moonbattery logo

Jul 01 2015

Cameron Demands BBC Stop Calling Islamic State “Islamic State”

Compare this sniveling dhimmi to Winston Churchill and you will know that Britain is doomed:

British Prime Minister David Cameron took issue Monday with Britain’s public broadcaster’s use of the term “Islamic State” in reference to the terrorist group, Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

During a BBC Radio 4 interview days after an ISIS-claimed terror attack on a Tunisian beach hotel cost the lives of at least 38 people, most of them British tourists, Cameron was asked whether he regarded “Islamic State” as an existential threat.

“I wish the BBC would stop calling it ‘Islamic State’ because it is not an Islamic state,” he said.

That’s his bold response to British blood being spilt: to veer off into absurd politically correct nonsense so as to whitewash Islam.

The reason even the Beeb calls the Islamic State the Islamic State is that the Islamic State calls itself the Islamic State. What are we supposed to call it, Denmark?

The idea of refusing to call it by its name is of course to perpetuate Obama’s preposterous lie that the Islamic State is not Islamic. This is the equivalent to proclaiming that the Vatican is not Catholic. Obviously Islam is the whole point to the Islamic State. Those who know so little about Islamic history (and current events) as to believe that the horrific atrocities characterizing the Islamic State are somehow inconsistent with Islam as it has been practiced from the beginning are referred to the life of Mohammad.

Naturally Cameron went on to praise Islam as a “great religion.”

Like all apologists for Islam, Cameron is either a liar or ignorant, and either a coward, a fool, or evil.

cameron-integrate-muslims
Yes, Cameron actually said this.

On a tip from DinaRehn.



80 Responses to “Cameron Demands BBC Stop Calling Islamic State “Islamic State””

  1. 762x51 says:

    Cameron is neither ignorant or a fool. He IS however, an evil lying coward as are ALL progressives.

    In the UK, Cameron is the leader of the Conservative Party, nuff said.

    Valete Britannia!

  2. TED says:

    A perfect example of what happens when LIBERALS that DO NOT want to deal with REALITY take over your country. THEY ALL live on their own little unicorn ranches in their heads and will not come out.

  3. Donna M says:

    That’s just fine with me!
    I prefer twisted, lying murdering muslim jihadist terrorists, anyway…

  4. 762x51 says:

    Cameron is neither ignorant or a fool. He IS however, an evil lying coward as are ALL progressives.

    In the UK, Cameron is the leader of the Conservative Party, nuff said.

    Valete Britannia!

  5. TED says:

    A perfect example of what happens when LIBERALS that DO NOT want to deal with REALITY take over your country. THEY ALL live on their own little unicorn ranches in their heads and will not come out.

  6. Donna M says:

    That’s just fine with me!
    I prefer twisted, lying murdering muslim jihadist terrorists, anyway…

  7. My disgust with Cameron could not be deeper than it is already. The man is a complete fool. It is political insanity to embrace and rationalize the evil that seeks to kill you.

  8. Donna M says:

    There’s an acronym in there somewhere.
    Marhaba. Ya’ mali coufs!

  9. My disgust with Cameron could not be deeper than it is already. The man is a complete fool. It is political insanity to embrace and rationalize the evil that seeks to kill you.

  10. Donna M says:

    There’s an acronym in there somewhere.
    Marhaba. Ya’ mali coufs!

  11. 762x51 says:

    Too long. How about jihadi jagoffs? Or just Muslim Murderers?

  12. 762x51 says:

    Too long. How about jihadi jagoffs? Or just Muslim Murderers?

  13. TED says:

    Meanwhile – In this country…
    http://i.imgur.com/s5JJrzI.jpg

  14. TED says:

    Meanwhile – In this country…
    http://i.imgur.com/s5JJrzI.jpg

  15. 762x51 says:

    David Cameron, all the brains of Cameron Diaz and none of the looks.

    I used to watch him on PM Questions on the BBC and enjoyed the way he beat up Brown but in the final analysis, they are the same.

  16. 762x51 says:

    David Cameron, all the brains of Cameron Diaz and none of the looks.

    I used to watch him on PM Questions on the BBC and enjoyed the way he beat up Brown but in the final analysis, they are the same.

  17. Donna M says:

    I have to tell ya’,
    We have an extremely large population of followers, of the prophet, here where I live.
    And no, they are NOT assimilating. They only tolerate us.
    This is important to understand.
    Since the building of the mosque, many locals have moved out of the neighborhood, just for expedience. Muslims are the politically preferred class and the gov has rolled out the welcome wagon. The gov can’t do enough for ’em.
    There are NO moderate Muslims. Pacifism is only a temporary state of mind, its the quiet “down” time before the eventual, $#it storm! They are coming for us, they’ve said so. OVER AND OVER AGAIN!

  18. Donna M says:

    I have to tell ya’,
    We have an extremely large population of followers, of the prophet, here where I live.
    And no, they are NOT assimilating. They only tolerate us.
    This is important to understand.
    Since the building of the mosque, many locals have moved out of the neighborhood, just for expedience. Muslims are the politically preferred class and the gov has rolled out the welcome wagon. The gov can’t do enough for ’em.
    There are NO moderate Muslims. Pacifism is only a temporary state of mind, its the quiet “down” time before the eventual, $#it storm! They are coming for us, they’ve said so. OVER AND OVER AGAIN!

  19. 762x51 says:

    The difference between them fighting our military and fighting us is that our military had a very restrictive set of ROE. Not so for us.

    In Vietnam the rule was, if they are Vietnamese and running, they are VC.

    I like my rules simple.

  20. 762x51 says:

    The difference between them fighting our military and fighting us is that our military had a very restrictive set of ROE. Not so for us.

    In Vietnam the rule was, if they are Vietnamese and running, they are VC.

    I like my rules simple.

  21. DinaRehn says:

    The truth Finally comes out:

    What could go wrong? NYT rationale for determining offensive images ‘doesn’t seem like a healthy precedent’

    Popehat @Popehat
    So @nytimes admits it. We publish art offensive to Catholics because they won’t kill us. http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/07/01/perfectly-reasonable-question-publishing-religious-images-that-may-offend/?module=BlogPost-ReadMore&version=Blog%20Main&action=Click&contentCollection=Opinion&pgtype=Blogs&region=Body&_r=0#more-8347 … pic.twitter.com/nHXGkeCzv2

    As Twitchy reported Monday, the New York Times, which declined to reproduce Charlie Hebdo cartoons on its pages, was called out for their double standard on “art” after publishing a portrait of Pope Benedict XVI made out of 17,000 condoms.

    The Times’ explained the decision:
    http://twitter.com/Popehat/status/616246067403878400/photo/1
    The standards editor of the New York Times, Philip B. Corbett, responded to accusations of double standards this way [emphasis ours]:

    I don’t think these situations — the Milwaukee artwork and the various Muhammad caricatures — are really equivalent. For one thing, many people might disagree, but museum officials clearly consider this Johnson piece to be a significant artwork. Also, there’s no indication that the primary intent of the portrait is to offend or blaspheme (the artist and the museum both say that it is not intended to offend people but to raise a social question about the fight against AIDS). And finally, the very different reactions bear this out. Hundreds of thousands of people protested worldwide, for instance, after the Danish cartoons were published some years ago. While some people might genuinely dislike this Milwaukee work, there doesn’t seem to be any comparable level of outrage.

    Well, at least they admitted it.

    Laura A Lorenzo @laura_lrnzo
    These are the brave liberals who claim to be in the forefront of individual rights.

    http://twitchy.com/2015/07/01/what-could-go-wrong-nyt-rationale-for-determining-offensive-images-doesnt-seem-like-a-healthy-precedent/

  22. $59154503 says:

    The truth Finally comes out:

    What could go wrong? NYT rationale for determining offensive images ‘doesn’t seem like a healthy precedent’

    Popehat @Popehat
    So @nytimes admits it. We publish art offensive to Catholics because they won’t kill us. http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/07/01/perfectly-reasonable-question-publishing-religious-images-that-may-offend/?module=BlogPost-ReadMore&version=Blog%20Main&action=Click&contentCollection=Opinion&pgtype=Blogs&region=Body&_r=0#more-8347 … pic.twitter.com/nHXGkeCzv2

    As Twitchy reported Monday, the New York Times, which declined to reproduce Charlie Hebdo cartoons on its pages, was called out for their double standard on “art” after publishing a portrait of Pope Benedict XVI made out of 17,000 condoms.

    The Times’ explained the decision:
    http://twitter.com/Popehat/status/616246067403878400/photo/1
    The standards editor of the New York Times, Philip B. Corbett, responded to accusations of double standards this way [emphasis ours]:

    I don’t think these situations — the Milwaukee artwork and the various Muhammad caricatures — are really equivalent. For one thing, many people might disagree, but museum officials clearly consider this Johnson piece to be a significant artwork. Also, there’s no indication that the primary intent of the portrait is to offend or blaspheme (the artist and the museum both say that it is not intended to offend people but to raise a social question about the fight against AIDS). And finally, the very different reactions bear this out. Hundreds of thousands of people protested worldwide, for instance, after the Danish cartoons were published some years ago. While some people might genuinely dislike this Milwaukee work, there doesn’t seem to be any comparable level of outrage.

    Well, at least they admitted it.

    Laura A Lorenzo @laura_lrnzo
    These are the brave liberals who claim to be in the forefront of individual rights.

    http://twitchy.com/2015/07/01/what-could-go-wrong-nyt-rationale-for-determining-offensive-images-doesnt-seem-like-a-healthy-precedent/

  23. 762x51 says:

    So my solution to all of this has been validated.

    Evil can only be defeated by force. QED

  24. 762x51 says:

    So my solution to all of this has been validated.

    Evil can only be defeated by force. QED

  25. DinaRehn says:

    You mean it’s not deterred by conflict resolution?

  26. $59154503 says:

    You mean it’s not deterred by conflict resolution?

  27. 762x51 says:

    Nor is it defeated by love like the BS Glenn Beck is peddling these days. Try defeating Hitler with love, see what happens. Totalitarians can only be stopped one way. Especially now that our system of checks and balances has been removed by corruption.

  28. 762x51 says:

    Nor is it defeated by love like the BS Glenn Beck is peddling these days. Try defeating Hitler with love, see what happens. Totalitarians can only be stopped one way. Especially now that our system of checks and balances has been removed by corruption.

  29. Son_of_Taz says:

    Excuse me, Mr. Prime Minister. Our esteemed counter-moonbat, Lt Col Ralph Peters (ret) has a few words about the state whose name you don’t want to hear:

    The way you deal with Islamic State, these bloodthirsty, blood drunken terrorists, is to kill them, keep on killing them, until you kill the last one and then you kill his pet goat. That’s how you deal with them.

    Any questions?

  30. Eddie_Valiant says:

    Excuse me, Mr. Prime Minister. Our esteemed counter-moonbat, Lt Col Ralph Peters (ret) has a few words about the state whose name you don’t want to hear:

    The way you deal with Islamic State, these bloodthirsty, blood drunken terrorists, is to kill them, keep on killing them, until you kill the last one and then you kill his pet goat. That’s how you deal with them.

    Any questions?

  31. DinaRehn says:

    Well, that depends on who you’re talking about.
    It won’t a matter to the IS death cult, but others it might.

  32. $59154503 says:

    Well, that depends on who you’re talking about.
    It won’t a matter to the IS death cult, but others it might.

  33. Pat says:

    What did the goat do?

  34. BallonCrash says:

    What did the goat do?

  35. Appalled By The World says:

    I guess it needs to be called the Happy State for all the joy it spreads in its midst.
    Let’s not kill the darlings, lest they get offended. Let’s just rename them so they can seem nice-this is how the West deals with marauding Islamania these days. No wonder they think the future is theirs with such idiotic opponents.

  36. Appalled By The World says:

    I guess it needs to be called the Happy State for all the joy it spreads in its midst.
    Let’s not kill the darlings, lest they get offended. Let’s just rename them so they can seem nice-this is how the West deals with marauding Islamania these days. No wonder they think the future is theirs with such idiotic opponents.

  37. Appalled By The World says:

    Think dandelions. They don’t integrate into a lawn-they take it over. Koranist believers are dandelions in animal form.

  38. Appalled By The World says:

    Think dandelions. They don’t integrate into a lawn-they take it over. Koranist believers are dandelions in animal form.

  39. Appalled By The World says:

    He’s no Churchill, that’s for sure.

  40. Appalled By The World says:

    He’s no Churchill, that’s for sure.

  41. 762x51 says:

    It was the terrorists lover . . .

  42. 762x51 says:

    It was the terrorists lover . . .

  43. 762x51 says:

    You can rename syphilis, call it cotton candy, but there would not be anything sweet about it. I use syphilis in my example because liberalism is a social disease.

  44. 762x51 says:

    You can rename syphilis, call it cotton candy, but there would not be anything sweet about it. I use syphilis in my example because liberalism is a social disease.

  45. 762x51 says:

    Or to progressives, both are totalitarian cults and must be destroyed by force.

  46. 762x51 says:

    Or to progressives, both are totalitarian cults and must be destroyed by force.

  47. 762x51 says:

    More like cancer, feeding off the host, overwriting its genetic code until it is dead.

  48. 762x51 says:

    More like cancer, feeding off the host, overwriting its genetic code until it is dead.

  49. 762x51 says:

    He’s not even Churchill’s hemorrhoids.

  50. 762x51 says:

    He’s not even Churchill’s hemorrhoids.

  51. Pat says:

    Goats can’t give their consent to sexual relations with Humans, goats get raped by Humans, they are victims.

  52. BallonCrash says:

    Goats can’t give their consent to sexual relations with Humans, goats get raped by Humans, they are victims.

  53. DM says:

    Nothing that Churchill wrote in 1899 has changed. He was RIGHT then and it is STILL TRUE & RIGHT.

    Winston Churchill on Islam
    The River War | 1899 | Sir Winston Churchill

    Posted on ‎3‎/‎7‎/‎2006‎ ‎8‎:‎30‎:‎18‎ ‎PM by southernnorthcarolina

    How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.

    The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

    A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

    Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

    No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.

    — Sir Winston Churchill (The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50 [London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899]).

    islam, is a CRIMINALLY SAVAGE POLITICAL AGENDA masquerading as a religion. DMH

    To paraphrase our Quisling in Chief, The future must belong to those who tell the truth about the prophet of Islam.
    04/2014

  54. DM says:

    Nothing that Sir Winston Churchill wrote in 1899 has changed. He was RIGHT then and it is STILL TRUE & RIGHT.

    Winston Churchill on Islam
    The River War | 1899 | Sir Winston Churchill

    Posted on ‎3‎/‎7‎/‎2006‎ ‎8‎:‎30‎:‎18‎ ‎PM by southernnorthcarolina

    How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.

    The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

    A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

    Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

    No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.

    — Sir Winston Churchill (The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50 [London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899]).

    islam, is a CRIMINALLY SAVAGE POLITICAL AGENDA masquerading as a religion. DMH 04/2014

    To paraphrase our Quisling in Chief, The future must belong to those who tell the truth about the prophet of Islam.

  55. Jack says:

    Have all British surrendered so enthusiastically as this leftist Cameron?

  56. 762x51 says:

    It had Stockholm Syndrome and was supportive of the jihad.

  57. 762x51 says:

    It had Stockholm Syndrome and was supportive of the jihad.

  58. DM says:

    Found this months ago and kept it to be posted where ever it might do some good.
    DO NOT SUBMIT!! REPUBLISH the Mohammed CARTOONS EVERYWHERE. HERE’s HOW.

    Posted Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:24 am 9 Comments

    Today’s terror attack on Charlie Hedbo, the irreverent French satirical magazine that was one of the few media outlets in France to publish the original “Mohammed cartoons,” is an attempt by Islamic fundamentalists to enforce shari’a worldwide, even on non-Muslims.

    We must not let them succeed.

    Self-censoring out of fear means self-imposition of shari’a (Islamic law).

    Self-censoring out of “respect” (actually just a euphemism for fear) means you are submitting to the terrorists’ worldview.

    The way to overcome them in this instance is to overwhelm them with disrespect and mockery.

    They can silence one magazine, but they can’t silence the entire Internet.

    Every blogger, of every political stripe, be it left, right, and everywhere in between, needs to realize that freedom of speech and freedom of the press are the two keystones of your ideology, whatever it may be. You need to make a stand. You need to make these terrorists lose the ideological battle.

    And the way to do that is to republish the Mohammed cartoons yourselves. Today. Right now.

    Fill the world with images of Mohammed so that the terrorists realize they can never expunge them all.

    But where to get the pictures? Easy.

    The Mohammed Image Archive, which I have hosted at zombietime since the day of the original “Mohammed cartoon crisis” back in May of 2006, has not only a full collection of the original cartoons, but more importantly the largest collection of Mohammed imagery ever assembled in the history of the world.

    I hereby grant permission, and even encourage, anyone reading this to repost any images found anywhere on the Mohammed Image Archive. No limits. Repost them all, if you want to.

    Go to any of these pages, download whatever images you choose, repost, and help to win the most important cultural war humanity has faced in a long time:

    The Mohammed Image Archive (main index page)

    Islamic Depictions of Mohammed in Full

    Islamic Depictions of Mohammed with Face Hidden

    European Medieval and Renaissance Images

    Miscellaneous Mohammed Images

    Dante’s Inferno

    Book Illustrations

    Book Covers

    Satirical Modern Cartoons

    The Jyllands-Posten Cartoons

    Recent Responses to the Controversy

    Extreme Mohammed

    Here’s a selection of Mohammed images to get the ball rolling:

  59. DM says:

    Found this months ago and kept it to be posted where ever it might do some good.
    DO NOT SUBMIT!! REPUBLISH the Mohammed CARTOONS EVERYWHERE. HERE’s HOW.

    Posted Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:24 am 9 Comments

    Today’s terror attack on Charlie Hedbo, the irreverent French satirical magazine that was one of the few media outlets in France to publish the original “Mohammed cartoons,” is an attempt by Islamic fundamentalists to enforce shari’a worldwide, even on non-Muslims.

    We must not let them succeed.

    Self-censoring out of fear means self-imposition of shari’a (Islamic law).

    Self-censoring out of “respect” (actually just a euphemism for fear) means you are submitting to the terrorists’ worldview.

    The way to overcome them in this instance is to overwhelm them with disrespect and mockery.

    They can silence one magazine, but they can’t silence the entire Internet.

    Every blogger, of every political stripe, be it left, right, and everywhere in between, needs to realize that freedom of speech and freedom of the press are the two keystones of your ideology, whatever it may be. You need to make a stand. You need to make these terrorists lose the ideological battle.

    And the way to do that is to republish the Mohammed cartoons yourselves. Today. Right now.

    Fill the world with images of Mohammed so that the terrorists realize they can never expunge them all.

    But where to get the pictures? Easy.

    The Mohammed Image Archive, which I have hosted at zombietime since the day of the original “Mohammed cartoon crisis” back in May of 2006, has not only a full collection of the original cartoons, but more importantly the largest collection of Mohammed imagery ever assembled in the history of the world.

    I hereby grant permission, and even encourage, anyone reading this to repost any images found anywhere on the Mohammed Image Archive. No limits. Repost them all, if you want to.

    Go to any of these pages, download whatever images you choose, repost, and help to win the most important cultural war humanity has faced in a long time:

    The Mohammed Image Archive (main index page)

    Islamic Depictions of Mohammed in Full

    Islamic Depictions of Mohammed with Face Hidden

    European Medieval and Renaissance Images

    Miscellaneous Mohammed Images

    Dante’s Inferno

    Book Illustrations

    Book Covers

    Satirical Modern Cartoons

    The Jyllands-Posten Cartoons

    Recent Responses to the Controversy

    Extreme Mohammed

    Here’s a selection of Mohammed images to get the ball rolling:

  60. Henry says:

    Muslim Murderers is redundant.

  61. Henry says:

    Muslim Murderers is redundant.

  62. Pat says:

    Come on, cut the goat some slack.

  63. BallonCrash says:

    Come on, cut the goat some slack.

  64. bob e says:

    his mug shot has the same expression as every homie does
    in every arrest, every hour of the day. we black & we proud ..
    sick to death of feral blacks & black people in general ..

  65. bob e says:

    his mug shot has the same expression as every homie does
    in every arrest, every hour of the day. we black & we proud ..
    sick to death of feral blacks & black people in general ..

  66. 762x51 says:

    I suppose Mohammad’s Murderers would also be redundant.

  67. 762x51 says:

    I suppose Mohammad’s Murderers would also be redundant.

  68. Appalled By The World says:

    LOL! I can just imagine how Winston would handle that bunch. Bismarck too for that matter.

  69. Appalled By The World says:

    Good point. At least dandelions aren’t deadly.

  70. Appalled By The World says:

    LOL! I can just imagine how Winston would handle that bunch. Bismarck too for that matter.

  71. Appalled By The World says:

    Good point. At least dandelions aren’t deadly.

  72. Appalled By The World says:

    And like syphilis it destroys the brain.

  73. Appalled By The World says:

    And like syphilis it destroys the brain.

  74. Sjors says:

    Doomed Tolerance tho the Intolerance


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy