moonbattery logo

Feb 28 2012

Canada to Forbid Teaching Your Own Children That Homosexual Depravity Is Wrong

Despite or rather because it has been regarded as shameful and unholy from time immemorial and spreads horrific, lethal, and extravagantly expensive diseases, homosexual depravity is sacred to moonbats — so sacred that in the authoritarian utopia to our north, it will soon be illegal to teach your own children that it is wrong:

Homeschooling families will soon be forbidden from teaching that homosexual sex is sinful as part of their schooling program, according to the government of Alberta, Canada.

Under the province’s Education Act, homeschoolers and religious schools will be banned from “disrespecting” people’s differences, Alberta Education Minister Thomas Lukaszuk’s office told LifeSiteNews just last week.

One of the main points of homeschooling is to spare innocent children from the increasingly depraved sexual indoctrination that takes place in public schools. Coercively degenerate bureaucrats want to close this avenue of escape.

gay-swastika.jpg

On a tip from Dave H.




42 Responses to “Canada to Forbid Teaching Your Own Children That Homosexual Depravity Is Wrong”

  1. Jester says:

    Anybody feel it getting hotter in here or is it just me?

  2. GM Car Of The Future says:

    A rush to bring those bee-sized Drones into Government use in Canada. Coming in 3… 2… 1…

  3. Doug says:

    How about Parliament adopting a law that would require lao to visit the bedroom of every pubescent teen in Canada and demonstrating the wonders of homosexuality?

  4. whotothewhat says:

    If you are home schooling and you are educating your children in not only the three Rs along with a strong faith in the bible and Gods teachings then please understand this. GOD’S LAW SUPERSEDES MANS LAW. Everyday it is becoming clearer and clearer that a new revolution is coming.

  5. Joe says:

    Just how do these idiots think they are going to enforce this fucking stupidity? If we as a family sit around the house discussing things, I can teach the kids anything I want to teach them. Are the fucking homo nazis going to put listening devices in my house?

  6. J says:

    the tree of liberty…

  7. Karin says:

    I don’t understand how this can be in a supposedly free society.

  8. Jimbo says:

    “…AND religious schools” WTF?

    These Canadian ass-hats are taking a cue from the american-liberals’ little brown gawd wanna-be. They are blatantly telling everyone they are smarter than God.

    My guess is, God doesn’t approve.

    Will they also enforce this in MOOSLIM schools? I bet not!

    Liberals are such fools.

  9. vonster says:

    I understand why they’re doing this. They’re just trying to enforce PC on homeschooling like they’ve done with public schools – standard Lib think. On the other hand, it doesn’t make any sense since a homeschooled kid will likely get the homosexuality is wrong and unnatural message at church.

    Just more proof Libs can’t think beyond the end of their noses.

  10. Sinister66 says:

    Joe says:
    Exactly right. No one will be able to stop anyone from teaching their kids that being queer is wrong. Or that blacks have an extra bone in their legs. or jews have green blood and tails.

    whotothewhat says:
    “GOD’S LAW SUPERSEDES MANS LAW”
    Not in America.

    Jimbo says:
    “Will they also enforce this in MOOSLIM schools?”
    That would probably fall under the “religious schools” part but its hard to know what will happen.

  11. son of a preacher man says:

    “Or that blacks have an extra bone in their legs. or jews have green blood and tails.”

    Exactly who is teaching that?

  12. lao says:

    Quoted in the thread header: … according to the government of Alberta, Canada.

    From Wikipedia:

    Alberta’s elections tend to yield results which are much more conservative than those of other Canadian provinces.

  13. Kevin R. says:

    …homeschoolers and religious schools will be banned from “disrespecting” people’s differences…

    Well, if disrespecting people’s differences is the standard, nothing says disrespecting people’s differences like turning people into criminals for their beliefs.

  14. So Cal Jim says:

    Hey Canada!! Good luck with enforcing that law, you lefturd morons! So I supose it’s now illegal to be a practicing Christian in Canada?

  15. Fiberal says:

    Once again and right on cue, Lao-Z finds and avidly trolls a posting on homosexuality.

  16. Sam Adams says:

    Karin says:
    February 28, 2012 at 2:47 pm

    I don’t understand how this can be in a supposedly free society.

    _________________

    Canadians are subjects, not citizens. They will do as they are told, else the queen will not be amused.

  17. Sam Adams says:

    From Wikipedia:

    Alberta’s elections tend to yield results which are much more conservative than those of other Canadian provinces.
    _______________

    Which demonstrates how thoroughly indoctrinated the Canadian school and political system must be.

  18. KHarn says:

    “Sinister66 says:February 28, 2012 at 3:09 pm”

    A perfect example of regressive thought: one extreme or another, there is nothing in between.
    ME: I favor the death penalty.
    66: You’re saying that ALL PRISONERS should be killed!

    “lao says:February 28, 2012 at 3:37 pm”

    So you’re saying that CONSERVATIVES are pro-homo while LIBERALS hate homos?

  19. modd kenwood says:

    Canada’s forbidden anti-homosexual preachings from the pulpit for over a decade. Ministers have been warned of arrest if they preach the Gospel about it…
    there.is.no.gay.agenda.
    repeat

  20. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Sinister
    First they came for religious speech, and I said nothing.
    Next they came for the Atheists…………

  21. NorthernX says:

    This story is from World Net Daily.
    Anything sourced from that site should be taken with a major grain of salt…

  22. Fiberal says:

    Whenever I see something like this, I’m always reminded that there is nothing in the name of decency that should evoke enthusiasm for codifying this sort of disgusting behavior into law.

    So you have to ask, what kind of sunken, degenerate imbecile would ever favor or support such perversion?

    And then I remember Lao-Z.

  23. lao says:

    Once again and right on cue, fibby ignores what I actually said to wander off into his homosexual preoccupations again.

    Whatever turns your crank fibby.

  24. big-pete says:

    Of course, as always, this is not about homosexuals. This is about controlling the minds of the future. When the government can criminalize what you teach your children then any opinion deemed subversive will land you in prison. Bend over, liberals, here comes the utopia you’ve been asking for.

  25. Bath House Barry says:

    lao says: February 28, 2012 at 6:36 pm- “Once again and right on cue, fibby ignores what I actually said to wander off into his homosexual preoccupations again. Whatever turns your crank fibby.”

    Well, I too ignore most of what you say, Lao my little studmuffin. I, for one, can’t help being preoccupied with your rampant homosexuality. I know you love it when President Lovelog gets mesmerised by your loins. You can turn my crank anytime, baby… gnomesayin?

  26. Joe says:

    sinister 666 says; February 28, 2012 at 3:09 pm

    Put down the crack pipe. You say there’s nothing wrong with homosexuality and so it should be taught in schools. I say there’s nothing wrong with Christianity. Should it be taught in schools? Just sayin.

  27. MrBlonde says:

    I bet they’re perfectly happy with teaching Darwinism as fact though.
    Wait, what?

  28. Fiberal says:

    Lao-Z,

    Back again to the homosexual posting. Its gettin old, dude.
    Don’t you need to go find a baguette somewhere?

    BTW I noticed that you’re only posting quick little cut&paste text these days.

    That relentless diarrhea really cuts into your keyboard time, huh?

    How’s your mom holding up?

  29. Restless says:

    Apparently, the law makes it perfectly all right to “disrespect” Christianity.

  30. lao says:

    Try gazing at the Assaulted by Occucommies thread fibby.

    Meanwhile KhaRn demonstrates another in a long series of his patented “So you’re saying…” strawman attacks.

    I simply provided the following quote Alberta’s elections tend to yield results which are much more conservative than those of other Canadian provinces.

    From that poor kHarn concluded: So you’re saying that CONSERVATIVES are pro-homo while LIBERALS hate homos?

    No KHArn, I am not saying anything of the sort.

    YOU are saying that.

    It is amusing that blount would label an item about the most conservative provincial government in Canada with a swastika. I thought you conservatives believed that nazis were liberal.

  31. Stephan the Original says:

    In response to lao,

    “LifeSiteNews noted that the Progressive Conservative government has 67 of the 83 seats in the Alberta Legislature, so the bill is almost certain to pass. However, with an election coming up, the new right-wing Wildrose Alliance Party may have a strong showing.”

    but this is a diversion (surprise, surprise – it’s lao after all)
    lao ignores the issue of teaching children something known to be unhealthy, let alone the government wanting to control the private lives of parents teaching their children. You’re an utter disgrace, lao, to the freedom you abuse. You have it, everybody here would defend it, but you don’t deserve it because you don’t value it.

  32. Stephan the Original says:

    lao, is homosexuality unhealthy?

  33. lao says:

    When you find the part in the Legislative Assembly of Alberta Bill 2 Education Act that demonstrates the truth of the claims made here, tell us where to find it.

  34. AlphaMail says:

    FIBERAL

    The wheedling tundra-smoking agent-provocateur from the “Province” is as predictable as sneeze snot.

    Check my post today at 9:46am @ “Bradley Manning nominated…..”

    He casts the bait (in this case it was “Alberta” and “Wikipedia”), then waits for a bite! He’s in full “stroke” by the time he gets a response.

    He doesn’t give a flyin’ “F” about the topic – he just wants to titillate and then try to trash. It’s a formula with this maple-leafed pervert-wannabee.

    I “explained” him in the a.m. and it took him less than 1/2 a day to prove my point.

    He’s flushed in fullblown orgasmic contemplation of his own exalted triumph.

    Problem is, most guys do it while looking at a picture of a hot babe – he does it while looking in the mirror.

  35. […] and cannot teach their children (and this goes way beyond basic curriculum requirements) (hat tip Moonbattery): Homeschooling families will soon be forbidden from teaching that homosexual sex is sinful as part […]

  36. Daniel Shumaker says:

    My right to teach my faith to my children supercedes your right to buggery.

  37. AlphaMail says:

    Daniel Shumaker

    Hmmm…the spiritual superceding the physical.

    Let me check………….Yup, my Bible agrees!

  38. […] in Canada: Canada to Forbid Teaching Your Own Children That Homosexual Depravity Is Wrong Also, this: Idiot Teacher Explaining 4 Year Old’s Gun Drawing Case Calls Teachers […]

  39. vonster says:

    WE NEED A SEPARATION OF SEXUALITY AND STATE!!

  40. Sinister66 says:

    KHarn says:
    Ghost of FA Hayek says:
    Joe says:

    You tools need to re-read what I posted.

    “Exactly right. No one will be able to stop anyone from teaching their kids that being queer is wrong. Or that blacks have an extra bone in their legs. or jews have green blood and tails.”

    Let me try to simplify this for ya.

    People will teach their kids whatever they choose and there isnt much anything anyone can do about it.

    You want to teach your kids being queer is wrong. Thats your purogitive.

    Then Joe shats this ignorant comment:
    “You say there’s nothing wrong with homosexuality and so it should be taught in schools.”

    WTF. How do you come up with this crap.

    Daniel Shumaker says:
    vonster says:

    Exactly right.

  41. KHarn says:

    “Sinister66 says:February 29, 2012 at 10:48 am”

    As I said “one extreme or another, nothing in between”. If you DIDN’T MEAN IT LITERALY, put a /s sarcasim tag on your post.

    But if the ALL-POWERFUL, ANSWERABLE TO NO ONE government can ban one “offencive” thing being discused in privacy, what makes you think they won’t ban more? Are you willing to take their word for it? Perhaps you have not lived as long as many of us (I’m 54) and have not seen “reasonable” laws expand to opressive mandates that would have had our grandparents loading their rifles and marching on the capital.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy