moonbattery logo

Jan 06 2017

Canadians Offer to Take Moonbat Zones

Democrats would not fare well in the short term if this came to pass:

The long term might be a different story, however. A USA without the left-wing drag of the deep blue zones would take flight economically as a result of reduced taxation and regulation. But success breeds decadence, and decadence breeds moonbattery. Within a generation, a new Hollywood and a new New York City would be established to pull the country back down. This would require another amputation. Another amputation would follow, and another, and another. Eventually the United States would consist of someone’s backyard in Wyoming.

Retreating doesn’t work. In the long run, there is no alternative to standing your ground and fighting moonbattery.

On a tip from Bodhisattva.

25 Responses to “Canadians Offer to Take Moonbat Zones”

  1. Steve2 says:

    Here’s a good compromise, let’s dump all our smelly hippies on Canada like so many bags of trash and keep our territory.

  2. Mack says:

    They could name it Trudopia.

    But, really, why should Canada be punished?

  3. grayjohn says:

    Why would Canada lower their standards to accept Americas ass cancer?

  4. Mr. Freemarket says:

    The Americans would find deference to the Queen difficult to swallow, too.

  5. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    I’d hate to give up some of the natural beauty of WA, OR, CA, and ME. CA is also a huge agricultural producer, and could be even more so if the people in charge were sane.

  6. Fred Trout says:

    Sorry, all you 36 million Canadians (about 10% of US), but the opposite is more likely. Only we won’t cherry pick; we will eat you entire. Deal with it. You will have more luck with that than dealing with those libtard country wreckers.

  7. TrojanMan says:

    “Eventually the United States would consist of someone’s backyard in Wyoming.”

    That may be true because Texas would secede before it came to that.

    Make Texas a Country Again!


  8. 762x51 says:

    Hmmm, leaving the union, now what was the word for that? Oh yeah, secession.

    Seems like I heard of some states that did that some years back. Involved a little thing called CIVIL WAR.

    Oh yeah, it’s coming, they are talking about it even now. Shootin’s about to start, inevitability is a bitch.

  9. MAS says:

    The line should actually only include most of the coastal areas in California, Oregon, and Washington. Even then some areas along the coast would be conservative enough to retain. Bring it Canada…

  10. Bob says:

    They can have Cook county in Illinois too. (Chicago)

  11. Artfuldgr says:

    they would then have to fight MECHA, who believes they were born here and not originated from SPAIN, which is why aztec is spoken today…

    As Chicanas and Chicanos of Aztlán, we are a nationalist movement of
    Indigenous Gente that lay claim to the land that is ours by birthright.
    As a nationalist movement we seek to free our people from the
    exploitation of an oppressive society that occupies our land. Thus, the
    principle of nationalism serves to preserve the cultural traditions of
    La Familia de La Raza and promotes our identity as a Chicana/Chicano
    Gente. M.E.CH.A

    i guess they also dont know that the people north of them were different and also have no real claim as they are not indigenous, they came over crossing from asia into alaska… ie. they are about as indiginous as anyone else but africans where the leaky family does its work digging up ancient relatives.

    i guess they forgot everyone came from africa, there was no parallel develkopment of humans, and that all places outside of that area of africa were invaded, and none are indigenous…

  12. TED says:

    I’m FOR IT!! BUT if they think ALL that cushy US welfare goes with it, FORGET IT SNOWFLAKES!!! EVERYTHING that made those states the CRAP they are would (THIS TIME) ACTUALLY move INWARDS! It’s not the LAND that is the CRAP.

  13. ramrodd says:

    better known as building the North American Union…

    what USA and what Constitution………………….

  14. TED says:


  15. TED says:


  16. TED says:


  17. TED says:

    CAN YOU IMAGINE THE WALL Mexico would throw up to keep Americans from getting to the Pacific!!!

  18. irandom419 says:

    Actually, you only need to take the western half of Oregon and California. And only Seattle in Washington. I imagine they want some compensation for such damaged goods because it would drag down their society.

  19. kurt9 says:

    Correct. Only King country in WA, Multnomah county in OR, and the Bay Area with the coastal areas of CA are actually liberal. The rest of the West is conservative/libertarian. SoCal of course could go to Mexico.

  20. SWohio says:

    I don’t see anything that would be missed.

  21. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    Heh, though these same folks didn’t seem to have much of an issue with King Obama the first (and hopefully last).

  22. cieran58 says:

    Don’t be including Nevada in your liberal secession fantasy. Only Las Vegas is infected with the moonbat virus, because of the many Californicates who moved there to escape the dystopia of California, but brought their “progressive” viewpoints and opinions with them.

  23. SNuss says:

    If you got rid of the metro areas of LA, San Francisco, and New York City, you would eliminate most of the Leftist infestation.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy