kids, because hey, at least it isn’t a styrofoam cup.

  69. It’s just oppresion. Facist statism where the state can do anything it want’s for your own good. I would rather see the whole family die of obesity rather than subject them to that kind of a farce. If the family is working and paying it’s own way then who is the state to say they have a right to intervene. This is what happens when first you force the people into a National Health Care system. First the state says you must pay for a health care system whether you like it or not for your own good. Then because you have access to a subsidized socialised system you must follow their dictates about what is healthy or not healthy for the good of the PUBLIC. It just goes on and on. I would rather live in a state of Anarchy than live in a state of tyranny.

  70. AC says:

    When I speak of “censure”, I mean to reduce or eliminate the hits and clicks websites get by not letting those sites get visits from the computers in your home. Sort of like “voting with the checkbook”, driving pageviews from undesirable content and to desirable content.

    Most people don’t visit Goatse or 2G1C on purpose. I think most everybody who has had to witness these things arrived by accident or a troll link.

    I’ve seen Goatse spewing trolls working the Politico comments section. Unwitting people click the link then see that which cannot be unseen.

  71. Grunt says:

    Ohhyeah.

  72. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Your comparison doesn’t really work, Grunt, since 14 isn’t usualy an attactive age for me.

    Mitsudomoe is not porn. It IS more then a few innuendo jokes. It IS Lolicon.

    Lewis Carrol was still a pedophile. He never raped anyone and wrote the second best book of all time, next to the Wizard of Oz.

  73. Grunt says:

    Anything that sexualizes children is porn. Commercials for Popsicles, for example, had been taken off the air because they looked too sexual, depicting children (and zooming in) performing what looked to be fellatio on a chilled treat.

    We are supposed to protect our kids, not let them grow into repugnant freaks like you.
    Loli is porn because it depicts minors in sexual positions with adults. Swine like you don’t want girlfriends, they want victims. Apparently, it must be impossible for you to feel like a man otherwise.

    Your denial doesn’t equal fact. You have stated that you are attracted to girls aged twelve and lower. You yourself have asserted that Loli is, in fact, pornography. Just because you are revealed to being the lying dreg you are, doesn’t mean the fault lies with me.

    That’s on you, Sunshine.

    Loli is listed in Hentai categories more than any other what is hentai, DorkLogan? You’re a wikipedia fan! Let’s look:

    Highlights include…
    Hentai (変態 or へんたい ?) About this sound listen (help·info) is a Japanese word that, in the West, is used when referring to sexually explicit or pornographic comics and animation, particularly those of Japanese origin such as anime, manga and computer games (see Japanese pornography).

    “In Japanese the word hentai is a kanji compound of 変 (hen meaning “change” “weird” or “strange”) and 態 (tai meaning “attitude” or “appearance”). The term is used as a shortened form of the phrase 変態性欲 (hentai seiyoku), or “sexual perversion”. In slang, 変態 (hentai) is used as an insult meaning roughly “pervert” or “weirdo”. ” I give a shit about how they deal with it in Japan, but here, little spoiled American twats like you like to split hairs on technicalities, using pointless terminology to pad your argumant. You are a Westerner, looking at animated depictions of sexual intercourse between an adult and a child (or adults and children), you use the western version of their terminology to differentiate that, and thus, by the very subject you claim you’re so well versed in, you are a freakin’ PERVERT.

    So, now you know.

    You are the one who admitted to it, You are the one who has defended it, You are the one trumpeting it, You are the one who tried to garner attention for a shock purpose. Your cup runneth over. DEAL with it.

    I give a shit about Caroll. Lewis Caroll wasn’t on MB defending his perversion.

  74. Adam says:

    On the one hand, the kids were a LOT heavier than normal, which could in some circles be considered a form of abuse, considering to what an extreme it was.
    On the other hand, the fact that things stayed the same after the family spent two years in a “Big Brother”- esque house where they were constantly supervised and all the food they ate was monitored suggests there may be more to this situation than meets the eye and that it’s not a simple matter of kids getting overfed with the wrong foods. Perhaps it was a glandular/ hormonal thing?
    For Eric/ Logan:
    Lewis Carroll seemed to enjoy the company of young girls, but that does not necessarily make him a pedophile, as we have no way of knowing if he was sexually attracted to them or not. To put it in perspective, when the Tim Burton version of ‘Charlie and the Chocolate Factory’ was in production, Johnny Depp was said to have spent a good deal of time getting to know/ befriending the five main child actors in it. Does that mean he was a pedophile?
    “I’m not going to rape anyone, AC. Please leave it at that.”
    The point we’re making is, you say that NOW, but if you stay on the path you’re going, you may have a LOT less restraint in, say, 10- 15 years. As is seen all the time among serial killers and rapists, there comes a point when simply fantasizing about something or looking at porn about it will no longer be enough to satisfy, and that’s when lives get ruined. Please, get help before it reaches that point and you find yourself having to knock on prospective neighbors’ doors to read a court- required notice to them (And that’s assuming that you survive prison; I hear when other prison inmates learn that a pedophile or child pornographer is among them, they become quite eager to show him their own definition of “Play time”).

  75. White Falcon 1 says:

    @Dark Eric: Boy, unless you carry or where a flak jacket or vest, Id strongly suggest you stay away from peoples kids…being shot is NOT as pleasant an experience as you may belive…being shot dead is worse, Im sure! If you can rationalise 12 year old girls having sex your either in dire need of a lobotomy or a bullet, there are no other options!
    I know you come here ONLY tp piss us off, but sometimes you take it a bit too far…I can guarentee youde NOT make that comment to my face and still keep all your teeth, ok? I have 11 and 12 year old girls and NOTHING is going to get you deader, faster than messing with either…I also know you think your funny, but your ignorant is all you are! I’ll tell you and anyone else who looks at my girls like you think you have the right to……I WILL pull your eyes right out of your face and skull fuck you…dont care that your 15 or 51…the results ARE ging to be the same….your going to die a prolonged and painful death and no-ones even going to hear you go…the end of you will be catfish shit in one of the lakes or ponds near here!!!

  76. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Whatever. Way to derail your own thread, guys.

  77. MissAnthropy says:

    It would seem you are the one who plants the flag of irrelevance on every single thread, inundating it with your mental flatulence.

    Shouldn’t you be down at the neo-natal ward getting your rocks off?

  78. Paul Byvtary says:

    Most are willfully unaware anything like this takes place.

  79. Paul Byvtary says:

    Most are willfully unaware anything like this takes place.


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy